It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Terrestrial geothermal springs are physicochemically diverse and host abundant populations of Archaea. However, the diversity, functionality, and geological influences of these Archaea are not well understood. Here we explore the genomic diversity of Archaea in 152 metagenomes from 48 geothermal springs in Tengchong, China, collected from 2016 to 2021. Our dataset is comprised of 2949 archaeal metagenome-assembled genomes spanning 12 phyla and 392 newly identified species, which increases the known species diversity of Archaea by ~48.6%. The structures and potential functions of the archaeal communities are strongly influenced by temperature and pH, with high-temperature acidic and alkaline springs favoring archaeal abundance over Bacteria. Genome-resolved metagenomics and metatranscriptomics provide insights into the potential ecological niches of these Archaea and their potential roles in carbon, sulfur, nitrogen, and hydrogen metabolism. Furthermore, our findings illustrate the interplay of competition and cooperation among Archaea in biogeochemical cycles, possibly arising from overlapping functional niches and metabolic handoffs. Taken together, our study expands the genomic diversity of Archaea inhabiting geothermal springs and provides a foundation for more incisive study of biogeochemical processes mediated by Archaea in geothermal ecosystems.
Here, Qi et al. assembled ~3000 archaeal genomes from hot springs, capturing temporal dynamics and environmental diversity, and systematically explored functional niches and metabolic handoffs, shedding light on Archaea’s role in biogeochemical cycling.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 University of Science and Technology of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Urban Pollutant Conversion, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hefei, China (GRID:grid.59053.3a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 9639)
2 Sichuan University–Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Chengdu, China (GRID:grid.16890.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 6123)
3 Sun Yat-Sen University, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou, PR China (GRID:grid.12981.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2360 039X)
4 China West Normal University, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanchong, China (GRID:grid.411527.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0610 111X)
5 South China Normal University, School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou, PR China (GRID:grid.263785.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 7397)
6 University of Nevada Las Vegas, School of Life Sciences, Las Vegas, USA (GRID:grid.272362.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0806 6926); University of Nevada Las Vegas, Nevada Institute of Personalized Medicine, Las Vegas, USA (GRID:grid.272362.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0806 6926)