It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Several systematic reviews (SRs), with and without meta-analyses, have investigated the use of wearable devices to improve physical activity, and there is a need for frequent and updated syntheses on the topic.
Objective
We aimed to evaluate whether using wearable devices increased physical activity and reduced sedentary behaviour in adults.
Methods
We conducted an umbrella review searching PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Library, MedRxiv, Rxiv and bioRxiv databases up to February 5th, 2023. We included all SRs that evaluated the efficacy of interventions when wearable devices were used to measure physical activity in adults aged over 18 years. The primary outcomes were physical activity and sedentary behaviour measured as the number of steps per day, minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per week, and minutes of sedentary behaviour (SB) per day. We assessed the methodological quality of each SR using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews, version 2 (AMSTAR 2) and the certainty of evidence of each outcome measure using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations). We interpreted the results using a decision-making framework examining the clinical relevance and the concordances or discordances of the SR effect size.
Results
Fifty-one SRs were included, of which 38 included meta-analyses (302 unique primary studies). Of the included SRs, 72.5% were rated as ‘critically low methodological quality’. Overall, with a slight overlap of primary studies (corrected cover area: 3.87% for steps per day, 3.12% for MVPA, 4.06% for SB) and low-to-moderate certainty of the evidence, the use of WDs may increase PA by a median of 1,312.23 (IQR 627–1854) steps per day and 57.8 (IQR 37.7 to 107.3) minutes per week of MVPA. Uncertainty is present for PA in pathologies and older adults subgroups and for SB in mixed and older adults subgroups (large confidence intervals).
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that the use of WDs may increase physical activity in middle-aged adults. Further studies are needed to investigate the effects of using WDs on specific subgroups (such as pathologies and older adults) in different follow-up lengths, and the role of other intervention components.
Key Points
There is a moderate certainty of evidence in our umbrella review, which included 51 systematic reviews (of which 38 included meta-analyses with 302 unique primary studies);
Available evidence suggests that using wearable devices may effectively increase physical activity across different population in number of steps per day and in minutes spent from moderate to vigorous physical activity per week;
Results on efficacy of wearable devices on minutes of sedentary behaviour per day are inconsistent.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details












1 University of Verona, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Verona, Italy (GRID:grid.5611.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1763 1124)
2 Vicenza, Italy (GRID:grid.5611.3)
3 IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.417776.4)
4 Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Orthopedics, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361)
5 Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.6292.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 1758); IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Unit of Occupational Medicine, Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.6292.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 1758)
6 Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Orthopedics, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361); University of Genoa, Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, Savona, Italy (GRID:grid.5606.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 3065)
7 Duke University, Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Physical Therapy, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)
8 University of Verona, School of Physiotherapy, Verona, Italy (GRID:grid.5611.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1763 1124); University of Roma “Sapienza Roma”, Department of Human Neurosciences, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.7841.a); Universidad Europea de Madrid, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Calle Tajo s/n, Villaviciosa de Odón 28670, Spain (GRID:grid.119375.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 8416)