It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Prediction of rainfall-runoff process, peak discharges, and finally flood hydrograph is essential for flood risk management and river engineering projects. In most previous studies in this field, the precipitation rates have been entered into the models without considering seasonal and monthly distribution. In this study, the daily precipitation data of 144 climatology stations in Iran were used to evaluate the seasonal and monthly pattern of flood-causing precipitation. Then, by determining the rainy seasons and seasonal fit of precipitation with a probabilistic model and using regional precipitation, a semi-distributed conceptual model of rainfall-runoff (MORDOR-SD) was trained and validated using the observed discharge data. Flood prediction was performed using climatic data, modeling of hydrological conditions, and extreme flow data with high performance. According to the results, the Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta coefficients were 0.69 and 0.82 for the mean daily streamflow, 0.98 and 0.98 for the seasonal streamflow, 0.98 and 0.94 for the maximum discharges, and 0.57 and 0.78 for low flows, respectively. Moreover, the maximum daily discharges in different return periods were estimated using the results of the MORDOR-SD model, considering the probability distribution function of the probabilistic model of central precipitation (MEWP), the probabilistic model of adjacent precipitation, and probability distribution function of the previous precipitation. Finally, the extreme flows were predicted and compared using different methods including the SCHADEX, regional flood analysis, GRADEX, and AGREGEE. The results showed that the methods GRADEX, AGREGEE, and SCHADEX have the highest performance in predicting extreme floods, respectively.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Malayer University, Department of Natural Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Malayer, Iran (GRID:grid.459711.f)
2 University of Tehran, Department of Sustainable Resources Engineering, Faculty of Energy and Sustainable Resources Engineering, College of interdisciplinary Sciences and Technologies, Tehran, Iran (GRID:grid.46072.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 0612 7950)
3 University of Tehran, Department of Reclamation of Arid & Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, Karaj, Iran (GRID:grid.46072.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 0612 7950)
4 University of Guilan, Department of Range and Watershed Management and Dept. of Water Eng. and Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, Sowmeh Sara, Iran (GRID:grid.411872.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2087 2250)