It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The availability of Global Positioning System (GPS), or more in general of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), and the development of smart mobile devices, able to exploit the geospatial information provided by GPS/GNSS and integrate their use within many applications, have had a dramatic impact on the everyday life of most of the World population. While GNSS allows for real-time positioning in a wide range of scenarios, there are many challenging environments, such as tunnels and urban canyons, where GNSS-based solutions are inaccurate, unreliable, or even unavailable. The enormous interest in applications requiring ubiquitous positioning (e.g., self-driving vehicles) has been motivating the development of alternative positioning systems to support or substitute GNSS when operating in challenging scenarios. Alternative positioning systems to GNSS are usually developed by employing several sensors, such as radio-based, vision, LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), and RADAR (Radio Detection and Ranging). Furthermore, a collaborative approach can also be developed to increase the robustness of the navigation solution of inter-connected vehicles. To support research in this area, we are presenting the CONTEST (Collaborative pOsitioning and NavigaTion bEtween ground and uaS plaTforms) dataset, aiming at providing multiple data streams to test collaborative positioning approaches, involving both terrestrial and aerial platforms, based on the use of several sensors, such as Ultra-Wide Band (UWB) transceivers, cameras, LiDARs, GNSS. Data are described and some initial results presented.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Florence, Florence, Italy; University of Florence, Florence, Italy
2 3D Optical Metrology (3DOM) unit, Bruno Kessler Foundation (FBK), Trento, Italy; 3D Optical Metrology (3DOM) unit, Bruno Kessler Foundation (FBK), Trento, Italy; Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering (DICAM), University of Trento, Italy
3 The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
4 3D Optical Metrology (3DOM) unit, Bruno Kessler Foundation (FBK), Trento, Italy; 3D Optical Metrology (3DOM) unit, Bruno Kessler Foundation (FBK), Trento, Italy