It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Polymerization of Y6-type acceptor molecules leads to bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells with both high power-conversion efficiency and device stability, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here we show that the exciton recombination dynamics of polymerized Y6-type acceptors (Y6-PAs) strongly depends on the degree of aggregation. While the fast exciton recombination rate in aggregated Y6-PA competes with electron-hole separation at the donor–acceptor (D–A) interface, the much-suppressed exciton recombination rate in dispersed Y6-PA is sufficient to allow efficient free charge generation. Indeed, our experimental results and theoretical simulations reveal that Y6-PAs have larger miscibility with the donor polymer than Y6-type small molecular acceptors, leading to D–A percolation that effectively prevents the formation of Y6-PA aggregates at the interface. Besides enabling high charge generation efficiency, the interfacial D–A percolation also improves the thermodynamic stability of the blend morphology, as evident by the reduced device “burn-in” loss upon solar illumination.
The underlying charge generation dynamics and structure-property relationships in organic solar cells are not fully understood. Here, the authors demonstrate that interfacial donor-acceptor percolation plays a key role in enabling both high charge generation efficiency and device stability.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hong Kong SAR, China (GRID:grid.194645.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2174 2757)
2 Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Haidian, CAS Key Laboratory of Organic Solids, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.418929.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0596 3295)
3 North Carolina State University, Department of Physics and Organic and Carbon Electronics Laboratories (ORaCEL), Raleigh, USA (GRID:grid.40803.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 6074)
4 City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hong Kong SAR, China (GRID:grid.35030.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1792 6846)
5 City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hong Kong SAR, China (GRID:grid.35030.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1792 6846); City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, School of Energy and Environment, Hong Kong SAR, China (GRID:grid.35030.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1792 6846); City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong Institute for Clean Energy, Hong Kong SAR, China (GRID:grid.35030.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1792 6846)