It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Multiple randomized controlled studies have compared numerous antibiotic regimens, including new, recently commercialized antibiotics in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (NP). The objective of this Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and the safety of different antibiotic treatments for NP.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases from 2000 through 2021. The study selection included studies comparing antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacilli in the setting of NP. The primary endpoint was 28 day mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical cure, microbiological cure and adverse events.
Results
Sixteen studies encompassing 4993 patients were included in this analysis comparing 13 antibiotic regimens. The level of evidence for mortality comparisons ranged from very low to moderate. No significant difference in 28 day mortality was found among all beta-lactam regimens. Only the combination of meropenem plus aerosolized colistin was associated with a significant decrease of mortality compared to using intravenous colistin alone (OR = 0.43; 95% credible interval [0.17–0.94]), based on the results of the smallest trial included. The clinical failure rate of ceftazidime was higher than meropenem with (OR = 1.97; 95% CrI [1.19–3.45]) or without aerosolized colistin (OR = 1.40; 95% CrI [1.00–2.01]), imipemen/cilastatin/relebactam (OR = 1.74; 95% CrI [1.03–2.90]) and ceftazidime/avibactam (OR = 1.48; 95% CrI [1.02–2.20]). For microbiological cure, no substantial difference between regimens was found, but ceftolozane/tazobactam had the highest probability of being superior to comparators. In safety analyses, there was no significant difference between treatments for the occurrence of adverse events, but acute kidney failure was more common in patients receiving intravenous colistin.
Conclusions
This network meta-analysis suggests that most antibiotic regimens, including new combinations and cefiderocol, have similar efficacy and safety in treating susceptible Gram-negative bacilli in NP. Further studies are necessary for NP caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria.
Registration PROSPERO CRD42021226603
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Pontchaillou Hospital, University Hospital of Rennes, Infectious Diseases and Intensive Care Unit, Rennes Cedex 9, France (GRID:grid.414271.5); Université de Rennes, Inserm U1230, Rennes, France (GRID:grid.410368.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2191 9284)
2 University Hospital of Angers, Intensive Care Unit, Angers, France (GRID:grid.411147.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0283)
3 Angers University Hospital, Laboratory of Hematology, Angers, France (GRID:grid.411147.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0283); INSERM, CRCINA, University of Angers, Angers, France (GRID:grid.7252.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 3363)
4 University Hospital of Tours, Department of Pneumology and Respiratory Functional Exploration, Tours, France (GRID:grid.411167.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1765 1600)
5 Angers University Hospital, Emergency Department, Angers, France (GRID:grid.411147.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0283); University of Angers, UMR MitoVasc CNRS 6015 - INSERM 1083, Angers, France (GRID:grid.7252.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 3363); FCRIN, INNOVTE, Saint Etienne, France (GRID:grid.423797.c)
6 University of Angers, Inserm, CNRS, MINT, SFR ICAT, Angers, France (GRID:grid.7252.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 3363); Angers University Hospital, Methodology and Biostatistics Department, Delegation to Clinical Research and Innovation, Angers, France (GRID:grid.411147.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0283)