It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) imaging is a vital tool used in the evaluation of complex cardiac pathology and the management of cardiac surgery patients. A key limitation to the application of deep learning strategies to intraoperative and intraprocedural TEE data is the complexity and unstructured nature of these images. In the present study, we developed a deep learning-based, multi-category TEE view classification model that can be used to add structure to intraoperative and intraprocedural TEE imaging data. More specifically, we trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict standardized TEE views using labeled intraoperative and intraprocedural TEE videos from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC). We externally validated our model on intraoperative TEE videos from Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC). Accuracy of our model was high across all labeled views. The highest performance was achieved for the Trans-Gastric Left Ventricular Short Axis View (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC] = 0.971 at CSMC, 0.957 at SUMC), the Mid-Esophageal Long Axis View (AUC = 0.954 at CSMC, 0.905 at SUMC), the Mid-Esophageal Aortic Valve Short Axis View (AUC = 0.946 at CSMC, 0.898 at SUMC), and the Mid-Esophageal 4-Chamber View (AUC = 0.939 at CSMC, 0.902 at SUMC). Ultimately, we demonstrate that our deep learning model can accurately classify standardized TEE views, which will facilitate further downstream deep learning analyses for intraoperative and intraprocedural TEE imaging.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Stanford University, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8956)
2 Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.50956.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2152 9905)
3 Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.50956.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2152 9905)
4 Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.50956.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2152 9905); Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.50956.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2152 9905)
5 Stanford University, Department of Computer Science, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8956)
6 Stanford University, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8956)