It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Monitoring crop phenology is essential for managing field disasters, protecting the environment, and making decisions about agricultural productivity. Because of its high timeliness, high resolution, great penetration, and sensitivity to specific structural elements, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is a valuable technique for crop phenology estimation. Particle filtering (PF) belongs to the family of dynamical approach and has the ability to predict crop phenology with SAR data in real time. The observation equation is a key factor affecting the accuracy of particle filtering estimation and depends on fitting. Compared to the common polynomial fitting (POLY), machine learning methods can automatically learn features and handle complex data structures, offering greater flexibility and generalization capabilities. Therefore, incorporating two ensemble learning algorithms consisting of support vector machine regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), respectively, we proposed two machine learning-aided particle filtering approaches (PF-SVR, PF-RFR) to estimate crop phenology. One year of time-series Sentinel-1 GRD SAR data in 2017 covering rice fields in Sevilla region in Spain was used for establishing the observation and prediction equations, and the other year of data in 2018 was used for validating the prediction accuracy of PF methods. Four polarization features (VV, VH, VH/VV and Radar Vegetation Index (RVI)) were exploited as the observations in modeling. Experimental results reveals that the machine learning-aided methods are superior than the PF-POLY method. The PF-SVR exhibited better performance than the PF-RFR and PF-POLY methods. The optimal outcome from PF-SVR yielded a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 7.79, compared to 7.94 for PF-RFR and 9.1 for PF-POLY. Moreover, the results suggest that the RVI is generally more sensitive than other features to crop phenology and the performance of polarization features presented consistent among all methods, i.e., RVI>VV>VH>VH/VV. Our findings offer valuable references for real-time crop phenology monitoring with SAR data.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 The School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China; The School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China
2 The School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; The School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
3 The Institute for Computer Research (IUII), University of Alicante, E-03080 Alicante, Spain; The Institute for Computer Research (IUII), University of Alicante, E-03080 Alicante, Spain