It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The market approval of Tazemetostat (TAZVERIK) for the treatment of follicular lymphoma and epithelioid sarcoma has established “enhancer of zeste homolog 2” (EZH2) as therapeutic target in oncology. Despite their structural similarities and common mode of inhibition, Tazemetostat and other EZH2 inhibitors display differentiated pharmacological profiles based on their target residence time. Here we established high throughput screening methods based on time-resolved fluorescence energy transfer, scintillation proximity and high content analysis microscopy to quantify the biochemical and cellular binding of a chemically diverse collection of EZH2 inhibitors. These assays allowed to further characterize the interplay between EZH2 allosteric modulation by methylated histone tails (H3K27me3) and inhibitor binding, and to evaluate the impact of EZH2’s clinically relevant mutant Y641N on drug target residence times. While all compounds in this study exhibited slower off-rates, those with clinical candidate status display significantly slower target residence times in wild type EZH2 and disease-related mutants. These inhibitors interact in a more entropy-driven fashion and show the most persistent effects in cellular washout and antiproliferative efficacy experiments. Our work provides mechanistic insights for the largest cohort of EZH2 inhibitors reported to date, demonstrating that—among several other binding parameters—target residence time is the best predictor of cellular efficacy.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.420044.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0374 4101); Rentschler Biopharma SE, Laupheim, Germany (GRID:grid.511380.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 9339 8547)
2 Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.420044.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0374 4101); Nuvisan Innovation Campus Berlin, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.491785.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0446 9279)
3 Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.420044.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0374 4101)
4 Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.420044.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0374 4101); Nested Therapeutics, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.420044.6)
5 Broad Institute, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.66859.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 1623)
6 Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.420044.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0374 4101); Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (GRID:grid.39009.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 0672 7022)
7 Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.420044.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0374 4101); Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riß, Germany (GRID:grid.420061.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 7500)