Abstract

Probiotics are widely used in agriculture including commercial beekeeping, but there is little evidence supporting their effectiveness. Antibiotic treatments can greatly distort the gut microbiome, reducing its protective abilities and facilitating the growth of antibiotic resistant pathogens. Commercial beekeepers regularly apply antibiotics to combat bacterial infections, often followed by an application of non-native probiotics advertised to ease the impact of antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis. We tested whether probiotics affect the gut microbiome or disease prevalence, or rescue the negative effects of antibiotic induced gut dysbiosis. We found no difference in the gut microbiome or disease markers by probiotic application or antibiotic recovery associated with probiotic treatment. A colony-level application of the antibiotics oxytetracycline and tylosin produced an immediate decrease in gut microbiome size, and over the longer-term, very different and persistent dysbiotic effects on the composition and membership of the hindgut microbiome. Our results demonstrate the lack of probiotic effect or antibiotic rescue, detail the duration and character of dysbiotic states resulting from different antibiotics, and highlight the importance of the gut microbiome for honeybee health.

Details

Title
A longitudinal field study of commercial honey bees shows that non-native probiotics do not rescue antibiotic treatment, and are generally not beneficial
Author
Anderson, Kirk E. 1 ; Allen, Nathan O. 2 ; Copeland, Duan C. 1 ; Kortenkamp, Oliver L. 2 ; Erickson, Robert 1 ; Mott, Brendon M. 1 ; Oliver, Randy 3 

 USDA-ARS Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, Tucson, USA (GRID:grid.512827.b) (ISNI:0000 0000 8931 265X) 
 University of Arizona, Department of Entomology and Center for Insect Science, Tucson, USA (GRID:grid.134563.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2168 186X) 
 ScientificBeekeeping.com, Grass Valley, USA (GRID:grid.512827.b) 
Pages
1954
Publication year
2024
Publication date
2024
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2917706645
Copyright
© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.