1. Introduction
Infertility refers to the inability of a person or a couple to achieve a clinical pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse [1]. Infertility remains highly prevalent, with approximately 48 million couples worldwide suffering from it [2]. Several conditions can cause female infertility such as tubal factor infertility, ovulatory dysfunction, and endometriosis; however, in 40% of cases, the underlying cause remains uncertain [3]. People affected by infertility may seek a fertility treatment, from which assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are widely chosen. According to the latest report of the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology, more than 3 million ART cycles were performed in 2018 [4]. Different approaches to ART exist, including in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) [5].
In the past, adverse health effects of ART on the offspring’s cardiovascular health were reported [6,7,8]. It was suggested that children born via ART have increased cardiovascular morbidity, but the pathophysiological reasons behind this remain unclear [9]. In addition, it has been proposed that infertile females might display an increased cardiovascular risk [10,11]. Murugappan et al. demonstrated that compared to their fertile peers, infertile females display a higher risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [10]. Moreover, Farland et al. found that females with a history of infertility have a 1.13-times higher risk of developing cardiovascular diseases compared to controls [11]. Females who suffer from infertility and thus seek ART treatment could potentially pass down certain cardiovascular risk factors to their offspring. However, to the best of our knowledge, limited data on the overall vascular health of females with history of ART are available.
Therefore, we conducted a pilot study aiming to investigate the overall vascular health of females with history of ART compared to individuals who conceived spontaneously.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethical Approval
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of LMU Munich on 27 December 2020 (Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Pettenkoferstraße 8a, 80336 Munich, Germany; approval number: 20-0844). The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki. Prior written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.
2.2. Study Design
Females who were treated at the Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich (Munich, Germany) and successfully conceived a child between 1995 and 2017 with the help of ART were informed in writing about the ongoing study. Age-matched individuals who conceived spontaneously were enrolled by public calls (e.g., flyers and posters in schools, sports clubs, etc.) within the greater Munich area (Germany).
As this pilot study was part of the Munich heARTerY-study (assisted reproductive technologies and their effects on heart and arterial function in youth), inclusion and exclusion criteria focused primarily on the pediatric cohort [12,13,14,15,16]. To assess whether parents with history of ART displayed an increased cardiovascular morbidity, no exclusion criteria were applied for the parental cohort.
Study participants were examined at the Division of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital, LMU Munich (Munich, Germany) from May 2021 to March 2022.
2.3. Medical History, Physical Examination, Course of Pregnancy and Birth, Level of Education
The self-reported medical history of each study participant, focusing on the presence of cardiovascular disease (e.g., arterial hypertension, disorders of glucose, and/or lipid metabolism), was assessed. In addition, self-reported smoking status and the regular use of medication were evaluated. All study participants underwent a physical examination. Body weight (kg), height (cm), waist circumference (cm), and hip circumference (cm) were measured in all subjects. The ratio of waist to hip circumference was determined. In addition, body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was calculated. The weight classification was defined as follows: underweight if BMI < 18.5 kg/m2, normal weight if BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m2 but <25 kg/m2, overweight if BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 but <30 kg/m2, and obese if BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 [17]. The following data regarding the course of pregnancy and birth were obtained from electronic and/or maternity records: conception mode (IVF, ICSI, GIFT, spontaneous conception), maternal age at birth (years), BMI at conception (kg/m2), presence of multiple pregnancy, weeks of gestation (weeks), maternal blood pressure during pregnancy ≥ 140/90 mmHg. Self-reported maternal educational level was determined according to the German education system: no school leaving qualification (0), lower secondary school leaving certificate (1), intermediate secondary school leaving certificate (2), general qualification for university entrance (3), completed apprenticeship (4), completed university degree (5).
2.4. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet
High adherence to the Mediterranean diet has a positive effect on cardiovascular morbidity [18]. To assess participants’ adherence to the Mediterranean diet, the validated 14-item Mediterranean diet assessment tool developed by Martínez-González et al. was translated into German and applied [19]. According to Martínez-González et al., a score ≤ 7 was considered low adherence to the Mediterranean diet and a score > 7 high adherence to the Mediterranean diet [19].
2.5. Level of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior
To determine the level of physical activity in study participants, the German version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) officially provided by the World Health Organization (WHO) was used [20]. Picture cards were presented for each activity type [20]. Total and recreational metabolic-equivalent (MET) minutes per week were calculated according to GPAQ recommendations [20]. Adult subjects met WHO recommendations if ≥600 total MET-minutes per week were achieved [20]. Furthermore, study participants were asked how many times per week muscle-strengthening activities were performed and how much time was spent per day with sedentary activities.
2.6. Vascular Function
2.6.1. Pulse Wave Analysis
An oscillometric blood pressure device (Mobil-O-Graph®, IEM GmbH, Aachen, Germany) was utilized to measure brachial systolic blood pressure (SBP, mmHg), brachial diastolic blood pressure (DBP, mmHg), mean arterial pressure (MAP, mmHg), heart rate (HR, bpm), central SBP (cSBP, mmHg), central DBP (cDBP, mmHg), augmentation index averaged to a heart rate of 75 bpm (AIx@75, %), and pulse wave velocity (PWV, m/s). Elevated SBP and DBP were present if SBP ≥ 130 mmHg and DBP ≥ 85 mmHg [21]. Cuff sizes were chosen based on participants’ right upper arm circumference. Study participants were asked to remain in a supine and calm position ≥ 5 min before and during the examination. Three consecutive measurements were performed and averaged.
2.6.2. Sonography of the Common Carotid Artery
Sonography of both common carotid arteries (CCA) was performed by one investigator for all study participants using either a Philips iE33 xMatrix or a Philips Epiq 7G ultrasound device (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). During the examination, study participants were asked to remain in a supine position, and the neck was extended to a 45° angle and turned to the opposite side of examination [22]. Offline analysis was conducted by one investigator.
Peak Circumferential Strain, Peak Strain Rate and Arterial Distensibility
The area directly below the carotid bifurcation was examined in the short-axis view using a 3–8 MHz sector array transducer (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Three consecutive loops were recorded under three-lead ECG tracing and transferred to a separate workstation (QLAB Cardiovascular Ultrasound Quantification Software, version 11.1, Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) for offline analysis. The software’s SAX-A function was utilized. The vascular region of interest (ROI) was manually adjusted to precisely track the vessel’s wall and to avoid tracking of the perivascular tissue. Pixels of the vascular ROI were then tracked two-dimensionally over the cardiac cycle. Peak circumferential strain (CS, %) and peak strain rate (SR, 1/s) were determined manually. To improve data validity, the average of three measurements was computed for each CCA side. Arterial distensibility (mmHg−1 × 10−3) was calculated using the following formula [23]:
In addition, CS, SR, and arterial distensibility of the right and left CCA were averaged.
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness
At the level of carotid bifurcation, both CCAs were evaluated in long-axis view utilizing a 3–12 MHz linear array transducer (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Three consecutive loops were recorded under three-lead ECG tracing and transferred to a separate workstation (QLAB Cardiovascular Ultrasound Quantification Software, version 11.1, Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) for offline analysis. At end-diastole (R wave in ECG), the carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT, mm) was assessed semi-automatically for each side. The ROI was set proximal to the carotid bifurcation and the length was adjusted to 10 mm. Three measurements were performed on each side, and the average cIMT for the right and left CCA was calculated. Moreover, the mean cIMT value of both CCAs was assessed.
Stiffness Index β
The abovementioned sonographic study protocol was applied. M-mode examinations of both CCAs were performed in long-axis view under three-lead ECG tracking using a 3–12 MHz linear array transducer (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The end-diastolic diameter (dD, mm) and end-systolic diameter (sD, mm) of both CCAs were measured offline on a separate workstation (IntelliSpace Cardiovascular Ultrasound Viewer, Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Stiffness index β was defined as [23]:
2.7. Blood Lipid Profile
To evaluate the blood lipid profile, total cholesterol (TC, mg/dL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C, mg/dL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C, mg/dL), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL, mg/dL), triglycerides (mg/dL), and lipoprotein a (Lp(a), mg/dL) were assessed. A fasting period of ≥4 h was requested before blood drawing. The presence of elevated conventional blood lipids was defined according to adult recommendations [24,25]. A Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL was defined as increased [26].
2.8. Statistical Analysis
As this was a pilot study, a prior sample size calculation was not feasible. A chi-square test was applied to compare nominal data. Continuous parameters were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and the Shapiro–Wilk test. In case of normal distribution, an unpaired t-test was used. For non-normally distributed continuous variables, the Mann–Whitney U test was utilized. Normally distributed data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) and non-normally distributed data as medians (interquartile range (IQR)). To control the false discovery rate (FDR), the Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) procedure was applied for multiple comparison correction. For data analysis, SPSS 26 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Patient Characteristics
A total of 46 ART females and 52 controls were initially recruited for this study. One subject in the ART group was excluded due to insufficient data assessment. In total, 45 ART females and 52 individuals who conceived spontaneously were included in the final analysis.
Mean age was 47.72 ± 5.96 years in ART females and 46.84 ± 7.43 years in controls (p = 0.525). The two groups did not differ significantly in anthropometric variables, weight classification, smoking status, or educational level (Table 1).
A total of 34 ART females conceived successfully with the help of ICSI, 10 with the help of IVF, and 1 with the help of GIFT. Regarding the course of pregnancy and birth, maternal age at birth and the presence of multiple pregnancy were significantly higher in the ART cohort compared to controls (Table 1).
Self-reported medical history was not significantly different between ART females and their peers (Table 1).
3.2. Diet Quality, Level of Physical Activity, and Sedentary Behavior
The two groups did not differ significantly in diet quality, level of physical activity, or sedentary behavior (Table 2).
3.3. Vascular Function
Vascular function did not show a significant difference between ART females and controls (Table 3).
3.4. Blood Lipid Profile
An initial comparison revealed a significantly higher prevalence of elevated Lp(a) in ART females (p = 0.011). However, after multiple comparison correction, this significant result no longer remained (p = 0.132) (Table 4). The remaining blood lipid profile did not display significant alterations between the two groups (Table 4).
4. Discussion
This pilot study investigated overall vascular health in 45 ART females and 52 controls who conceived spontaneously. Interestingly, the results of this study did not reveal significant differences in overall vascular function between ART females and controls. Initially, a significantly higher prevalence of elevated Lp(a) was observed in ART females. However, after multiple comparison correction, this significant result disappeared. Special care was taken to adequately match both groups by age, as well as by diet quality, physical activity, and sedentary behavior. The two groups did not differ significantly in anthropometric variables, weight classification, smoking status, educational level, or self-reported medical history. Maternal age at childbirth was significantly higher in the ART group than in the control group. There is evidence that as age increases, the mother’s cardiovascular system may be less able to adapt to pregnancy, putting the child at higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, which could potentially harm the cardiovascular function of the offspring [27,28]. In addition, the prevalence of multiple pregnancy was significantly higher in the ART group. This may be due to the ART procedure itself, as multiple embryos are often transferred at once. The literature suggests that one in five IVF cycles results in a multiple pregnancy [29]. Even though no significant difference in gestational hypertension was found in our study, multiple pregnancy still resulted in a higher rate of peripartal morbidities, such as preeclampsia [30].
To assess overall vascular function, different non-invasive methodologies were applied, including the measurement of brachial blood pressure, central blood pressure, and PWV via an oscillometric blood pressure device. Additionally, arterial stiffness and cIMT of the CCA were assessed via sonography in this study.
Female infertility can be caused by a variety of factors such as ovulation disorders, hormonal imbalances, structural alterations of the reproductive system, chronic illnesses, lifestyle, and age [2,31]. Some studies have demonstrated that female infertility and cardiovascular dysfunction might have potential associations [32,33]. A recent prospective cohort study of more than 100,000 participants with 28 years of follow-up demonstrated that females with a history of infertility (12 months of trying to conceive without success, including individuals who subsequently conceived) may show an increased risk of facing coronary heart disease later in life compared to fertile controls [11]. The study observed that cardiovascular risk correlated inversely with age of first infertility diagnosis. Interestingly, the authors revealed that cardiovascular risk may be restricted to infertility-related ovulation disorders such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and endometriosis [11]. Another cross-sectional study including over 700 female participants from the USA (age range: 20–59 years) demonstrated that experiencing infertility at any point within the female reproductive window may be linked with later-life cardiovascular morbidity [34].
In contrast to the abovementioned studies, we did not find a significant difference in vascular function between individuals who conceived through ART and control subjects who conceived spontaneously. One of the reasons for this might be that our study solely focused on females who had successfully conceived offspring with the help of ART, while other studies focused on females with infertility who did not conceive successfully even when an ART history was potentially present [11,32]. Therefore, we may have examined individuals with “less-pronounced” infertility. Additionally, the subjects in our cohort displayed a younger age compared to the study participants of Farland et al. [11]; hence, vascular abnormalities might have not become detectable yet in our study.
Initially, a significantly higher prevalence of elevated Lp(a) was observed in ART females. However, after multiple comparison correction, this significant result disappeared. Lp(a) has a similar structure to low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and is characterized by the binding of apolipoprotein(a) (apo (a)) to apolipoprotein B100 [35]. Circulating Lp(a) levels are largely determined by the LPA gene encoding apo(a) and are therefore not significantly affected by age, sex, physical activity, and diet [36]. Elevated Lp(a) levels are present in 10% to 30% of the population and increase cardiovascular risk [37,38,39]. Limited data on the relationship between Lp(a) and infertility are available. However, some studies suggest a link between elevated Lp(a) levels and female disorders that are associated with infertility, such as endometriosis and PCOS. Crook et al. investigated the blood lipid profile of 29 females with endometriosis and 29 healthy females and found that the Lp(a) levels in females with endometriosis were significantly higher [40]. Furthermore, Swetha et al. demonstrated that the prevalence of elevated Lp(a) levels was significantly higher in PCOS patients [41].
The exact pathophysiological mechanisms linking elevated Lp(a) levels and female infertility are still largely unknown and require further investigation. Potentially, elevated Lp(a) levels disturb the regulation of female sex hormones, such as estrogen and progesterone, and lead to irregular menstrual cycles, anovulation, and ultimately decreased fertility [42,43]. Moreover, it was shown that elevated Lp(a) levels induce inflammatory responses via interleukin 6 (IL-6), which could potentially alter cardiovascular, as well as reproductive, function [44].
With the widespread use of ART, it is of particular concern whether the offspring of females with history of ART may inherit certain cardiovascular risk factors associated with female infertility, such as altered Lp(a) levels. Interestingly, some studies have suggested that ART offspring may have a higher risk of vascular dysfunction [6,45]. Therefore, further studies investigating the role of maternal risk factors in cardiovascular morbidity of ART offspring are required.
Notably, the causes of female infertility can be complex and are often multifactorial. Although there are shared risk factors between the onset of cardiovascular disease and infertility (e.g., obesity, arterial hypertension, diabetes) [46,47,48,49], research on the association between female infertility and increased cardiovascular risk is sparse. Hence, in the future, more studies are required addressing such pathophysiological interactions.
4.1. Limitations
4.1.1. Study Design and Study Population
The present study was a single-center study in Germany. The participants were recruited in the greater Munich area, and therefore the results might be restricted by cultural factors, socioeconomic status (SES), and ethnic homogeneity, due to selection bias. Leischik et al. pointed out that the spectrum of diseases is different in countries with different levels of development. In developed countries, non-communicable diseases, especially cardiovascular diseases, have received much attention, and differences in SES can lead to health inequalities. People with higher SES tend to have better health outcomes than those with lower SES [50]. Moreover, different ecosystems and the physical environment affect health performance, including the cardiovascular system [50]. The sample size of this pilot study could be regarded as relatively small. Our ART group included different types of ART, including IVF, ICSI, and GIFT, which resulted in a relatively heterogeneous study sample. This manuscript does not address data on the number of ART cycles in the examined females or the type of embryo transfer (fresh vs. frozen) conducted. Some patient characteristics were obtained via questioning the participants. Hence, some response bias might be present. Females with history of ART were more frequently on hormone replacement therapy, which could have altered the results on vascular function [51]. We did not acquire data on an individual’s menstrual cycle, which could potentially alter cardiovascular function. Furthermore, we recruited relatively young ART females, and therefore some cardiovascular changes might have not become detectable yet. The causes of infertility are complex. Hormonal, genetic, and psychological factors, as well as the potential influence of male infertility, were not addressed in this study. One in four females with infertility suffer from hormonal imbalances and disorders causing anovulation [52]. In approximately 10% of cases, genetic abnormalities are present [53]. Moreover, psychological distress may be also related to the development of female infertility [54]. Hence, prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate the results demonstrated in this study and enable precise cardiovascular risk stratification of females with history of ART.
4.1.2. Methodology
As this was a pilot study, a prior power analysis was not feasible. We applied the BH procedure to reduce FDR and this might have lowered the ability to find significant results and reduce statistical effects. This pilot study suggests Lp(a) as a significant cardiovascular risk factor in ART females. To draw more definitive conclusions, a separate study focusing solely on Lp(a) should be executed in the future. In this study, we applied a wide variety of methodologies to detect vascular dysfunction. Although carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) measurement is considered the noninvasive gold standard of arterial stiffness assessment, it has not been widely used in clinical practice, because the procedure is time-consuming and requires special equipment. We therefore applied oscillometric PWV measurement, as it has a satisfying agreement and consistency with the abovementioned gold standard, making it an easy as well as suitable screening tool for cardiovascular risk determination [55,56]. To the best of our knowledge, two-dimensional speckle tracking (2DST) is a new technique for measuring arterial stiffness and has not yet been validated. However, several studies have suggested that 2DST may be a useful tool for the noninvasive assessment of arterial stiffness compared to the current gold standard of measuring cfPWV [57,58]. The assessment of cIMT and 2DST parameters was not conducted blindly, which could have resulted in some bias. However, various vascular parameters (e.g., brachial blood pressure, PWV) were measured automatically by the respective devices. To reduce intermeasurement variability in this study, the mean of three measurements was calculated to improve data validity. To reduce interobserver variability, ultrasound images were acquired and analyzed offline by a single investigator.
5. Conclusions
This pilot study investigated the overall vascular health of females with history of ART compared to individuals who conceived spontaneously. No significant differences in vascular function were displayed between the two groups. The potentially higher prevalence of elevated Lp(a), a cardiovascular risk factor, among females with history of ART might contribute to an impaired reproductive process and play an important role in the etiology of female infertility. As female infertility has been linked with an increased cardiovascular risk within the literature, subjects suffering from infertility might profit from a cardiovascular screening to identify risk factors at an early stage and therefore improve their overall outcome. In the future, multicenter studies with a larger sample size, as well as a long-term follow-up design, are needed for a more precise cardiovascular risk stratification of infertile females.
All authors contributed to this study; Study concept and design, T.V., A.J., N.R., R.D.-P., C.T., N.A.H. and F.S.O.; Methodology, P.L. and F.S.O.; Software, P.L. and F.S.O.; Validation, P.L. and F.S.O.; Formal analysis, P.L. and F.S.O.; Investigation, P.L. and F.S.O.; Resources, A.J., N.R., N.A.H., R.D.-P., C.T. and F.S.O.; Data curation, P.L. and F.S.O.; Writing—original draft preparation, P.L. and F.S.O.; Writing—review and editing, all authors; Visualization, P.L. and F.S.O.; Supervision, T.V., A.J., N.R., N.A.H., R.D.-P., C.T. and F.S.O.; Project administration, P.L., M.L., T.V., M.K., F.S., B.K. and F.S.O.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of LMU Munich on 27 December 2020 (Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Pettenkoferstraße 8a, 80336 Munich, Germany; approval number: 20-0844).
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
We would like to thank Megan Crouse for editorial assistance.
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. Outside the submitted work: F.S.O.: Funding support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—413635475 and the Munich Clinician Scientist Program (MCSP) of LMU Munich; N.R.: Support for symposium and others from Ferring Arzneimittel GmbH, Theramex Germany GmbH, Merck KGaA, Teva GmbH, Besins Healthcare.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Patients’ characteristics.
| Variable | ART (n = 45) | Control (n = 52) | p-Value | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 47.72 ± 5.96 | 46.84 ± 7.43 | 0.525 | 0.735 |
| Bodyweight (kg) | 64.50 | 65.15 | 0.332 | 0.719 |
| Height (cm) | 167.86 ± 7.14 | 168.25 ± 6.56 | 0.782 | 0.876 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.41 | 23.03 | 0.506 | 0.735 |
| Underweight (n (%)) | 1 (2.22) | 1 (1.92) | 0.724 | 0.845 |
| Normal weight (n (%)) | 27 (60.00) | 37 (71.16) | ||
| Overweight (n (%)) | 8 (17.78) | 7 (13.46) | ||
| Obese (n (%)) | 9 (20.00) | 7 (13.46) | ||
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.175 | 0.663 |
| Smoking (n (%)) | 4 (8.89) | 5 (9.62) | 1 | 1 |
| Maternal educational level | 4.00 | 5.00 | 0.188 | 0.663 |
| Course of pregnancy and birth | ||||
| Maternal age at birth (years) | 38.45 ± 3.64 | 31.85 ± 3.99 | <0.001 *** | 0.028 * |
| BMI at conception (kg/m2) 1 | 22.22 | 21.42 | 0.277 | 0.705 |
| Multiple pregnancy (n (%)) | 11 (24.44) | 2 (3.85) | 0.003 ** | 0.042 * |
| Weeks of gestation (weeks) 2 | 39.00 | 39.00 | 0.101 | 0.663 |
| Maternal blood pressure during pregnancy ≥ 140/90 mmHg 3 | 0 (0) | 3 (12.5) | 0.246 | 0.689 |
| Medical history | ||||
| Arterial hypertension (n (%)) | 6 (13.33) | 4 (7.69) | 0.506 | 0.735 |
| Dyslipidemia (n (%)) | 4 (8.89) | 7 (13.46) | 0.479 | 0.735 |
| Glucose metabolism disorder | 2 (4.44) | 0 (0) | 0.213 | 0.663 |
| Thyroid disease (n (%)) | 9 (20) | 10 (19.23) | 0.924 | 0.995 |
| History of thrombosis (n (%)) | 2 (4.44) | 1 (1.92) | 0.595 | 0.756 |
| History of pulmonary embolism (n (%)) | 1 (2.22) | 0 (0) | 0.464 | 0.735 |
| History of questionable transient ischemic attack (n (%)) | 1 (2.22) | 0 (0) | 0.464 | 0.735 |
| History of cancer (n (%)) | 0 (0) | 2 (3.85) | 0.497 | 0.735 |
| Medication | ||||
| Antihypertensive medication | 1 (2.22) | 3 (5.77) | 0.621 | 0.756 |
| Lipid-lowering medication (n (%)) | 1 (2.22) | 3 (5.77) | 0.621 | 0.756 |
| L-thyroxine (n (%)) | 9 (20) | 10 (19.23) | 0.924 | 0.958 |
| Antidiabetic medication (n (%)) | 2 (4.44) | 0 (0) | 0.213 | 0.663 |
| Blood thinners (n (%)) | 2 (4.44) | 0 (0) | 0.213 | 0.663 |
| Hormone replacement therapy | 5 (11.11) | 0 (0) | 0.019 * | 0.177 |
| Oral contraceptives (n (%)) | 3 (6.67) | 1 (1.92) | 0.334 | 0.719 |
ART, assisted reproductive technologies; BMI, body mass index. 1 33 ART females and 36 control subjects were included in the analysis. 2 41 ART females and 48 control subjects were included in the analysis. 3 21 ART females and 24 control subjects were included in the analysis. Maternal educational level was assessed according to the German education system: no school leaving qualification (0), lower secondary school leaving certificate (1), intermediate secondary school leaving certificate (2), general qualification for university entrance (3), completed apprenticeship (4), completed university degree (5). Data are presented as means ± SD for normally distributed parameters and as medians (IQR) for non-normally distributed parameters. Nominal data are presented as n (%). Benjamini–Hochberg procedure was applied for adjusting p-value. * p < 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001.
Diet quality, level of physical activity, and sedentary behavior.
| Variable | ART (n = 45) | Control (n = 52) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| MEDAS | 6.49 ± 2.29 | 6.87 ± 2.28 | 0.420 |
| Total MET-min per week 1 | 2880.00 | 3300.00 | 0.843 |
| Recreational MET-min per week 1 | 900.00 | 1080.00 | 0.935 |
| Muscle strengthening activities (times/week) | 0 | 0 | 0.534 |
| Sedentary behavior (hours/day) | 6.01 ± 3.53 | 6.70 ± 2.73 | 0.281 |
ART, assisted reproductive technologies; MEDAS, Mediterranean diet adherence score; MET, metabolic-equivalent. Data are presented as means ± SD for normally distributed parameters and as medians (IQR) for non-normally distributed parameters. Nominal data are presented as n (%). 1 44 ART females were included in the analysis.
Vascular function.
| Variable | ART (n = 45) | Control (n = 52) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulse wave analysis | |||
| SBP (mmHg) | 123.49 ± 15.50 | 120.94 ± 12.35 | 0.371 |
| Elevated SBP (n (%)) | 11 (24.44) | 13 (25) | 0.950 |
| DPB (mmHg) | 79.29 ± 10.71 | 78.01 ± 8.70 | 0.518 |
| Elevated DBP (n (%)) | 12 (26.67) | 12 (23.08) | 0.683 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 99.51 ± 12.36 | 97.64 ± 9.87 | 0.411 |
| cSBP (mmHg) | 118.33 ± 14.48 | 115.05 ± 11.38 | 0.215 |
| cDBP (mmHg) | 80.29 ± 10.87 | 79.01 ± 8.85 | 0.526 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 61.42 ± 7.98 | 60.71 ± 8.76 | 0.680 |
| AIx@75 (%) | 17.85 ± 11.05 | 20.41 ± 12.60 | 0.293 |
| PWV (m/s) | 6.93 ± 0.96 | 6.78 ± 0.91 | 0.424 |
| Sonography of the common carotid artery | |||
| CS (%) 1 | 7.18 ± 2.30 | 7.30 ± 2.19 | 0.791 |
| SR (1/s) 1 | 1.58 | 1.58 | 0.917 |
| Arterial distensibility (mmHg−1 × 10−3) 1 | 333.31 ± 106.93 | 347.98 ± 116.06 | 0.526 |
| Stiffness index β 2 | 5.87 | 5.24 | 0.438 |
| cIMT (mm) | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.783 |
ART, assisted reproductive technologies; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; cSBP, central systolic blood pressure; cDBP, central diastolic blood pressure; AIx@75, augmentation index averaged to a heart rate of 75 bpm; PWV, pulse wave velocity; CS, peak circumferential strain; SR, peak strain rate; cIMT, carotid intima-media thickness. 1 44 ART females and 51 control subjects were included in the analysis. 2 50 control subjects were included in the analysis. Data are presented as means ± SD for normally distributed parameters and as medians (IQR) for non-normally distributed parameters. Nominal data are presented as n (%).
Blood lipid profile.
| Variable | ART (n = 45) | Control (n = 52) | p-Value | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC (mg/dL) | 196.00 | 189.00 | 0.441 | 0.722 |
| Increased TC (n (%)) | 20 (44.44) | 23 (44.23) | 0.983 | 0.983 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 121.16 ± 24.33 | 115.98 ± 30.76 | 0.366 | 0.722 |
| Increased LDL-C (n (%)) | 24 (53.33) | 24 (46.15) | 0.481 | 0.722 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 69.40 ± 18.47 | 68.81 ± 17.44 | 0.871 | 0.983 |
| Decreased HDL-C (n (%)) | 5 (11.11) | 6 (11.54) | 0.947 | 0.983 |
| Non-HDL-C (mg/dL) | 124.00 | 122.00 | 0.399 | 0.722 |
| Increased Non-HDL-C (n (%)) | 22 (48.89) | 21 (40.38) | 0.400 | 0.722 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 81.00 | 76.50 | 0.876 | 0.983 |
| Increased Triglycerides (n (%)) | 4 (8.89) | 8 (15.38) | 0.333 | 0.722 |
| Lp(a) (mg/dL) 1 | 12.00 | 7.00 | 0.110 | 0.66 |
| Increased Lp(a) (n (%)) 1 | 10 (27.78) | 4 (7.69) | 0.011 * | 0.132 |
ART, assisted reproductive technologies; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; non-HDL-C, non-HDL cholesterol; Lp(a), lipoprotein (a). Data are presented as means ± SD for normally distributed parameters and as medians (IQR) for non-normally distributed parameters. Nominal data are presented as n (%). Benjamini–Hochberg procedure was applied for adjusting p-value. 1 36 ART females were included in the analysis. * p < 0.05.
References
1. World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Revision (ICD-11); World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
2. Infertility 2023 [Updated 14 Septemebr 2020]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility (accessed on 9 March 2023).
3. Healy, D.L.; Trounson, A.O.; Andersen, A.N. Female infertility: Causes and treatment. Lancet; 1994; 343, pp. 1539-1544. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92941-6]
4. Adamson, G.D.; Zegers-Hochschild, F.; Dyer, S.; Chambers, G.; De Mouzon, J.; Ishihara, O.; Kupka, M.; Banker, M.; Jwa, S.C.; Elgindy, E. et al. World Report on Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2018. Proceedings of the 38th Hybrid Annual Meeting of the ESHRE; Milan, Italy, 3–6 July 2022; International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART): Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2022.
5. Nardelli, A.A.; Stafinski, T.; Motan, T.; Klein, K.; Menon, D. Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs): Evaluation of evidence to support public policy development. Reprod. Health; 2014; 11, 76. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-76]
6. Meister, T.A.; Rimoldi, S.F.; Soria, R.; Arx, R.v.; Messerli, F.H.; Sartori, C.; Scherrer, U.; Rexhaj, E. Association of Assisted Reproductive Technologies With Arterial Hypertension During Adolescence. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.; 2018; 72, pp. 1267-1274. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.060]
7. Cui, L.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, W.; Lv, J.; Hu, J.; Ma, J.; Fang, M.; Yang, L.; Magnussen, C.G. et al. Assessment of Cardiovascular Health of Children Ages 6 to 10 Years Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology. JAMA Netw. Open; 2021; 4, e2132602. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32602]
8. Guo, X.Y.; Liu, X.M.; Jin, L.; Wang, T.T.; Ullah, K.; Sheng, J.Z.; Huang, H.F. Cardiovascular and metabolic profiles of offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technologies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril.; 2017; 107, pp. 622-631. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.007]
9. Scherrer, U.; Rexhaj, E.; Allemann, Y.; Sartori, C.; Rimoldi, S.F. Cardiovascular dysfunction in children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies. Eur. Heart J.; 2015; 36, pp. 1583-1589. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv145]
10. Murugappan, G.; Leonard, S.A.; Farland, L.V.; Lau, E.S.; Shadyab, A.H.; Wild, R.A.; Schnatz, P.; Carmichael, S.L.; Stefanick, M.L.; Parikh, N.I. Association of infertility with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among postmenopausal participants in the Women’s Health Initiative. Fertil. Steril.; 2022; 117, pp. 1038-1046. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.02.005]
11. Farland, L.V.; Wang, Y.X.; Gaskins, A.J.; Rich-Edwards, J.W.; Wang, S.; Magnus, M.C.; Chavarro, J.E.; Rexrode, K.M.; Missmer, S.A. Infertility and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study. J. Am. Heart Assoc.; 2023; 12, e027755. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027755]
12. Langer, M.; Vilsmaier, T.; Kramer, M.; Sciuk, F.; Kolbinger, B.; Li, P.; Jakob, A.; Rogenhofer, N.; Dalla-Pozza, R.; Thaler, C. et al. Vascular Health in Adults Born After Using Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Pediatr. Cardiol.; 2022; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-03050-4]
13. Langer, M.; Li, P.; Vilsmaier, T.; Kramer, M.; Sciuk, F.; Kolbinger, B.; Jakob, A.; Rogenhofer, N.; Haas, N.A.; Dalla-Pozza, R. et al. Subjects Conceived through Assisted Reproductive Technologies Display Normal Arterial Stiffness. Diagnostics; 2022; 12, 2763. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112763]
14. Sciuk, F.; Vilsmaier, T.; Kramer, M.; Langer, M.; Kolbinger, B.; Li, P.; Jakob, A.; Rogenhofer, N.; Dalla-Pozza, R.; Thaler, C. et al. Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Subjects Conceived through Assisted Reproductive Technologies. J. Clin. Med.; 2022; 11, 7128. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237128]
15. Sciuk, F.; Vilsmaier, T.; Kramer, M.; Langer, M.; Kolbinger, B.; Li, P.; Jakob, A.; Rogenhofer, N.; Dalla-Pozza, R.; Thaler, C. et al. Left ventricular systolic function in subjects conceived through assisted reproductive technologies. Front. Cardiovasc. Med.; 2023; 10, 1059713. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1059713]
16. Oberhoffer, F.S.; Langer, M.; Li, P.; Vilsmaier, T.; Sciuk, F.; Kramer, M.; Kolbinger, B.; Jakob, A.; Rogenhofer, N.; Dalla-Pozza, R. et al. Vascular function in a cohort of children, adolescents and young adults conceived through assisted reproductive technologies-results from the Munich heARTerY-study. Transl. Pediatr.; 2023; 12, pp. 1619-1633. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-67]
17. Nuttall, F.Q. Body Mass Index: Obesity, BMI, and Health: A Critical Review. Nutr. Today; 2015; 50, pp. 117-128. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NT.0000000000000092]
18. Jennings, A.; Berendsen, A.M.; de Groot, L.; Feskens, E.J.M.; Brzozowska, A.; Sicinska, E.; Pietruszka, B.; Meunier, N.; Caumon, E.; Malpuech-Brugère, C. et al. Mediterranean-Style Diet Improves Systolic Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Older Adults. Hypertension; 2019; 73, pp. 578-586. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12259]
19. Martínez-González, M.A.; García-Arellano, A.; Toledo, E.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Buil-Cosiales, P.; Corella, D.; Covas, M.I.; Schröder, H.; Arós, F.; Gómez-Gracia, E. et al. A 14-Item Mediterranean Diet Assessment Tool and Obesity Indexes among High-Risk Subjects: The PREDIMED Trial. PLoS ONE; 2012; 7, e43134. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043134]
20. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) 2021 [Updated 13 November 2021]. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/surveillance/systems-tools/physical-activity-surveillance (accessed on 3 May 2021).
21. Williams, B.; Mancia, G.; Spiering, W.; Agabiti Rosei, E.; Azizi, M.; Burnier, M.; Clement, D.L.; Coca, A.; de Simone, G.; Dominiczak, A. et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). Eur. Heart J.; 2018; 39, pp. 3021-3104. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339]
22. Dalla-Pozza, R.; Ehringer-Schetitska, D.; Fritsch, P.; Jokinen, E.; Petropoulos, A.; Oberhoffer, R. Intima media thickness measurement in children: A statement from the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology (AEPC) Working Group on Cardiovascular Prevention endorsed by the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology. Atherosclerosis; 2015; 238, pp. 380-387. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.12.029]
23. Cho, J.Y.; Kim, K.H. Evaluation of Arterial Stiffness by Echocardiography: Methodological Aspects. Chonnam Med. J.; 2016; 52, pp. 101-106. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4068/cmj.2016.52.2.101]
24. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA; 2001; 285, pp. 2486-2497. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.19.2486] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11368702]
25. Mach, F.; Baigent, C.; Catapano, A.L.; Koskinas, K.C.; Casula, M.; Badimon, L.; Chapman, M.J.; De Backer, G.G.; Delgado, V.; Ference, B.A. et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur. Heart J.; 2020; 41, pp. 111-188. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31504418]
26. Nordestgaard, B.G.; Chapman, M.J.; Ray, K.; Borén, J.; Andreotti, F.; Watts, G.F.; Ginsberg, H.; Amarenco, P.; Catapano, A.; Descamps, O.S. et al. Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor: Current status. Eur. Heart J.; 2010; 31, pp. 2844-2853. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq386] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20965889]
27. Cooke, C.M.; Davidge, S.T. Advanced maternal age and the impact on maternal and offspring cardiovascular health. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.; 2019; 317, pp. H387-H394. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00045.2019]
28. Haug, E.B.; Markovitz, A.R.; Fraser, A.; Dalen, H.; Romundstad, P.R.; Åsvold, B.O.; Rich-Edwards, J.W.; Horn, J. The role of cardiovascular risk factors in maternal cardiovascular disease according to offspring birth characteristics in the HUNT study. Sci. Rep.; 2021; 11, 22981. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99478-4]
29. El-Toukhy, T.; Bhattacharya, S.; Akande, V.A. Multiple Pregnancies Following Assisted Conception: Scientific Impact Paper No. 22. BJOG—Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.; 2018; 125, pp. e12-e18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14974]
30. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum. Reprod.; 2000; 15, pp. 1856-1864. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.8.1856]
31. Breitkopf, D.M.; Hill, M. Infertility Workup for the Women’s Health Specialist: ACOG Committee Opinion Summary, Number 781. Obstet. Gynecol.; 2019; 133, pp. 1294-1295. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003272]
32. Verit, F.F.; Yildiz Zeyrek, F.; Zebitay, A.G.; Akyol, H. Cardiovascular risk may be increased in women with unexplained infertility. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med.; 2017; 44, pp. 28-32. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2017.44.1.28]
33. Senapati, S. Infertility: A marker of future health risk in women?. Fertil. Steril.; 2018; 110, pp. 783-789. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.058]
34. Gleason, J.L.; Shenassa, E.D.; Thoma, M.E. Self-reported infertility, metabolic dysfunction, and cardiovascular events: A cross-sectional analysis among U.S. women. Fertil. Steril.; 2019; 111, pp. 138-146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.009]
35. Scipione, C.A.; Koschinsky, M.L.; Boffa, M.B. Lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice: New perspectives from basic and translational science. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci.; 2018; 55, pp. 33-54. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2017.1415866]
36. Enas, E.A.; Varkey, B.; Dharmarajan, T.S.; Pare, G.; Bahl, V.K. Lipoprotein(a): An independent, genetic, and causal factor for cardiovascular disease and acute myocardial infarction. Indian Heart J.; 2019; 71, pp. 99-112. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2019.03.004]
37. Duarte Lau, F.; Giugliano, R.P. Lipoprotein(a) and its Significance in Cardiovascular Disease: A Review. JAMA Cardiol.; 2022; 7, pp. 760-769. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2022.0987]
38. Kamstrup, P.R.; Tybjærg-Hansen, A.; Nordestgaard, B.G. Genetic evidence that lipoprotein(a) associates with atherosclerotic stenosis rather than venous thrombosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.; 2012; 32, pp. 1732-1741. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.248765]
39. Tsimikas, S.; Fazio, S.; Ferdinand, K.C.; Ginsberg, H.N.; Koschinsky, M.L.; Marcovina, S.M.; Moriarty, P.M.; Rader, D.J.; Remaley, A.T.; Reyes-Soffer, G. et al. NHLBI Working Group Recommendations to Reduce Lipoprotein(a)-Mediated Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Aortic Stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.; 2018; 71, pp. 177-192. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.014]
40. Crook, D.; Howell, R.; Sidhu, M.; Edmonds, D.K.; Stevenson, J.C. Elevated serum lipoprotein(a) levels in young women with endometriosis. Metabolism; 1997; 46, pp. 735-739. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0026-0495(97)90115-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9225824]
41. Swetha, R.; Ravi, B.V.; Nalini, K.S. Serum lipoprotein(a) and lipid profile in polycystic ovarian syndrome. J. Clin. Sci. Res.; 2015; 4, pp. 2-6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15380/2277-5706.Jcsr.14.007]
42. Kim, C.J.; Jang, H.C.; Cho, D.H.; Min, Y.K. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on lipoprotein(a) and lipids in postmenopausal women. Arterioscler. Thromb.; 1994; 14, pp. 275-281. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.14.2.275]
43. Harris, H.R.; Titus, L.J.; Cramer, D.W.; Terry, K.L. Long and irregular menstrual cycles, polycystic ovary syndrome, and ovarian cancer risk in a population-based case-control study. Int. J. Cancer; 2017; 140, pp. 285-291. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30441]
44. Reyes-Soffer, G.; Westerterp, M. Beyond Lipoprotein(a) plasma measurements: Lipoprotein(a) and inflammation. Pharmacol. Res.; 2021; 169, 105689. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105689] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34033878]
45. Scherrer, U.; Rimoldi, S.F.; Rexhaj, E.; Stuber, T.; Duplain, H.; Garcin, S.; de Marchi, S.F.; Nicod, P.; Germond, M.; Allemann, Y. et al. Systemic and pulmonary vascular dysfunction in children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies. Circulation; 2012; 125, pp. 1890-1896. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.071183]
46. Mahalingaiah, S.; Sun, F.; Cheng, J.J.; Chow, E.T.; Lunetta, K.L.; Murabito, J.M. Cardiovascular risk factors among women with self-reported infertility. Fertil. Res. Pract.; 2017; 3, 7. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-017-0034-0]
47. Zheng, Y.; Manson, J.E.; Yuan, C.; Liang, M.H.; Grodstein, F.; Stampfer, M.J.; Willett, W.C.; Hu, F.B. Associations of Weight Gain From Early to Middle Adulthood With Major Health Outcomes Later in Life. JAMA; 2017; 318, pp. 255-269. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7092]
48. Nilsson, P.M.; Viigimaa, M.; Giwercman, A.; Cifkova, R. Hypertension and Reproduction. Curr. Hypertens. Rep.; 2020; 22, 29. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11906-020-01036-2]
49. Álvaro, H.; Yunsung, L.; Christian, M.P.; Karoline, H.S.; Siri, E.H.; Per, M.; Pål, R.N.; Ole, A.A.; Elizabeth, C.C.; Alexandra, H. et al. Impaired glucose tolerance and cardiovascular risk factors in relation to infertility: A Mendelian randomization analysis in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study. Hum. Reprod.; 2024; 39, pp. 436-441. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead234]
50. Leischik, R.; Dworrak, B.; Strauß, M.; Przybylek, B.; Dworrak, T.; Schöne, D.; Horlitz, M.; Mügge, A. Plasticity of Health. Ger. J. Med.; 2016; 1, pp. 1-17. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.19209/GJOM000001]
51. Niazi, E.; Dumanski, S.M. Change of HeART: Cardiovascular Implications of Assisted Reproductive Technology. CJC Open; 2023; in press journal pre-proof [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2023.09.008]
52. Walker, M.H.; Tobler, K.J. Female Infertility. StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023.
53. Yatsenko, S.A.; Rajkovic, A. Genetics of human female infertility. Biol. Reprod.; 2019; 101, pp. 549-566. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioz084]
54. Cwikel, J.; Gidron, Y.; Sheiner, E. Psychological interactions with infertility among women. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.; 2004; 117, pp. 126-131. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.05.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15541845]
55. Reshetnik, A.; Gohlisch, C.; Tölle, M.; Zidek, W.; Van Der Giet, M. Oscillometric assessment of arterial stiffness in everyday clinical practice. Hypertens. Res.; 2017; 40, pp. 140-145. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hr.2016.115] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27604342]
56. Del Giorno, R.; Troiani, C.; Gabutti, S.; Stefanelli, K.; Gabutti, L. Comparing oscillometric and tonometric methods to assess pulse wave velocity: A population-based study. Ann. Med.; 2021; 53, pp. 1-16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2020.1794538] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32729734]
57. Saito, M.; Okayama, H.; Inoue, K.; Yoshii, T.; Hiasa, G.; Sumimoto, T.; Nishimura, K.; Ogimoto, A.; Higaki, J. Carotid arterial circumferential strain by two-dimensional speckle tracking: A novel parameter of arterial elasticity. Hypertens. Res.; 2012; 35, pp. 897-902. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hr.2012.39]
58. Podgórski, M.; Grzelak, P.; Kaczmarska, M.; Polguj, M.; Łukaszewski, M.; Stefańczyk, L. Feasibility of two-dimensional speckle tracking in evaluation of arterial stiffness: Comparison with pulse wave velocity and conventional sonographic markers of atherosclerosis. Vascular; 2018; 26, pp. 63-69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1708538117720047]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
The use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) for the treatment of infertility is gaining popularity. Limited data on the overall vascular health of females with history of ART are available. This pilot study aimed to investigate the overall vascular health of females with history of ART compared to individuals who conceived spontaneously. The assessment of overall vascular health included the measurement of brachial blood pressure, central blood pressure, and pulse wave velocity, as well as the evaluation of the arterial stiffness and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) of the common carotid arteries. Conventional blood lipids including lipoprotein a (Lp(a)) were also determined. In total, 45 females with history of ART and 52 females who conceived spontaneously were included (mean age: 47.72 ± 5.96 years vs. 46.84 ± 7.43 years, p = 0.525). An initial comparison revealed a significantly higher prevalence of elevated Lp(a) in ART females (p = 0.011). However, after multiple comparison correction, the significant result disappeared (p = 0.132). Within the cohort of ART females, no significantly higher cardiovascular risk was detected regarding vascular function. The potentially higher prevalence of elevated Lp(a) in ART females must be further investigated in future studies, as it might contribute to the impaired reproductive process in this cohort.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Kramer, Marie 1 ; Sciuk, Franziska 1 ; Kolbinger, Brenda 3 ; Jakob, André 1
; Rogenhofer, Nina 2 ; Dalla-Pozza, Robert 1 ; Thaler, Christian 2 ; Haas, Nikolaus Alexander 1 ; Oberhoffer, Felix Sebastian 1 1 Division of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
2 Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
3 Division of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;