It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The fortification system of the tunnel structure spanning the active fault, such as the failure mechanism and fault-resistant design (measures), has not been thoroughly established. In this study, the self-developed cross-fault large-scale bedrock dislocation loading device platform is utilized to carry out the model test of the tunnel structure and soil site of sand and cohesive soil when the low-angle reverse fault dislocation occurs, based on the earthquake damage. The results demonstrate that: (1) When the fault is staggered, the segmented flexible joint tunnel segment is more favorable in the cohesive soil site. (2) When compared to the cohesive soil tunnel structure site, the strain change of the tunnel structure in the sandy soil site is greater, with the vault increasing by roughly two times and the arch bottom increasing by nearly six times. After the tunnel is buried, the uplift range of the sand cover layer grows, revealing uneven deformation, and the rupture zone migrates to the footwall; hence, the sand site plays a “add seismic” role in the cross-fault tunnel structure. (3) Knowing the location and shape of the rupture range of the overburden soil caused by bedrock dislocation under different inclination angles and soil properties is required in the design in order to place the buried depth and segment length of the tunnel reasonably and take fault-resistant measures.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Institute of Disaster Prevention, College of Geological Engineering, Sanhe, China (GRID:grid.470919.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1789 9593); Hebei Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Prevention and Risk Assessment, Sanhe, China (GRID:grid.470919.2); China Earthquake Administration, Key Laboratory of Building Collapse Mechanism and Disaster Prevention, Sanhe, China (GRID:grid.450296.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9558 2971)
2 Institute of Disaster Prevention, College of Geological Engineering, Sanhe, China (GRID:grid.470919.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1789 9593)
3 Beijing Zhongkan Earthquake Prevention Technology Development Co., Ltd, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.470919.2)




