It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The precise arrangement and nature of atoms drive electronic phase transitions in condensed matter. To explore this tenuous link, we developed a true biaxial mechanical deformation device working at cryogenic temperatures, compatible with x-ray diffraction and transport measurements, well adapted to layered samples. Here we show that a slight deformation of TbTe3 can have a dramatic influence on its Charge Density Wave (CDW), with an orientational transition from c to a driven by the a/c parameter, a tiny coexistence region near a = c, and without space group change. The CDW transition temperature Tc displays a linear dependence with
Previous studies of the effects of strain on charge density waves have mostly focused on uniaxial strain. Here the authors use a biaxial-strain device to demonstrate switching of the charge density wave orientation, as well as a strong linear increase of the transition temperature while the gap seems to saturate.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, Orsay Cedex, France (GRID:grid.4444.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 9282)
2 CNRS-Université de Poitiers-ENSMA, Institut Pprime, Futuroscope-Chasseneuil Cedex, France (GRID:grid.462224.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2164 3230)
3 Institut Néel, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, Grenoble, France (GRID:grid.450308.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0369 268X)
4 L’Orme des Merisiers, Synchrotron SOLEIL, Saint-Aubin, France (GRID:grid.426328.9)
5 L. D. Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics, Chernogolovka, Russia (GRID:grid.436090.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 7671); National University of Science and Technology ‘MISiS’, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.35043.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 0010 3972)
6 NRS, CEA Grenoble, IRIG, MEM, Grenoble, France (GRID:grid.457348.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0630 1517)