It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Taking the return-airway 4204 with roof cutting in Longquan Coal Mine as the engineering background, roof structure, key parameters, and deviatoric stress evolution were studied. Conclusion: The Key Stratum within a 4–8 times mining height is considered as Near Key Stratum. Cutting the roof makes it possible to form a cantilever structure of the Key Stratum on the solid coal side, which is more conducive to the stability of gob-side roadway. During cutting angle of 90–55°, the deviatoric stress increases linearly, and the increase rate is coal pillar > solid coal > roof > floor. While cutting length from 0 to 35 m, the deviatoric stress decreases linearly, and the decreasing range: coal pillar > solid coal > roof > floor. When coal pillar width is from 30 to 4 m, the deviatoric stress of left side and floor presents a “single peak” distribution. The deviatoric stress of coal pillar changes from an asymmetric “double peak” to a bell-shaped distribution, and the deviatoric stress of roof changes from a “single peak” to an asymmetric “double peak” distribution. Under same coal pillar width, the deviatoric stress of left, coal pillar and roof after roof cutting decreases most obviously, followed by the floor. Finally, the coal pillar width is 8 m, the cutting angle is 75°, the cutting length is 20 m, and the hole spacing is 1.0 m. The support scheme is bolt + metal mesh + steel belt + anchor cable combined support. The stable period of roadway is about 10 days.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Henan Polytechnic University, School of Civil Engineering, Jiaozuo, China (GRID:grid.412097.9) (ISNI:0000 0000 8645 6375); Henan Polytechnic University, International Joint Research Laboratory of Henan Province for Underground Space Development and Disaster Prevention, Jiaozuo, China (GRID:grid.412097.9) (ISNI:0000 0000 8645 6375)
2 Henan Polytechnic University, School of Civil Engineering, Jiaozuo, China (GRID:grid.412097.9) (ISNI:0000 0000 8645 6375)
3 The Norman B. Keevil Institute of Mining Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (GRID:grid.17091.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2288 9830)
4 Shandong University of Science and Technology, College of Mining and Safety Engineering, Qingdao, China (GRID:grid.412508.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1799 3811)
5 Xinjiang University, School of Geology and Mining Engineering, Urumqi, China (GRID:grid.413254.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9544 7024)
6 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Los Alamos, USA (GRID:grid.148313.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0428 3079)
7 Université de Lorraine, LEM3 Laboratory, Metz, France (GRID:grid.29172.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2194 6418)