1. Introduction
Bacterial meningitis in neonates is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates [1,2]. Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus, GBS) and Escherichia coli are the most common pathogens that cause 65–78% of all neonatal meningitis, with high mortality rates ranging from 8–13% and 14–25% in term-born and preterm infants, respectively [2,3,4,5,6]. Bacterial meningitis is associated with a high risk of neurological complications, and neonates with meningitis are at high risk of long-term neurological sequelae [5,6,7,8]. Recent reports have found that 42.5–54% of survivors who experience bacterial meningitis during their neonatal period will have various degrees of neurodevelopmental delay in preschool age [9,10].
Most studies regarding neonatal meningitis focus on the microbiology, epidemiology, clinical manifestations and outcomes of GBS diseases, and fewer studies are for E. coli meningitis [3,4,5,6,7,8,11,12,13]. Very few studies have examined the neurological complications of acute bacterial meningitis in neonates [11,12,13]. Subdural empyema, one of the important complications of bacterial meningitis, is characterized by a suppurative collection between the dura mater and the arachnoid mater and a prolonged course of treatment and hospitalization [14,15]. Previous studies have concluded that subdural empyema is a neurosurgical emergency, potentially fatal, requiring a high need for clinical awareness. [14,15,16]. A recent surveillance study found that subdural effusion and/or empyema was noted in 21.7% of pediatric patients with acute bacterial meningitis, accounting for the most common intracranial complications [17]. However, the presence of subdural empyema may be underdiagnosed, and few studies have focused on this issue [18,19,20,21]. In this study, we aimed to describe the clinical features, microbiology, therapeutic strategies and outcomes of neonatal meningitis complicated with subdural empyema from two tertiary level medical centers in Taiwan.
2. Methods
2.1. Patients, Study Design and Settings
Between January 2003 and December 2020, all neonates aged less than 90 days old with documented bacterial meningitis were retrieved from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) database of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) to analyze the presence of subdural empyema after meningitis. Both the Linkou and Kaohsiung NICUs are tertiary-level medical centers located in the north and south of Taiwan, respectively. There are a total of 80 beds equipped with ventilators and 90 beds of special care nurseries. The overall annual admission in the NICUs of Linkou and Kaohsiung CGMH was more than 1000 critically ill and preterm neonates. Neonates with acute bacterial meningitis without subdural empyema were also analyzed as the controls for comparisons. Only cases of primary bacterial meningitis and subdural empyema after primary meningitis were enrolled for analyses. Neonates with central nervous system (CNS) infections after artificial devices, including ventriculoperitoneal shunt, extraventricular drainage and post-neurosurgical CNS infections, were excluded from this study. Cases of subdural empyema after sinusitis, neurosurgery, head injury or other disease entities were not included in this study. The electronic records of patients’ demographics, clinical manifestations, hospital courses, treatments and outcomes were all reviewed and recorded. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of CGMH (certificate no. 202201668B0), and a waiver of informed consent for anonymous data collection was approved.
2.2. Definitions and Data Collection
The presence of subdural empyema was confirmed after a radiologist had examined the neuroimaging studies, which showed a crescent or ellipse-shaped fluid collection in the subdural space. All subdural fluid collections were considered empyema because the sterile subdural fluid collection is mostly noted in chronic disease and rare in neonates. Meningitis was defined based on the criteria of the World Health Organization as the presence of positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures for bacterial pathogens plus clinical signs and symptoms compatible with central nervous system infections [22,23]. In cases with negative CSF culture for bacterial pathogens, the following were considered bacterial meningitis: if the presence of clinical manifestations was compatible with bacterial meningitis plus a positive blood culture and CSF results showing at least one individual marker of bacterial meningitis, including a leukocyte count of more than 2000/μL, a glucose level of less than 34 mg/dL [1.9 mol/L], a ratio of CSF glucose to blood glucose of less than 0.23, or a protein level of more than 220 mg/dL [22]. Severe sepsis, septic shock, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy were defined based on the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [22].
The presence of neurological complications and long-term neurological sequelae in these patients were evaluated based on the definitions of our previous studies [21,24]. In our institute, transcranial sonography was routinely performed for all patients with bacterial meningitis, and brain computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were arranged after the attending physicians’ clinical evaluation, especially when clinical consciousness changed, seizures, abnormal neurological symptoms, or abnormal sonography were noted. The follow-up neuroimaging studies for neonates with bacterial meningitis, including transcranial ultrasound, brain CT scan or MRI, were also decided by the attending physicians, who always closely observed any neurological symptoms or signs or when intracranial abnormalities were suspected. The neurological complications after meningitis and after the onset of subdural empyema were also recorded. The onset of subdural empyema was defined as the day when the first neuroimaging studies identified abnormalities.
All patients’ demographics, clinical manifestations at the onset of meningitis, laboratory findings at the onset of symptoms and treatment course, neurological findings at discharge and final outcomes were recorded. In our institute, survivors of neonatal meningitis were followed by a neurologist after discharge for standard neurological examinations, and serial outcomes were graded according to the validated Pediatric Version of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E Peds) [25]. A favorable outcome was defined as a GOS-E Peds score of 5 (good recovery) and an unfavorable outcome as a score of 1 (indicating death) to 4 (moderate disability). In this study, all mortality cases and neonates with critical discharge on request and those with early signs of cerebral palsy at discharge were considered unfavorable outcomes.
2.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
All the bacterial pathogens that caused neonatal meningitis were tested to check the presence of antibiotic resistance. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with the disk diffusion method, as described in previous studies [26]. For gram-negative bacteria, antibiotic susceptibility patterns were determined according to methods recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for disk diffusion methods and categorical assignment was carried out using CLSI breakpoints [27]. All the following antibiotic susceptibilities were tested against GBS isolates: ampicillin, macrolide, clindamycin, vancomycin, penicillin, cefotaxime and teicoplanin. The guidelines of the CLSI for the disk dilution method were used [27].
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Neonates with subdural empyema after acute bacterial meningitis were in the study group, and those without subdural empyema were also enrolled as controls. The clinical features, microbiology, treatments and outcomes were compared to characterize the cases of subdural empyema in this study. Categorical and continuous variables were expressed as proportions and medians (interquartile, IQR), respectively. The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the categorical variables, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated in the results. The Mann—Whitney U-test and the t-test were used to investigate the differences between continuous variables depending on the distributions of the data. p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
We aimed to investigate the independent risk factor for occurrence of subdural empyema in neonates with acute bacterial meningitis. Associations between patients’ demographic, clinical and molecular characteristics, therapeutic strategies and laboratory results were tested in univariate analyses, and odds ratios (ORs) were used to quantify the strength of associations. Covariates presumed to be associated with final adverse outcomes based on previous studies [3,12,21] and those associated with mortality at p < 0.1 were subsequently entered into the multivariable logistic regression model. All statistical analyses were analyzed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Patients’ Demographics, Microbiology, and Clinical Features
During the study period, a total of 153 neonates with bacterial meningitis were identified from the NICUs of the two medical centers in Taiwan. In the cohort, a total of 27 neonates (17.6%) had subdural empyema after acute bacterial meningitis. Neonates with subdural empyema after bacterial meningitis had comparable demographics with those without subdural empyema after bacterial meningitis (Table 1). The median gestational age and birth body weight in the cases were 37.3 ± 2.09 weeks and 2826 ± 535.9 g, respectively. Only a few cases of neonates (29.6%, n = 8) were preterm (GA < 37 weeks), and only 22.2% (n = 6) cases were low birth weight infants (BBW < 2500 g). The median age at onset and diagnosis of bacterial meningitis and subdural empyema was 30 (21.0–47.0) [Interquartile range (IQR)] and 38 (25.0–60.0) days old, respectively. The average occurrence of subdural empyema from the onset of acute meningitis was 9.6 ± 4.7 days. There were 3 (11.1%) cases of early-onset disease (EOS, onset at age ≤ 7 days old) and 24 (88.9%) cases occurred between 7–90 days old (late-onset disease, [LOS]). Most patients were inborn, and only 11.1% (n = 3) were transferred from other hospitals.
In the overall cohort of neonates with meningitis, 92.8% (n = 142) patients had a positive CSF culture and 128 (83.7%) neonates had concurrent bacteremia (positive blood culture). All neonates with subdural empyema had positive CSF cultures. The pathogen distributions of cases with subdural empyema were similar to that of neonatal meningitis. A total of 44.4% (n = 12) of cases were caused by group B Streptococcus (GBS), and 33.3% (n = 9) were caused by E coli. Other pathogens included Klebsiella spp. (7.4%, n = 2), Staphylococcus aureus (7.4%, n = 2), Salmonella (3.7%, n = 1), and Pseudomonas spp. (3.7%, n = 1). Most neonates (88.9%, n = 24) with subdural empyema had concurrent bacteremia at the onset of bacterial meningitis, and all of the blood cultures were the same as those identified in the CSF culture. All neonates with meningitis had a cranial sonography examination following bacterial meningitis, and cranial imaging studies were performed in 98 (64.1%) of 153 patients, and the median (IQR) days between the lumbar puncture and first neuroimaging was 12.5 (7.0–18.0) days.
At the onset of subdural empyema, which was defined when the first brain imaging studies were found to have the typical crescent- or ellipse-shaped fluid collections (Figure 1), most patients had a fever (85.2%), seizure (81.5%), feeding difficulties (66.7%) and respiratory symptoms (63.0%). Most clinical manifestations were not significantly different between neonates with subdural empyema and the controls. The laboratory results were also comparable between neonates with subdural empyema and those with meningitis but no subdural empyema. As to the CSF examinations, neonates with subdural empyema had a significantly higher white blood cell count, a lower glucose value, and a higher protein value than the controls (p = 0.014, 0.004 and 0.015, respectively) (Table 1).
3.2. Therapeutic Courses and Neurological Complications
In neonates with subdural empyema after bacterial meningitis, the common manifestations were persistent symptoms despite appropriate antibiotic treatment (n = 27, 100%). Neonates had persistent fever, seizure, and sometimes clinical deteriorations, including septic shock, respiratory failure and decreased level of consciousness. However, none of the cases had transtentorial cerebral herniation, pupil dilation or abnormal posturing during the hospitalization. In our institute, ampicillin plus cefotaxime or vancomycin plus cefotaxime were usually prescribed as empiric antibiotics, and modification of therapeutic antibiotics depended on the CSF culture results and the attending physicians’ decisions. Because only 11.1% (n = 3) of neonates with subdural empyema had antibiotic-resistant pathogens that required modification of initially prescribed antibiotics, none of the cohort cases had delayed treatment with adequate antibiotics. During the therapeutic courses, neonates with subdural empyema were significantly more likely to have neurological complications than those without subdural empyema, especially seizure, subdural effusion and periventricular leukomalacia (Table 2).
3.3. Therapeutic Strategies and Final Outcomes
The time course of all neonates with subdural empyema is summarized in Figure 2. The duration of antibiotic use was significantly longer in neonates with subdural empyema than in cases of bacterial meningitis but no subdural empyema [median (IQR) 27.0 (24.0–65.0) days vs. 22.0 (19.5–55.0) days, p < 0.001]. There were two patients (7.4%) who died, and the mortality rate was not significantly higher. Surgical interventions were arranged in all neonates with subdural empyema. At discharge, 56.0% (14 out of 25) of the survivors had neurological sequelae, which was comparable with those without subdural empyema.
We aimed to investigate whether the presence of subdural empyema was independently associated with final adverse outcomes, which included those with in-hospital mortality and neurological sequelae at discharge (Table 3). Preterm neonates (GA < 37 weeks) had a significantly higher risk of worse outcomes than term-born neonates. Variables characterizing neonates with early-onset disease, seizure at onset (defined as seizure attack within 48 h after onset of meningitis), respiratory failure and septic shock, and presence of subdural empyema that required surgical intervention were entered into the multivariable regression model. After multivariate logistic regression analyses, the independent risk factors for final adverse outcomes in neonates with acute bacterial meningitis were seizure at onset (OR, 2.45; 95% CI: 1.15–4.56, p = 0.013) and early-onset sepsis (OR, 3.38; 95% CI: 1.10–8.04, p = 0.027).
4. Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize subdural empyema in neonates after acute bacterial meningitis, although some case series can be found in the literature [15,18,19]. This study shows that subdural empyema complicates 18% of all neonates with bacterial meningitis. It has been well known that most neonates with bacterial meningitis have neurological complications, and nearly half of the survivors have long-term neurological sequela. However, we found that neonates with subdural empyema had comparable final outcomes when compared with the controls, similar to those reported in the literature [14,20,28,29,30]. The diagnosis of subdural empyema was often delayed when neonates were on antibiotic treatment, and some of the neurological complications were noted even several weeks after the onset of neonatal meningitis. Therefore, continuous monitoring and high alertness of relevant symptoms and signs are important for clinicians.
The pathogen distributions of neonates with subdural empyema after bacterial meningitis in the cohort were similar to those of neonatal meningitis [4,5,6,8,12], and none of our cases had multiple microorganisms isolated. Previous studies found Streptococcus agalactiae, Listeria monocytogenes and Enterobacteriaceae to be important pathogens of subdural empyema in neonates with bacterial meningitis [29,31,32], although some important pathogens, including Haemophilus influenza type b, S. aureus, Salmonella spp. and Neisseria meningitis have been reported in the literature [15,18,19,33]. The incidence of neonatal GBS sepsis has declined in the past decade, mostly due to current infection control and preventive strategies that have worked successfully to reduce maternal colonization and vertical transmission [7,34]. We found that Gram-negative bacilli have become important pathogens of neonatal meningitis [21,31]. Most of the Gram-negative bacteria were antibiotic-susceptible, and initial inadequate antibiotic treatment was rare in our cases at the onset of meningitis. Therefore, we do not conclude that the occurrence of subdural empyema is related to initial delayed antibiotic treatment and suggest it occurs spontaneously. Additionally, we also found that timely surgical decompression was the most important factor; initial antibiotic management was not associated with final outcomes, which was similar to previous studies [14,20,29].
The clinical features of our cases with subdural empyema were compatible with those reported in the literature [20,23,35]. A recent study concluded that subdural empyema should be considered in patients with persistent fever while on adequate antibiotic therapy or above 4.65 protein-to-glucose ratio in the CSF [16]. Among all meningitis-related complications, subdural empyema was often identified earlier [21]. In adult patients, subdural empyema should be suspected when clinical deterioration is noted within the first 8 h after lumbar puncture [36]. However, local expansion of the empyema that caused brain shift or transtentorial cerebral herniation was rarely observed in our cases. Only one of the cases of subdural empyema after severe subdural effusion had mild brain shift (Figure 3). Therefore, the initial presentations can be subtle. A decision must be made for highly suspicious presentations to arrange intracranial images or continuous monitoring, which is necessary for prompt intervention after early diagnosis [23,24].
In our cohort, cases of subdural empyema had a higher WBC count, lower glucose level and higher protein level, which indicated more severe intracranial inflammation [6,16,37]. Most of the subdural empyema were direct bacterial invasions, and it is reasonable that these patients were more likely to have concurrent bacteremia, more severe clinical manifestations and neurological sequelae at discharge. Based on our experience, when more abnormal CSF data, fever, and early seizure were noted in neonates with bacterial meningitis, subdural empyema should be considered, and cranial images should be arranged.
Most of the cases with subdural empyema were treated with combined antibiotics and surgical intervention in the literature [14,15,16,19]. However, there have been cases suc-cessfully treated with a long period of antibiotics plus less invasive treatments, including aspiration, subdural washout, and drainage [20,30,38]. Another study found that 20% of children with intra-cranial abscesses received only antibiotics [39]. Although surgical interventions were performed on all our cases and final favorable outcomes were achieved, an antibiotics-only strategy should be considered in deep-seated lesions or unstable patients [40].
Some limitations in this study need to be addressed. The cohort was only from two medical centers in Taiwan, and a population-based surveillance study or data from a national database would better contribute to the generalization of the conclusions to other institutes and countries. Contrast-enhanced brain imaging is required to differentiate subdural effusion from subdural empyema, but some of our patients had only non-enhanced imaging examinations and may have been misdiagnosed with subdural empyema. Because the study period was long, the therapeutic strategies were not unified and may have been changed. Therefore, some biases are inevitable in the study. Additionally, the number of cases in this study was not adequate for performing the logistic regression analyses, and we were unable to perform the subgroup analyses as in previous studies. We suggest that further nationwide routinely collected databases related to subdural empyema after neonatal meningitis are warranted in the future.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, subdural empyema is not uncommon in neonates with acute bacterial meningitis. It will cause significant neurological sequelae, although neonates with subdural empyema after acute bacterial meningitis did not have a significantly higher mortality rate in the cohort. Because most cases of subdural empyema occur several days or even weeks after the onset of meningitis, continuous monitoring of neonates with bacterial meningitis is important, which also can help the early diagnosis of other neurological complications. We found that prompt surgical intervention and prolonged use of antibiotics may help guarantee a favorable outcome. Early identification of clinical signs associated with the occurrence of long-term neurological sequelae and validation of a predictive scoring model for neonates with bacterial meningitis are warranted in the future.
Conceptualization: W.-J.L., J.-F.H. and M.-H.T. Data collection and verification: W.-J.L., J.-F.H., S.-M.C., H.-R.H., C.-C.C., J.-F.H. and M.-C.C. Formal analysis: M.-C.C., J.-F.H., S.-M.C., C.-W.L. and P.-H.Y. Funding acquisition: J.-F.H., C.-W.L. and M.-H.T. Investigation: J.-F.H., H.-R.H., and C.-C.C. Methodology: C.-W.L., S.-M.C., H.-R.H. and M.-C.C. Supervision: M.-H.T. and M.-C.O.-Y. Writing—original draft: W.-J.L. and M.-C.O.-Y. Writing—review and editing: M.-C.O.-Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (certificate no. 202201668B0), with a waiver for informed consent because all patient records and information were anonymized and deidentified prior to analysis.
Not applicable.
The datasets used/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
All authors thank Chiao-Ching Chiang for keeping the database of our NICU, and all nursing staff working in our NICUs for keeping extremely detailed patient records, which contributed greatly to the completion of this research.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CI: confidence interval; CC: clonal complex; CGMH: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; EOD: Early-onset disease; GBS: Group B Streptococcus; IAP: intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis; LOD: late-onset disease; MLST: multilocus sequence typing; ST: sequence type; OR: odds ratio; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; TPN: total parenteral nutrition; VAP: ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. CTs of empyema complicated by bacterial meningitis in neonates. The axial CT of a neonate with bacterial meningitis with subdural empyema. This patient had a mild brain midline shift.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. The time course of all neonates with subdural empyema, including the onset of meningitis, first neuroimaging, diagnosis of subdural empyema, and treatment courses, including surgical intervention and antibiotic treatment. The star indicates the day of the two mortality cases.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. The MRI of a 3-month-old neonate with E. coli meningitis showed progressive bilateral subdural effusion (A). The apparent diffusion coefficient-weighted (B) and diffusion-weighted (C) MRIs of a subdural empyema over the left convexity are also noted.
Patient demographics and clinical features of neonates with subdural empyema after bacterial meningitis and those without subdural empyema from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH), 2003–2020.
| All Cases | Cases with Subdural Empyema after Meningitis (Total n = 27) | Neonates with Bacterial Meningitis (Total n = 126) | p Values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age, (week) | 38.0 (36.0–39.0) | 37.0 (36.0–38.0) | 38.0 (36.8–40.0) | 0.314 |
| Birth body weight, (g) | 2890.0 (2490–3227.5) | 2870.0 (2500–3050) | 2890.0 (2464.0–3240.0) | 0.698 |
| Gender, (male/female, n/%) | 82 (53.6)/71 (46.4) | 15 (55.6)/12 (44.4) | 67 (53.2)/59 (46.8) | 0.836 |
| Birth by NSD/Cesarean section, n (%) | 104 (68.0)/49 (32.0) | 18 (66.7)/9 (33.3) | 86 (68.2)/40 (31.7) | 0.514 |
| 5 min Apgar score < 7, n (%) | 15 (9.8) | 3 (11.1) | 12 (9.5) | 0.628 |
| Premature rupture of membrane, n (%) | 27 (17.6) | 5 (18.5) | 22 (17.5) | 0.697 |
| Onset of bacterial meningitis (day), median (IQR) | 30.0 (13.0–69.5) | 30.0 (21.0–47.0) | 36.0 (11.0–82.0) | 0.476 |
| Early-onset sepsis (≤7 days), n (%) | 27 (17.6) | 3 (11.1) | 24 (19.0) | |
| Late-onset sepsis (8–90 days), n (%) | 126 (82.4) | 24 (88.9) | 102 (81.0) | |
| Clinical features *, n (%) | ||||
| Fever (≥38.3 °C) | 110 (71.9) | 23 (85.2) | 87 (69.0) | 0.025 |
| Seizure (within 3 days after onset of meningitis) | 62 (40.5) | 22 (81.5) | 40 (31.7) | <0.001 |
| Apnea, bradycardia and/or cyanosis | 91 (59.5) | 17 (63.0) | 74 (58.7) | 0.245 |
| Ventilator requirement | 0.131 | |||
| Room air | 62 (40.5) | 10 (37.0) | 52 (41.3) | |
| Nasal canula | 9 (5.9) | 3 (11.1) | 6 (4.8) | |
| Non-invasive ventilator (N-CPAP and N-IMV) | 16 (10.4) | 4 (14.8) | 12 (9.5) | |
| Intubation | 56 (36.6) | 7 (25.9) | 49 (38.9) | |
| High-frequency oscillatory ventilator | 10 (6.5) | 3 (11.1) | 7 (5.5) | 0.053 |
| Abdominal distension and/or vomiting | 92 (60.1) | 18 (66.7) | 74 (58.7) | 0.520 |
| Hypoglycemia | 26 (17.0) | 5 (18.5) | 21 (16.6) | 0.782 |
| Hypotension | 54 (35.1) | 12 (44.4) | 42 (33.3) | 0.277 |
| Severe sepsis | 73 (47.7) | 16 (59.3) | 57 (45.2) | 0.133 |
| Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy | 31 (20.3) | 7 (25.9) | 24 (19.0) | 0.286 |
| Requirement of blood transfusion ** | 89 (58.2) | 19 (70.4) | 70 (55.6) | 0.114 |
| Laboratory data at onset of GBS bacteremia, n (%) | ||||
| Leukocytosis (WBC > 20,000/L) | 79 (51.6) | 18 (66.7) | 61 (48.4) | 0.065 |
| Leukopenia (WBC < 4000/L) | 52 (34.0) | 9 (33.3) | 43 (34.1) | 1.000 |
| Shift to left in WBC (immature > 20%) | 35 (22.9) | 8 (29.6) | 27 (21.4) | 0.247 |
| Anemia (hemoglobin level < 11.5 g/dL) | 80 (52.3) | 16 (59.3) | 64 (50.8) | 0.279 |
| Thrombocytopenia (platelet < 150,000/uL) | 42 (27.5) | 8 (29.6) | 34 (27.0) | 0.474 |
| Metabolic acidosis | 54 (35.3) | 11 (40.7) | 43 (34.1) | 0.329 |
| Coagulopathy | 52 (34.0) | 11 (40.7) | 41 (32.5) | 0.274 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/dL), median (IQR) | 121.0 (50.6–187.4) | 116.5 (70.0–155.5) | 108.0 (52.5–179.8) | 0.616 |
| Cerebrospinal fluid examinations | ||||
| WBC count (/L), median (IQR) | 32.2 (11.5–480.0) | 300.0 (50.0–2593.8) | 25.9 (10.8–380.0) | 0.011 |
| Protein level (mg/dL), median (IQR) | 274.6 (111.6–417.2) | 333.0 (275.5–493.5) | 233.0 (92.7–370.0) | 0.006 |
| Glucose level (mg/dL), median (IQR) | 31.0 (7.0–52.0) | 12.0 (5.0–30.5) | 37.5 (12.8–54.3) | 0.003 |
| Pathogens | 0.189 | |||
| Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) | 54 (35.3) | 12 (44.4) | 42 (33.3) | |
| E. coli | 39 (25.5) | 9 (33.3) | 30 (23.8) | |
| Other gram-negative bacilli | 28 (18.3) | 4 (14.8) | 24 (19.0) | |
| Other gram-positive cocci | 21 (13.7) | 2 (7.4) | 19 (15.1) | |
| CSF culture-negative cases | 11 (7.2) | 0 (0) | 11 (8.7) |
All p values are the comparisons between neonates with subdural empyema after bacterial meningitis and those without subdural empyema; All data are expressed as numbers (%) or medians (IQR); * At the onset of bacterial meningitis; ** Including leukocyte, poor red blood cell, platelet transfusion and correlation of coagulopathy and/or disseminated intravascular coagulopathy; IQR: interquartile range; WBC: white blood cell count; N-CPAP: nasal continuous positive airway pressure; N-IMV: non-invasive mechanical ventilation.
Neurological complications and final outcomes in neonates with subdural empyema after bacterial meningitis and those without subdural empyema in CGMH, 2003–2020.
| Neurological Complications, Sequelae and Death | Neonates with Subdural Empyema after Meningitis (n = 27) | Neonates with Bacterial Meningitis (n = 126) | p Values |
|---|---|---|---|
| Any neurological complications | 27 (100.0) | 98 (77.8) | <0.001 |
| Seizure with anti-convulsants at discharge | 23 (85.2) | 44 (34.9) | <0.001 |
| Subdural effusion | 22 (81.5) | 42 (33.3) | <0.001 |
| Increased intracranial pressure | 8 (29.6) | 32 (25.4) | 0.636 |
| Ventriculomegaly | 14 (51.9) | 48 (38.1) | 0.280 |
| Hydrocephalus | 8 (29.6) | 23 (18.3) | 0.196 |
| Encephalomalacia | 4 (14.8) | 11 (8.7) | 0.335 |
| Subependymal hemorrhage | 2 (7.4) | 21 (16.7) | 0.222 |
| Intraventricular hemorrhage | 2 (7.4) | 12 (9.5) | 0.663 |
| Ventriculitis | 3 (11.1) | 13 (10.3) | 0.903 |
| Periventricular leukomalacia | 7 (25.9) | 4 (3.2) | 0.001 |
| Infarction | 3 (11.1) | 9 (7.1) | 0.486 |
| Brain atrophy | 1 (3.7) | 2 (1.6) | 0.187 |
| Discharge with neurological sequelae | 14 (56.6) | 54 (47.8) | 0.260 |
| Final mortality * | 2 (7.4) | 13 (10.3) | 0.463 |
All data are expressed as numbers (%); * Including cases of critical discharge at the family’s request.
Risk factors for final unfavorable outcomes (death or major neurological sequelae at discharge) by univariate and multivariate analyses for neonates with bacterial meningitis.
| Parameters | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p Value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p Value | |
| Preterm birth (GA < 37 weeks) | 2.28 (1.08–4.81) | 0.030 | 1.83 (0.76–4.25) | 0.194 |
| Septic shock | 2.11 (1.01–4.39) | 0.047 | 1.99 (0.58–6.84) | 0.282 |
| Respiratory failure (requirement of intubation) | 2.53 (1.12–5.74) | 0.026 | 1.35 (0.39–4.78) | 0.712 |
| Concurrent bacteremia | 0.78 (0.41–1.50) | 0.462 | ||
| GBS versus gram-negative bacilli | 0.74 (0.38–1.67) | 0.862 | ||
| High protein level in CSF | 0.93 (0.46–1.87) | 0.835 | ||
| Early-onset sepsis | 4.26 (1.51–12.04) | 0.006 | 3.38 (1.10–8.04) | 0.027 |
| The presence of subdural empyema | 1.72 (0.83–3.55) | 0.218 | 1.42 (0.87–2.56) | 0.356 |
| Seizure at onset | 2.48 (1.28–4.81) | 0.007 | 2.45 (1.15–4.56) | 0.013 |
| Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 150,000/μL) | 0.89 (0.41–1.91) | 0.762 | ||
GA: gestational age; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
References
1. Basmaci, R.; Bonacorsi, S.; Bidet, P.; Biran, V.; Aujard, Y.; Bingen, E.; Béchet, S.; Cohen, R.; Levy, C. Escherichia coli meningitis features in 325 children from 2001 to 2013 in France. Clinical. Infect. Dis.; 2016; 61, pp. 779-786. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ367] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25944342]
2. Okike, I.O.; Johnson, A.P.; Henderson, K.L.; Blackburn, R.M.; Muller-Pebody, B.; Ladhani, S.N.; Anthony, M.; Ninis, N.; Heath, P.T. Incidence, etiology, and outcome of bacterial meningitis in infants aged < 90 days in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland: Prospective, enhanced, national population-based surveillance. Clin. Infect. Dis.; 2014; 59, pp. e150-e157. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24997051]
3. Okike, I.O.; Ladhani, S.N.; Johnson, A.P.; Henderson, K.L.; Blackburn, R.M.; Muller-Pebody, B.; Cafferkey, M.; Anthony, M.; Ninis, N.; Heath, P.T. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for poor outcome in infants less than 90 days of age with bacterial meningitis in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.; 2018; 37, pp. 837-843. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000001917] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29384979]
4. Erickson, T.A.; Munoz, F.M.; Troisi, C.L.; Nolan, M.S.; Hasbun, R.; Brown, E.L.; Murray, K.O. The epidemiology of meningitis in infants under 90 days of age in a large pediatric hospital. Microorganisms; 2021; 9, 526. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9030526]
5. Liu, Y.; Zhu, M.; Fu, X.; Cai, J.; Chen, S.; Lin, Y.; Jiang, N.; Chen, S.; Lin, Z. Escherichia coli causing neonatal meningitis during 2001–2020: A study in Eastern China. Int. J. Gen. Med.; 2021; 14, pp. 3007-3016. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S317299]
6. Ouchenir, L.; Renaud, C.; Khan, S.; Bitnun, A.; Boisvert, A.-A.; McDonald, J.; Bowes, J.; Brophy, J.; Barton, M.; Ting, J. et al. The epidemiology, management, and outcomes of bacterial meningitis in infants. Pediatrics; 2017; 140, e20170476. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-0476]
7. Tavares, T.; Pinho, L.; Bonifacio Andrade, E. Group B Streptococcal neonatal meningitis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.; 2022; 35, e0007921. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00079-21] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35170986]
8. Wong, C.H.; Duque, J.R.; Wong, J.S.C.; Chan, C.M.V.; Lam, C.S.I.; Fu, Y.M.; Cheong, K.N.; Chua, G.T.; Lee, P.P.; Ip, P. et al. Epidemiology and trends of infective meningitis in neonates and infants less than 3 months old in Hong Kong. Int. J. Infect. Dis.; 2021; 111, pp. 288-294. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.025]
9. Sewell, E.; Roberts, J.; Mukhopadhyay, S. Association of infection in neonates and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. Clin. Perinatol.; 2021; 48, pp. 251-261. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2021.03.001]
10. Christie, D.; Rashid, H.; El-Bashir, H.; Sweeney, F.; Shore, T.; Booy, R.; Viner, R.M. Impact of meningitis on intelligence and development: A systemic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE; 2017; 12, e0175024. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175024]
11. Kralik, S.F.; Kukreja, M.K.; Paldino, M.J.; Desai, N.K.; Vallejo, J.G. Comparison of CSF and MRI findings among neonates and infants with E coli or group B Streptococcal meningitis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.; 2019; 40, pp. 1413-1417. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6134] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31320464]
12. El-Naggar, W.; Afifi, J.; McMillan, D.; Toye, J.; Ting, J.; Yoon, E.W.; Shah, P.S. Epidemiology of meningitis in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.; 2019; 38, pp. 476-480. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000002247] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30986789]
13. Zhu, N.; Liu, W.; Prakash, A.; Zhang, C.; Kim, K.S. Targeting E coli invasion of the blood-brain barrier for investigating the pathogenesis and therapeutic development of E coli meningitis. Cell. Microbiol.; 2020; 22, e13231. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cmi.13231]
14. Muzumdar, D.; Biyani, N.; Deopujari, C. Subdural empyema in children. Childs Nerv. Syst.; 2018; 34, pp. 1881-1887. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-3907-6]
15. Ray, S.; Riordan, A.; Tawil, M.; Mallucci, C.; Jauhari, P.; Solomon, T.; Kneen, R. Subdural empyema caused by Neisseria meningitides: A case report and review of the literature. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.; 2016; 35, pp. 1156-1159. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000001252]
16. Yalcinkaya, R.; Tanir, G.; Kaman, A.; Oz, F.N.; Aydin Teke, T.; Yasar Durmus, S.; Ekşioğlu, A.S.; Aycan, A.E.; Ceyhan, M. Pediatric subdural empyema as a complication of meningitis: Could CSF protein/CSF glucose ratio be used to screen for subdural empyema?. Eur. J. Pediatr.; 2021; 180, pp. 415-423. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03791-5]
17. Wang, C.; Xu, H.; Liu, G.; Liu, J.; Yu, H.; Chen, B.; Zheng, G.; Shu, M.; Du, L.; Xu, Z. et al. A Multicenter Epidemiological and Pathogenic Characteristics Study of Community-Acquired Bacterial Meningitis Children in China: Results from the Chinese Pediatric Bacterial Meningitis Surveillance (CPBMS) 2019–2020. Infect. Drug Resist.; 2023; 16, pp. 6587-6601. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S413147] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37849791]
18. Keus, A.M.J.; Peeters, D.D.; Bekker, V.V.; Veldkamp, K.E.K.; Lambregts, M.M.; Bolt-Wieringa, J.J.; Steggerda, S.S. Neonatal Meningitis and Subdural Empyema Caused by an Unusual Pathogen. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.; 2019; 38, pp. e329-e331. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000002482]
19. Williams, V.; Lakshmikantha, K.M.; Nallasamy, K.; Sudeep, K.C.; Baranwal, A.K.; Jayashree, M. Subdural empyema due to Salmonella paratyphi B in an infant: A case report and review of literature. Childs Nerv. Syst.; 2018; 34, pp. 2317-2320. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-3825-7]
20. Lundy, P.; Kaufman, C.; Garcia, D.; Partington, M.D.; Grabb, P.A. Intracranial subdural empyemas and epidural abscesses in children. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr.; 2019; 24, pp. 14-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2019.1.PEDS18434]
21. Hsu, M.H.; Hsu, J.F.; Kuo, H.C.; Lai, M.Y.; Chiang, M.C.; Lin, Y.J.; Huang, H.-R.; Chu, S.-M.; Tsai, M.-H. Neurological Complications in Young Infants with Acute Bacterial Meningitis. Front. Neurol.; 2018; 9, 903. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00903]
22. van de Beek, D.; Cabellos, C.; Dzupova, O.; Esposito, S.; Klein, M.; Kloek, A.T.; Leib, S.; Mourvillier, B.; Ostergaard, C.; Pagliano, P. et al. ESCMID guideline: Diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.; 2016; 22, (Suppl. S3), pp. S37-S62. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.01.007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27062097]
23. Xing, X.W.; Zhang, J.T.; Ma, Y.B.; He, M.W.; Yao, G.E.; Wang, W.; Qi, X.-K.; Chen, X.-Y.; Wu, L.; Wang, X.-L. et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for diagnosis of infectious encephalitis and meningitis: A large, prospective case series of 213 patients. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2020; 10, 88. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00088] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32211343]
24. Lin, C.; Chu, S.M.; Wang, H.C.; Yang, P.H.; Huang, H.R.; Chiang, M.C.; Fu, R.H.; Tsai, M.H.; Hsu, J.F. Complicated Streptococcus agalactiae sepsis with/without meningitis in young infants and newborns: The clinical and molecular characteristics and outcomes. Microorganisms; 2021; 9, 2094. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102094] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683413]
25. Beers, S.R.; Wisniewski, S.R.; Garcia-Filion, P.; Tian, Y.; Hahner, T.; Berger, R.P.; Bell, M.J.; Adelson, P.D. Validity of a pediatric version of the Glasgow Outcomes Scale-Extended. J. Neurotrauma; 2012; 29, pp. 1126-1139. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.2272]
26. Matuschek, E.; Ahman, J.; Webster, C.; Kahlmeter, G. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin-evolution of seven commercial MIC products against standard broth microdilution for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.; 2018; 24, pp. 865-870. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.11.020] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29221995]
27.
28. Tibussek, D.; Sinclair, A.; Yau, I.; Teatero, S.; Fittipaldi, N.; Richardson, S.E.; Mayatepek, E.; Jahn, P.; Askalan, R. Late-onset group B streptococcal meningitis has cerebrovascular complications. J. Pediatr.; 2015; 166, pp. 1187-1192.e1. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.02.014] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25919727]
29. Liu, Z.H.; Chen, N.Y.; Tu, P.H.; Lee, S.T.; Wu, C.T. The treatment and outcome of postmeningitic subdural empyema in infants. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr.; 2010; 6, pp. 38-42. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2010.4.PEDS09433]
30. Kanu, O.O.; Esezobor, C.I.; Ojo, O.A.; Asoegwu, C.N.; Nnoli, C.; Dawang, Y.; Temiye, E. Infantile supratentorial subdural empyema managed by percutaneous aspiration: An outcome study in a Nigerian city. Sudan. J. Paediatr.; 2019; 19, pp. 37-43. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24911/SJP.106-1520470056]
31. Ou-Yang, M.C.; Tsai, M.H.; Chu, S.M.; Chen, C.C.; Yang, P.H.; Huang, H.R.; Chang, C.-M.; Fu, R.-H.; Hsu, J.-F. The Clinical Characteristics, Microbiology and Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes in Neonates with Gram-Negative Bacillary Meningitis. Antibiotics; 2023; 12, 1131. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12071131]
32. Mashau, R.C.; Meiring, S.T.; Dramowski, A.; Magobo, R.E.; Quan, V.C.; Perovic, O.; von Gottberg, A.; Cohen, C.; Velaphi, S.; van Schalkwyk, E. et al. Culture-confirmed neonatal bloodstream infections and meningitis in South Africa, 2014–2019: A cross-sectional study. Lancet Glob. Health; 2022; 10, pp. e1170-e1178. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00246-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35839815]
33. Wu, H.M.; Huang, W.Y.; Lee, M.L.; Yang, A.D.; Chaou, K.P.; Hsieh, L.-Y. Clinical features, acute complications, and outcome of Salmonella meningitis in children under one year of age in Taiwan. BMC Infect. Dis.; 2011; 11, 30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-30] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21272341]
34. Hsu, J.F.; Lu, J.J.; Chu, S.M.; Lee, W.J.; Huang, H.R.; Chiang, M.C.; Yang, P.-H.; Tsai, M.-H. The Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Streptococcus agalactiae Meningitis in Neonates. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2023; 24, 15387. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015387] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37895067]
35. Wu, T.J.; Chiu, N.C.; Huang, F.Y. Subdural empyema in children-20-year experience in a medical center. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect.; 2008; 41, pp. 62-67. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18327428]
36. Jim, K.K.; Brouwer, M.C.; van der Ende, A.; van de Beek, D. Subdural empyema in bacterial meningitis. Neurology; 2012; 79, pp. 2133-2139. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182752d0e]
37. Shahan, B.; Choi, E.Y.; Nieves, G. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Am. Fam. Physician; 2021; 103, pp. 422-428. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33788511]
38. Jolayemi, E.O.; Bankole, O.B.; Ojo, O.A.; Bamigboye, B.; Adebayo, B.O.; Arekhandia, B.J.; Asoegwu, C.N.; Alabi, O.I.; Ifezue, U.C.; Nwawolo, C.C. et al. Contemporary management of intracranial subdural empyema: An institutional experience. J. West Afr. Coll. Surg.; 2022; 12, pp. 56-63. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388740]
39. Kanu, O.O.; Ojo, O.; Esezobor, C.; Bankole, O.; Olatosi, J.; Ogunleye, E.; Asoegwu, C.; Eghosa, M.; Adebayo, B.; Oladele, R. et al. Pediatric brain abscess—Etiology, management challenges and outcome in Lagos Nigeria. Surg. Neurol. Int.; 2021; 12, 592. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_605_2021]
40. Bonfield, C.M.; Sharma, J.; Dobson, S. Pediatric intracranial abscesses. J. Infect.; 2015; 71, (Suppl. S1), pp. S42-S46. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2015.04.012]
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Jen-Fu Hsu 3 ; Shih-Ming, Chu 3 ; Chih-Chen, Chen 3 ; Peng-Hong, Yang 4 ; Hsuan-Rong Huang 3 ; Miao-Ching, Chi 5 ; Chiang-Wen, Lee 5 ; Ou-Yang, Mei-Chen 3 1 Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 613, Taiwan;
2 College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan;
3 College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan;
4 College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan;
5 Department of Respiratory Care, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan;