It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Basically, the interface shear strength between two concrete layers of varying ages must be sufficient to withstand the applied actions on the structure, specifically fire attack, which may cause the complete collapse of the composite structure. Thus, interfacial shear behavior was investigated and analyzed in this paper under the influence of a set of parameters, including temperature (25, 200, 400, and 600 °C), time exposure (30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min), concrete type, and fibers type (polypropylene fiber (PPF), steel fiber (SF), and hybrid fiber) by employing a Z-shape push-off test. The test consists of two parts with different ages: normal strength concrete (NCS) and high-performance concrete (HPC). HPC includes high-strength concrete (HSC) and fly ash concrete (FAC). Initially, twenty-five Z-shaped push-off tests were made, four of which were cast as one unit (NSC/or concrete with hybrid (FSP)), and the rest were composite specimens. Furthermore, a 3D finite element model of a composite push-off specimen was developed to simulate and analyze the impact of various time and temperature exposures on the interfacial shear strength of composite specimen N-FSP. The results indicated that temperature degree and exposure time adversely affected the interfacial shear strength. Also, interfacial shear strength is significantly influenced by fiber types. Including combined fiber (SF + PPF) improved the interfacial shear strength by 114% compared to the composite specimen NSC-NSC after exposure to a temperature of 600 °C. In contrast, using PPF negatively affected the interfacial shear strength, recording only 84% of the composite specimen NSC-NSC. In addition, the inclusion of supplementary cementitious material enhanced the interfacial shear strength by 60.5% in the NSC-FAC composite specimen with 30% FA, compared to the NSC-NSC specimen. Finally, a finite element (FE) model was proposed with a satisfactory level of accuracy (0.95 to 1.03) in predicting the maximum shear strength. Additionally, the difference between the FE and experimental stiffness was between 0.92 and 1.07.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer