It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In previous studies, replicated and multiple types of speech data have been used for Parkinson’s disease (PD) detection. However, two main problems in these studies are lower PD detection accuracy and inappropriate validation methodologies leading to unreliable results. This study discusses the effects of inappropriate validation methodologies used in previous studies and highlights the use of appropriate alternative validation methods that would ensure generalization. To enhance PD detection accuracy, we propose a two-stage diagnostic system that refines the extracted set of features through
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Science and Technology Bannu, Department of Electrical Engineering, Bannu, Pakistan (GRID:grid.440569.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0637 9154)
2 Karolinska Institutet, Aging Research Center, Solna, Sweden (GRID:grid.4714.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0626)
3 King Abdulaziz University, Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (GRID:grid.412125.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0619 1117)
4 Bool Mind Software Technologies, Mequon, USA (GRID:grid.412125.1)
5 Noroff University College, Department of Applied Data Science, Kristiansand, Norway (GRID:grid.512929.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 8023 4383); Ajman University, Artificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC), Ajman, United Arab Emirates (GRID:grid.444470.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8672 9927); Lebanese American University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Byblos, Lebanon (GRID:grid.411323.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2324 5973)
6 University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, Ultimo, Australia (GRID:grid.117476.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7611); Óbuda University, University Research and Innovation Center (EKIK), Budapest, Hungary (GRID:grid.440535.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 1092 7422)