It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Shannon entropy is a core concept in machine learning and information theory, particularly in decision tree modeling. To date, no studies have extensively and quantitatively applied Shannon entropy in a systematic way to quantify the entropy of clinical situations using diagnostic variables (true and false positives and negatives, respectively). Decision tree representations of medical decision-making tools can be generated using diagnostic variables found in literature and entropy removal can be calculated for these tools. This concept of clinical entropy removal has significant potential for further use to bring forth healthcare innovation, such as quantifying the impact of clinical guidelines and value of care and applications to Emergency Medicine scenarios where diagnostic accuracy in a limited time window is paramount. This analysis was done for 623 diagnostic tools and provided unique insights into their utility. For studies that provided detailed data on medical decision-making algorithms, bootstrapped datasets were generated from source data to perform comprehensive machine learning analysis on these algorithms and their constituent steps, which revealed a novel and thorough evaluation of medical diagnostic algorithms.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.32224.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 0386 9924)
2 Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, USA (GRID:grid.253606.4) (ISNI:0000 0000 9701 1136)
3 Texas A&M University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College Station, USA (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082); Computational Science Initiative, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, USA (GRID:grid.202665.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 4229)
4 Texas A&M University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College Station, USA (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082)
5 University of Toronto, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938)
6 Harvard University Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X)
7 Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, USA (GRID:grid.5288.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9758 5690)
8 Massachusetts General Hospital Institute of Health Professions, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.32224.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 0386 9924)