It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Soft bioelectronic devices exhibit motion-adaptive properties for neural interfaces to investigate complex neural circuits. Here, we develop a fabrication approach through the control of metamorphic polymers’ amorphous-crystalline transition to miniaturize and integrate multiple components into hydrogel bioelectronics. We attain an about 80% diameter reduction in chemically cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel fibers in a fully hydrated state. This strategy allows regulation of hydrogel properties, including refractive index (1.37-1.40 at 480 nm), light transmission (>96%), stretchability (139-169%), bending stiffness (4.6 ± 1.4 N/m), and elastic modulus (2.8-9.3 MPa). To exploit the applications, we apply step-index hydrogel optical probes in the mouse ventral tegmental area, coupled with fiber photometry recordings and social behavioral assays. Additionally, we fabricate carbon nanotubes-PVA hydrogel microelectrodes by incorporating conductive nanomaterials in hydrogel for spontaneous neural activities recording. We enable simultaneous optogenetic stimulation and electrophysiological recordings of light-triggered neural activities in Channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice.
Soft elastic materials could be useful in the fabrication of brain-machine interfaces, but achieving the desirable material properties can be challenging. Here, the authors report control of the amorphous-crystalline transition of polymers to alter hydrogel properties and monitor mouse behaviour.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 State University of New York, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Binghamton University, Binghamton, USA (GRID:grid.264260.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2164 4508); University of Massachusetts, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Amherst, USA (GRID:grid.266683.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2166 5835)
2 Michigan State University, Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, East Lansing, USA (GRID:grid.17088.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2195 6501)
3 Michigan State University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, East Lansing, USA (GRID:grid.17088.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2195 6501)
4 University of Massachusetts, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Amherst, USA (GRID:grid.266683.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2166 5835)
5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786)
6 University of Massachusetts, Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Amherst, USA (GRID:grid.266683.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2166 5835)