It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Millions of households globally rely on uncultivated ecosystems for their livelihoods. However, much of the understanding about the broader contribution of uncultivated ecosystems to human wellbeing is still based on a series of small-scale studies due to limited availability of large-scale datasets. We pooled together 11 comparable datasets comprising 232 settlements and 10,971 households in ten low-and middle-income countries, representing forest, savanna and coastal ecosystems to analyse how uncultivated nature contributes to multi-dimensional wellbeing and how benefits from nature are distributed between households. The resulting dataset integrates secondary data on rural livelihoods, multidimensional human wellbeing, household demographics, resource tenure and social-ecological context, primarily drawing on nine existing household surveys and their associated contextual information together with selected variables, such as travel time to cities, population density, local area GDP and land use and land cover from existing global datasets. This integrated dataset has been archived with ReShare (UK Data Service) and will be useful for further analyses on nature-wellbeing relationships on its own or in combination with similar datasets.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details











1 University of Kent, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, Canterbury, UK (GRID:grid.9759.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2232 2818)
2 Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Geography, Munich, Germany (GRID:grid.5252.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 973X)
3 University of Edinburgh, School of Geosciences, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.4305.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7988)
4 Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Bangalore, India (GRID:grid.464760.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8547 8046)
5 King’s College London, Department of Geography, London, UK (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764)
6 Stockholm University, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.10548.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9377)
7 SCI Foundation, London, UK (GRID:grid.482772.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0514 9189)
8 Trinity College Dublin, Department of Botany, Dublin, Ireland (GRID:grid.8217.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9705)
9 McGill University, Department of Geography, Montreal, Canada (GRID:grid.14709.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8649)
10 Bangor University, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor, UK (GRID:grid.7362.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 1882 0937)
11 University College London, Department of Anthropology, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1201)
12 University of Bern, Institute of Social Anthropology, Bern, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5734.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0726 5157)
13 Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique (GRID:grid.8295.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0943 5818)
14 Edinburgh Napier University, School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.20409.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2348 339X)