Introduction
The age group of 2 to 17 years is the most important period for growth and development in all aspects for children. However unfortunately certain children lack them, specially labelled as “Special needs children” or “Children with special healthcare needs” [1,2]. They have problems in growth and development in terms of physical, developmental, behavioural and emotional conditions. They require increased attention and care and are at increased trend of seeking healthcare services like frequent hospital visits, and hospital admissions for health-related ailments [2,3].
The normal growth and development of children depend on their nutritional intake. Mothers are the primary caretakers, taking care of the nutritional needs of their children. It requires immense attention and additional care while looking after special needs children because they cannot express their hunger and satiety like normal children. The knowledge and understanding of the mothers about the special needs children will be beneficial in taking care of them. Lack of knowledge of the mothers about nutrition affects the health of their child leading to nutritional deficiency and malnutrition [4-7].
Health-seeking behaviour is a decision-making process to seek perfect treatment for health. It is governed by multiple factors. Special needs children are at increased risk of having unmet health needs when compared to normal children. Health-seeking behaviour has emerged as a tool to tackle ill health by taking remedial actions and people are being encouraged to learn and use health-promoting behaviours [8-11].
There are a lot of studies addressing the nutritional problems of normal children but only limited studies were done among special needs children. To bridge the knowledge gap, this is one of few studies conducted among special needs children and the main purpose of this study is to assess the nutritional problems and health-seeking behaviour of special needs children [12-14].
Materials and methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted among special needs children attending a special children home at the Rural health training centre field practice area of a tertiary care teaching hospital (Sri Ramachandra Medical College & Research Institute) in Tiruvallur district during August and September 2022. There were a total of 46 children, clinically confirmed and certified as special needs children attending the special children home. All the special needs children were included as study participants.
Ethical considerations
The study was initiated after obtaining Ethics approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC NO: CSP-MED/22/AUG/79/130 dated 16/09/2022). Permission was obtained from the special children's home for conducting the study. Informed consent was obtained from the parents/guardians of the special needs children. The information collected from the study participants was kept confidential.
Data collection method
Data was collected from the parents/caregivers of the special needs children using a semi-structured questionnaire consisting of three parts (Part A, B & C). Part A consists of questions related to basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, gender, birth order, number of siblings of the special needs children, type of marriage, type of family, education & occupation of both father and mother, monthly income and socioeconomic status of the family. Part B consists of questions related to nutritional statuses such as eat normally or not, symptoms of decreased eating, any illness, fever, respiratory & gastrointestinal symptoms in the past two weeks, the habit of nail biting, eating soil/pica, difficulty in concentration, symptoms of memory loss, intake of nutritional supplements or any other medications, diet history using 24-hour recall method, total calorie intake, calorie requirement and calorie deficit. Part C consists of questions related to their health-seeking behaviour for general ailments or sickness/respiratory/gastrointestinal/neurological problems such as whether sought health care services, where do you seek health care services - government hospital / private clinic/pharmacy/others, reason for not taking treatment - able to manage / not aware / not affordable / others. The special needs children were examined clinically including anthropometric measurements like height, weight, BMI, head circumference, chest circumference and mid-arm circumference.
Statistics
The data was collected and entered using Microsoft Excel. Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 16 (Released 2007; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). and the results were tabulated. A Chi-square test was used to find the association between nutritional problems and related variables. The level of significance was kept as a p-value < 0.05.
Results
Sociodemographic characteristics
In this study, out of the 46 special needs children who participated, 69.6% were male and 30.4% were female. The mean age was 11.69 ±- 4.62 years with 82.6% belonging to 6 - 17 years of age. There were a total of 46 special needs children who belonged to a nuclear family and they lived in a rural area. The parents of all the children were educated and the fathers were employed, with 71.7% belonging to Socioeconomic Class III according to Modified B.G. Prasad Classification (Table 1).
Table 1
Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants
The data have been represented as frequency(n) and percentage (%). The socioeconomic status was classified based on Modified B.G. Prasad Classification 2023
Variables | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
Age | ||
2 to 5 years | 8 | 17.4% |
6 to 17 years | 38 | 82.6% |
Gender | ||
Male | 32 | 69.6% |
Female | 14 | 30.4% |
Birth Order | ||
First | 29 | 63% |
Second | 16 | 34.8% |
Third | 1 | 2.2% |
Type of Marriage | ||
Consanguinous | 21 | 45.7% |
Non-consanguinous | 25 | 54.3% |
Father’s Education | ||
Primary | 8 | 17.4% |
Middle | 24 | 52.2% |
Secondary | 11 | 23.9% |
Graduate & above | 3 | 6.5% |
Mother’s Education | ||
Primary | 4 | 8.7% |
Middle | 23 | 50% |
Secondary | 13 | 28.3% |
Graduate & above | 6 | 13% |
Mother’s Occupation | ||
Working | 24 | 52.2% |
Not working | 22 | 47.8% |
Monthly Income | ||
0 to 10,000 | 2 | 4.3% |
10,001 to 20,000 | 36 | 78.3% |
20,001 to 30,000 | 6 | 13% |
30,001 to 40,000 | 2 | 4.3% |
Socio Economic Status | ||
Class I | - | - |
Class II | 7 | 15.2% |
Class III | 33 | 71.7% |
Class IV | 6 | 13% |
Class V | - | - |
Total Family Size | ||
< 5 | 14 | 30.4% |
> 5 | 32 | 69.6% |
Number of Siblings | ||
< 1 | 41 | 89.1% |
> 1 | 5 | 10.9% |
Nutritional problems
The study revealed that 78.3% of the children have a calorie deficit of more than 300 kcal even though most of the children eat normally (97.8%). Also, 100% of the children did not have the following symptoms gastrointestinal symptoms in the past two weeks; habit of nail biting; difficulty in concentration; symptoms of memory loss; intake of nutritional supplements and other symptoms. Only a few children had symptoms of decreased eating, illness, fever and respiratory symptoms in the past two weeks and habit of eating soil/pica (Table 2).
Table 2
Nutritional problems among the study participants
The data are represented as frequency(n) and percentage (%)
Variables | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
Does the child eat normally? | ||
Yes | 45 | 97.8% |
No | 1 | 2.2% |
Does the child have symptoms of decreased eating? | ||
Yes | 4 | 8.7% |
No | 42 | 91.3% |
Did the child have any illness in the past two weeks? | ||
Yes | 10 | 21.7% |
No | 36 | 78.3% |
Did the child have fever in the past two weeks? | ||
Yes | 1 | 2.2% |
No | 45 | 97.8% |
Did the child have any respiratory symptoms like cough, runny nose, nasal congestion & sore throat in the past 2 weeks? | ||
Yes | 10 | 21.7% |
No | 36 | 78.3% |
Does the child have the habit of eating soil/pica? | ||
Yes | 2 | 4.3% |
No | 44 | 95.7% |
Does the child take any other medications? | ||
Yes | 2 | 4.3% |
No | 44 | 95.7% |
Calorie deficit | ||
Yes | 36 | 78.3% |
No | 10 | 21.7% |
Nutritional status
Based on the anthropometric measurements, the nutritional status of the special needs children revealed that 65.22% were underweight and only 13.04% were found to be of normal weight (Table 3).
Table 3
Nutritional status of the study participants based on examination
The data have been represented as frequency(n) and percentage (%). The nutritional status was classified based on WHO BMI Classification.
Nutritional Status | Frequency (n) | Participants (%) |
Underweight | 30 | 65.22 % |
Normal Weight | 6 | 13.04 % |
Obese I | 5 | 10.87 % |
Overweight | 3 | 6.52 % |
Obese III | 2 | 4.35% |
Total | 46 | 100% |
Health-seeking behaviour
Assessment of the health-seeking behaviour of the participants revealed that 63% of them prefer private healthcare facilities and 37% of them seek Government healthcare facilities for their healthcare needs.
Association of nutritional problems with related variables
This study revealed that the association of nutritional problems with related variables using the Chi-Square test shows a significant association of nutritional problems with calorie deficit and monthly income, whereas the rest of the variables were found to be not significant (Table 4).
Table 4
Association between nutritional problems and related variables
The data have been represented as frequency(n) and percentage (%). χ2 = Chi-square value is considered significant between <2 z-score and > −3 z-score. The p-value is considered statistically significant at p < 0.05
Variables | Nutritional Problems | Chi-square value | Odd’s Ratio | 95% C.I. | p-Value | |||
Present | Absent | |||||||
n (30) | % | n (16) | % | |||||
Age | ||||||||
2 to 5 years | 6 | 75% | 2 | 25% | 0.409 | 1.750 | 0.310 – 9.878 | 0.523 |
6 to 17 years | 24 | 63.2% | 14 | 36.8% | ||||
Gender | ||||||||
Female | 9 | 64.3% | 5 | 35.7% | 0.008 | 0.943 | 0.253 – 3.509 | 0.930 |
Male | 21 | 19.6% | 11 | 10.9% | ||||
Birth Order | ||||||||
Second & above | 13 | 76.5% | 4 | 23.5% | 1.505 | 2.294 | 0.599 – 8.782 | 0.220 |
First | 17 | 58.6% | 12 | 41.4% | ||||
Mother’s Occupation | ||||||||
Working | 14 | 58.3% | 10 | 41.7% | 1.048 | 0.525 | 0.152 – 1.815 | 0.306 |
Not Working | 16 | 72.7% | 6 | 27.3% | ||||
Monthly Income | ||||||||
< 20,000 | 28 | 73.7% | 10 | 26.3% | 6.905 | 8.400 | 1.451 – 48.613 | 0.009* |
> 20,000 | 2 | 25% | 6 | 75% | ||||
Socioeconomic status | ||||||||
Low | 4 | 66.7% | 2 | 33.3% | 0.006 | 0.929 | 0.151 – 5.717 | 0.936 |
High | 26 | 65% | 14 | 35% | ||||
Total Family Size | ||||||||
< 5 | 21 | 65.6% | 11 | 34.4% | 0.008 | 1.061 | 0.285 – 3.948 | 0.930 |
> 5 | 9 | 64.3% | 5 | 35.7% | ||||
No. of. Siblings | ||||||||
< 1 | 3 | 60% | 2 | 40% | 0.067 | 0.778 | 0.116 – 5.211 | 0.795 |
> 1 | 27 | 65.9% | 14 | 34.1% | ||||
Decreased Eating | ||||||||
Yes | 3 | 75% | 1 | 25% | 0.185 | 1.667 | 0.159 – 17.468 | 0.667 |
No | 27 | 64.3% | 15 | 35.7% | ||||
Illness | ||||||||
Yes | 8 | 80% | 2 | 20% | 1.231 | 2.545 | 0.471 – 13.770 | 0.267 |
No | 22 | 61.1% | 14 | 38.9% | ||||
Respiratory Symptoms | ||||||||
Yes | 8 | 80% | 2 | 20% | 1.231 | 2.545 | 0.471 – 13.770 | 0.267 |
No | 22 | 61.1% | 14 | 38.9% | ||||
Eat Soil/Pica | ||||||||
Yes | 1 | 50% | 1 | 50% | 0.213 | 0.517 | 0.030 – 8.862 | 0.644 |
No | 29 | 65.9% | 15 | 34.1% | ||||
Calorie Deficit | ||||||||
> 300 kcal | 27 | 81.8% | 6 | 18.2% | 14.186 | 15.000 | 3.138 – 71.693 | 0.000* |
< 300 kcal | 3 | 23.1% | 10 | 76.9% |
Discussion
Out of the 46 special needs children assessed, the study revealed that 65.22% were underweight and malnourished which is high when compared to normal children. Only few studies were done previously in special needs children. In India, a study conducted by Katoch found that 19% of children were underweight [15]. Similarly, in Indonesia, a study by Kementerian Kesehatan found that 17.1% of children under 5 years of age were underweight, while another study by Wungouw et al. in Indonesia reported that 15.3% of children were underweight [16,17]. In Ethiopia, a study by Simon et al. revealed that 42% of children were underweight, which is higher than the global prevalence of 22.5% [18].
In children, adequate food intake and nutrition are essential to achieve their normal growth and development. In our study, 78.3% of children were found to have a calorie deficit of more than 300 kcal causing malnourishment which is comparable to a study done in Bali by Permatananda et al. where 68.3% of children have less nutrition intake compared to children with adequate nutrition intake [19]. The reasons for high-calorie deficit in our study were low monthly income and lack of awareness of balanced nutrition. Balanced and adequate nutrition is important to improve the quality of life of children [7]. The nutritional requirements of the special needs children were not met due to economic circumstances as the primary caretaker has to be with them all day, not allowing them to go to work. Malnourishment is commonly seen due to the economic burden of the family. Malnutrition makes the children vulnerable to infections and weight loss which can lead to complications, increased morbidity and mortality. The lack of knowledge about nutrition among the primary caretakers also affects the growth and development of the children [6,7].
According to Mkhize, household food insecurity and low household income are the leading factors affecting the nutritional status of children under five years of age in South Africa. Underweight and overweight are the nutritional indicators used to evaluate and monitor the nutritional status of the children. The nutritional status of the children in developed countries is not majorly affected by poverty or economic growth but rather by eating disorders. Frequent and prolonged illness in children can also affect their nutritional status, leading to changes in appetite, absorption, metabolism, and behaviour. Conversely, poor nutritional status can make the children more prone to illness or lengthen their recovery time [4,6].
According to the results of our study, only calorie deficit and monthly income show significant association with nutritional problems which states that low-income people take less nutrition. In contrast to this statement, the Katoch study states that in India, low-income people consume more calories with less malnutrition rates as they are covered by nutrition schemes of the government like Public Distribution System and Integrated Child Development Services providing quality nutrition foods and awareness of balanced nutrition [15]. The programs covering these special needs children under Maternal and Child Health (MCH) and Children With Special Health Care Needs (CSHCN) were responsible for planning and developing the health care systems and providing health care services to them [1,20]. This study enlightens the nutritional problems of the special needs children necessitating actions to be taken to improve their quality of life.
Our study had some limitations that need to be acknowledged. Firstly, we included special needs children from one home in this study which in future studies can include different homes to obtain a more comprehensive conclusion. Secondly, we only used anthropometry and clinical examination for our analysis and in future studies, we can include biochemical laboratory investigations.
Conclusions
This study revealed that a high proportion of the special needs children were underweight. The most important reasons for being underweight were found to be calorie deficit, low monthly income of the family, and lack of awareness of balanced nutrition among the caretakers. Most of the mothers who were the primary caretakers of these children were unable to go for work which increases the economic burden of the family. Increasing parental awareness and emphasizing the importance of balanced nutrition with cost-effective, seasonal, and locally available nutritious foods can help the caretakers manage food properly. It further helps them to meet the nutritional requirements and ensures the normal growth and development of the special needs children.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2024, K S et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background
Special needs children have various health problems, and the most common problems are nutritional deficiency and malnourishment which leads to increased morbidity affecting their quality of life. This study aims to assess the nutritional status and health-seeking behaviour of special needs children.
Methods
The study was conducted among 46 special needs children at a special needs children's home. After collecting basic sociodemographic details, they were assessed for nutritional status and health-seeking behaviour using a semi-structured questionnaire followed by general and clinical examination.
Results
Out of these 46 special needs children, 69.6% were male and 30.4% were female. The mean age was 11.69±4.62 years. In this study, 65.22% were underweight; 6.52% were overweight; 10.87% were obese I; 4.35% were obese III; 13.04% were normal. Among them, 37% seek Government healthcare facilities for their healthcare needs. Referral advice was provided to all required children.
Conclusion
A high proportion of the special needs children were screened positive for nutritional deficiency and malnourishment which needs to be addressed. Interventions should be aimed at correcting the nutritional deficiency and malnourishment by involving the caretakers, mainly mothers of these children.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer