It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Purpose
Aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a non-weight bearing (NWB) protocol within 21 post-operative days after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on static and dynamic anterior tibial translations (SATT and DATT, respectively). The hypothesis is that delayed WB would improve ATT at 9 months follow-up.
Methods
A series of patients treated with ACL reconstruction was retrospectively reviewed, comparing a group with immediate post-operative weight bearing (WB group) and a group without post-operative weight bearing (NWB group). The NWB protocol was applied to patients with posterior tibial slope (PTS) ≥ 12°, pre-operative SATT ≥ 5 mm, and/or meniscal lesions of root or radial type. SATT, and PTS were measured on 20° flexion monopodal lateral x-rays, while DATT on Telos™ x-rays at pre-operative and 9-months follow-up.
Results
One hundred seventy-nine patients were included (50 NWB group, 129 WB group). The SATT worsened in the WB group with a mean increase of 0.7 mm (SD 3.1 mm), while in the NWB group, the SATT improved with a mean decrease of 1.4 mm (SD 3.1 mm) from the pre-operative to 9 months’ follow-up (p < 0.001). The side-to-side Telos™ evaluation showed a significant improvement in DATT within both the groups (p < 0.001), but there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.99).
Conclusion
The post-operative protocol of 21 days without WB led to an improvement in SATT at 9 months without an influence on DATT, and it is recommended for patients with a SATT ≥ 5 mm and/or a PTS ≥ 12° as part of an “à la carte” approach to ACL reconstruction.
Level of evidence
Level IV, Retrospective case series
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Lyon Ortho Clinic, Clinique de La Sauvegarde, Orthopedic Surgery Department, Lyon, France (GRID:grid.518334.8); IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2, Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.419038.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2154 6641)
2 Lyon Ortho Clinic, Clinique de La Sauvegarde, Orthopedic Surgery Department, Lyon, France (GRID:grid.518334.8)
3 Lyon Ortho Clinic, Clinique de La Sauvegarde, Orthopedic Surgery Department, Lyon, France (GRID:grid.518334.8); University of New South Wales, Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4902 0432)
4 Lyon Ortho Clinic, Clinique de La Sauvegarde, Orthopedic Surgery Department, Lyon, France (GRID:grid.518334.8); Hospital El Carmen, Santiago, Chile (GRID:grid.518334.8)