It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The copper (Cu)-catalyzed electrochemical CO2 reduction provides a route for the synthesis of multicarbon (C2+) products. However, the thermodynamically favorable Cu surface (i.e. Cu(111)) energetically favors single-carbon production, leading to low energy efficiency and low production rates for C2+ products. Here we introduce in situ copper faceting from electrochemical reduction to enable preferential exposure of Cu(100) facets. During the precatalyst evolution, a phosphate ligand slows the reduction of Cu and assists the generation and co-adsorption of CO and hydroxide ions, steering the surface reconstruction to Cu (100). The resulting Cu catalyst enables current densities of > 500 mA cm−2 and Faradaic efficiencies of >83% towards C2+ products from both CO2 reduction and CO reduction. When run at 500 mA cm−2 for 150 hours, the catalyst maintains a 37% full-cell energy efficiency and a 95% single-pass carbon efficiency throughout.
Copper electrocatalysts enable carbon dioxide/carbon monoxide reduction but suffer from low production rates. Here, the authors promote in situ growth of Cu(100) during electrolysis, enabling efficient and stable electrosynthesis of multicarbon products at industrially-relevant current densities
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 Tianjin University, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin, China (GRID:grid.33763.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 2484); Kunming University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Kunming, China (GRID:grid.218292.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 8571 108X)
2 Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Frontiers Science Center for Transformative Molecules, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and Zhangjiang Institute for Advanced Study, Shanghai, China (GRID:grid.16821.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 8293)
3 University of Toronto, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938)
4 Tianjin University, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin, China (GRID:grid.33763.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 2484)
5 Tianjin University, School of Science, Tianjin, China (GRID:grid.33763.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 2484)
6 Tianjin University, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin, China (GRID:grid.33763.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 2484); Tianjin University, State Key Lab of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin, China (GRID:grid.33763.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 2484)
7 Longyan University, College of Chemistry and Material Science, Longyan, China (GRID:grid.440829.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 6010 6026)
8 Sinopec Shanghai Research Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Shanghai, China (GRID:grid.418531.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1793 5814)
9 The University of Auckland, School of Chemical Sciences, Auckland, New Zealand (GRID:grid.9654.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 3343)