It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is a widely employed screening tool for the severity of cognitive impairment. Among the MMSE items, the pentagon copying test (PCT) requires participants to accurately replicate a sample of two interlocking pentagons. While the PCT is traditionally scored on a binary scale, there have been limited developments of granular scoring scale to assess task performance. In this paper, we present a novel three-stage algorithm, called Quantification of Interlocking Pentagons (QIP) which quantifies PCT performance by computing the areas of individual pentagons and their intersection areas, and a balance ratio between the areas of the two individual pentagons. The three stages of the QIP algorithm include: (1) detection of line segments, (2) unraveling of the interlocking pentagons, and (3) quantification of areas. A set of 497 PCTs from 84 participants including their baseline and follow-up PCTs from the Rush Memory and Aging Project was selected blinded about their cognitive and clinical status. Analysis of the quantified data revealed a significant inverse relationship between age and balance ratio (beta = − 0.49, p = 0.0033), indicating that older age was associated with a smaller balance ratio. In addition, balance ratio was associated with perceptual speed (r = 0.71, p = 0.0135), vascular risk factors (beta = − 3.96, p = 0.0269), and medical conditions (beta = − 2.78, p = 0.0389). The QIP algorithm can serve as a useful tool for enhancing the scoring of performance in the PCT.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Michael Reese Foundation Center for Health Equity Research, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.262641.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0388 7807)
2 Rush University Medical Center, Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.240684.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0705 3621)
3 University of Southern California, Department of Family Medicine, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.42505.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 6853); University of Southern California, Department of Neurology, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.42505.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 6853); University of Southern California, Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.42505.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 6853); University of Southern California, School of Gerontology, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.42505.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 6853)
4 Clemson University, Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson, USA (GRID:grid.26090.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0665 0280)