It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This study attempts to solve these issues associated with hyperspectral (HS) data, i.e., coarse spatial resolution and high volume, by understanding the effect of deep learning and traditional dimensionality reduction on super-resolved products generated from the recently launched PRecursore IperSpettrale della Missione Applicativa (PRISMA) HS mission. Four single-frame super-resolution (SR) algorithms have been used to super-resolve a 30 m PRISMA scene of Ahmedabad, India and generate 15 m spatial resolution images with both spatial and spectral fidelity. Iterative back projection (IBP) and sparse representation (SIS) are the best and worst-performing SR algorithms following a comparative assessment and validation protocol. Next, denoising autoencoders and PCT computed using singular and eigenvalue decompositions have been executed on the original PRISMA, IBP and SIS-based super-resolved datasets. The resulting low-dimensional representations have been assessed to preserve the original dataset's topology using label-independent Lee and Verleysen's co-ranking matrix and loss of quality measure. Findings suggest that autoencoders are computationally expensive and require a higher neighbourhood size than PCT and its variants to produce a high-quality encoding. These insights remain significant for urban information extraction as there are few direct comparative assessments between machine learning-based linear and non-linear data compression methods in earlier studies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Geomatics Engineering Group, Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, 247667, India; Geomatics Engineering Group, Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, 247667, India
2 MULTIP Research Group, Department IMAGE, Institut d’Electronique et des Technologies du numéRique (IETR) UMR CNRS 6164, Université de Rennes, F-22305 Lannion, France; MULTIP Research Group, Department IMAGE, Institut d’Electronique et des Technologies du numéRique (IETR) UMR CNRS 6164, Université de Rennes, F-22305 Lannion, France