It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Invasive species significantly impact biodiversity and ecosystem services, yet understanding these effects at large spatial scales remains a challenge. Our study addresses this gap by assessing the current and potential future risks posed by 94 invasive species to seven key ecosystem services in Europe. We demonstrate widespread potential impacts, particularly on outdoor recreation, habitat maintenance, crop provisioning, and soil and nitrogen retention. Exposure to invasive species was higher in areas with lower provision of ecosystem services, particularly for regulating and cultural services. Exposure was also high in areas where ecosystem contributions to crop provision and nitrogen retention were at their highest. Notably, regions vital for ecosystem services currently have low invasion suitability, but face an average 77% increase in potential invasion area. Here we show that, while high-value ecosystem service areas at the highest risk represent a small fraction of Europe (0-13%), they are disproportionally important for service conservation. Our study underscores the importance of monitoring and protecting these hotspots to align management strategies with international biodiversity targets, considering both invasion vulnerability and ecosystem service sustainability.
Non-native species may pose a threat not only to native biodiversity, but also to the provision of ecosystem services. Here, the authors quantify the potential impact of invasive species on a set of ecosystem services across Europe.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 CSIC, Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (IPE), Zaragoza, Spain (GRID:grid.452561.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2159 7377); Biosecurity Initiative at St. Catherine’s (BioRISC), Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.452561.1)
2 Unit Ecology & Evolution, University of Fribourg, Department of Biology, Fribourg, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8534.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0478 1713)
3 Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Centro de Investigação em Ciências Geo-Espaciais (CICGE), Porto, Portugal (GRID:grid.5808.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1503 7226)
4 LECA, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble, France (GRID:grid.462909.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0609 8934)
5 University of Cordoba, Campus de Rabanales, Department of Forest Engineering, Córdoba, Spain (GRID:grid.411901.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2183 9102)
6 CSIC, Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (IPE), Zaragoza, Spain (GRID:grid.452561.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2159 7377)
7 University of California, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Irvine, USA (GRID:grid.266093.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7243)
8 CSIC, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD), Sevilla, Spain (GRID:grid.418875.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 1091 6248); University of Sevilla, Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Sevilla, Spain (GRID:grid.9224.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2168 1229)