It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Plant materials are a rich source of polyphenolic compounds with interesting health-beneficial effects. The present study aimed to determine the optimized condition for maximum extraction of polyphenols from grape seeds through RSM (response surface methodology), ANFIS (adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system), and machine learning (ML) algorithm models. Effect of five independent variables and their ranges, particle size (X1: 0.5–1 mm), methanol concentration (X2: 60–70% in distilled water), ultrasound exposure time (X3: 18–28 min), temperature (X4: 35–45 °C), and ultrasound intensity (X5: 65–75 W cm−2) at five levels (− 2, − 1, 0, + 1, and + 2) concerning dependent variables, total phenolic content (y1; TPC), total flavonoid content (y2; TFC), 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl free radicals scavenging (y3; %DPPH*sc), 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) free radicals scavenging (y4; %ABTS*sc) and Ferric ion reducing antioxidant potential (y5; FRAP) were selected. The optimized condition was observed at X1 = 0.155 mm, X2 = 65% methanol in water, X3 = 23 min ultrasound exposure time, X4 = 40 °C, and X5 = 70 W cm−2 ultrasound intensity. Under this situation, the optimal yields of TPC, TFC, and antioxidant scavenging potential were achieved to be 670.32 mg GAE/g, 451.45 mg RE/g, 81.23% DPPH*sc, 77.39% ABTS*sc and 71.55 μg mol (Fe(II))/g FRAP. This optimal condition yielded equal experimental and expected values. A well-fitted quadratic model was recommended. Furthermore, the validated extraction parameters were optimized and compared using the ANFIS and random forest regressor-ML algorithm. Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy (LC–MS) analyses were performed to find the existence of the bioactive compounds in the optimized extract.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Department of Biotechnology, Krishnankoil, India (GRID:grid.444541.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 948X)
2 Vellore Institute of Technology, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore, India (GRID:grid.412813.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0687 4946)
3 Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Department of Information Technology, Krishnankoil, India (GRID:grid.444541.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 948X)
4 M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bengaluru, India (GRID:grid.464941.a)
5 Swamy Vivekanandha College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Tiruchengode, India (GRID:grid.430780.8)
6 Vellore Institute of Technology, School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore, India (GRID:grid.412813.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0687 4946)




