Aortic Angiosarcoma Manifesting as Multiple Musculoskeletal Metastases: A Case Report

Abstract

Aortic angiosarcomas are rare. Due to its rarity and metastatic presentation, it is difficult to diagnose metastatic aortic angiosarcoma. We describe the clinicopathological and radiologic features of a metastatic aortic angiosarcoma presenting as musculoskeletal metastases. A 59-year-old male patient presented with left thigh pain. Plain radiographs revealed multifocal osteolytic lesions in the left femur shaft. Abdominopelvic computed tomography showed a lobulated osteolytic lesion in the left iliac bone. Magnetic resonance images revealed multifocal soft tissue lesions in the thigh musculature. A positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan demonstrated multiple foci of increased uptake in the left femur bone, pelvis, left thigh, and calf musculature. Focal increased uptake in the lower abdominal aorta was newly detected. Pelvis biopsy showed tumor cell nests of epithelioid cells. The tumor cells showed vasoformative features. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells showed positivity for vimentin, CD31, and ERG. The pathologic diagnosis of epithelioid angiosarcoma was established. The origin of the tumor was presumed to be the aorta. This case underscores the importance of PET scans in identifying primary lesions. In terms of the histopathologic diagnosis of biopsy samples with tumor cells exhibiting epithelioid neoplastic morphology, employing appropriate ancillary techniques such as immunocytochemistry with vascular markers may assist in accurately diagnosing metastatic angiosarcoma.

Angiosarcomas are rare sarcoma subtypes. They represent 2–4% of all sarcomas [1]. More than 50% of cases arise in the skin and seldom arise from the large vessels or the heart [2]. Aortic sarcomas are rare, and are most frequently seen in elastic arteries [3]. Among the aortic sarcomas, angiosarcomas are even rarer. In a case series of 26 cases of aortic sarcomas, only 8 cases were angiosarcoma. Among these 26 cases, 10 patients were found to have metastatic disease through imaging in various sites, such as the kidneys, skin or soft tissue, iliac bone, retroperitoneum, spine, brain, or adrenal gland. Less than 140 cases of aortic sarcoma have been reported with only 34 categorized as angiosarcoma [4]. Herein, we describe the clinicopathological and radiologic features of a metastatic aortic angiosarcoma presenting as multifocal musculoskeletal metastases of unknown primary.

A 59-year-old male patient presented with left thigh pain that had been increasing over the course of 2 weeks. Plain radiographs of both femurs revealed multifocal osteolytic lesions with occasional cortical thinning affecting the left femur shaft (Figure 1). Magnetic resonance (MR) images of the right thigh revealed multifocal soft tissue nodules in the anterior, posterior, and medial compartments of the thigh musculature (Figure 2a,b). These multiple ill-defined intramuscular nodules exhibit hypointense signal on both T1-weighted (Figure 2a) and T2-weighted images (Figure 2b) when compared to the adjacent musculature. The presence of ill-demarcated hyperintense signal around the nodules would suggest the infiltrative nature of tumor (Figure 2a,b, yellow arrows).

On MR, multiple bone lesions in the left femur shaft were hyperintense on both T1-weighted and T2-weighted images (Figure 3a,b).

On the abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT), an osteolytic lesion in the left iliac bone, 4 cm sized, is noted (Figure 4a). In addition, pelvic bone MR images revealed the detail of this left iliac bone osteolytic lesion (Figure 4b). This iliac lesion shows extraosseous extension.

In summary, we have detected multiple bone and soft tissue lesions involving the left femur and pelvic bone and the left thigh musculature. The radiologic differential diagnosis included metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary, multiple myeloma, and vascular malignancy such as epithelioid hemangioendothelioma or angiosarcoma. After discussion in a multidisciplinary tumor board meeting, an ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scan was performed and demonstrated multiple foci of increased uptake in the left femur bone, sacrum and left iliac wing of the pelvis, and left thigh and calf musculature (Figure 5a–c, yellow arrows). In addition to these lesions, focal uptake in the lower abdominal aorta was newly detected (Figure 5a, red arrow and Figure 6a–c, red arrows). We discussed this and decided to obtain a tissue sample from the left anterior superior iliac spine of the pelvis through incisional biopsy, to minimize tissue damage and complications.

Microscopic examination showed tumor cell nests in the bone marrow. The tumor cell nests were composed of tubules and solid nests of epithelioid cells (Figure 7a). Red blood cells were commonly observed amid the neoplastic cells. Areas displaying a vascular pattern consisted of irregular and sometimes widened vascular spaces filled with red blood cells. At higher magnification, the tumor cells exhibited large and epithelioid features, characterized by abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and distinct cell borders. The nuclei showed marked pleomorphism and were frequently hyperchromatic. Mitoses were evident. Prominent, large eosinophilic nucleoli were frequent, often surrounded by a clear halo, giving them an appearance akin to inclusions. In some areas, the tumor cell nests were composed of mainly solid nests of plasmacytoid cells. Immunohistochemical stains showed that neoplastic cells were negative for CK, and positive for vimentin and vascular markers such as CD31 (Figure 7b) and ERG (Figure 7c). The Ki-67 index was more than 70% (Figure 7d). Based on these histopathologic and immunohistochemical stain findings, a pathologic diagnosis of metastatic epithelioid angiosarcoma was established. The origin of the tumor was presumed to be the aorta, based on the radiologic findings.

After the diagnosis was established, he underwent chemotherapy along with radiation therapy. Unfortunately, after four months, the patient’s dyspnea and fever worsened and he passed away.

Aortic sarcomas are rare, and angiosarcomas are even rarer [3]. In a case series of 26 cases of aortic sarcomas, only 8 cases were angiosarcoma. Among these 26 cases, 10 patients were found to have metastatic disease through imaging, and it was found in various metastatic sites. Less than 140 cases of aortic sarcoma have been documented, with only 34 identified as angiosarcoma [4].

From a radiologist’s point of view, it is very hard to differentiate vascular tumors of the musculoskeletal areas based on imaging findings, and clinical correlation can help narrow the differential diagnosis [5]. Angiosarcomas originating in bone are exceedingly rare, constituting less than 1% of primary malignant bone tumors [6]. Based on the findings from one European retrospective study, primary angiosarcomas of bone constitute 56%, while metastatic angiosarcomas of bone represent 44% of the total 80 patient diagnosed with angiosarcomas of bone [7]. The predominant sites for bone angiosarcomas are typically the long bones (60%), notably the tibia (23%), femur (18%), humerus (13%), and pelvis (7%) [5,6]. Radiographic and CT imaging of malignant vascular bone tumors exhibit diverse characteristics, often appearing lytic with poorly defined margins [8]. In a retrospective analysis involving 63 patients with malignant vascular bone lesions, multifocal lesions were observed in 40% of cases. However, the presence of multifocal lesions devoid of periosteal reaction could also suggest lytic bony metastases or multiple myeloma, especially in individuals aged over 40, warranting histopathologic confirmation in the diagnostic process [6,9]. It has been suggested that in individuals over 40 years old presenting with a well-defined osteolytic lesion exceeding 4 cm in the femur, featuring geographic cortical destruction and lacking evidence of periosteal reaction, suspicion should be directed towards a malignant vascular bone lesion [6,9].

In our case, the radiological differential diagnoses of multifocal lesions involving musculoskeletal system include metastases and multiple myeloma. Interestingly, a subsequent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scan could identify the primary tumor origin. The primary tumor was not identified on the abdominopelvic CT. We misinterpreted the mural tumor of the aorta as mural thrombus with calcified atherosclerosis on the CT.

This case highlights two noteworthy points. Firstly, it underscores the significance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans in detecting primary lesions, especially in cases where multiple metastatic lesions in the musculoskeletal system are suspected. Secondly, when the pathological examination reveals tumor cells of epithelioid neoplastic morphology, it can pose a diagnostic challenge for pathologists, especially in biopsy samples. Understanding the clinical setting and being aware of the morphologic clues like the vasoformative features of angiosarcoma, along with employing ancillary techniques such as immunocytochemistry with vascular markers (CD31, CD34, or ERG), may aid in establishing a pathologic diagnosis of metastatic angiosarcoma in bone biopsies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.J.B. and K.J.S.; data collection, W.J.B. and K.J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, K.J.S.; writing—review and editing, S.J.N., I.Y.W., Y.K. and K.J.S.; supervision, W.J.B. and K.J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical review and approval were waived for this study as it is a retrospective single case report.

Informed Consent Statement

The IRB of our institution waived the need for patient consent form for this retrospective single case report.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Figures

References

1. The WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO Classification of Tumors: Soft Tisse and Bone Tumors; 5th ed. IARC Press: Lyon, France, 2020.

2. Fayette, J.; Martin, E.; Piperno-Neumann, S.; Le Cesne, A.; Robert, C.; Bonvalot, S.; Ranchère, D.; Pouillart, P.; Coindre, J.M.; Blay, J.Y. Angiosarcomas, a heterogeneous group of sarcomas with specific behavior depending on primary site: A retrospective study of 161 cases. Ann. Oncol.; 2007; 18, pp. 2030-2036. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdm381]

3. Staats, P.; Tavora, F.; Burke, A.P. Intimal sarcomas of the aorta and iliofemoral arteries: A clinicopathological study of 26 cases. Pathology; 2014; 46, pp. 596-603. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAT.0000000000000182] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25393249]

4. Brylka, D.; Demos, T.C.; Pierce, K. Primary angiosarcoma of the abdominal aorta: A case report and literature review (aortic angiosarcoma). Abdom. Imaging; 2009; 34, pp. 239-242. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9371-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18253778]

5. Murphey, M.D.; Fairbairn, K.J.; Parman, L.M.; Baxter, K.G.; Parsa, M.B.; Smith, W.S. From the archives of the AFIP. Musculoskeletal angiomatous lesions: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics; 1995; 15, pp. 893-917. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.15.4.7569134] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7569134]

6. Bhaludin, B.N.; Thway, K.; Adejolu, M.; Renn, A.; Kelly-Morland, C.; Fisher, C.; Jones, R.L.; Messiou, C.; Moskovic, E. Imaging features of primary sites and metastatic patterns of angiosarcoma. Insights Imaging; 2021; 12, 189. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01129-9]

7. Palmerini, E.; Leithner, A.; Windhager, R.; Gosheger, G.; Boye, K.; Laitinen, M.; Hardes, J.; Traub, F.; Jutte, P.; Willegger, M. et al. Angiosarcoma of bone: A retrospective study of the European Musculoskeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS). Sci. Rep.; 2020; 10, 10853. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66579-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32616718]

8. Wenger, D.E.; Wold, L.E. Malignant vascular lesions of bone: Radiologic and pathologic features. Skelet. Radiol.; 2000; 29, pp. 619-631. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002560000261] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11201031]

9. Vermaat, M.; Vanel, D.; Kroon, H.M.; Verbeke, S.L.; Alberghini, M.; Bovee, J.V.; Bloem, J.L. Vascular tumors of bone: Imaging findings. Eur. J. Radiol.; 2011; 77, pp. 13-18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.052] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20828961]