It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The inspired sinewave technique (IST) is a non-invasive method to measure lung heterogeneity indices (including both uneven ventilation and perfusion or heterogeneity), which reveal multiple conditions of the lung and lung injury. To evaluate the reproducibility and predicted clinical outcomes of IST heterogeneity values, a comparison with a quantitative lung computed tomography (CT) scan is performed. Six anaesthetised pigs were studied after surfactant depletion by saline-lavage. Paired measurements of lung heterogeneity were then taken with both the IST and CT. Lung heterogeneity measured by the IST was calculated by (a) the ratio of tracer gas outputs measured at oscillation periods of 180 s and 60 s, and (b) by the standard deviation of the modelled log-normal distribution of ventilations and perfusions in the simulation lung. In the CT images, lungs were manually segmented and divided into different regions according to voxel density. A quantitative CT method to calculate the heterogeneity (the Cressoni method) was applied. The IST and CT show good Pearson correlation coefficients in lung heterogeneity measurements (ventilation: 0.71, and perfusion, 0.60, p < 0.001). Within individual animals, the coefficients of determination average ventilation (R2 = 0.53) and perfusion (R2 = 0.68) heterogeneity. Strong concordance rates of 98% in ventilation and 89% when the heterogeneity changes were reported in pairs measured by CT scanning and IST methods. This quantitative method to identify heterogeneity has the potential to replicate CT lung heterogeneity, and to aid individualised care in ARDS.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Oxford, Nuffield Division of Anesthetics, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948)
2 University of Oxford, Nuffield Division of Anesthetics, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948); University of Oxford, Department of Engineering and Science, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948)
3 University of Oxford, Nuffield Division of Anesthetics, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948); King’s College London, Centre for Human and Applied Physiology, London, UK (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764); The University of Nebraska Omaha, Department of Biomechanics, Omaha, USA (GRID:grid.266815.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 0775 5412)
4 King’s College London, Centre for Human and Applied Physiology, London, UK (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764)
5 Uppsala University, Hedenstierna Laboratory, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden (GRID:grid.8993.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9457)
6 University of Oxford, Department of Engineering and Science, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948)