Abstract

This paper evaluates the effectiveness and safety of XEN63 stent, either standalone or in combination with phacoemulsification, in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Eighty eyes from 80 patients with medically uncontrolled POAG were assigned to undergo XEN63 implant. The primary outcome was the surgical success, defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering from preoperative values ≥ 20% and an IOP absolute value between 6 and 18 mmHg, with or without antiglaucoma medications. Forty-three (53.7%) eyes underwent XEN63-standalone and 37(46.2%) eyes a XEN63 + Phacoemulsification procedure. Success rate was 68.8% (55/80) eyes in the overall study sample, 69.8% (30/43) eyes in the XEN63-standalone group; and 67.6% (25/37) eyes in the XEN63 + Phaco group (p = 0.6133). Preoperative IOP was significantly lowered from 22.1 ± 4.9 mmHg and 19.8 ± 3.7 mmHg to 14.7 ± 5.3 mmHg and 13.8 ± 3.4 mmHg in the XEN63-standalone and XEN63 + Phaco groups, respectively (p < 0.0001 each, respectively); without significant differences between them at any of the time-points measured. Preoperative number of ocular-hypotensive drugs was significantly reduced from 2.3 ± 0.8 to 0.3 ± 0.7 drugs, from 2.5 ± 0.7 to 0.3 ± 0.7 drugs; and from 2.0 ± 0.8 to 0.3 ± 0.7 drugs, in the overall, XEN63-standalone, and XEN63 + Phaco groups, respectively. Regarding safety, 3(42.5%) eyes had transient hypotony at some point during the study, although only in one (1.2%) eye was clinically significant. Four (5.0%) eyes underwent a needling, 4 (5.0%) eyes underwent surgical-bleb-revision, 1 (1.2%) eye required a device replacement and 1 (1.2%) eye a device removal due to maculopathy. XEN63, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, significantly lowered IOP and reduced the number of ocular hypotensive medications. The rate of ocular hypotony was relatively high, although it was clinically relevant only in one eye.

Details

Title
Effectiveness and safety of XEN 63 in patients with primary-open-angle glaucoma
Author
Martínez-de-la-Casa, José María 1 ; Marcos-Parra, María Teresa 2 ; Millá-Griñó, Elena 3 ; Laborda, Teresa 4 ; Giménez-Gomez, Rafael 5 ; Larrosa, José Manuel 6 ; Urcola, Aritz 7 ; Teus, Miguel Ángel 8 ; Perucho-Martínez, Susana 9 

 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology and ORL, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Clinico San-Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San-Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.4795.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7667) 
 Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Ophthalmology Department, Alicante, Spain (GRID:grid.411086.a) (ISNI:0000 0000 8875 8879) 
 Ophthalmology Department. Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.410458.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9635 9413) 
 Glaucoma Department. Hospital La Arruzafa, Córdoba, Spain (GRID:grid.410458.c) 
 Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (GRID:grid.411349.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1771 4667) 
 Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain (GRID:grid.411106.3) (ISNI:0000 0000 9854 2756) 
 Araba University Hospital, Ophthalmology Department, Álava, Spain (GRID:grid.411106.3) 
 Alcalá University Hospital, Ophthalmology Department, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.7159.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0239) 
 Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Ophthalmology Department, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.411242.0) (ISNI:0000 0000 8968 2642) 
Pages
4561
Publication year
2024
Publication date
2024
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2931204526
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2024. corrected publication 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.