It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Conventional assumptions about multiphase flow in gas condensate reservoirs often do not correlate with field production. This discrepancy stems from the various mechanisms influencing the multiphase process, which are inadequately represented in numerical models. One of the least understood mechanisms is the influence of the non-equilibrium thermodynamics on the flow in the wellbore region, where the reservoir pressure is below the dew point pressure. To address this problem, experimental and mathematical analyses were conducted using a microfluidic device designed to replicate the flow dynamics in a gas condensate system. The experimental results showed an 11% deviation from the initial pressure of condensate saturation when compared with the conventional assumption of local equilibrium in numerical models. Similarly, there is a 14% deviation between the experimental and simulated volumes of the condensate. These findings underscore the inadequacy of existing models to accurately predict the saturation profile of the condensate phase. A mathematical model based on a relaxation parameter was applied to account for non-equilibrium phase separation and the fog state of the aerosol as observed in the microfluidic experiment. Incorporating a relaxation parameter (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, CPSE, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.454320.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0555 3608)
2 Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, CPSE, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.454320.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0555 3608); LABADVANCE LLC, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.454320.4)
3 Bashkir State University, Ufa, Russia (GRID:grid.77269.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 7624)
4 Ufa State Petroleum Technological University, Ufa, Russia (GRID:grid.446213.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0068 9862)
5 Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia (GRID:grid.446209.d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9203 3563)
6 Institute of Nanotechnology of Microelectronics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.4886.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2192 9124)