1. Introduction
The tremendous increase in antibiotic resistance among pathogenic microorganisms is a major hazard to human wellness. Antibiotics can be regarded as the organic compounds that suppress the growth of or kill bacterial cells, thereby preventing infections caused by pathogenic bacteria [1,2]. Antibiotics are considered as vital in practically every major therapeutic field, including serious surgeries, notably the transplantation of organs, premature newborn treatment, and chemotherapy medication in cancer patients, which could not be achieved without adequately avoiding and treating bacterial infections [3,4]. The most frequently used antibacterial medications are β-lactam antibiotics; yet, because of growing bacterial resistance, several drugs of this class have loosened their clinical effectiveness [5]. Furthermore, using antibiotics at higher doses during treatment promotes the emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR), rendering antibiotic therapy ineffective against pathogenic bacteria [6]. However, another important factor that contributes to the development of MDR in bacteria is the uses of sub-lethal doses of antibiotics, wherein bacteria gain resistance to drugs without being killed. Incorrect and excessive antibiotic administration, insufficient diagnosis, and advanced resistance mechanisms accrued by microorganisms can all lead to collapses of therapeutic efficiency [7,8]. Biofilm-associated illnesses which have become tolerant to current antibiotic treatments leading to scarcity of efficient therapeutic alternatives have become a serious matter of concern nowadays. Besides these, the other contributing factors for increased AMR include the widespread use of antibiotics in the field of agriculture as well as in dairy and poultry industries, a lack of novel medications, massive regulatory hurdles, incorrect prescriptions, etc. [9,10]. The inadequate effectiveness of traditional antibiotics, whether due to extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) or through other resistance pathways, necessitates the innovation of novel therapeutic remedies with enhanced activities. Furthermore, combating infections using as low a dose as possible might serve as the most efficient approach to fight against diseases caused by MDR bacteria [7]. While developing new antimicrobial compounds to fight drug-resistant bacteria is extremely difficult, it is also extremely crucial and necessary in the interim. Chemical alteration in antibiotic structures to combat antimicrobial resistance as well as the synthesis of novel antibiotics with high efficiency is arduous and is typically not economically viable. To render antibiotic therapy more efficient and cost-effective, the antibiotic dose must be reduced while the stability must be enhanced [11].
Recent advances in medical research introduced novel antibiotics and advanced clinical therapies that can effectively tackle pathogenic microorganisms [12]. The application of nanomaterials in the domain of antibiotic drug delivery offers the potential for significant improvements in the clinical effectiveness of antibacterial treatment. In comparison to traditional medications, nanoformulations for the administration of antibiotics along with infectious site targeting provide several advantages, which comprise enhanced tissue targeting, prolonged antibiotic half-life, raised solubility, gained greater stability, increased permeability to epithelial cells, and limited side effects [13,14]. Recently, nanoparticles (NPs) (having a particle size between 1 and 100 nm) have come into the limelight as a revolutionary approach for treating deadly diseases caused by bacteria. Moreover, metallic NPs functionalised with antibiotics offer promising nanoplatforms for fighting against bacterial resistance.
The use of nanomaterials in medicine has also historical importance in India. Bhasmas, which have been utilised as Ayurvedic medicines in India to cure a variety of diseases including cancer, were discovered to contain NPs of alloys, sulphides, metals and metal oxides [1,15]. Nanomaterials possess promising potential to be used in the field of drug delivery, medical imaging and disease diagnosis, considering their high surface area as well as their small size effect. Among the diverse range of nanomaterials, NPs like AgNPs, AuNPs, ZnONPs and CuONPs have been receiving specific attention because of their easy and simple synthesis procedure, higher biocompatibility and versatile physicochemical properties that can be easily altered by stimulating parameters like temperature, pH, light and reaction time [16,17,18]. NPs exhibit the tremendous potential to serve as drug carriers and can be easily functionalised by incorporating bioactive compounds, drug molecules, antibiotics, polymers, antibacterial peptides, etc. for the enhancement of antimicrobial activity to combat AMR [19,20,21]. Polymer-functionalised NPs have offered immense promises in the field of novel drug carrier and delivery systems owing to their great potential for protecting as well as improving the bioavailability and release rate of encapsulated drug molecules thereby contributing to the reduction in toxic impacts [21]. Because of their flexible physical characteristics, NPs serve as a versatile system for medicinal applications. The small size of the nanomaterials imparts a high surface-to-volume ratio, which promotes the binding of several antibacterial agents in order to produce multivalent nanomaterials against pathogenic bacteria [7]. More importantly, many NPs demonstrate inherent antimicrobial characteristics by inhibiting biofilm formation, activating reactive oxygen production, and interfering with bacterial cell membranes as well as with proteins and DNA within the bacterial cell [16]. Several metal NPs, such as Ag, Au, Cu, Zn, Ce, Mg, Pd, Ti, etc., and metal oxide NPs, such as ZnO, CuO, NiO, Al2O3 TiO and Fe3O2, as well as their functionalisation through conjugation with other compounds, have been reported to demonstrate antibacterial properties against various pathogenic bacteria [16,22,23,24,25]. Compared to the pure AuNPs, the conjugated or functionalised AuNPs demonstrate better antimicrobial properties [19,20,21]. Since NPs do not exhibit a specific mechanism of action unlike antibiotics, these are especially advantageous in combating bacterial resistance [1]. Recent studies revealed that AuNPs do not impart any toxic effects in human cells; hence, AuNPs have captured the interest of modern biomedical researchers [26]. AgNPs are also used in medicinal therapies. Although AgNPs are easy to synthesise, cost effective and possess inherent antimicrobial property, their cytotoxicity due to the release as well as aggregation of Ag ions in the body from AgNPs has restricted their utilisation in nanomedicine. However, the higher biocompatibility ease of synthesis and inertness of the AuNPs make them suitable for use in medicinal therapies. High cost is the major disadvantage associated with AuNPs [27,28]. The higher biocompatibility, nontoxicity, high rates of absorption and powerful light scattering allow them to be used in versatile fields, such as electronics, sensors, catalysis, drug delivery, drug carriers and other biomedical applications, including delivery of genes, molecular imaging, targeted drug administration, plasmonic bio-sensing, tissue engineering, colorimetric sensing, cancer treatment, diagnostics and photo-induced therapy [27,28,29]. Recently, AuNPs were employed to administer numerous antibiotics belonging to different classes that included carbapenems, polymyxins, tetracycline, cephalosporin, glycopeptide, cephalosporin, aminoglycoside, penicillin and cephalosporin [1,30,31]. However, numerous limitations are associated with modern as well as conventional antibiotic medication therapy, including limited bioavailability, the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, poor penetration power, insufficient drug concentrations at specific infection sites, adverse side effects, a higher frequency of administration, and poor patient compliance. Therefore, AuNP-conjugated drug delivery systems provide a superior and revolutionary approach to eradicating the disadvantages associated with the use of antimicrobial drug therapy, because of their large surface-to-volume ratio, photostability, ability to target biofilms, potential for organ as well as cellular targeting, strong interaction and their penetration through the bacterial cell wall [3,13]. The conjugation of antibiotic drug molecules with AuNPs significantly enhances their antimicrobial properties. The conjugation of antibiotic drugs with AuNPs leads to the enhanced bioavailability and biocompatibility of the drugs. This can also enhance the interaction as well as penetration power of the drug molecules though the bacterial cell wall. The electrostatic attraction between the negatively charged bacterial cell wall and the cationic behaviour of the antibiotic-loaded AuNPs enhances the interaction as well as penetrating power of the drug molecules through the bacterial cell wall. This facilitates the release of the antibiotic drug molecules within the bacterial cell and interacts with the bacterial cellular matrix causing the death of bacteria [5,6]. Indeed, AuNPs are effective for the transformation of various ineffective antibiotics into Au nanoformulations with strong antimicrobial properties [32]. However, the efficient incorporation of a specific antibiotic drug molecule on the surface of the AuNPs requires a variety of strategies, including physical absorption, electrostatic relations, coupling processes and Au-S and Au-N linkages [1]. Different physical, chemical and biological methods, including green synthesis, for the fabrication of AuNPs have been reported. Among these, chemical colloidal synthesis, which involves the use of a metal precursor as well as a reducing and a stabilising agent, is one of the most frequently employed methods for the synthesis of AuNPs [1,7].
Thus, the review covers cutting-edge research on the effectiveness of AuNPs as a strategy for combating antimicrobial resistance. Special emphasis has been put on the development of bioactive and antibiotic-coated AuNPs exhibiting enhanced antimicrobial attributes to combat pathogenic bacteria and biofilms, as well as their activities and physicochemical features. A schematic representation of the synthesis of antibiotic-coated AuNPs and their interaction with bacterial cells to combat AMR is demonstrated in Figure 1.
2. AMR—A Global Threat
The World Health Organization (WHO) has recognised AMR as one of the leading global hazards to human health and development. It falls among the top ten public health threats worldwide [33]. The escalating growth and dissemination of antibiotic-resistant organisms and the inadequate efficacy of antimicrobial drugs make the treatment of antimicrobial infection challenging, leading to elevated fatality rates and huge monetary expenses [34,35]. With the current scientific revolutions, antibiotics have become a wonderful gift to the livestock and human healthcare professions to aid in the cure of bacterial infections as well as other disorders. Before the 1950s, antibiotics were frequently employed in both human health and animal husbandry due to their low cost and few side effects [13]. However, the serious problem of drug resistance has arisen as a result of the decades-long widespread use of antibiotics. The discovery of β-lactam antibiotics provided a temporary solution to the problem, but disappointingly, this did not endure for long with the first instance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) identified in the UK in 1961 [27,36]. The ability of a specific microbe to avoid the pharmacological mechanism of action linked to antibacterial medications and then go on living is known as antibacterial resistance. The growing number of drug-resistant microorganisms has been strongly attributed to the inappropriate application of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Klebsiella pneumoniae is a multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria that causes several types of hospital-acquired illnesses and epidemics, including septicaemia, urinary tract infections and pneumonia [14]. It has developed resistance against carbapenem and tigecycline, which is the most effective as well as a last-resort antibiotic for treating K. pneumoniae. Due to the secretion of the β lactam enzymes like carbapenemases and extended-spectrum β-lactamases, K. pneumoniae is capable of hydrolysing a wide range of broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics [17,37]. Salmonella spp. responsible for diseases like bacteremia, gastroenteritis, paratyphoid and typhoid have become fluoroquinolone-resistant [38]. Infections like pneumonia, tuberculosis and gonorrhoea become challenging to cure since medications are becoming less effective towards these diseases because of their increased resistance of bacteria. Moreover, ESBLs have now developed resistance to several antibiotic classes, including aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, cotrimoxazole, quinolones and trimethoprim, further limiting therapeutic choices for clinicians [7,39]. Multidrug resistance has emerged as a global threat and is accelerating rapidly. Nowadays, MDR has become more prevalent in both pathogenic as well as non-pathogenic bacterial strains and is primarily attributed to gene acquisition and/or alteration in the target genes of antibiotics [9]. Besides these, the antibiotic resistance of bacteria was regarded as one of the major economic burdens for the world [9]. Lack of access to conventional antibiotics, however, will result in costlier medication, extended hospital exposure, prolonged treatment period, higher treatment expenses due to the need for intensive care and, ultimately, life-threatening harm [40]. The widespread usage of antibiotics during the COVID-19 pandemic has fuelled the issue of antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotics, antiviral and antipyretic medications that have been used erratically to treat COVID-19 have led to the emergence of AMR [41]. Some pathogenic bacteria that have developed resistance against multiple drugs and their harmful effects on humans are represented in Table 1.
3. Bacterial Resistance Mechanisms
There are four primary mechanisms including the inactivation of drug molecules, target modification, limiting drug uptake and the development of efflux pumps through which bacteria can develop resistance towards antibiotics [9,51]. Some strategies adopted by bacteria to develop resistance against antibiotics are represented in Figure 2.
3.1. Inactivation of the Drug
In severe cases, bacteria acquire resistance through their direct interaction with the antibiotics via hydrolysis or the transfer of a chemical moiety including adenyl, acetyl and phosphoryl groups [51]. A wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria develop resistance to certain antibiotics through the secretion of enzymes that have the ability to bring out chemical modifications to the antibacterial compound. Among these, β-lactamases are the most prominent, which can demolish the drug molecule by hydrolysing the amide linkage of the β-lactam ring, rendering it ineffective. The most common biochemical reactions catalysed by modifying enzymes include acetylation, phosphorylation and adenylation [51,52].
3.2. Target Modification
Bacteria can modify the target of the antibiotic through protection, mutation and posttranslational modification [27]. Point mutations within the gene generating the target site, enzymatic transformations of the target and evading the original site are the primary components of target site alteration. Evading the original site, bacteria create new targets that resemble the original but are not exact replicas of it. As a result, antibiotics will be unable to inhibit the metabolic processes accomplished by newly developed equivalent targets [51,52].
3.3. Limiting Drug Uptake
The primary surface membrane component found in practically all Gram-negative bacteria is lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which is crucial to the outer membrane’s structure as well as its functionality [51,53]. The presence of this LPS layer provides a barrier to a large number of antibacterial agents. However, for Gram-positive bacteria, the outer membrane is absent. The presence of the outer membrane in the Gram-negative bacteria is the primary reason for the development of resistance towards a wide range of antibiotics. Modifications in this outer membrane, such as the mutation of porins or the alteration of hydrophobic properties, can impart resistance [51,53]. Hence, bacterial infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria are difficult to cure compared to Gram-positive bacterial infections. In Gram-negative bacteria, drug molecules penetrate the cell through porin channels. Bacteria can impede drug uptake by reducing the porin channels or by mutations that lead to alterations in the selectivity of the porin.
3.4. Development of Efflux Pump
Genes producing efflux pumps are found chromosomally in bacteria. Transmembrane proteins called efflux pumps enable bacteria to exchange or evacuate antibiotic compounds from their cells, which helps the bacteria to survive [51,54]. These are the bacteria’s self-defence mechanisms. Based on structure as well as energy sources, there are five major families of efflux pumps, which include the ATP binding cassette family, small multidrug resistance family, resistance–nodulation–cell division family, multidrug and toxic compound extrusion family and major facilitator superfamily [51].
4. Synthesis of Antibiotic-Coated AuNPs
A variety of physical, chemical or green synthesis techniques could be employed for the synthesis of AuNPs. The most frequently employed physical methods for the fabrication of AuNPs are laser ablation and evaporation–condensation [55]. The fundamental steps in the chemical synthesis method of AuNPs involve the formation of Au0 through the reduction of Au+ ions by the action of a reducing agent followed by stabilisation via capping agents [7]. During the chemical synthesis procedures, different chemicals were used as reducing and capping agents. The synthesis of AuNPs from vitamins, enzymes, microbes and plant extracts using green solvents is the prime focus of green synthesis methods. The green synthesized, antibiotic-loaded nanomaterials serve as a fascinating and significantly effective alternative for the treatment of disease caused by the microbes as they reduce or avoid the use of any hazardous compounds, thereby reducing side effects [25,56]. AuNPs may exhibit various colours depending on their shape, size, aggregation level and surrounding environment because of the surface plasmon resonance. A variation of colour from light pink to dark purple can appear owing to the localised surface plasmon resonance (SPR), which is further associated with the size and shape of the NPs [7,57]. AuNPs exhibit a SPR band between 500 and 550 nm [57]. However, the facile surface functionalisation of AuNPs makes it easier to conjugate versatile bioactive compounds or ligands with AuNPs which significantly enhances the functionality of the NPs. The incorporation of antibiotic drug molecules on the surface of AuNPs is a recent innovation and is reported to be highly efficient in combating bacterial resistance toward traditional antibiotics. In most of the studies, the antibiotic-coated AuNPs were fabricated using chemical methods. Antibiotics are able to adhere to the surface of AuNPs by means of their different functional groups, including amino, carboxylic, hydroxyl and thiols, resulting in the surface modification of AuNPs leading to the enhancement in the antibacterial activity of the system [58]. Temperature, reaction time and pH are the imminent factors that significantly affect the properties of the AuNPs. Recently, in 2023, Halawani et al. evaluated the effect of the concentration of precursor salt, temperature, reaction time and pH on the synthesis of amoxicillin-conjugated AuNPs [59]. They have reported that with an increase in the concentration of the precursor salt from 1 mM to 5 mM, the absorption spectra become more intense, showing a blue shift and revealing the decreased size of the synthesized AuNPs. Further increasing the concentration beyond 5 mM leads to aggregation and precipitation of the NPs indicating a decrease in stability. Time also possesses a crucial role in the synthesis of NPs. An increase in the absorption peak was reported up to 1 h; however, further increasing the reaction time showed a decrease in the intensity of the absorption spectra. They have reported that the ideal pH for the synthesis of AuNPs is 6.
5. Antibiotic-Coated AuNPs to Combat AMR
The emergence of bacterial resistance to conventional antibiotics is a worldwide concern for human health. The widespread usage of antibiotics among medical professionals and throughout the community is the driving force for the development of resistance to conventional antibiotics for a wide range of bacteria. This has disputed the clinical efficacy of certain present antimicrobial medicines and highlighted the demand for relatively more effective antibiotics. AuNPs, with these promising features, offer a diverse platform for nanoscale biological assemblies comprising antimicrobial agents, antibodies, nucleotide proteins and DNA [1]. Recently, the synergistic effects of AuNP-based formulation have attracted researchers. Formulations of antibiotic-coated AuNPs are undergoing clinical trials and have drawn significant attention. The activity of some recently developed antibiotic-coated AuNPs to combat AMR are represented briefly in Table 2.
Ali et al. prepared cefixime-stabilised AuNPs through an easy, simple as well as single-step procedure and evaluated the antibacterial activity against S. aureus bacteria [5]. S. aureus belongs to the groups of human pathogens that can trigger a variety of infections, including food poisoning as well as respiratory and skin infections. Because S. aureus has the ability to break down β-lactam antibiotics using lactamase, it could develop resistance to these drugs. Cefixime belongs to the class of drugs designated as cephalosporin antibiotics. A potent β-lactam antibiotic, cefixime is often prescribed to combat bacterial infections of the throat, ear, urinary tracts and lungs, as well as gonorrhoea, pneumonia and bronchitis [5,66]. The results of their study suggested that the antibacterial activity of the cefixime rose by eight times when integrated with AuNPs. Additionally, cefixime’s effective treatment period of eight hours was reduced to half upon integration with AuNPs. They further evaluated the cytotoxicity associated with the prepared NPs. Up to a concentration of 75 μg/mL, cefixime conjugated-AuNPs did not exhibit notable cytotoxic effects on human cells. On the other hand, as dosage increased to 100 μg/mL, a reduction in cell viability by approximately 0.50% was noted. The mechanism for the enhanced antibacterial activity of the cefixime-integrated AuNPs can be summarized in three steps. The initial step involves the interaction of the cefixime with AuNPs to form cefixime-stabilised AuNPs. As the metal NPs are highly responsive to sulphur, the synthesised NPs then interact with the bacterial cell wall by interacting with the protein and DNA through the sulphur as well as the phosphorous atom. Finally, the release of the AuNPs into the cellular matrix leads to cell lysis causing damage as well as the death of bacterial cells. They have presumed that the cefixime has enhanced the membrane’s permeability through interaction with the peptidoglycan barrier of S. aureus, leading to the well penetration of AuNPs to the bacterial cell facilitating the interaction with protein and DNA and causing cell death [5].
The formation of biofilms is an important approach through which bacteria can also develop antibacterial resistance. Bacterial biofilm comprises a complicated microbial cluster encased by an array of extracellular polymeric compounds that are produced while a community of microbes clings irrevocably to a static or living substrate [6]. However, not all biofilms are surface based. For example, there are wound biofilms and respiratory biofilms. Besides the assistance provided by the polymeric array, microorganisms in biofilms may execute a variety of survival tactics to avoid diagnosis by the host mechanisms of defence. This framework is regarded as a major virulence parameter since it is challenging to eliminate and is usually attributed to therapeutic troubles. The bacteria across the biofilm demonstrate changes in metabolism, protein synthesis and gene transcription in response to ambient anoxia as well as nutritional limitation. This can result in reduced metabolic activity and a slower rate of cell replication [6,67]. The biofilm-related illnesses are often chronic infections that emerge slowly, are hardly cured by the body’s immune system, and show inconsistent responses to antimicrobial therapies. Due to its wide range of activity, photodynamic antimicrobial therapy (PACT) comes out as a promising and effective therapeutic remedy for multidrug-resistant bacterial biofilm. E. faecium, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, Enterobacter and A. baumannii are some of the bacterial strains that are very prone to biofilm formation [62]. This leads to the development of resistance against common antibiotics like β-lactams, tetracyclines, macrolides, fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides, etc. The greater surface area attributed to an increased surface-to-volume ratio improves the penetrations as well as associations of the NPs with the biofilm network in comparison with pure drug molecules. AuNP have been extensively studied as photosensitisers owing to their unique attributes, such as their excellent biocompatibility in human cells, smaller size optical characteristics and simplicity of functionalisation through the surface ligands, which render them fascinating for a wide range of applications, particularly PACT [6,68]. Nowadays, antimicrobial therapy, which involves the use of photoactive substances, has appeared as an excellent alternative to combat the infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria. P. aeruginosa has developed resistance against several widely employed antibiotics, such as β-lactams, quinolones, aminoglycosides and cephalosporins. Furthermore, metal NPs minimise antibiotic dosages as well as the side effects [69].
In 2020, Rocca et al. prepared gold AuNPs coated with a lower concentration of amoxicillin as an alternative for PACT and employed them as a photoactive compound for the reduction of the biofilm produced by P. aeruginosa (PAE 189718 and PAE 191150) and S. aureus (MRSA 773 and MRSA 771) bacteria [6]. Upon irradiating them with the amoxicillin-coated AuNPs (1.5 μg/mL) in the presence of white light, the viability of the S. aureus bacteria in the biofilm reduced to 60%, while a 70% reduction was observed in the case of P. aeruginosa biofilms after 3 h. However, no changes in the viability of the S. aureus biofilm were reported when treated with pure amoxicillin, indicating the high antibacterial resistance of S. aureus against amoxicillin. The AuNPs were synthesised using a single-step synthetic procedure by employing amoxicillin trihydrate as a reducing and capping agent. The biofilms were developed in 96 well-plates. Further, they reported that when the S. aureus biofilms were treated with a pure amoxicillin concentration 10 times higher than the MIC of amoxicillin-coated AuNPs, they did not show any reduction in the viability of bacterial stain. Penetration within biofilm, as well as microbial adhesion, may be greatly influenced by electrostatic attraction among the negatively charged extracellular matrix of the biofilm and the positively charged amoxicillin-coated AuNPs. Furthermore, the localised surface plasmon resonance exhibited by AuNPs produces a specific heating on the surface of the particles. Thus, the bacteria near the particle’s surface may suffer cellular damage as a result of the increased temperature, which might eventually result in the death of the bacteria [6]. While combating biofilm formation, the primary goal is the eradication of either a 5-log reduction or sometimes a 3-log reduction. Since this study reported a 60% and 70% reduction in the viability of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilms, it gives room for further improvement in the activity of the prepared amoxicillin-coated AuNPs.
In another study, Halawani et al. developed amoxicillin-conjugated AuNPs to combat the multidrug resistance developed by E. coli and the methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteria [59]. Amoxicillin is classified as a β-lactam antibiotic, which is typically utilised for the treatment of microbial infections of the urinary and respiratory tracts. It can prevent the formation of bacterial cell walls and is efficient against numerous types of antibiotic-resistant bacteria [59,70]. They have isolated the bacterial strains from several infection sources and identified them through biotype, phenotype and 16S rRNA gene evaluations. For the synthesis of the AuNPs, aqueous Juniperus excelsa leaf extract was used. Sodium tri-polyphosphate (TPP) was employed as a linker component for the fabrication of the amoxicillin-conjugated gold nanodrug. They have reported that the increase in the volume of the extract makes the absorption spectra more intense and sharper, indicating the increase in the concentration of AuNPs with decreased size. This indicates that a higher concentration of extract was suitable for the synthesis of AuNPs. They have also reported that smaller size of the NPs exhibits a greater concentration of amoxicillin and show enhanced conjugation potential. This is due to the higher surface area associated with the small size of the NPs. As the size increases, the conjugation efficiency decreases [59]. They have evaluated the antibacterial activity of the pure AuNPs and amoxicillin-conjugated AuNPs using agar well diffusion method and reported that the synthesized AuNPs do not exhibit any zone of inhibition, indicating the absence of antibacterial activity. The amoxicillin-conjugated AuNPs exhibit an inhibition zone ranging from 20 to 37 nm. The MIC associated with amoxicillin was 96–114 µg/mL. However, in the case of amoxicillin-conjugated AuNPs, the MIC was reduced by 12–31 times, i.e., 3.6–8 µg/mL. The TEM analysis reveals the presence of the amoxicillin-conjugated AuNPs in the cell wall as well as inside the bacterial cell. The antibacterial activity depends upon the release rate of amoxicillin from the NPs inside the cell. AuNPs enhanced the penetration and release of the antibiotic molecules inside the cell. However, amoxicillin alone is unable to penetrate the bacterial cell. Amoxicillin-conjugated AuNPs destroy the bacterial cell wall by inhibiting the production of mucopeptide caused by amoxicillin. After penetrating through bacterial cell walls, it interferes with the phosphorus present in RNA or DNA causing disruption in protein synthesis, which leads to cell lysis [59]. Here, the AuNPs serve as drug carriers and delivery systems for amoxicillin to combat bacterial infections.
Fenniri and coworkers, in another study, prepared ampicillin-conjugated AuNPs decorated on PEG-functionalised rosette nanotubes to enhance the antimicrobial activity of ampicillin [58]. They investigated the antimicrobial activity against S. aureus as well as MRSA bacteria. The MIC value for S. aureus bacteria was reported as 0.58 μg/mL, which was 18% less than the MIC value of pure ampicillin. However, in the case of MRSA bacteria, the MIC was reduced by 10–20 times as compared to the ampicillin antibiotic, revealing significant enhancement in the antibacterial activity. The MIC of ampicillin against MRSA was reported as 32 to 50 µg/mL. However, for the ampicillin-conjugated AuNPs, the MIC value was 4 µg/mL against MRSA, which is almost ten times lower than the ampicillin alone. The electrostatic attraction between the bacterial cell wall, which bears a negative charge, and the cationic behaviour of the prepared AuNP system enhances the binding potential of the antibiotics with the bacterial cell wall thereby facilitating the release of the antibiotic drug molecules. However, AuNPs themselves can interfere with the bacterial metabolic system. Ampicillin, a β-lactam antibiotic, works by specifically targeting proteins that bind to penicillin. These are essential for the formation of bacterial peptidoglycan, required for the constitution of bacterial cell walls. The synergistic effects of these three mechanisms contribute to the enhancement of the antibacterial activity of the ampicillin-conjugated AuNP system.
Kaur et al. prepared different AuNPs using trisodium citrate, Tween 20 and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone as surfactants using chemical methods [60]. These prepared NPs were then coated with amikacin to gain superior antimicrobial activity. The formation of AuNPs was confirmed through UV-visible absorption spectroscopy. As the size of the surfactant molecule decreases, the amount of amikacin loaded in the AuNPs increases. They reported the density of citrate, Tween 20 and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone-capped AuNPs as 1.78 ×1014/mL, 2.4 × 1013/mL and 4.2 × 1012/mL, respectively. For this reported density, the amount of amikacin loaded on the AuNPs synthesised using citrate, Tween 20 and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone as surfactants were 60 µg/mL, 46 µg/mL and 40 µg/mL, respectively. They evaluated and compared the antibacterial activity of the prepared AuNPs, pure amikacin and amikacin-coated AuNPs against E. coli and S. aureus bacteria using the agar well diffusion method. Pure AuNPs do not exhibit any antimicrobial properties. However, the antibiotics-coated AuNPs demonstrated a higher zone of inhibitions against both the bacterial strain in the antibacterial activity test as compared to amikacin, indicating enhanced antimicrobial activity. For the E. coli and S. aureus bacterial strains, amikacin alone demonstrated an inhibition zone ranging from 7 to 8 mm and 5 to 6 mm, respectively, depending on different concentrations. However, for the same concentrations, the antibiotic-coated AuNPs demonstrated a higher zone of inhibitions, ranging from 10 to 13 mm for E. coli bacteria and 6 to 8 mm for S. aureus bacteria. Regarding the mechanism of action of the prepared NP system, they reported that since gold serves as a soft acid, the AuNPs have a great potential to interact readily with soft bases like the phosphorus and sulphur that exists in DNA, as well as the proteins of the bacterial cell membrane, leading to cell lysis or the death of bacteria. The cationic behaviour of amikacin tends to interact with the anionic substances of the bacterial strain, thereby inhibiting protein synthesis through adhering with the 30S ribosomal subunit [60].
A wide range of Gram-negative bacterial strains secrete ESBL enzymes which display enhanced resistance against frequently employed antibiotics like penicillins and cephalosporins. Cefotaximase-Munich (CTX-M) is one such common ESBL found in K. pneumoniae and E. coli bacteria [61]. However, among different varieties of CTXM, the most prevalent one is CTXM-15, which is found extensively in India. These bacterial strains have developed resistance against cefotaxime. Thus, to enhance the antibacterial activity of cefotaxime antibiotics, Shaikh et al. conjugated it with biosynthesized AuNPs and evaluated the antibacterial activity against the cefotaxime-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae bacterial strain [61]. The AuNPs were prepared using a bio enzyme, bromelain, as a reducing and capping agent. The loading ability of the prepared AuNPs for cefotaxime was reported to be 77.59%. The MIC value for cefotaxime-coated AuNPs was reported as 2.018 μg/mL and 1.009 μg/mL against the K. pneumoniae and E. coli strains, respectively. Furthermore, the MBC value was reported as 4.037 μg/mL and 2.018 μg/mL, respectively, against K. pneumoniae and E. coli. The synthesised AuNPs alone do not exhibit any antibacterial activity. The conjugation with AuNPs increases the release rate of the antibiotics in the bacterial cell, thereby increasing the activity.
In another study, Hagbani et al. used AuNPs as a vehicle to deliver as well as to increase the antibacterial activity of vancomycin [62]. The antibacterial property of vancomycin is often associated with its potential to impede the formation of the cell walls of bacteria by adhering to a particular C-terminal sequence, D-Ala-D-Ala, within the peptidoglycan pentapeptide [71]. During the synthesis of vancomycin-coated AuNPs through a one-pot synthesis method, the antibiotics themselves play the role of capping and reducing agents. The zeta potential analysis of the coated AuNPs demonstrated a high negative value of −18 meV indicating high stability of the prepared vancomycin-coated AuNPs. The drug loading efficiency of the AuNPs was reported to be 86.2% for the evaluation of antibacterial activity, and a comparative study was carried out between the pure vancomycin and vancomycin-loaded AuNPs against the Gram-positive S. aureus and Gram-negative K. oxytoca, E. coli and P. aeruginosa bacterial strains. Although both pure vancomycin and the vancomycin-coated AuNPs show antibacterial activity, the effective concentration of vancomycin was reduced by half when conjugated with AuNPs. Here, AuNPs acts as a drug carrier as well as contributing to the enhancement of antibacterial activity by hindering the bacteria ATPase functions and disrupting the potential of the membrane. This combined effect of the vancomycin and the AuNPs results in structural damage, inadequate surface adherence, disruption of metabolic processes and, eventually, bacterial cell death.
Another widely used antibiotic against which various Gram-negative bacteria have developed resistance is cefoxitin. Cefoxitin falls under the second-generation cephalosporin class of antibiotics [32,72]. Nowadays, this drug is losing its effectiveness because of the alteration of porins, including in numerous Gram-negative bacteria. The resistance acquired by K. pneumoniae and E. coli strains is due to the alterations in the proteins ompK36 and ompK35 in the outer membrane [72]. Porins usually create small channel-like structures in the outer membrane through which small hydrophilic compounds as well as β lactam antibiotics may migrate [51]. However, the modification of the porins hinders the diffusion of the drug molecules. Further, AuNPs have the ability to interact with the bacterial cell membrane and create pores causing the disruption of the cell wall. Hence, cefoxitin, when conjugated with AuNPs, can carry and release the drug molecules in the bacterial cell more efficiently even if the porins disappear or are altered. To revive the potency of the cefoxitin drug, Rizvi and coworkers conjugated it with AuNPs using cefoxitin itself as the reducing and capping agent [32]. The prepared antibiotics-coated AuNPs exhibit higher stability indicated by the high negative zeta potential value of −23.6 ± 1.6 mV with a drug loading efficiency of 71.92%. No additional cross-linking agent was employed during the synthesis of cefoxitin-loaded AuNPs. They have evaluated the antimicrobial activity of the prepared cefoxitin-coated AuNPs against Gram-negative K. pneumoniae and E. coli strains, which have developed resistance against cefoxitin following the well diffusion method. Surprisingly, cefoxitin alone does not display any antibacterial activity against both bacterial strains up to a concentration of 6 μg/well, while cefoxitin-coated AuNPs demonstrate an inhibition zone of 18 mm and 17 mm against the E. coli and K. pneumoniae bacterial strains at the same concentration. On conjugation with AuNPs, the antibacterial property was significantly enhanced and the MIC50 value was reported as 2.5 µg/mL and 1.5 µg/mL, respectively, for K. pneumoniae and E. coli bacteria. However, cefoxitin alone possesses a MIC50 value of 19.5 µg/mL and 23 µg/mL, respectively, for E. coli and K. pneumoniae bacteria.
Haddada et al. fabricated doxycycline-coated AuNPs and evaluated the antibacterial activity against Gram-positive S. aureus, E. faecalis and E. faecium bacteria as well as against Gram-negative E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii bacteria [11]. The chemical structure of doxycycline possesses a tetracyclic unit with aromatic hydroxyl anthraquinone rings that serve as chromophores contributing to the therapeutic effect [11,73]. PEG was also used as a stabilising agent during the synthesis of AuNPs. The AuNPs showed a maximum drug loading efficiency of 86%. Pure doxycycline exhibited a MIC value of ~32 μg/mL against K. pneumonia, P. aeruginosa, E. faecalis, S. aureus and E. faecium bacterial strains, which were reduced to 2 μg/mL when doxycycline-coated AuNPs were employed, indicating a significant enhancement in antimicrobial properties. However, for E. coli bacteria, they reported that pure doxycycline as well as doxycycline-coated AuNPs exhibited a MIC value of 2 μg/mL. The detailed explanation regarding the antimicrobial activity against E. coli bacteria was not provided in the manuscript.
Yang and coworkers prepared AuNPs coated with pharmaceutical intermediate compounds, including 7-aminodesacetoxycephalosporanic acid (7-ADCA), 7-aminocephalosporanic acid (7-ACA) and 6-aminopenicillanic acid (APA), and evaluated the activity towards MDR bacterial strains isolated from a patient’s saliva or urine [63]. They referred to these compounds as “antibacterial intermediates”, as they comprise the major structural unit of β-lactam antibiotics. The conjugation of different pharmaceutical intermediates which are used for the chemical synthesis of antibiotic drugs with NPs has appeared as an innovative approach to fight against antimicrobial resistance. AuNPs coated with such pharmaceutical intermediate also possess the ability to kill MDR as well as Gram-negative bacterial strains [63]. These coated AuNPs have been reported to be effective against Gram-negative bacteria, while for Gram-positive bacteria they are reported to be inactive because of the higher thickness of the cell wall, which may hinder the penetration of the NP system. They reported that the 6-aminopenicillanic acid (APA)-coated AuNPs demonstrated superior antibacterial properties compared to other antibacterial intermediates. From the toxicity study, they reported that the prepared AuNPs conjugated with APA are highly biocompatible and do not impart any toxic effect to human cells up to a concentration of 20 μg/mL, which is almost eight times higher than the MIC value against E. coli and K. pneumoniae and four times compared to the MIC values against P. aeruginosa as well as MDR E. coli and K. pneumoniae. The MIC value of APA-coated AuNPs was 5 μg/mL for P. aeruginosa and MDR E. coli and K. pneumoniae. For E. coli and K. pneumoniae, the MIC value was reported as 2.5 μg/mL. However, the MIC value of the 6-aminopenicillanic acid molecule alone was greater than 250 μg/mL.
Due to the growth of pathogens that have evolved resistance to all existing conventional antibacterial medications, colistin is being employed as a therapeutic option once again. Colistin is used as a last-line antibiotic to combat both acute and chronic illnesses caused by Gram-negative bacteria. A higher dose of colistin imparts numerous side effects to human health [64,74]. Hence, dose reduction is essential for the enhancement of the therapeutic effect of the drug. In this regard, Fuller et al. fabricated colistin-coated AuNPs to reduce the dose of the drug and evaluated the antibacterial activity against the Gram-negative E. coli bacterial strain [64]. The prepared colistin-coated AuNPs demonstrated a 6.8 times reduction in the MIC value as compared to pure colistin.
Carbapenems are a type of highly efficient antibiotic that is frequently employed for curing fatal bacterial infections. Carbapenems are broad-spectrum antibiotics and are usually susceptible to hydrolysis via numerous β-lactamases, operate as inhibiting agents of β-lactamases or “slow substrates” in certain cases and assault penicillin-binding proteins, which makes them differ from other β-lactam antibiotics [65,75]. However, the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in recent times has drastically reduced its clinical significance. Shaker et al. prepared carbapenem-coated AuNPs using meropenem and imipenem and demonstrated the antibacterial activity using Gram-negative carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis and A. baumanii bacterial strains isolated from infected patients [65]. They synthesised AuNPs possessing particle sizes 35, 70 and 200 nm, with the best results reported being particle sizes of 35 nm. Carbapenems can be easily functionalised, preventing any chemical alteration of the drug molecules because of the ample interactions of the thioether group of the meropenem and imipenem molecules with AuNPs. The surface-to-volume ratio associated with the smaller size of the NPs enhances the drug-loading potential, thereby increasing the antibacterial activity of the carbapenems. A maximum of ~73% drug-loading ability was reported for AuNPs with a particle size of 35 nm. However, with an increase in the particle size, the loading efficiency of the drug decreases. A minimum drug loading of ~41% has been reported for AuNPs with a particle size of 200 nm. However, drug release efficiency was also associated with the particle size of the NPs. The small size of the NPs showed a faster drug release rate. A total of 89% and 94% of drug releases were reported for AuNPs with a particle size of 35 nm. Imipenem-coated AuNPs with a particle size of 35 nm decrease the MIC value by three and four times against P. mirabilis and A. baumanii as well as K. pneumoniae bacteria, respectively. However, meropenem-coated AuNPs reported two times and three times, respectively, for P. mirabilis and A. baumanii bacteria. Pure AuNPs do not exhibit antimicrobial properties against the tested bacterial strains. The carbapenem-loaded AuNPs interact with the cell membrane of the bacterial strain, and as a result, the loaded drug molecules may conjugate with the penicillin-binding proteins and accumulate in the outer cell membrane of the bacteria. This integration of the drug molecules can result in the disruption of the integrity of the bacterial cell wall or may impede the formation of the cell wall of the bacteria causing the death of the bacterial strain.
6. Antibacterial Flavonoids and Heterocyclic Compounds Coated AuNPs to Combat AMR
Flavonoids are a class of bioactive natural compounds originating from plants, that exhibit a wide range of medicinal properties, including antibacterial ones [76]. These are the secondary metabolites comprising a benzopyrone ring possessing phenolic groups [77]. The structures of some flavonoid compounds that have been reported to bear antimicrobial properties are depicted in Figure 3. It has been reported that the inhibitory efficacy of flavonoids against Gram-positive bacteria was greater than that against Gram-negative bacteria [78]. Alhadrami et al. took the advantages associated with the AuNPs, including excellent drug carrier properties and high polyvalent effects [76]. They analysed the antibacterial activity of several pure flavonoids and found that kaempferol and quercetin possess superior antimicrobial properties towards Gram-negative bacteria, hence they were considered for conjunction with AuNPs along with chrysin, which exhibits superior antibacterial properties against Gram-positive bacteria. They have prepared the AuNPs using L-glutathione through a chemical synthesis method. The carboxylate terminal of the glutathione exhibits an excellent binding ability towards flavonoids, thereby facilitating the conjunction with AuNPs, which increases stability, and their hydrophilic nature increases the water solubility of AuNPs. The conjunction efficiency of the flavonoids was reported as 41, 71 and 80%, respectively, for chrysin, kaempferol and quercetin. The antibacterial activity of the coated AuNPs was examined against the Gram-negative E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumonia and P. vulgaris bacterial strains. Among the three flavonoids, quercetin-coated AuNPs were reported as the most active antibacterial agent, possessing a MIC value of 30 µg/mL for E. coli, P. aeruginosa and P. vulgaris and 60 µg/mL for K. pneumonia. They reported that quercetin and kaempferol alone possesses a MIC value of 0.48 mM against P. vulgaris, K. pneumonia and P. aeruginosa bacteria. However, for E. coli bacteria, it was reported as 0.24 mM. Chrysin alone possesses a MIC value > 1 mM. The interaction of the flavonoids-coated AuNPs with bacterial cell walls increases the rigidity of the cell membrane, thereby decreasing the functionality. Flavonoids also possess the ability to inhibit the functions of DNA gyrase of E. coli bacteria possessing the IC50 value between 0.9 and 3.9 µM.
In another study conducted by Ramasamy et al., cinnamaldehyde, a natural flavonoid compound possessing antibacterial activity was employed to coat AuNPs to impart enhanced antibacterial properties [79]. The prepared flavonoid-coated AuNPs were found to be efficient for the eradication of bacterial biofilms formed by Gram-negative E. coli and P. aeruginosa as well as Gram-positive S. aureus and MRSA bacteria. They used tyrosine during the AuNPs’ synthesis, which acts as the reducing as well as the capping agent. Further, the surface functionalisation of AuNPs was performed using Tween 80 and TEOS. The prepared flavonoid-coated AuNPs exhibited two peaks at 540 nm and 290 nm in UV-visible spectroscopy for the AuNPs and the cinnamaldehyde molecules. The flavonoid-conjugated nanoformulation with a cinnamaldehyde concentration of 0.005% (v/v) was reported as effective for the inhibition of bacterial biofilm formation, as a greater than 50% inhibition in the biofilm formation was obtained at such concentration. However, for cinnamaldehyde alone, the effective concentration for reducing the biofilm formation was reported as 0.025% (v/v), indicating the increased activity of cinnamaldehyde-coated AuNPs.
Riaz et al., on the other hand, developed a green synthetic approach for the fabrication of flavonoid-coated AuNPs [80]. Flavonoids were extracted from the methanolic leaf extract of Berberis lyceum and used for the stabilisation of AuNPs during synthesis. The prepared coated AuNPs showed antibacterial activity against the E. faecalis bacterial strain, with a MIC value of 25 µg/mL.
Moreover, the chemical structures of some small heterocyclic compounds that have been successfully conjugated with AuNPs to fight against AMR are represented in Figure 4 [81,82,83,84,85].
Table 3 shows few examples of heterocyclic compounds-coated AuNPs and their activity against different bacteria. In 2020, Zhang et al. developed a new strategy for the treatment of oral P. gingivalis through the coating of aligners with the heterocyclic compound 4,6-diamino-2-pyrimidinethiol-conjugated AuNPs [81]. The synthesized nano formulation was reported as efficient for the inhibition of the growth of bacteria as well as for eradicating biofilm formation. From the biological safety aspects, they reported that the prepared nano formulation did not impart any toxic effect on the human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) at a dose below 100 g/mL. The concentration of the 4,6-diamino-2-pyrimidinethiol-conjugated AuNPs on aligner coating was 1.109 ± 0.021 μg/cm2, and the incubation concentration was reported as 517 ± 12.6 μg/mL. The bacterial growth was diminished when the concentration of the bacterial suspension was 104 CFU/mL (colony-forming units per mL). Increasing the concentration of the bacterial suspension to 105 CFU/mL bacterial growth slowed initiation. Thus, at the concentration of 1.109 ± 0.021 μg/cm2, the conjugated AuNPs were effective in inhibiting the growth of the bacteria up to the bacterial suspension concentration of 104 CFU/mL.
Acridines are heterocyclic organic compounds containing one N atom possessing enormous pharmacological properties. Because of their ability to interact strongly with biomolecules, including protein and DNA, they are widely employed in biological fields [86,87]. Acridine-based therapies are widely recognised for their immense antimalarial, antifungal and antibacterial properties [82]. Considering these significant pharmacological properties, Basu and coworkers developed AuNPs coated with acridine derivatives, including 9-aminoacridine hydrochloride hydrate, acridine orange, proflavine and acridine yellow dyes [82]. Citrate was employed for the stabilisation of the NPs. The amine groups on the medicines may enable covalent bonding with the AuNPs. The antibacterial activities of the pure drug molecules as well as the drug-coated AuNPs were evaluated against B. subtilis and E. coli bacteria and it was reported that 9-aminoacridine hydrochloride hydrate and acridine orange demonstrated antibacterial activity alone as well as when conjugated with AuNPs. Conjugation of the heterocyclic compounds with AuNPs enhanced the antibacterial activity of the molecules. However, no antibacterial property was detected for pure proflavine and acridine yellow and their conjugated AuNPs. One AuNP was capable of adsorbing many pharmacological molecules; hence, with the increase in AuNP concentration, the antibacterial property also increases. The interaction of the coated AuNPs with the cell wall disrupts the membrane structure, creating pores through which cause the cellular contents to leak or explode, resulting in an osmotic imbalance, cellular integrity loss and, ultimately, cell death.
In another study, Wang et al. prepared AuNPs coated with small N-heterocyclic compounds that included 3- amino-1,2,4 triazole-5-thiol, 6-amino-2-mercaptobenzothiazole, 2-amino-6-mercaptopurine, 6-aminopenicillanic acid and 2-mercaptoimidazole [83]. The heterocyclic compounds as well as pure AuNPs did not demonstrate any antimicrobial activities against the tested pathogenic bacteria. When conjugated with AuNPs, all heterocyclic compounds, except 6-aminopenicillanic acid, revealed immense antibacterial properties. All the coated AuNPs reduced the viability of the S. aureus biofilm. 3-Amino-1,2,4 triazole-5-thiol- and 6-amino-2-mercaptobenzothiazole-coated AuNPs showed a 2.5-log reduction in the viability of S. aureus biofilm, 2-mercaptoimidazole-coated AuNPs showed a 5-log reduction. However, 2-amino-6-mercaptopurine- and 2-mercaptoimidazole-coated AuNPs showed a 2-log reduction in the viability of E. coli biofilm. They assumed that, except for 6-aminopenicillanic acid-conjugated AuNPs, all other conjugated AuNPs exhibit a positive charge, making it feasible to attack the bacterial cell wall carrying negative charges. 2-mercaptoimidazole-coated AuNPs exhibited enhanced biocompatibility and did not impart any toxic effect up to a concentration of 100 mg/mL. Among all the nanoformulations, 2-mercaptoimidazole- and 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole-5-thiol-coated AuNPs demonstrated superior antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus bacteria as well as their MDR variants. These two AuNPs also exhibit activity against bacterial biofilm reduction.
Li et al. developed 4,6-diamino-2-pyrimidinethiol-coated AuNPs to serve as a useful alternative to cure disease caused by the E. coli bacterial strain [84]. They evaluated the toxicity of the synthesised nanoformulation by assessing the impact of the long-term delivery of the coated AuNPs to mice. While uncoated AuNPs disrupted the mitochondrial membrane, the coated AuNPs had no effect on the intestinal epithelial cells’ mitochondria. A biocompatibility study demonstrated that the viability of intestinal epithelial cells (MODE-K) was 16.5% greater as compared to pure AuNPs. They reported that the 4,6-diamino-2-pyrimidinethiol-coated AuNPs are more biocompatible with intestinal epithelial cells (MODE-K), and the number of dead cells in the case of the coated AuNPs was 60% lesser than that in the case of pure AuNPs. The antibacterial activity of the prepared AuNPs was evaluated against E. coli bacteria in comparison with pure AuNPs and levofloxacin, and it was reported that the number of living bacteria decreased by 85.2% and 91.2%, respectively, in comparison to pure AuNPs and coated AuNPs, indicating their higher effectiveness.
A novel aminopyridine-based heterocyclic compound, 4-Dimethyl aminopyridinium propylthioacetate (1), which acts as a cationic ligand, was prepared by Anwar and coworkers (Figure 5) and conjugated with AuNPs to obtain immense antibacterial properties [85]. The antimicrobial activity of the prepared nanoformulation was compared with pure 4-Dimethyl aminopyridinium propylthioacetate as well as with the antibiotic pefoxacin against the Gram-negative E. coli bacterial strain. The reported reaction scheme for the synthesis of 4-Dimethyl aminopyridinium propylthioacetate is represented below.
The MIC values for the pefloxacin antibiotic, 4-Dimethyl aminopyridinium propylthioacetate and their coated AuNPs were reported as 50 µg/mL, 300 µg/mL and 200 µg/mL. This indicates that incorporation with AuNPs significantly increases the antibacterial activity of the prepared heterocyclic compound. Further mixing of the coated AuNPs with pefloxacin also showed an enhancement in the antimicrobial activity, thereby reducing the MIC value up to 25 µg/mL, which is almost half compared to the pure antibiotics.
7. Conclusions
AuNPs are effectively progressing toward clinical trials. The small particle size offers a large surface area which enhances drug-loading efficiency as well as a higher penetration power of the NP through the bacterial cell wall, which makes them an efficient tool for drug delivery. Among numerous metal and metal oxide NPs, pure AuNPs or those conjugated with antibacterial agents or drugs emerge as fascinating because of the easy-to-synthesise, nontoxic nature and high biocompatibility of Au. Apart from improved delivery, numerous studies have shown that combining AuNPs with antibacterial drugs increase antibacterial properties while minimising side effects through decreasing the antibiotic dosages. Still, the mechanical intricacies of its activity, cytotoxicity and the biosafety associated with the AuNPs are the areas that necessitate special and detailed research. Moreover, although the mode of action of the antibiotics is well known, the mechanism underlying the antibacterial activity of the antibiotic-conjugated AuNPs is less clear. Hence, a systematic investigation to evaluate the proper mechanism of antibacterial action associated with conjugated AuNPs is very important. Special attention should be given in the large-scale preparation, cost effectiveness and safety of antibiotic-coated AuNPs. In the current scenario of antibiotic resistance, transforming an inept antibiotic into a robust nanoformulation is a delightful concept. However, only a few studies have reported on the synthesis of antibiotic-conjugated AuNPs utilising green methods, leaving room for further research in this area.
Conceptualization, A.R. and P.K.B.; writing—original draft preparation, P.P.S.; writing—review and editing, P.P.S., A.R. and P.K.B.; supervision, P.K.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Synthesis of antibiotic-coated AuNPs and their interaction with the bacterial cell to combat AMR.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Chemical structure of some flavonoids possessing antibacterial activity.
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Chemical structure of some heterocyclic compounds possessing antibacterial activity.
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. Scheme for the synthesis of 4-Dimethyl aminopyridinium propylthioacetate.
Examples of multidrug resistant pathogenic bacteria and their harmful effect on human health.
| Name of the | Type of the Bacteria | Resistance to Antibiotics | Infections Caused | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staphylococcus aureus | Small round-shaped, | Methicillin, | Nosocomial infections, | [ |
| Escherichia coli | Rod-shaped, | Carbapenems, | Urinary tract infections, | [ |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | Rod-shaped, | β-Lactams, | Pneumonia, | [ |
| Klebsiella oxytoca | Rod-shaped, | Aminoglycosides, | Bacteremia, | [ |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Rod-shaped, | β-Lactams, | Nosocomial infections, urinary tract infections, pneumonia, | [ |
| Acinetobacter baumannii | Short rod-shaped, | Carbapenem, | Urinary tract infections, bloodstream infections, hospital- | [ |
| Proteus mirabilis | Rod-shaped, | Penicillin, | Gastrointestinal tract infections, | [ |
| Enterococcus faecalis | Slightly oval shaped, | Glycopeptides, | Abdominal infections, | [ |
| Porphyromonas gingivalis | Rod-shaped, | Tetracyclines, | Periodontal disease. | [ |
| Micrococcus luteus | Sphere-shaped, | Macrolides, | Hepatic and brain abscess, | [ |
| Aeromonas hydrophila | Rod-shaped, | Penicillin, | Bacteremia, | [ |
| Staphylococcus epidermidis | Grape-like clusters shaped, | Vancomycin, | Bloodstream infections, surgical site infections. | [ |
Some recently developed antibiotic-coated AuNPs and their activity towards combating AMR.
| Name of | Class of | Size and Shape | Time, | Tested | MIC | Remarks | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cefixime | Cephalosporin | Spherical, | 2.5 h | S. aureus | 45 ± 0.12 μg/mL (correspond to | Efficiency of cefixime increased | [ |
| Amoxicillin | Penicillin | Irregular shapes | 18 min | P. aeruginosa, | 1.5 µg/mL | A 60% and 70% reduction in the viability was obtained for S. aureus and P. aeruginosa | [ |
| Amoxicillin | Penicillin | Hexagonal and spherical shape, | 1 h and 25 °C | MRSA, | 3.6–8 µg/mL | The synthesised coated AuNPs exhibited a MIC | [ |
| Ampicillin | Penicillin | 1.43 ± 0.5 nm. | 24 h and room temp | MRSA, | 0.58 μg/mL | The MIC reduced by 18% against S. aureus bacteria and 10–20 times against MRSA as compared to ampicillin alone. | [ |
| Amikacin | Aminoglycoside | All possesses spherical | 2 h and room temp. | E. coli, | - | All the amikacin-coated AuNPs fabricated using different surfactants exhibit enhanced antibacterial | [ |
| Cefotaxime | Cephalosporin | All possess | 48 h and 40 °C | E. coli, | 1.009 μg/mL for | Conjugation of cefotaxime introduced antibacterial | [ |
| Vancomycin | Glycopeptide | Spherical shape and | 48 h and | E. coli, | 93.44 μg/mL for | Vancomycin-coated AuNPs enhanced the antibacterial activity of the drug by 1.6, 1.4, 1.6 and | [ |
| Cefoxitin | Cephalosporin | Spherical, | 48 h and | E. coli, | MIC 50 value | AuNPs are found to be efficient for delivering the drug to both the bacterial strains and transform the antibiotic from an unresponsive drug to an effective one. | [ |
| Doxycycline | Tetracycline | Spherical, | 15 min | S. aureus | 2 μg/mL | MIC value for doxycycline conjugated AuNPs was reduced by almost 16 times as compared to doxycycline alone. | [ |
| 6-Amino-penicillanic acid | - | ~3 nm | ~1 h in ice | E. coli, | 2.5 μg/mL for | MIC value of | [ |
| Colistin | Polymyxins | - | - | E. coli | 0.23 ± 0.03 µg/mL | On conjugation with AuNPs the MIC of colistin reduced by 6.8 fold. | [ |
| Imipenem and Meropenem | Carbapenems | 35–200 nm | 20 min | K. pneumoniae, | 2.5 µg/mL for | Imipenem-loaded AuNPs demonstrated decreased MIC of imipenem by four times, and meropenem-loaded AuNPs demonstrated a three times decrease in the MIC of meropenem. | [ |
Synthesis of some heterocyclic compounds-coated AuNPs to combat AMR.
| Heterocyclic Compounds | Size of | UV Absorption Peak | Tested | Antimicrobial Activity | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,6-Diamino- | Less than 4 nm | 510 nm | P. gingivalis | Inhibited the growth of bacteria as well as biofilm formation and up to a concentration of 104 CFU/mL bacterial growth was arrested. | [ |
| Acridine derivatives | 15–20 nm | 525 nm | B. subtilis | 9-Aminoacridine hydrochloride | [ |
| 3-Amino-1,2,4 triazole- | 4–7 nm | - | S. aureus | 2-Mercaptoimidazole and 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole-5-thiol-coated AuNPs reduced the viability of MRSA by 4.1 and 3.5 logs, respectively. | [ |
| 4,6-Diamino-2- | 12.90 and 16.57 nm for pure and coated AuNPs | 520 nm | E. coli | Compared to the antimicrobial | [ |
| 4-Dimethyl aminopyridinium propylthioacetate | 5–20 nm | 520 nm | E. coli | Conjugation with AuNPs enhanced the antimicrobial properties of the 4-Dimethyl aminopyridinium propylthioacetate ligand. Further, combination of the heterocyclic compound-coated AuNPs with a pefoxacin drug reduced the MIC value by almost half compared to the pure drug. | [ |
References
1. Khandelwal, P.; Singh, D.K.; Poddar, P. Advances in the Experimental and Theoretical Understandings of Antibiotic Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles for Antibacterial Applications. ChemistrySelect; 2019; 4, pp. 6719-6738. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/slct.201900083]
2. Davies, J.; Davies, D. Origins and Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.; 2010; 74, pp. 417-433. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00016-10]
3. Kalhapure, R.S.; Suleman, N.; Mocktar, C.; Seedat, N.; Govender, T. Nanoengineered Drug Delivery Systems for Enhancing Antibiotic Therapy. J. Pharm. Sci.; 2015; 104, pp. 872-905. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.24298]
4. Cars, O.; Hedin, A.; Heddini, A. The global need for effective antibiotics—Moving towards concerted action. Drug Resist. Updates; 2011; 14, pp. 68-69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2011.02.006]
5. Ali, S.; Perveen, S.; Shah, M.R.; Zareef, M.; Arslan, M.; Basheer, S.; Ullah, S.; Ali, M. Bactericidal potentials of silver and gold nanoparticles stabilized with cefixime: A strategy against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. J. Nanoparticle Res.; 2020; 22, 201. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-04939-y]
6. Rocca, D.M.; Silvero, C.M.J.; Aiassa, V.; Cecilia Becerra, M. Rapid and effective photodynamic treatment of biofilm infections using low doses of amoxicillin-coated gold nanoparticles. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther.; 2020; 31, 101811. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101811] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32439578]
7. Rizvi, S.M.; Lila, A.S.; Moin, A.; Hussain, T.; Kamal, M.A.; Sonbol, H.; Khafagy, E.-S. Antibiotic-Loaded Gold Nanoparticles: A Nano-Arsenal against ESBL Producer-Resistant Pathogens. Pharmaceutics; 2023; 15, 430. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020430] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36839753]
8. Teklu, D.S.; Negeri, A.A.; Legese, M.H.; Bedada, T.L.; Woldemariam, H.K.; Tullu, K.D. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production and multi-drug resistance among Enterobacteriaceae isolated in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control; 2019; 8, 39. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0488-4]
9. Saha, M.; Sarkar, A. Review on Multiple Facets of Drug Resistance: A Rising Challenge in the 21st Century. J. Xenobiotics; 2021; 11, pp. 197-214. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jox11040013]
10. Prestinaci, F.; Pezzotti, P.; Pantosti, A. Antimicrobial resistance: A global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog. Glob. Health; 2015; 109, pp. 309-318. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000030]
11. Haddada, M.B.; Jeannot, K.; Spadavecchia, J. Novel Synthesis and Characterization of Doxycycline-loaded Gold Nanoparticles: The Golden Doxycycline for Antibacterial Applications. Part. Part. Syst. Charact.; 2018; 36, 1800395. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.201800395]
12. Hakemi-Vala, M.; Rafati, H.; Aliahmadi, A.; Ardalan, A. Nanoemulsions: A Novel Antimicrobial Delivery System. Nano-and Microscale Drug Delivery Systems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 245-266.
13. Yeh, Y.C.; Huang, T.H.; Yang, S.C.; Chen, C.C.; Fang, J.Y. Nano-Based Drug Delivery or Targeting to Eradicate Bacteria for Infection Mitigation: A Review of Recent Advances. Front. Chem.; 2020; 8, 286. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00286] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391321]
14. Pizzolato-Cezar, L.R.; Okuda-Shinagawa, N.M.; Machini, M.T. Combinatory Therapy Antimicrobial Peptide-Antibiotic to Minimize the Ongoing Rise of Resistance. Front. Microbiol.; 2019; 10, 1703. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01703] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447797]
15. Khandelwal, P.; Poddar, P. Fluorescent metal quantum clusters: An updated overview of the synthesis, properties, and biological applications. J. Mater. Chem. B; 2017; 5, pp. 9055-9084. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7TB02320K] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32264589]
16. Baptista, P.V.; McCusker, M.P.; Carvalho, A.; Ferreira, D.A.; Mohan, N.M.; Martins, M.; Fernandes, A.R. Nano-Strategies to Fight Multidrug Resistant Bacteria “a Battle of the Titans”. Front. Microbiol.; 2018; 9, 1441. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01441] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30013539]
17. Gholipourmalekabadi, M.; Mobaraki, M.; Ghaffari, M.; Zarebkohan, A.; Omrani, V.; Urbanska, A.; Seifalian, A. Targeted Drug Delivery Based on Gold Nanoparticle Derivatives. Curr. Pharm. Des.; 2017; 23, 20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612823666170419105413]
18. Wang, Z.; Dong, K.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Sun, H.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. Activation of biologically relevant levels of reactive oxygen species by au/g-c3n4 hybrid nanozyme for bacteria killing and wound disinfection. Biomaterials; 2017; 113, pp. 145-157. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.041]
19. Zhao, Y.; Jiang, X. Multiple strategies to activate gold nanoparticles as antibiotics. Nanoscale; 2013; 5, 8340. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3nr01990j]
20. Wadhwani, P.; Heidenreich, N.; Podeyn, B.; Bürck, J.; Ulrich, A.S. Antibiotic gold: Tethering of antimicrobial peptides to gold nanoparticles maintains conformational flexibility of peptides and improves trypsin susceptibility. Biomater. Sci.; 2017; 5, pp. 817-827. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7BM00069C]
21. Hussein, M.A.; Grinholc, M.; Dena, A.S.; El-Sherbiny, I.M.; Megahed, M. Boosting the antibacterial activity of chitosan–gold nanoparticles against antibiotic–resistant bacteria by Punicagranatum L. Extract. Carbohydr. Polym.; 2021; 256, 117498. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117498]
22. Sinha, R.; Karan, R.; Sinha, A.; Khare, S.K. interaction and nanotoxic effect of zno and ag nanoparticles on mesophilic and halophilic bacterial cells. Bioresour. Technol.; 2011; 102, pp. 1516-1520. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.117]
23. Hemeg, H. Nanomaterials for alternative antibacterial therapy. Int. J. Nanomed.; 2017; 12, pp. 8211-8225. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S132163]
24. Dakal, T.C.; Kumar, A.; Majumdar, R.S.; Yadav, V. Mechanistic Basis of Antimicrobial Actions of Silver Nanoparticles. Front. Microbiol.; 2016; 7, 1831. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01831]
25. Sarma, P.P.; Barman, K.; Baruah, P.K. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Murraya koenigii leaf extract with efficient catalytic, antimicrobial, and sensing properties towards heavy metal ions. Inorg. Chem. Commun.; 2023; 152, 110676. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2023.110676]
26. Manju, S.; Malaikozhundan, B.; Vijayakumar, S.; Shanthi, S.; Jaishabanu, A.; Ekambaram, P.; Vaseeharan, B. Antibacterial, antibiofilm and cytotoxic effects of Nigella sativa essential oil coated gold nanoparticles. Microb. Pathog.; 2016; 91, pp. 129-135. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2015.11.021]
27. Okkeh, M.; Bloise, N.; Restivo, E.; De Vita, L.; Pallavicini, P.; Visai, L. Gold Nanoparticles: Can They Be the next Magic Bullet for Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria?. Nanomaterials; 2021; 11, 312. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11020312]
28. Khanna, S.; Padhan, P.; Das, S.; Jaiswal, K.S.; Tripathy, A.; Smita, S.; Tripathy, S.K.; Raghav, S.K.; Gupta, B. A Simple Colorimetric Method for Naked-eye Detection of Circulating Cell-free DNA Using Unlabelled Gold Nanoparticles. ChemistrySelect; 2018; 3, pp. 11541-11551. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/slct.201802671]
29. Kukreja, A.; Kang, B.; Kim, H.O.; Jang, E.; Son, H.Y.; Huh, Y.M.; Haam, S. Preparation of gold core-mesoporous iron-oxide shell nanoparticles and their application as dual MR/CT contrast agent in human gastric cancer cells. J. Ind. Eng. Chem.; 2017; 48, pp. 56-65. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.12.020]
30. Ahangari, A.; Salouti, M.; Saghatchi, F. Gentamicin-gold nanoparticles conjugate: A contrast agent for x-ray imaging of infectious foci due to Staphylococcus aureus. IET Nanobiotechnol.; 2016; 10, pp. 190-194. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2015.0034] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27463788]
31. Pourali, P.; Yahyaei, B.; Afsharnezhad, S. Bio-Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles by Fusarium oxysporum and Assessment of Their Conjugation Possibility with Two Types of β-Lactam Antibiotics without Any Additional Linkers. Microbiology; 2018; 87, pp. 229-237. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0026261718020108]
32. Alafnan, A.; Rizvi, S.M.; Alshammari, A.S.; Faiyaz, S.S.; Lila, A.S.; Katamesh, A.A.; Khafagy, E.S.; Alotaibi, H.F.; Ahmed, A.B. Gold Nanoparticle-Based Resuscitation of Cefoxitin against Clinical Pathogens: A Nano-Antibiotic Strategy to Overcome Resistance. Nanomaterials; 2022; 12, 3643. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12203643]
33. Zong, T.-X.; Silveira, A.P.; Morais, J.A.; Sampaio, M.C.; Muehlmann, L.A.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, C.-S.; Liu, S.-K. Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Nano-Drug Delivery Systems. Nanomaterials; 2022; 12, 1855. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12111855]
34. Tayeb, H.H.; Moqaddam, S.A.; Hasaballah, N.H.; Felimban, R.I. Development of nanoemulsions for the delivery of hydrophobic and hydrophilic compounds against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. RSC Adv.; 2022; 12, pp. 26455-26462. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D2RA03925G]
35. Larsson, D.G.; Flach, C.F. Antibiotic resistance in the environment. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.; 2021; 20, pp. 257-269. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00649-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737424]
36. Sengupta, S.; Chattopadhyay, M.K.; Grossart, H. The multifaceted roles of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in nature. Front. Microbiol.; 2013; 4, 47. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00047] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23487476]
37. Alba, C.; Blanco, A.; Alarcon, T. Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.; 2017; 30, pp. 489-497. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000396] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28704226]
38. Kohler, V.; Vaishampayan, A.; Grohmann, E. Problematic Groups of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Their Resistance Mechanisms. Antibacterial Drug Discovery to Combat MDR; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 25-69.
39. Chaudhuri, A.; Martin, P.M.; Kennedy, P.G.; Andrew Seaton, R.; Portegies, P.; Bojar, M.; Steiner, I. EFNS guideline on the management of community-acquired bacterial meningitis: Report of an EFNS Task Force on acute bacterial meningitis in older children and adults. Eur. J. Neurol.; 2008; 15, pp. 649-659. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02193.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18582342]
40. Poulin-Laprade, D.; Matteau, D.; Jacques, P.E.; Rodrigue, S.; Burrus, V. Transfer Activation of SXT/R391 integrative and conjugative elements: Unraveling the SetCD Regulon. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2015; 43, pp. 2045-2056. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv071] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25662215]
41. Afshinnekoo, E.; Bhattacharya, C.; Burguete-García, A.; Castro-Nallar, E.; Deng, Y.; Desnues, C.; Dias-Neto, E.; Elhaik, E.; Iraola, G.; Jang, S. et al. COVID-19 drug practices risk antimicrobial resistance evolution. Lancet Microbe; 2021; 2, pp. E135-E136. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00039-2]
42. Tong, S.Y.; Davis, J.S.; Eichenberger, E.; Holland, T.L.; Fowler, V.G. Staphylococcus aureus Infections: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.; 2015; 28, pp. 603-661. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00134-14]
43. Yang, J.; Long, H.; Hu, Y.; Feng, Y.; McNally, A.; Zong, Z. Klebsiella oxytoca Complex: Update on Taxonomy, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Virulence. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.; 2022; 35, e00006-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00006-21]
44. Lister, P.D.; Wolter, D.J.; Hanson, N.D. Antibacterial-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Clinical Impact and Complex Regulation of Chromosomally Encoded Resistance Mechanisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.; 2009; 22, pp. 582-610. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00040-09]
45. Wang, M.; Guo, Q.; Xu, X.; Wang, X.; Ye, X.; Wu, S.; Hooper, D.C.; Wang, M. New Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance Gene, qnrC, Found in a Clinical Isolate of Proteus mirabilis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.; 2009; 53, pp. 1892-1897. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01400-08]
46. Zhang, Y.; Tangadanchu, V.K.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, R.G.; Lin, J.M.; Zhou, C.H. Potential Antimicrobial Isopropanol-Conjugated Carbazole Azoles as Dual Targeting Inhibitors of Enterococcus faecalis. ACS Med. Chem. Lett.; 2018; 9, pp. 244-249. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.7b00514]
47. Conrads, G.; Klomp, T.; Deng, D.; Wenzler, J.S.; Braun, A.; Abdelbary, M.M. The Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Porphyromonas gingivalis: Genetic Repertoire, Global Phenotype, and Review of the Literature. Antibiotics; 2021; 10, 1438. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121438]
48. Zhu, M.; Zhu, Q.; Yang, Z.; Liang, Z. Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Micrococcus luteus Bloodstream Infection in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital. Pol. J. Microbiol.; 2021; 70, pp. 321-326. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2021-030]
49. Odeyemi, O.A.; Ahmad, A. Antibiotic resistance profiling and phenotyping of Aeromonas species isolated from aquatic sources. Saudi J. Biol. Sci.; 2017; 24, pp. 65-70. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.09.016] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28053573]
50. Lee, J.Y.; Monk, I.R.; Gonçalves, S.A.; Seemann, T.; Chua, K.Y.; Kearns, A.; Hill, R.; Woodford, N.; Bartels, M.D.; Strommenger, B. et al. Global spread of three multidrug-resistant lineages of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Nat. Microbiol.; 2018; 3, pp. 1175-1185. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0230-7]
51. Blair, J.M.; Webber, M.A.; Baylay, A.J.; Ogbolu, D.O.; Piddock, L.J. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.; 2014; 13, pp. 42-51. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3380]
52. Chawla, M.; Verma, J.; Gupta, R.; Das, B. Antibiotic Potentiators against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: Discovery, Development, and Clinical Relevance. Front. Microbiol.; 2022; 13, 887251. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.887251] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847117]
53. Blair, J.M.; Richmond, G.E.; Piddock, L.J. Multidrug Efflux Pumps in Gram-Negative Bacteria and Their Role in Antibiotic Resistance. Future Microbiol.; 2014; 9, pp. 1165-1177. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fmb.14.66]
54. Villagra, N.A.; Fuentes, J.A.; Jofre, M.R.; Hidalgo, A.A.; Garcia, P.; Mora, G.C. The carbon source influences the efflux pump-mediated antimicrobial resistance in clinically important Gram-negative bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.; 2012; 67, pp. 921-927. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr573]
55. Samanta, S.; Agarwal, S.; Nair, K.K.; Harris, R.A.; Swart, H. Biomolecular assisted synthesis and mechanism of silver and gold nanoparticles. Mater. Res. Express; 2019; 6, 82009. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab296b]
56. Barman, K.; Chowdhury, D.; Baruah, P.K. Bio-synthesized silver nanoparticles using Zingiber officinale rhizome extract as efficient catalyst for the degradation of environmental pollutants. Inorg. Nano-Met. Chem.; 2019; 50, pp. 57-65. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24701556.2019.1661468]
57. Li, N.; Zhao, P.; Astruc, D. Anisotropic Gold Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Properties, Applications, and Toxicity. Angew. Chem.; 2014; 53, pp. 1756-1789. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201300441]
58. Fan, Y.; Pauer, A.C.; Gonzales, A.A.; Fenniri, H. Enhanced antibiotic activity of ampicillin conjugated to gold nanoparticles on PEGylated rosette nanotubes. Int. J. Nanomed.; 2019; 14, pp. 7281-7289. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S209756]
59. Halawani, E.M.; Alzahrani, S.S.; Gad El-Rab, S.M. Biosynthesis Strategy of Gold Nanoparticles and Biofabrication of a Novel Amoxicillin Gold Nanodrug to Overcome the Resistance of Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Pathogens MRSA and E. Coli. Biomimetics; 2023; 8, 452. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8060452]
60. Kaur, A.; Kumar, R. Untangling the Effect of Surfactants as an Intermediate at Gold Nanoparticle-Antibiotic Interface for Enhanced Bactericidal Effect. ES Food Agrofor.; 2022; 7, pp. 30-40. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30919/esfaf563]
61. Shaikh, S.; Rizvi, S.M.D.; Shakil, S.; Hussain, T.; Alshammari, T.M.; Ahmad, W.; Tabrez, S.; Al-Qahtani, M.H.; Abuzenadah, A.M. Synthesis and Characterization of Cefotaxime Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles and Their Use to Target Drug-Resistant CTX-M-Producing Bacterial Pathogens. J. Cell. Biochem.; 2017; 118, pp. 2802-2808. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcb.25929] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28181300]
62. Hagbani, T.A.; Yadav, H.; Moin, A.; Lila, A.S.; Mehmood, K.; Alshammari, F.; Khan, S.; Khafagy, E.S.; Hussain, T.; Rizvi, S.M. et al. Enhancement of Vancomycin Potential against Pathogenic Bacterial Strains via Gold Nano-Formulations: A Nano-Antibiotic Approach. Materials; 2022; 15, 1108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15031108] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161053]
63. Yang, X.; Yang, J.; Wang, L.; Ran, B.; Jia, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, G.; Shao, H.; Jiang, X. Pharmaceutical Intermediate-Modified Gold Nanoparticles: Against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Wound-Healing Application via an Electrospun Scaffold. ACS Nano; 2017; 11, pp. 5737-5745. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b01240] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28531351]
64. Fuller, M.; Whiley, H.; Koper, I. Antibiotic delivery using gold nanoparticles. SN Appl. Sci.; 2020; 2, 1022. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2835-8]
65. Shaker, M.A.; Shaaban, M.I. Formulation of carbapenems loaded gold nanoparticles to combat multi-antibiotic bacterial resistance: In vitro antibacterial study. Int. J. Pharm.; 2017; 525, pp. 71-84. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.04.019]
66. Zhang, T.; Liu, Q.; Xie, Z.; Song, X.; Gong, J. Determination and Correlation of Solubility Data and Dissolution Thermodynamic Data of Cefixime Trihydrate in Seven Pure Solvents. J. Chem. Eng. Data; 2014; 59, pp. 1915-1921. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je5000605]
67. Estes Bright, L.M.; Garren, M.R.; Douglass, M.; Handa, H. Synthesis and Characterization of Nitric Oxide-Releasing Ampicillin as a Potential Strategy for Combatting Bacterial Biofilm Formation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces; 2023; 15, pp. 15185-15194. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c00140]
68. Golmohamadpour, A.; Bahramian, B.; Khoobi, M.; Pourhajibagher, M.; Barikani, H.R.; Bahador, A. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy assessment of three indocyanine green-loaded metal-organic frameworks against Enterococcus faecalis. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther.; 2018; 23, pp. 331-338. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.08.004]
69. Post, S.J.; Shapiro, J.A.; Wuest, W.M. Connecting iron acquisition and biofilm formation in the ESKAPE pathogens as a strategy for combatting antibiotic resistance. MedChemComm; 2019; 10, pp. 505-512. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9MD00032A] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31057729]
70. Ghai, I.; Bajaj, H.; Arun Bafna, J.; El Damrany Hussein, H.A.; Winterhalter, M.; Wagner, R. Ampicillin permeation across Ompf, the major outer-membrane channel in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem.; 2018; 293, pp. 7030-7037. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA117.000705]
71. Choo, E.J.; Chambers, H.F. Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Infect. Chemother.; 2016; 48, 267. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3947/ic.2016.48.4.267]
72. Shi, W.; Li, K.; Ji, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Shi, M.; Mi, Z. Carbapenem and cefoxitin resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains associated with porin Ompk36 loss and DHA-1-β-lactamase production. Braz. J. Microbiol.; 2013; 44, pp. 435-442. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822013000200015]
73. Moustaoui, H.; Movia, D.; Dupont, N.; Bouchemal, N.; Casale, S.; Djaker, N.; Savarin, P.; Prina-Mello, A.; de la Chapelle, M.L.; Spadavecchia, J. Tunable Design of Gold(III)–Doxorubicin Complex–Pegylated Nanocarrier. the Golden Doxorubicin for Oncological Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces; 2016; 8, pp. 19946-19957. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b07250] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27424920]
74. Justo, J.A.; Bosso, J.A. Adverse Reactions Associated with Systemic Polymyxin Therapy. Pharmacother. J. Hum. Pharmacol. Drug Ther.; 2014; 35, pp. 28-33. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phar.1493]
75. Sotgiu, G.; D’Ambrosio, L.; Centis, R.; Tiberi, S.; Esposito, S.; Dore, S.; Spanevello, A.; Migliori, G. Carbapenems to Treat Multidrug and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2016; 17, 373. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17030373]
76. Alhadrami, H.A.; Orfali, R.; Hamed, A.A.; Ghoneim, M.M.; Hassan, H.M.; Hassane, A.S.; Rateb, M.E.; Sayed, A.M.; Gamaleldin, N.M. Flavonoid-Coated Gold Nanoparticles as Efficient Antibiotics against Gram-Negative Bacteria—Evidence from in Silico-Supported in Vitro Studies. Antibiotics; 2021; 10, 968. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10080968] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34439019]
77. Ullah, A.; Munir, S.; Badshah, S.L.; Khan, N.; Ghani, L.; Poulson, B.G.; Emwas, A.H.; Jaremko, M. Important Flavonoids and Their Role as a Therapeutic Agent. Molecules; 2020; 25, 5243. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25225243] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33187049]
78. Osonga, F.J.; Akgul, A.; Miller, R.M.; Eshun, G.B.; Yazgan, I.; Akgul, A.; Sadik, O.A. Antimicrobial Activity of a New Class of Phosphorylated and Modified Flavonoids. ACS Omega; 2019; 4, pp. 12865-12871. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b00077] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31460413]
79. Ramasamy, M.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, J. Development of gold nanoparticles coated with silica containing the antibiofilm drug cinnamaldehyde and their effects on pathogenic bacteria. Int. J. Nanomed.; 2017; 12, pp. 2813-2828. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S132784] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435260]
80. Riaz, S.; Fatima, R.N.; Hussain, I.; Tanweer, T.; Nawaz, A.; Menaa, F.; Janjua, H.A.; Alam, T.; Batool, A.; Naeem, A. et al. Effect of Flavonoid-Coated Gold Nanoparticles on Bacterial Colonization in Mice Organs. Nanomaterials; 2020; 10, 1769. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10091769]
81. Zhang, M.; Liu, X.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, X.; Lin, J. Biological Safe Gold Nanoparticle-Modified Dental Aligner Prevents the Porphyromonas gingivalis Biofilm Formation. ACS Omega; 2020; 5, pp. 18685-18692. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01532]
82. Mitra, P.; Chakraborty, P.K.; Saha, P.; Ray, P.; Basu, S. Antibacterial efficacy of acridine derivatives conjugated with gold nanoparticles. Int. J. Pharm.; 2014; 473, pp. 636-643. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.07.051]
83. Wang, L.; Natan, M.; Zheng, W.; Zheng, W.; Liu, S.; Jacobi, G.; Perelshtein, I.; Gedanken, A.; Banin, E.; Jiang, X. Small molecule-decorated gold nanoparticles for preparing antibiofilm fabrics. Nanoscale Adv.; 2020; 2, pp. 2293-2302. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D0NA00179A] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36133385]
84. Li, J.; Cha, R.; Zhao, X.; Guo, H.; Luo, H.; Wang, M.; Zhou, F.; Jiang, X. Gold Nanoparticles Cure Bacterial Infection with Benefit to Intestinal Microflora. ACS Nano; 2019; 13, pp. 5002-5014. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b01002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30916928]
85. Anwar, A.; Khalid, S.; Perveen, S.; Ahmed, S.; Siddiqui, R.; Khan, N.A.; Shah, M.R. Synthesis of 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine propylthioacetate coated gold nanoparticles and their antibacterial and photophysical activity. J. Nanobiotechnol.; 2018; 16, 6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-017-0332-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378569]
86. Long, Y.F.; Huang, C.Z.; Li, Y.F. Hybridization Detection of DNA by Measuring Organic Small Molecule Amplified Resonance Light Scattering Signals. J. Phys. Chem. B; 2007; 111, pp. 4535-4538. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp066242o]
87. Bentin, T.; Nielsen, P.E. Superior Duplex DNA Strand Invasion by Acridine Conjugated Peptide Nucleic Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2003; 125, pp. 6378-6379. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja029936t]
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
1 Department of Applied Sciences, GUIST, Gauhati University, Guwahati 781014, Assam, India
2 CNC—Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology and Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology, University of Coimbra, 000-447 Coimbra, Portugal