It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Globally, urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the leading cause of hospital visits, especially among women. In many developing countries, especially in lower health facilities, the dipstick urinalysis is the most commonly requested test, as urine culture is not routinely performed. The dipstick test can potentially reduce the number of patients who could be treated with empirical antibiotics and reduce the burden of antibiotic resistance. The current study determined the utility of dipstick urinalysis in diagnosing UTIs using urine culture as a gold standard method.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted between July and November 2021. The study involved 1327 outpatients attending lower health centres in Mwanza (n = 678) and Dar es Salaam (n = 649) regions. The samples were subjected to dipstick urinalysis (nitrite and leucocytes) and quantitative bacterial culture.
Results
Of all 1326 patient samples, 808(60.9%) and 48(3.6%) were positive for urinary leucocyte and nitrite, respectively, while significant urine culture was found in 364(27.4%). leucocyte test correctly diagnosed UTI in 283 (77.75%) and nitrite test in 36 (9.89%). The leucocytes and nitrites, in combination, exhibited a sensitivity of 79.40% and NPV of 85.24% but a lower specificity of 44.96% and a lower PPV of 35.29%. Urinary leucocyte test had a higher discrimination ability to detect urinary tract infection than urinary nitrite test (AUC = 0.073, 95% CI 0.043–0.103, p < 0.001); likewise, combined results of urinary nitrite and leucocytes tests had higher discrimination ability to detect UTI than nitrite only (AUC = − 0.079, 95% CI − 0.107–0.050, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
In settings where culture is available, dipstick urinalysis can be a helpful screening method for reducing unnecessary urine cultures and related expenses because of its higher negative predictive value. In most low-resource settings where patients' diagnosis solely depends on clinical diagnosis and culture is not easily available, urine dipstick can decrease the risk of overuse of antibiotics. However, the combined (leucocytes and nitrites) dipstick urinalysis has a rather low positive predictive value, with approximately one-third of cases giving positive test results being truly UTI, subjecting over 65% of cases to unnecessary antibiotic treatment.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (GRID:grid.25867.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1481 7466)
2 Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Mwanza, Tanzania (GRID:grid.411961.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0451 3858)
3 National Public Health Laboratory, Department of Bacteriology, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania (GRID:grid.411961.a)
4 SACCIDS Africa Centre of Excellence for Infectious Diseases, the Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania (GRID:grid.11887.37) (ISNI:0000 0000 9428 8105)
5 National Public Health Laboratory, Department of Bacteriology, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania (GRID:grid.25867.3e)
6 Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Mwanza, Tanzania (GRID:grid.411961.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0451 3858); SACCIDS Africa Centre of Excellence for Infectious Diseases, the Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania (GRID:grid.11887.37) (ISNI:0000 0000 9428 8105)
7 Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (GRID:grid.25867.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1481 7466); SACCIDS Africa Centre of Excellence for Infectious Diseases, the Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania (GRID:grid.11887.37) (ISNI:0000 0000 9428 8105)