It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
While the awareness of the corporate world toward sustainability is growing, how to assess corporate environmental performance objectively and efficiently remains an open question. Here we estimate the relationship between company size and four environmental indicators to understand the environmental performance of nearly 6500 companies, building on the concept of allometric scaling and using Thomson Reuters EIKON data for the year 2018. We highlight that carbon dioxide emissions, energy use, water and waste production scale with the size according to a power law. This can be used as a benchmark to assess unambiguously a company’s environmental performance. We find that the adopted Environmental, Social & Governance rating is uncorrelated with the environmental performance. Our results suggest that a fair and effective environmental policy should consider the nature of the scaling relationship. Scaling laws suggest the existence of a nexus between an underlying network and corporate metabolism, whose understanding would help in discerning the determinants of environmental impacts.
The environmental impact of companies from carbon dioxide emissions, energy use, water withdrawal and waste production increases more slowly than the size of the company, according to an analysis of 6500 companies’ data for 2018.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 IMT School for Advanced Studies, Lucca, Lucca, Italy (GRID:grid.462365.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 1790 9464)
2 University of Groningen, Integrated Research on Energy, Environment and Society (IREES), Faculty of Science and Engineering, Groningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4830.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0407 1981)
3 University of Birmingham, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486)