It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
There is growing demand for emergency-based eyecare services where the majority of those attending do not require urgent ophthalmic management. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists have recommended upskilling and supporting of allied health professionals to support eyecare delivery, where machine learning algorithms could help. A mixed methods study was conducted to evaluate the usability of an artificial intelligence (AI) powered online triage platform for ophthalmology. The interface, usability, safety and acceptability were investigated using a Think Aloud interview and usability questionnaires. Twenty participants who actively examine patients in ophthalmic triage within a tertiary eye centre or primary care setting completed the interview and questionnaires. 90% or more of participants found the platform easy to use, reflected their triage process and were able to interpret the triage outcome, 85% found it safe to use and 95% felt the processing time was fast. A quarter of clinicians reported that they have experienced some uncertainty when triaging in their career and were unsure of using AI, after this study 95% of clinicians were willing to use the platform in their clinical workflow. This study showed the platform interface was acceptable and usable for clinicians actively working in ophthalmic emergency triage.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (GRID:grid.436474.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9168 0080); University College London, Department of Brain Sciences, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1201)
2 Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (GRID:grid.436474.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9168 0080)
3 University College London, Department of Brain Sciences, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1201); Moorfields Eye Hospital, NIHR Moorfields Clinical Research Facility, London, UK (GRID:grid.439257.e) (ISNI:0000 0000 8726 5837)
4 Moorfields Eye Hospital, NIHR Moorfields Clinical Research Facility, London, UK (GRID:grid.439257.e) (ISNI:0000 0000 8726 5837)
5 Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (GRID:grid.436474.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9168 0080); University College London, Department of Brain Sciences, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1201); Moorfields Eye Hospital, NIHR Moorfields Clinical Research Facility, London, UK (GRID:grid.439257.e) (ISNI:0000 0000 8726 5837)