It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Thermal fatigue is a common failure mode in electronic solder joints, yet the role of microstructure is incompletely understood. Here, we quantify the evolution of microstructure and damage in Sn-3Ag-0.5Cu joints throughout a ball grid array (BGA) package using EBSD mapping of localised subgrains, recrystallisation and heavily coarsened Ag3Sn. We then interpret the results with a multi-scale modelling approach that links from a continuum model at the package/board scale through to a crystal plasticity finite element model at the microstructure scale. We measure and explain the dependence of damage evolution on (i) the β-Sn crystal orientation(s) in single and multigrain joints, and (ii) the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch between tin grains in cyclic twinned multigrain joints. We further explore the relative importance of the solder microstructure versus the joint location in the array. The results provide a basis for designing optimum solder joint microstructures for thermal fatigue resistance.
Thermal fatigue frequently leads to failure in electronic solder joints. Here, the authors measure and quantitatively explain how microstructure affects thermal fatigue in a ball grid array package and propose optimum microstructures for thermal fatigue resistance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Imperial College London, Department of Materials, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111); Dalian University of Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian, China (GRID:grid.30055.33) (ISNI:0000 0000 9247 7930)
2 Imperial College London, Department of Materials, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111); Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 1 Fusionopolis Way, #16-16 Connexis, Institute of High Performance Computing (IHPC), Singapore, Republic of Singapore (GRID:grid.418742.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 8006)
3 University of Greenwich, School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, London, UK (GRID:grid.36316.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 0806 5472)
4 Murray Hill, Nokia Bell Labs, New Jersey, USA (GRID:grid.469490.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0520 1282)
5 Imperial College London, Department of Materials, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111)