This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
The perovskite-type ferrite material with the general formula ABO3, known for its stability, has garnered significant attention from researchers in the field of nanotechnology. Among the various nanosized ferrites, ABO3-type rare-earth orthoferrites, such as LaFeO3, stand out as particularly intriguing materials due to their diverse set of properties, including optical, electronic, catalytic, ferroelectric, and magnetic characteristics. These properties make LaFeO3 highly versatile and suitable for applications in photocatalysts, biosensors, solid oxide fuel cells, photovoltaic cells, and magnetic data storage [1–3]. At room temperature, LaFeO3 exhibits antiferromagnetic behavior and acts as an insulator with a Neel temperature of 740 K [4]. When scaled down to the nanoscale, LaFeO3 demonstrates exceptional characteristics, including enhanced sensing properties, a larger surface area, and improved catalytic activity, thanks to the quantum size effect. In the literature, several synthesis methods have been reported for producing nanocrystalline LaFeO3 materials, including the coprecipitation method [5], microemulsion method [6], electrospinning technique [7], hot soap method [8], hydrothermal method [9], polymer pyrolysis method [10], thermal decomposition method [11], and auto-combustion technique [12]. Each of these methods offers its own set of advantages, disadvantages, and limitations. However, the traditional high-temperature or the approach of solid-state reaction technique has gained significant attention due to its simplicity, high reactivity, and cost-effectiveness in the production of nanocrystalline materials. This method remains a preferred choice for synthesizing LaFeO3 nanocrystals.
Currently, researchers have become more interested in examining the effects of rare-earth element substitutions in ferrite materials. Remarkably, the perovskite structure of LaFeO3 demonstrates a remarkable tolerance for a wide range of dopant ions. This flexibility allows researchers to precisely tailor and control the properties of the final product based on the type and concentration of the dopant used. The physicochemical characteristics of LaFeO3 can be finely tuned by selecting specific synthesis methods and carefully controlling the amount of dopant incorporated. Various dopants have been employed to occupy either the A or B sites within the LaFeO3 structure, resulting in alterations in the material’s band gaps, morphology, cell characteristics, crystalline size, and grain diameters. These modifications can be harnessed for various applications. In recent studies, conventional solid-state techniques were utilized to synthesize compounds like Sm/Nd-doped LaFeO3 (La0.9(Sm/Nd)0.1FeO3), Co-doped LaFeO3 (LaCoxFe1−xO3, where x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25), Ti-doped LaFeO3 (LaTixFe1−xO3, where x = 0, 0.05, 0.15, 0.25), and Mn-doped LaFeO3 (LaMnxFe1−O3, where x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25) [13, 14]. These nanocrystalline compounds were successfully synthesized using oxide materials as starting precursors and showed promise in applications such as gas sensing, magnetic memory storage, high-frequency switching, and more. Additionally, compounds like La0.9M0.1FeO3 (M = Ca and Ba) were explored as thermoelectric materials, and have potential uses in power generation, waste heat recovery, and refrigeration [15]. Moreover, recently Kumar et al. [16] have been synthesized using the sol–gel method, multiferroic BiFeO3─NiO (BFO─NiO) nanocomposites have been created and studied. The stability and physical characteristics of the solid state-synthesized lead-free K, Na, and Nb-doped BiFeO3 system have been demonstrated by Reygadas et al. [17]. Comparative evaluation of BiFeO3-modified devices based on “La” for high-conversion efficiency perovskite solar cells have been developed by Raj et al. [18]. The structural, dielectric, transport, and ferroelectric properties of Ca-Modified Bi0.80La0.20FeO3 (BCLFO) polycrystalline samples produced by the solid-state reaction are investigated by Kumar et al. [19]. Using the sol–gel combustion method, nanoparticles (NPs) of (La1−xSrx)(Fe1−xNix)O3, (x = 0.0, 0.1, and 0.2), with an orthorhombic perovskite structure, were successfully prepared by Saad et al. [20]. Redistributing dissolved Cu nanoparticles on LaFeO3 photocatalyst for adjustable CO2 reduction through photocatalysis has been demonstrated by Saad et al. [21]. Ni doping’s effect on the physical characteristics of La0.7Sr0.3FeO3 produced using the reverse micelle technique reported by Hassan et al. [22].
Continuing this line of research on LaFeO3 materials, the current study investigates the incorporation of Pr3+ as a dopant to replace rare-earth A-site (La) ions in LaFeO3. The aim is to explore and understand the intrinsic properties of the resulting materials. As far as we are aware, there have not been any prior investigations into the effects of Pr3+ substitution in LaFeO3 using conventional solid-state techniques. This research seeks to fill this gap in our understanding of these materials.
In this study, our primary objective is to document the synthesis of La1−xPrxFeO3 (LPFO) materials, where x can be either 0 or 0.5, using the conventional solid-state technique. What sets this research apart is its focus on understanding the impact of substituting rare-earth Pr3+ ions into the nanocrystalline LaFeO3 material. Specifically, we aim to investigate how this substitution has an impact on the structural, morphological, dielectric, and magnetic characteristics of nanoscale LaFeO3. To achieve this goal, we have undertaken a comprehensive characterization of the synthesized nanocrystalline LaFeO3 materials. Our analytical techniques include X-ray diffractometer (XRD), FT-IR (Fourier Transform-Infrared spectroscopy), the Raman spectroscopy method, scanning electron microscope (SEM) coupled to energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS), transmission electron microscope (TEM), measurements of the dielectric constant and loss, and magnetic property analysis using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). Through these investigations, we seek to provide insights into how the presence of Pr3+ ions influences the intrinsic properties of the nanocrystalline LPFO ferrite material.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Synthesis Materials and Technique
Praseodymium oxide (Pr6O11), Lanthanum (III) oxide (La2O3), and Iron oxide (Fe2O3) precursors with purity of 99.9%, sourced from Sigma–Aldrich, served as the initial materials. The nanocrystalline compounds, denoted as La1−xPrxFeO3 (LPFO) with x values of 0 and 0.5, were fabricated using the traditional high-temperature solid-state reaction technique. To achieve a uniform fine powder, the chosen initial materials were carefully weighed in the required stoichiometric ratio and powdered for ∼1.5 hr using an agate mortar.
Subsequently, the powders underwent calcination at 900°C for a duration of 12 hr, followed by thorough grinding. Following that, they were then placed into an alumina container. In addition, the processing involved sintering the samples at 1100°C for 6 hr, with intermittent crushing steps. The resultant synthesized ferrite powders allowed to achieve homogeneity, the mixture should progressively come down to room temperature at a pace of 5°C/min. At Final, the prepared LPFO powder samples were subjected to a final sintering step at 1100°C for 6 hr to facilitate phase formation. After this, they were well-grounded and ready for various analytical measurements. To facilitate dielectric characteristics, using a hydraulic press, the prepared ferrite powders were pelletized at a pressure of ∼2.5–4.5 tonnes. The schematic diagram depicting the synthesized LPFO ferrite materials schematic diagram is provided in Figure 1.
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
2.2. Characterization Techniques
The phase and construction of structure composition of the nanocrystalline materials synthesized were investigated using a Bruker D2 phaser XRD, utilizing Cu-Kα (1.5418 Å) radiation. XRD patterns in the 2θ range covering 20–60° were captured. Phase identifications were matched to the PDF-4 database maintained by the International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD). Further structural details, including bond angles and bond lengths, were determined through Rietveld refinement using the FULLPROF software package of the recorded XRD profiles. For the additional characterizations, using a Bruker Alpha FTIR Spectrophotometer, FT-IR spectra were acquired in the wavelength spanning 500–1750 cm−1. With the use of a He-Ne laser and a Horiba Jobin-Yvon HR-800 UV Spectrophotometer, room-temperature Raman spectra were obtained that ranged from 100 to 1000 cm−1. A JEOL-ZEM SEM with an energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDX) was used to analyze the surface morphology, elemental distribution mapping, and quantitative assessments of the generated samples. Furthermore, dielectric measurements were performed to assess the temperature and frequency-dependent dielectric properties. These characteristics were measured using a Wayne Kerr—LCR 4275 in the frequency ranges from 10 Hz to 1 MHz. In last, magnetic properties were investigated using a Lakeshore (MODEL-7407) VSM at ambient temperature.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Structural Analysis—X-Ray Diffractometer (XRD) Studies
The phase formation of the nanocrystalline LPFO materials that were synthesized was examined using X-ray diffraction. In Figure 2, you can see the XRD pattern obtained through Rietveld refinement of these materials, which were synthesized through the traditional high-temperature solid-state reaction method. This pattern reveals that the diffraction peaks corresponding to the (101), (121), (220), (202), (311), (240), (242), and (204) planes closely matched the ICDD No. 37-1493 database, indicating that the causes of these peaks are the distorted orthorhombic structure of LaFeO3 with the space group of (Pbnm). The refined crystallographic parameters are provided in Table 1. After substituting Pr3+ for La in LaFeO3, small discrepancies in bond distances and lattice constraints were measured. The lattice expansion or contraction is to blame for this disparity, which occurs owing to differences in the ionic radii of the host and substituent atoms within the crystal structure. Importantly, there were no additional or impurity peaks were detected in the XRD pattern. This suggests the high purity of the nanocrystalline LPFO materials synthesized materials. The broadening of the diffraction peaks in the XRD pattern indicates that the crystallites within the synthesized materials are relatively small in size. Scherrer’s formula was used for estimating the mean size of the crystallite (indicated as “d”) of the nanocrystalline LPFO materials. The result is demonstrated by the equation [23] as follows:
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
Table 1
The refined structural parameters of the LaFeO3 and La0.5Pr0.5FeO3 ferrite materials.
Samples/parameters | LaFeO3 | La0.5Pr0.5FeO3 |
a (Å) | 5.559 (5) | 5.564 (1) |
b (Å) | 5.569 (4) | 5.566 (4) |
c (Å) | 7.860 (4) | 7.859 (7) |
Volume (Å3) | 242.75 (11) | 312.42 (42) |
Rwp (%) | 3.8 | 3.6 |
Rp (%) | 2.7 | 3.2 |
χ2 | 2.0 | 3.4 |
α (°) | 90 | 90 |
β (°) | 90 | 90 |
γ (°) | 90 | 90 |
Crystallite size in (nm) | 88 | 65 |
Fe–O bond length in (Å) | 2.00 | 2.12 |
Minimum Fe–O bond length in (Å) | 2.37 | 2.24 |
Maximum Fe–O bond length in (Å) | 3.27 | 3.16 |
3.2. Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopic (FT-IR) Studies
In Figure 3, the FT-IR spectra of the synthesized nanocrystalline LPFO materials within the wavelength range of 500–4000 cm−1 are depicted. Several notable features can be observed in these spectra. First, there is a prominent, intense band near 3000 cm−1, which pertains to the stretching vibrational mode of O─H groups. This indicates the presence of hydroxyl (O─H) groups on the material’s surface. Moreover, pristine LFO spectra indicate that the characteristic peaks are present at 1061, 1392, 1591, 2348, 2979, and 3784 cm−1. Additionally, there is another band in the region of 1000–1600 cm−1, which is attributed to the C─H bending vibrations. This indicates the presence of carbon–hydrogen bonds, likely originating from contaminants or impurities.
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
In the case of perovskite-type LaFeO3, it adopts an orthorhombic structure wherein the crystal lattice’s tetrahedral (A) and octahedral (B) positions are occupied by La3+ ions and Fe3+ ions, respectively. Typically, higher frequency bands in the region of 550–600 cm−1 and lower frequency bands in the region of 400–450 cm−1 are indicative of FeO and La─O bonds [25]. In this context, the FT-IR spectra reveal bands at 546 and 559 cm−1, which can be attributed to the intrinsic vibrations of the transition metal (TM) Fe─O complexes in synthesized both LaFeO3 and La0.5Pr0.5FeO3 materials. However, it is evident that there are slight variations in the intensity and position of these transition metal bands when rare-earth (Pr3+) ions are substituted into lanthanum ferrites. These differences may arise from tiny variations in the crystal lattice, as indicated by the powder XRD results. This suggests that the substitution of Pr3+ ions influences the material’s vibrational properties, reflecting changes in its crystal structure.
3.3. Raman Spectroscopy Analysis
Raman spectroscopic technique is a resilient tool for analyzing various aspects of materials, including impurity phases, cation distribution, spin–phonon coupling, crystal structure, and dynamical/local lattice distortion. Moreover, in the context of orthorhombic crystal structure, there exists a total of 60 vibrational modes within the Brillouin zone’s center. However, only 24 of these modes (comprising 7Ag, 5B1g, 7B2g, and 5B3g) are Raman active [26]. Figure 4 in the study presents the deconvolution of Raman peaks for La1−xPrxFeO3 (x = 0.0 and 0.5) using a Lorentzian profile fitting. In this figure, the blue lines denote the Lorentzian multipeak matching profile, the solid red curve denotes the sum of all the total intensity curves, and the black open circles depict the experimental data. Table 2 provides information on the various vibrational modes discovered through Raman spectroscopy, along with their probable attributes, based on the study of Watanabe et al. [27] and Sharma et al. [28].
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
Table 2
Assignment of active Raman modes observed for La1−xPrxFeO3 (x = 0.0 and 0.5).
Raman modes (cm−1) | |
LaFeO3 | La0.5Pr0.5FeO3 |
154—A1g | 161—A1g |
283—B1g | 287—B1g |
434—A2g | 345—A2g |
627—B2g | 417—B2g |
709—B3g | 557—B3g |
775—A3g | 624—B4g |
817—B4g | 769—A3g |
936—2A1g | 962—2A1g |
According to the study, Raman spectroscopy is expected to reveal 24 modes with mixed symmetries in the Raman spectra of La1−xPrxFeO3 (x = 0.0 and 0.5). In the Raman analysis conducted, eight vibrational modes were identified, with the most intense mode appearing at 410–440 cm−1. The table lists lower order frequencies below 900 cm−1. For higher order frequencies, the mode at 930–970 cm−1 is attributed to oxygen stretching with 2A1g(1) symmetry, while the mode at 936 cm−1 results from FeO6 octahedra bending with 2A1g(2) symmetry. Finally, the modes at 936 and 962 cm−1 possess A1g symmetry and correspond to O2 “scissors” and stretching movements, respectively. The presence of a few smaller peaks corresponding to Bg phonon modes and a decrease in the intensities of A1 modes suggest that Pr3+ substitution has influenced the La-site in LaFeO3. Raman scattering spectra are highly sensitive to atomic arrangements, and the observation of Raman active modes in LaFeO3 ceramics provides valuable insights into the lattice structure alterations induced by Pr3+ substitution.
3.4. Morphology Studies
Figure 5 displays SEM and TEM images of the synthesized nanocrystalline LPFO materials. Notably, the particles exhibit a nanoscale dimension, measuring less than 100 nm, and display a spherical shape. Furthermore, there is a tendency for these nanoparticles to cluster together, forming slight agglomerations. This propensity for spherical morphology and agglomeration is attributed to the presence of rare-earth (Pr3+) ion substitutions and the synthesis temperature.
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
3.5. Dielectric Analysis
Figure 6 illustrates the frequency-dependent behavior of the dielectric properties (εʹ and tan δ) of La1−xPrxFeO3 ceramic compounds with different compositions (x = 0.0 and 0.5) at various temperatures. LaFeO3 is known for its exceptional dielectric characteristics. In the lower frequency range, the dielectric constant exhibited high values, but as the frequency increased, it gradually decreased before stabilizing within the frequency range of 103–106 Hz. This phenomenon can be attributed to the higher resistivity and greater energy requirements for electron hopping at lower frequencies, resulting in increased energy loss. Conversely, at higher frequencies, conductivity increased, and electron hopping demanded less energy, leading to a reduction in the dielectric loss factor. It is important to remember that variables like composition, structural homogeneity, and sintering temperature affect the dielectric loss factor. The findings revealed that as frequency increased, dielectric loss decreased in both samples [29].
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
Figure 7 displays the temperature-dependent characteristics of the dielectric properties (εʹ and tan δ) for La1−xPrxFeO3 ceramic compounds with varying compositions (x = 0.0 and 0.5) at different frequencies. In this figure, it is evident that both pure and 0.5% praseodymium-substituted samples exhibit relatively low-dielectric loss factors. Additionally, at low temperatures ranging from 40 to 160°C, the dielectric constant decreases, while at higher temperatures, it increases, particularly at lower frequencies. The greater thermal energy at higher temperatures is blamed for this behavior, which enhances the mobility of charge carriers, leading to a higher hopping rate. Conversely, at low temperatures, thermal energy is insufficient to significantly contribute to charge carrier mobility, resulting in a decrease in the dielectric constant. This observed mechanism results in higher polarization at elevated temperatures, leading to an increase in the dielectric constant. Furthermore, both the εʹ and tan δ demonstrate relaxor behavior as the doping concentration increases. This behavior can be attributed to the chemical pressure induced in La–Fe–O due to the substitution of Pr3+ ions. These findings align with our most recent research findings [14].
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
3.6. Magnetic Analysis
The impact of Pr3+ doping on the magnetic characteristics of LaFeO3 was explored using a vibrating sample magnetometer, as depicted in Figure 8. The magnetization hysteresis loop of the nanocrystalline La1−xPrxFeO3 (x = 0.0 and 0.5) ferrite materials, observed at room temperature, indicates that the prepared LPFO ferrite materials possess a soft nature and exhibit antiferromagnetic behavior since the synthesized materials were not saturated.
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
From the hysteresis loop, a number of significant parameters were recovered, including coercive field (Hc), magnetization at maximum field (±15 Oe) of the Pr3+ content (x = 0.5) in doped LaFeO3 was exhibits both Ms (ranging from 0.108 to 0.19 emu/g at max. magnetic field) and Mr (varying from 0.01 to 0.027 emu/g) show an increase, while coercivity (decreasing from 1409.1 to 1325.6 Oe) decreases following the introduction of Pr3+ doping into LaFeO3 ferrite materials synthesized via the traditional solid-state method.
This behavior can be elucidated by considering that the incorporation of rare-earth Pr3+ ions resulted in a reduction in crystallite size (as indicated in the XRD measurements). Consequently, this reduction disrupts the canted spins without compensation present at the surface and weakens the super–exchange interaction between Pr3+ ions and Fe ion (RE─O─RE, RE─O─Fe, and Fe─O─Fe, where RE represents rare-earth). It is worth noting that our results slightly deviate from the literature values, with Ms values reported as 0.6 emu/g for LaFeO3, 0.5 emu/g for La0.5Nd0.5FeO3, and 0.1 emu/g for La0.5Sm0.5FeO3 [30, 31].
4. Conclusion
In an effort to modify the inherent properties of LaFeO3 ferrite materials, Pr3+ doping (LPFO) was employed using the traditional solid-state method. This doping induced a lattice distortion, thereby allowing for the adjustment of the structural properties. FT-IR was used to analyze the creation of the crystal structure and the subsequent modifications in the bond stretching vibrations of tetrahedral and octahedral metal complexes. The introduction of Pr3+ dopants had a notable impact on the dielectric characteristics, particularly within the frequency span of 10 kHz–1 MHz and over the temperature variation of 40–160°C. The surface morphology of the materials was characterized as spherical with slight agglomeration. The room-temperature magnetic properties of the LPFO ferrite materials displayed antiferromagnetic behavior. Finally, it should be noted that the size of the crystallites had a significant impact on these magnetic properties, which resulted in a weakening of the super-exchange contact between Fe and Pr3+ ions.
[1] H. Zhang, Z. Zeng, X. Shi, Y. Du, "In-depth study on the structures and properties of rare-earth-containing perovskite materials," Nanoscale, vol. no. 33, pp. 13976-13994, DOI: 10.1039/d1nr02950a, 2021.
[2] R. K. Raji, T. Ramachandran, M. Muralidharan, R. Suriakarthick, M. Dhilip, A. Raja, V. Kurapati, F. Hamed, P. Ramasamy, A.-H. I. Mourad, "Twitching the inherent properties: the impact of transition metal Mn-doped on LaFeO 3 -based perovskite materials," Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 32 no. 20, pp. 25528-25544, DOI: 10.1007/s10854-021-07018-7, 2021.
[3] S. K. Kundu, D. K. Rana, L. Karmakar, "Enhanced multiferroic, magnetodielectric and electrical properties of Sm doped lanthanum ferrite nanoparticles," Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 30, pp. 10694-10710, DOI: 10.1007/s10854-019-01415-9, 2019.
[4] R. K. Raji, M. Muralidharan, T. Ramachandran, R. Suriakarthick, M. Dhilip, F. Hamed, V. Kurapati, "Conventional synthesis of perovskite structured LaTi x Fe 1 − x O 3 : a comprehensive evaluation on phase formation, opto-magnetic, and dielectric properties," International Journal of Materials Research, vol. 112 no. 9, pp. 753-765, DOI: 10.1515/ijmr-2020-8162, 2021.
[5] F. A. Fabian, P. P. Pedra, J. L. S. Filho, J. G. S. Duque, C. T. Meneses, "Synthesis and characterization of La(Cr,Fe,Mn)O 3 nanoparticles obtained by co-precipitation method," Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 379, pp. 80-83, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.12.004, 2015.
[6] R. Abazari, S. Sanati, L. A. Saghatforoush, "A unique and facile preparation of lanthanum ferrite nanoparticles in emulsion nanoreactors: morphology, structure, and efficient photocatalysis," Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 25, pp. 301-306, DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2014.01.017, 2014.
[7] W. Lee, H. Joong Yun, J. Yoon, "Characterization and magnetic properties of LaFeO 3 nanofibers synthesized by electrospinning," The Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 583, pp. 320-324, DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.08.191, 2014.
[8] T. Fujii, I. Matsusue, D. Nakatsuka, M. Nakanishi, J. Takada, "Synthesis and anomalous magnetic properties of LaFeO 3 nanoparticles by hot soap method," Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 129, pp. 805-809, DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.05.015, 2011.
[9] S. Thirumalairajan, K. Girija, I. Ganesh, D. Mangalaraj, C. Viswanathan, A. Balamurugan, N. Ponpandian, "Controlled synthesis of perovskite LaFeO 3 microsphere composed of nanoparticles via self-assembly process and their associated photocatalytic activity," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 209, pp. 420-428, DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.012, 2012.
[10] S. Phokha, S. Pinitsoontorn, S. Rujirawat, S. Maensiri, "Polymer pyrolysis synthesis and magnetic properties of LaFeO 3 nanoparticles," Physica B, vol. 476, pp. 55-60, DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2015.07.021, 2015.
[11] Z. Wang, R. Gao, X. Deng, G. Chen, W. Cai, C. Fu, "Dielectric and ferroelectric properties of LaFeO 3 particles derived from metal organic frameworks precursor," Ceramics International, vol. 45, pp. 1825-1830, DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.071, 2019.
[12] M. A. Gabal, F. Al-Solami, Y. M. Al Angari, A. A. Ali, A. A. Al-Juaid, M. Alsabban, K.-W. Huang, "Auto-combustion synthesis and characterization of perovskite-type LaFeO 3 nanocrystals prepared via different routes," Ceramics International, vol. 45, pp. 16530-16539, DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.187, 2019.
[13] R. R. Kumar, T. Ramachandran, K. Natarajan, M. Muralidharan, F. Hamed, V. Kurapati, "Fraction of rare-earth (Sm/Nd)-lanthanum ferrite-based perovskite ferroelectric and magnetic nanopowders," Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 48 no. 3,DOI: 10.1007/s11664-018-06897-7, 2019.
[14] R. K. Raji, K. Vishista, T. Ramachandran, M. Muralidharan, R. Suriakarthick, M. Dhilip, F. Hamed, "Tweaking the red emission, magneto, and dielectrical properties of perovskite type-LaFeO 3 in the presence of Co substitution," Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 31, pp. 7998-8014, DOI: 10.1007/s10854-020-03340-8, 2020.
[15] N. Karthikeyan, R. R. Kumar, G. Jaiganesh, K. Sivakumar, "Thermoelectric power factor of La 0.9 M 0.1 FeO 3 (M = Ca and Ba) system: structural, band gap and electrical transport evaluations," Physica B: Condensed Matter, vol. 529,DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2017.09.131, 2018.
[16] M. Kumar, A. Kumar, S. Sharma, R. K. Chourasia, R. Kumar, S. Dabas, A. Singh, A. Anshul, "Investigations on low temperature magnetic and magnetoelectric properties of multiferroic-NiO nanocomposites," Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 965,DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171353, 2023.
[17] M. U. Reygadas, S. Sharma, M. P. C. Manish Kumar, J. M. Siqueiros, O. R. Herrera, B. Part, "Stability and physical properties of the K, Na and Nb doped BiFeO 3 lead-free system synthesized by the solid state route," Ceramics International, vol. 49 no. 17, pp. 28720-28728, DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.06.130, 2023.
[18] A. Raj, M. Kumar, A. Kumar, K. Singh, S. Sharma, R. C. Singh, M. Z. A. Y. Manish Singh Pawar, A. Anshul, "Comparative analysis of ‘La’ modified BiFeO 3 -based perovskite solar cell devices for high conversion efficiency," Ceramics International, vol. 49 no. 1, pp. 1317-1327, 2023.
[19] M. Kumar, S. Sharma, O. Raymond-Herrera, J. Siqueiros, "Investigations on dielectric, transport, and ferroelectric properties of Ca-modified Bi 0.80 La 0.20 FeO 3 ceramic synthesized by solid state reaction route," Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 52, pp. 4312-4320, DOI: 10.1007/s11664-023-10209-z, 2023.
[20] A. A. Saad, W. Khan, P. Dhiman, A. H. Naqvi, M. Singh, "Structural, optical and magnetic properties of perovskite (La 1− x Sr x )(Fe 1− x Ni x )O 3," Electronic Materials Letters, vol. 9 no. 1, pp. 77-81, DOI: 10.1007/s13391-012-2103-1, 2013.
[21] A. A. Saad, W. Khan, P. Dhiman, A. H. Naqvi, M. Singh, "Redispersion of exsolved Cu nanoparticles on LaFeO 3 photocatalyst for tunable photocatalytic CO 2 reduction," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 452 no. Part 3,DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.139273, 2023.
[22] A. Hassan, W. Khan, S. Husain, P. Dhiman, M. Singh, M. G. Alanazi, "Influence of Ni doping on physical properties of La 0.7 Sr 0.3 FeO 3 synthesized by reverse micelle technique," Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 32, pp. 3753-3765, DOI: 10.1007/s10854-020-05120-w, 2021.
[23] R. Tholkappiyan, T. Thiemann, F. Hamed, "Phase evolution and magnetic properties of Dy 3 Fe 5+ x O 12− x nanocrystalline powders: a choice of fuel approach," Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 240,DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122138, 2020.
[24] A. Muiruri, M. Maringa, W. du Preez, "Evaluation of dislocation densities in various microstructures of additively manufactured Ti 6 Al 4 V (Eli) by the method of X-ray diffraction," Materials, vol. 13 no. 23,DOI: 10.3390/ma13235355, 2020.
[25] G. V. S. Rao, C. N. R. Rao, J. R. Ferraro, "Infrared and electronic spectra of rare earth perovskites: ortho-chromites, manganites and -ferrites," Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 24 no. 4, pp. 436-445, 1970.
[26] D. L. Rousseau, P. Bauman, P. S. Porto, "Normal mode determination in crystals," Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, vol. 10 no. 1, pp. 253-290, DOI: 10.1002/jrs.1250100152, 1981.
[27] N. Watanabe, S. Adachi, S. Tajima, H. Yamauchi, N. Koshizuka, "Phonon Raman scattering in polycrystalline Yt, PrBazCu 40 s," Physical Review B, vol. 48, 1993.
[28] P. Sharma, S. S. Dinesh Varshney, P. K. Gupta, "Effect of Pr substitution on structural and electrical properties of BiFeO 3 ceramics," Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 143, pp. 629-636, DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.09.045, 2014.
[29] K. Sultan, M. Ikram, K. Asokan, "Structural, optical and dielectric study of Mn doped PrFeO 3 ceramics," Vacuum, vol. 99, pp. 251-258, DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2013.06.014, 2014.
[30] P. Blessington, V. Pazhanivelu, C. Jagadeeshwaran, M. Rathinasamy, P. M. Gazzali, G. Chandrasekaran, "An analysis on structural and magnetic properties of La 1− x RE x FeO 3 ( x = 0.0 and 0.5, RE = Nd, Sm and Gd) nanoparticles," Applied Physics A, vol. 123 no. 1,DOI: 10.1007/s00339-016-0651-1, 2016.
[31] R. K. Raji, M. Muralidharan, T. Ramachandran, R. Suriakarthick, M. Dhilip, A. Raja, K. Aravinth, S. Karthikeyan, P. Ramasamy, V. Kurapati, F. Hamed, I. Abdel-Hamid, "Dual-phase formation in LaFeO 3 upon doping of rare-earth Dy 3+ : struct–opto–dielectric–magnetic characteristics," Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 33 no. 2, pp. 10626-10644, DOI: 10.1007/s10854-022-08047-6, 2022.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2023 Ramesh Kumar Raji et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Multiferroic materials have sparked significant interest in the realm of materials science because of their potential impact on various device applications. This study focuses on the synthesis of nanocrystalline La1−xPrxFeO3 (LPFO) materials, where x can be either 0 or 0.5, using a solid-state technique. The aim is to gain insights into their structural, optical, dielectric, and magnetic properties. To confirm the chemical phase of the synthesized materials, X-ray diffractometer and Raman spectroscopy were employed. The outcome of the Rietveld analysis reveals that the LPFO crystallites exhibit orthorhombic symmetry with a Pbnm space group. The functional groups that were present in the LPFO samples were identified using FT-IR spectroscopic analysis. The morphological studies using scanning electron microscope and transmission electron microscope indicate that the synthesized samples exhibit excellent homogeneity with uniformly distributed grains. In order to investigate the dielectric constant (εʹ) and dielectric loss (tan δ) were examined as functions of temperature and frequency. Pr3+ dopants had a notable impact on the dielectric characteristics, particularly within the frequency span of 10 kHz–1 MHz and over the temperature variation of 40–160°C. The ambient temperature magnetic properties of the LPFO ferrite materials displayed antiferromagnetic behavior. Ultimately, this research reveals insightful information on the structural, optical, dielectric, and magnetic properties of the synthesized nanocrystalline LPFO materials, shedding light on their potential applications in the multifunctional devices.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Department of Physics, Surana College (Autonomous), South End Road, Bangalore, Karnataka 560004, India
2 Department of Physics, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box-15551, Al Ain, UAE; National Water and Energy Center, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box-15551, Al Ain, UAE
3 Department of Physics, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box-15551, Al Ain, UAE