Abstract
Background
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, autoimmune, and inflammatory disease. The economic burden of MS is substantial, and the high cost of Disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) prices are the main drivers of healthcare expenditures. We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of DMDs for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
Materials and method
Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. The search covered articles published between May 2001 and May 2023. Studies that were written in English and Persian and examined the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of DMDs in patients with MS were included in our review. Data extraction was guided by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist, and the quality of economic evaluations was assessed using the Quality of Health Economics Studies Instrument (QHES). All costs were converted to 2020 U.S. dollars using Purchasing Power Parity (PPP).
Results
The search yielded 1589 studies, and 49 studies were eligible for inclusion. The studies were mainly based on a European setting. Most studies employed Markov model to assess the cost–effectiveness. The lowest and highest numerical value of outcome measures were -1,623,918 and 2,297,141.53, respectively. Furthermore, the lowest and highest numerical value of the cost of DMDs of RRMS were $180.67, and $1474840.19, respectively.
Conclusions
Based on the results of all studies, it can be concluded that for the treatment of patients with MS, care-oriented strategies should be preferred to drug strategies. Also, among the drug strategies with different prescribing methods, oral disease-modifying drugs of RRMS should be preferred to injectable drugs and intravenous infusions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Jamebozorgi, Khosro 2 ; Mir, Nazanin 1 ; Jalilian, Habib 3 ; Soleimanpour, Samira 4 ; Hoseini, Saeed 1 ; Rezapour, Aziz 5 ; Eshraghi, Abbas 6 1 Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Health Management and Economics Research Center, Tehran, Iran (GRID:grid.411746.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 4911 7066)
2 Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Zabol, Iran (GRID:grid.444944.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0384 898X)
3 Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Department of Health Services Management, School of Health, Ahvaz, Iran (GRID:grid.411230.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9296 6873)
4 Iran University of Medical Sciences, Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Tehran, Iran (GRID:grid.411746.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 4911 7066)
5 Iran University of Medical Sciences, Health Management and Economics Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Tehran, Iran (GRID:grid.411746.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 4911 7066)
6 Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Student Research Committee, Tabriz, Iran (GRID:grid.412888.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2174 8913)




