It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Recent geologic and modeled evidence suggests that the grounding line of the Siple Coast of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) retreated hundreds of kilometers beyond its present position in the middle to late Holocene and readvanced within the past 1.7 ka. This grounding line reversal has been attributed to both changing rates of isostatic rebound and regional climate change. Here, we test these two hypotheses using a proxy-informed ensemble of ice sheet model simulations with varying ocean thermal forcing, global glacioisostatic adjustment (GIA) model simulations, and coupled ice sheet-GIA simulations that consider the interactions between these processes. Our results indicate that a warm to cold ocean cavity regime shift is the most likely cause of this grounding line reversal, but that GIA influences the rate of ice sheet response to oceanic changes. This implies that the grounding line here is sensitive to future changes in sub-ice shelf ocean circulation.
Using ice sheet model and glacio-isostatic adjustment model simulations and paleoclimate proxies, this work demonstrates that the most likely cause of past West Antarctic grounding-line reversal was a regime shift from a warm to cold ocean cavity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 GNS Science, Department of Surface Geosciences, Lower Hutt, New Zealand (GRID:grid.15638.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0429 3066)
2 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Fluid Dynamics and Solid Mechanics Group, Los Alamos, USA (GRID:grid.148313.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0428 3079); California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, USA (GRID:grid.20861.3d) (ISNI:0000000107068890)
3 Victoria University of Wellington, Antarctic Research Centre, Wellington, New Zealand (GRID:grid.267827.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2292 3111)
4 McGill University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Montréal, Canada (GRID:grid.14709.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8649)