It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the number of uses and autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue resistance of four replica-like instruments RC Blue; Only One File Blue; Recip One Blue; and Micro Blue compared to the original system Reciproc Blue (VDW, Munich, Germany). The instruments were analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) before being used in root canal instrumentation (baseline). Fifty molars were instrumented by ten instruments (n=10). After sterilization in an autoclave, the instruments were analyzed by SEM. This procedure was repeated twice more using different molars, totaling 3 rounds of instrumentation, sterilization and SEM analysis. Then, ten different instruments from each brand were tested for cyclic fatigue resistance. Number of uses data were analyzed using Chi-squared analysis, and cyclic fatigue data were analyzed by one-way Anova followed by Tukey’s test as the data had normal distribution. The fracture times for all systems had no significant difference, but Micro Blue had significantly lower values than the other systems (p < 0.05). The SEM analysis showed distortions in the instruments after the 3rd use. Therefore, all tested instruments except of Micro Blue have similar resistance to cyclic fatigue, and all are reliable for use in up to 2-cases.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Endodontia, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil (GRID:grid.456544.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0373 160X)
2 São Paulo State University (UNESP), Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, Brazil (GRID:grid.410543.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 478X); Universidad Espíritu Santo, School of Dentistry, Samborondón, Ecuador (GRID:grid.442156.0) (ISNI:0000 0000 9557 7590)
3 São Paulo State University (UNESP), Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, Brazil (GRID:grid.410543.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 478X)
4 Aeronautics Technological Institute (ITA), Physics Department, São José dos Campos, Brazil (GRID:grid.419270.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0643 8732)