Abstract

Background

Multiple randomized controlled studies have compared numerous antibiotic regimens, including new, recently commercialized antibiotics in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (NP). The objective of this Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and the safety of different antibiotic treatments for NP.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases from 2000 through 2021. The study selection included studies comparing antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacilli in the setting of NP. The primary endpoint was 28 day mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical cure, microbiological cure and adverse events.

Results

Sixteen studies encompassing 4993 patients were included in this analysis comparing 13 antibiotic regimens. The level of evidence for mortality comparisons ranged from very low to moderate. No significant difference in 28 day mortality was found among all beta-lactam regimens. Only the combination of meropenem plus aerosolized colistin was associated with a significant decrease of mortality compared to using intravenous colistin alone (OR = 0.43; 95% credible interval [0.17–0.94]), based on the results of the smallest trial included. The clinical failure rate of ceftazidime was higher than meropenem with (OR = 1.97; 95% CrI [1.19–3.45]) or without aerosolized colistin (OR = 1.40; 95% CrI [1.00–2.01]), imipemen/cilastatin/relebactam (OR = 1.74; 95% CrI [1.03–2.90]) and ceftazidime/avibactam (OR = 1.48; 95% CrI [1.02–2.20]). For microbiological cure, no substantial difference between regimens was found, but ceftolozane/tazobactam had the highest probability of being superior to comparators. In safety analyses, there was no significant difference between treatments for the occurrence of adverse events, but acute kidney failure was more common in patients receiving intravenous colistin.

Conclusions

This network meta-analysis suggests that most antibiotic regimens, including new combinations and cefiderocol, have similar efficacy and safety in treating susceptible Gram-negative bacilli in NP. Further studies are necessary for NP caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Registration PROSPERO CRD42021226603

Details

Title
Efficacy and safety of antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacteria in nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
Author
Luque Paz, David 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Chean, Dara 2 ; Tattevin, Pierre 1 ; Luque Paz, Damien 3 ; Bayeh, Betsega Assefa 4 ; Kouatchet, Achille 2 ; Douillet, Delphine 5 ; Riou, Jérémie 6 

 Pontchaillou Hospital, University Hospital of Rennes, Infectious Diseases and Intensive Care Unit, Rennes Cedex 9, France (GRID:grid.414271.5); Université de Rennes, Inserm U1230, Rennes, France (GRID:grid.410368.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2191 9284) 
 University Hospital of Angers, Intensive Care Unit, Angers, France (GRID:grid.411147.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0283) 
 Angers University Hospital, Laboratory of Hematology, Angers, France (GRID:grid.411147.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0283); INSERM, CRCINA, University of Angers, Angers, France (GRID:grid.7252.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 3363) 
 University Hospital of Tours, Department of Pneumology and Respiratory Functional Exploration, Tours, France (GRID:grid.411167.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1765 1600) 
 Angers University Hospital, Emergency Department, Angers, France (GRID:grid.411147.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0283); University of Angers, UMR MitoVasc CNRS 6015 - INSERM 1083, Angers, France (GRID:grid.7252.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 3363); FCRIN, INNOVTE, Saint Etienne, France (GRID:grid.423797.c) 
 University of Angers, Inserm, CNRS, MINT, SFR ICAT, Angers, France (GRID:grid.7252.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 3363); Angers University Hospital, Methodology and Biostatistics Department, Delegation to Clinical Research and Innovation, Angers, France (GRID:grid.411147.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0283) 
Pages
66
Publication year
2024
Publication date
Dec 2024
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
e-ISSN
21105820
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
3046248023
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.