It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Balancing selection has been shown to be common in plants for several different types of traits, such as self-incompatibility and heterostyly. Generally, for these traits balancing selection is generated by interactions among individuals or between individuals and other species (e.g., pathogens or pollinators). However, there are phenotypic polymorphisms in plants that do not obviously involve types of interactions that generate balancing selection. Little is known about the extent to which balancing selection also acts to preserve these polymorphisms. Here we ask whether balancing selection preserves an anther-color polymorphism in Erythronium umbilicatum (Liliaceae). We identified a major gene underlying this polymorphism. We then attempted to detect signatures of balancing selection on that gene by developing a new coalescence test for balancing selection. We found that variation in anther color is in large part caused by variation in a paralog of EuMYB3, an anthocyanin-regulating R2R3-MYB transcription factor. However, we found little evidence for balancing selection having acted historically on EuMYB3. Our results thus suggest that plant polymorphisms, especially those not involved in interactions that are likely to generate negative frequency-dependent selection, may reflect a transient state in which one morph will eventually be fixed by either genetic drift or directional selection. Our results also suggest that regulation of the anthocyanin pathway is more evolutionarily labile than is generally believed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Duke University, Department of Biology, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961); University of Connecticut, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Storrs, USA (GRID:grid.63054.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 0860 4915)
2 Duke University, Department of Biology, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)