It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The hazardous plasma environment surrounding Earth poses risks to satellites due to internal charging and surface charging effects. Accurate predictions of these risks are crucial for minimizing damage and preparing for system failures of satellites. To forecast the plasma environment, it is essential to know the current state of the system, as the accuracy of the forecast depends on the accuracy of the initial condition of the forecast. In this study, we use data assimilation techniques to combine observational data and model predictions, and present the first global validation of a data-assimilative electron ring current nowcast during a geomagnetic storm. By assimilating measurements from one satellite and validating the results against another satellite in a different magnetic local time sector, we assess the global response and effectiveness of the data assimilation technique for space weather applications. Using this method, we found that the simulation accuracy can be drastically improved at times when observations are available while eliminating almost all of the bias previously present in the model. These findings contribute to the construction of improved operational models in estimating surface charging risks and providing realistic ’source’ populations for radiation belt simulations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.23731.34) (ISNI:0000 0000 9195 2461); University of Potsdam, Institute of Physics and Astronomy, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.11348.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0942 1117)
2 Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.23731.34) (ISNI:0000 0000 9195 2461); University of Potsdam, Institute of Physics and Astronomy, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.11348.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0942 1117); University of California, Department of the Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.19006.3e) (ISNI:0000 0000 9632 6718)
3 Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.23731.34) (ISNI:0000 0000 9195 2461)
4 Nagoya University, ISEE, Nagoya, Japan (GRID:grid.27476.30) (ISNI:0000 0001 0943 978X)
5 University of Tokyo, School of Science, Tokyo, Japan (GRID:grid.26999.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 536X)
6 Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan (GRID:grid.136593.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0373 3971)
7 Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, Tokyo, Japan (GRID:grid.62167.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 2220 7916)