It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This study combines volcanic gas compositions, SO2 flux and satellite thermal data collected at Nevado del Ruiz between 2018 and 2021. We find the Nevado del Ruiz plume to have exhibited relatively steady, high CO2 compositions (avg. CO2/ST ratios of 5.4 ± 1.9) throughout. Our degassing models support that the CO2/ST ratio variability derives from volatile exsolution from andesitic magma stored in the 1–4 km depth range. Separate ascent of CO2-rich gas bubbles through shallow (< 1 km depth), viscous, conduit resident magma causes the observed excess degassing. We infer that degassing of ~ 974 mm3 of shallow (1–4 km) stored magma has sourced the elevated SO2 degassing recorded during 2018–2021 (average flux ~ 1548 t/d). Of this, only < 1 mm3 of magma have been erupted through dome extrusion, highlighting a large imbalance between erupted and degassed magma. Escalating deep CO2 gas flushing, combined with the disruption of passive degassing, through sudden accumulation and pressurization of bubbles due to lithostatic pressure, may accelerate volcanic unrest and eventually lead to a major eruption.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Università Degli Studi Di Palermo, Dipartimento DiSTeM, Palermo, Italy (GRID:grid.10776.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1762 5517)
2 Servicio Geológico Colombiano, Observatorio Vulcanológico y Sismológico de Manizales, Manizales, Colombia (GRID:grid.510879.2)
3 Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Gothenburg, Sweden (GRID:grid.5371.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0775 6028)
4 Università Di Torino, Dipartimento Di Scienze Della Terra, Torino, Italy (GRID:grid.7605.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2336 6580)
5 Istituto Nazionale Di Geofisica E Vulcanologia, Sezione Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.410348.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2300 5064)
6 Istituto Nazionale Di Geofisica E Vulcanologia, Osservatorio Etneo, Catania, Italy (GRID:grid.410348.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2300 5064)