It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Radical innovations can shift the global competitiveness of entire nations. While countries typically struggle to absorb knowledge about novel technologies quickly, in which knowledge tends to be spatially sticky, an important exception is the fast catch-up of the Korean Li-ion battery industry from Japan in the early 2000s. In this paper, we conduct an exploratory case study on this surprising success story. Focussing on patent co-inventions between Korea and Japan, we investigate their significance, as well as underlying types of co-inventions and types of transferred knowledge. To this end, we proceed in four steps: (1) a Poisson regression model; (2) social network analyses; (3) patent inventor tracking and (4) patent coding. Our results indicate that Korean–Japanese co-inventions hold significantly greater influence than other cross-country co-inventions, including with patents without cross-country collaboration. We find a pronounced knowledge-transfer intensity during the early 2000s and observe two types of co-inventions: organisation-level and inventor-level. Predominantly, we observe inventor-level co-inventions, i.e. Korean companies hiring experienced Japanese engineers, that proved important to transferring sticky knowledge. Moreover, while most patents target the design of core battery components, the share of manufacturing patents are—contrary to theoretical expectations—highest during the first half of the observation period. We also discuss our findings and draw implications for policy, industrial and academic players, including industry localisation policies, technology-inherent catch-up strategies and directions for future research.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Energy and Technology Policy Group, ETH Zurich , Clausiusstrasse 37, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland; Materials and Device Engineering Group, ETH Zurich , Gloriastrasse 35, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland; Institute for Science, Technology and Policy, ETH Zurich , Universitätstrasse 41, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
2 Energy and Technology Policy Group, ETH Zurich , Clausiusstrasse 37, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
3 Climate Finance and Policy Group, ETH Zurich , Clausiusstrasse 37, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
4 School of Public Policy, IIT Delhi; Hauz Khas , New Delhi 110016, India; Belfer Center, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University , 79 John F. Kennedy St, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States of America
5 Energy and Technology Policy Group, ETH Zurich , Clausiusstrasse 37, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland; Institute for Science, Technology and Policy, ETH Zurich , Universitätstrasse 41, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland