It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Information regarding regional arterial stiffness assessment in osteoarthritis (OA) was scarce and sometimes contradictory. We aimed to investigate the aortic, lower limb peripheral arterial stiffness and their associations with knee OA. Patients with primary knee OA and matched non-OA controls were prospectively enrolled from two medical centers in China. The carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and femoral-ankle pulse wave velocity (faPWV) were measured using a novel ultrasound technique. A total of 238 participants (including 128 patients with knee OA and 110 controls) were included. In OA patients, cfPWV was significantly higher than that of non-OA controls (9.40 ± 1.92 vs 8.25 ± 1.26 m/s, P < 0.0001). However, faPWV measurements in OA patients (12.10 ± 2.09 m/s) showed no significant difference compared with that of the controls (11.67 ± 2.52 m/s, P = 0.130). Multiple regression analysis revealed that cfPWV was independently associated with knee OA (P < 0.0001) after adjusting for the confounding factors including age, gender, smoking, mean blood pressure, body mass index, heart rate, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and lipids profiles. In contrast, faPWV did not show independent association with knee OA (P = 0.372) when after adjusting for confounding factors. In addition, Spearman’s correlation analysis showed cfPWV had a significant correlation with Kellgren-Lawrence score (rs = 0.2333, P = 0.008), but no correlation was founded between faPWV with Kellgren-Lawrence score (rs = 0.1624, P = 0.067) in OA patients. This study demonstrated that stiffening of aorta, but not lower limb arteries, was independently associated with knee OA. Our findings may call for further implementation of routine aortic stiffness assessments so as to evaluate cardiovascular risk in patients with OA.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Fourth Military Medical University, Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Tangdu Hospital, Xi’an, China (GRID:grid.233520.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 4404)
2 Qinhuai Medical Section of General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Department of Osteology, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.233520.5)
3 Fourth Military Medical University, Department of OsteologyTangdu Hospital, Xi’an, China (GRID:grid.233520.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 4404)
4 Qinhuai Medical Section of General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.233520.5)
5 Hospital of Unit 96608 of the People′s Liberation Army (PLA), Department of Medical Imaging, Hanzhong, China (GRID:grid.233520.5)
6 Fourth Military Medical University, Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Tangdu Hospital, Xi’an, China (GRID:grid.233520.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 4404); Hospital of Unit 96608 of the People′s Liberation Army (PLA), Department of Medical Imaging, Hanzhong, China (GRID:grid.233520.5)