- CI
- cardiac index
- CO
- cardiac output
- CVP
- central venous pressure
- eRVSP
- estimated right ventricular systolic pressure
- ICU
- intensive care unit
- IQR
- interquartile range
- KDIGO
- Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes
- LV
- left ventricle
- MAP
- mean arterial pressure
- PAC
- pulmonary artery catheter
- PCWP
- pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
- PH
- pulmonary hypertension
- RAP
- right atrial pressure
- RHC
- right heart catheterization
- RRT
- renal replacement therapy
- RV
- right ventricle
- RVF
- right ventricle failure
- ScvO2
- central venous oxygen saturation
- SD
- standard deviation
- SPP
- systemic perfusion pressure
- SvO2
- venous oxygen saturation
- TAPSE
- tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion
- TLC
- triple lumen catheter
- TR
- tricuspid regurgitation
- TTE
- transthoracic echocardiogram
Abbreviations
BACKGROUND
Pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disease with high morbidity and mortality. The right ventricle (RV) is constantly adapting to the increased afterload that defines PH, and RV function is a major determinant of prognosis and functional capacity. Patients with PH often require hospitalization during the course of their disease as the RV ultimately decompensates, becoming dilated, hypokinetic and fibrotic. RV failure (RVF) requiring admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) has an inpatient mortality rate of over 40%, making it the leading cause of death in PH patients. Management requires optimization of RV preload, afterload, and contractility. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring via a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and/or clinical and laboratory findings, such as creatinine and lactate, paired with jugular venous pressure on physical exam, can guide treatment. The management of RVF and subsequent shock is complicated, and there is considerable overlap in management strategies in patients with left ventricular (LV) failure as well. There are currently no guidelines for what the optimal perfusion target is in patients with a failing RV. Establishing an adequate mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients with decompensated RVF becomes essential as it promotes perfusion to the RV myocardium, perfuses the kidneys by maintaining systemic perfusion pressure (SPP), increases LV afterload and reduces the amount of right-to-left shunting in patients with a patent foramen ovale. However, the optimal MAP target has not been well established, and there is no substantial evidence to suggest an exact goal. While a MAP target of 65 mmHg is universally used for all forms of shock, the literature behind this target predominantly comes from studies on septic shock. Some suggest incorporating the central venous pressure (CVP) into a MAP target, whereas others will recommend a higher MAP goal, similar to how clinicians approach the management of hepatorenal syndrome. Given the sparsity of evidence to support specific MAP targets in pre-capillary PH patients with RVF, we sought to describe the relationship between MAP and morbidity and mortality in this critically ill patient population. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes in pre-capillary PH patients admitted with RVF who were treated with a static MAP target (MAP65/70) versus those managed with a dynamic MAP goal (MAPCVP).
METHODS
Study design
This was a retrospective study approved by the Hartford HealthCare Institutional Review Board. Records of patients were identified by the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) using the diagnosis of RVF (I50.810) secondary to pre-capillary PH (I27.0, I27.20) at a single tertiary academic center from October 2020 to March 2023. Patients with pre-capillary PH, defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥ 20 mmHg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≤ 15 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 3 Wood units, were included in the study, and those with a component of post-capillary PH were excluded. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and development of acute kidney injury (AKI). Secondary outcomes were hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS).
Establishing a diagnosis of RVF
The ICD-10 diagnosis of RVF was further confirmed by echocardiographic and invasive hemodynamic data. Criteria used to confirm evidence of RVF included RV dysfunction identified on echocardiogram along with elevated right atrial pressure (RAP) or CVP > 15 mmHg and reduced Fick cardiac index (CI) < 2.0. In patients where PAC was not placed, surrogate data was obtained from a triple lumen catheter (TLC), where CVP was used interchangeably with RAP (14/60, 23.3%) and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) served as a surrogate (14/60, 23.3%) for venous oxygen saturation (SvO2).
Treatment of RVF
Management of RVF was guided by a specific protocol. Patients were treated based on clinician judgment in a multidisciplinary approach, including PH consult service, nephrology, and/or advanced heart failure. Specific vasopressor or inotrope use was not specified except for avoidance of phenylephrine, as it causes vasoconstriction of the pulmonary vascular bed, further increasing PVR and worsening RV performance. With respect to the MAPCVP group, the primary focus was to optimize SPP based on the formula: SPP = MAP − CVP. Lastly, preload was optimized with diuresis for a target RAP or CVP goal of 8–12.
Statistical analysis
The outcomes analyzed for this study included: mortality, end-organ damage (assessed by lactic acid), AKI defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification (a minimal increase in creatinine by ≥0.3 mg/dL or 50% from baseline), and ICU LOS. Descriptive statistics were generated for each episode or admission and aggregated within each of the two MAP groups. They comprised means and standard deviations (SD) for normally distributed continuous variables, median and interquartile ranges (IQR) for non-normally distributed continuous variables, and frequencies for categorical/dichotomous variables. Inferential statistics were used to evaluate differences in the outcomes listed above between the two MAP groups. Categorical variables were compared with a Fisher's exact test. ICU LOS was evaluated with a Mann–Whitney U test. All analyses were conducted with SPSS v. 29 (IBM). Results yielding p < 0.05 were deemed statistically significant.
RESULTS
Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics
A total of 60 consecutive pre-capillary PH patients with RVF requiring admission to the ICU were identified. The initial thirty patients identified who were treated in a conventional manner targeting a static MAP goal of either 65 or 70 mmHg (MAP65/70) and the initial 30 patients who were managed with a dynamic MAP goal based on invasively measured RAP or CVP (MAPCVP) were retrospectively evaluated. Of the 30 patients in the MAP65/70 group, 20 (66.7%) had a MAP target of 65 mmHg, and 10 (33.3%) had a MAP target of 70 mmHg. The MAPCVP group had a changing MAP goal that was adjusted every 12 h based on the patient's transduced CVP or RAP, and it was calculated based on the equation of MAP = 60 + CVP (or RAP).
Baseline characteristics demonstrated a male predominance (56.7%) and a mean age of 64.8 years (Table ). The predominant etiology of pre-capillary PH was World Health Organization (WHO) Group 1 (57%), followed by WHO Group 3 (15%), combined WHO Group 1 and 3 (13%), WHO Group 4 (12%), and WHO Group 5 (3%). Thirty-eight patients (63%) were not on PH-specific therapy at the time of admission. Baseline echocardiographic data, including estimated right ventricular systolic pressure (eRVSP), estimated RAP, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), were similar between the two cohorts. Likewise, baseline invasive hemodynamic data were similar between the two groups.
Table 1 Baseline characteristics.
MAP65/70 | MAPCVP | p-Value | |
Sample (n, %) | 30 (50%) | 30 (50%) | --- |
Age, years (mean ± SD) | 65.1 ± 10.2 | 64.4 ± 13.8 | 0.807A |
Gender (n, %) | |||
Male | 18 (60%) | 16 (53.3%) | |
Female | 12 (40%) | 14 (46.7%) | 0.795B |
Race/ethnicity (n, %) | |||
W | 22 (73.3%) | 21 (70%) | |
B/AA | 5 (16.7%) | 6 (20%) | 0.945C |
H | 3 (10%) | 3 (10%) | |
WHO Group | 0.025C | ||
1 | 22 (73.3%) | 12 (40.0%) | |
3 | 5 (16.7%) | 4 (13.3%) | |
4 | 1 (3.3%) | 6 (20.0%) | |
5 | 1 (3.3%) | 1 (3.3%) | |
1 & 3 | 1 (3.3%) | 7 (23.3%) | |
On PH therapy | 13 (43.3%) | 9 (30%) | 0.422B |
Baseline TTE measurements | |||
eRVSP | 80.7 ± 21.2 | 87.8 ± 21.3 | 0.197A |
TAPSE | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 0.963A |
RAP | 1.000B | ||
8 (moderately dilated) | 9 (30%) | 9 (30%) | |
15 (severely dilated) | 21 (70%) | 21 (70%) | |
Baseline RHC measurements | |||
RAP | 18.9 ± 3.8 | 18.4 ± 3.3 | 0.615A |
RVSP | 76.9 ± 19.0 | 80.2 ± 15.2 | 0.465A |
Mean PA | 44.8 ± 9.8 | 44.9 ± 10.1 | 0.979A |
PAOP | 9.7 ± 3.8 | 9.3 ± 3.0 | 0.708A |
CI (F) | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 0.459A |
PVR (F) | 10.6 ± 3.5 | 10.8 ± 2.8 | 0.855A |
PA Sat | 53.0 ± 6.4 | 52.9 ± 6.4 | 0.958A |
Primary and secondary outcomes between MAP65/70 and MAPCVP
There was a statistically significant difference in the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality between the MAP65/70 and MAPCVP groups, with decreased mortality in the dynamic MAP cohort (MAP65/70: 43.3%, MAPCVP: 16.7%; p = 0.047; Table ). Similarly, 73.3% of MAP65/70 patients developed AKI compared with 3.3% in the MAPCVP group (p < 0.001). As for secondary outcomes, the MAP65/70 patients had a non-significantly shorter median LOS for index hospitalization (MAP65/70: 14 days, MAPCVP: 15 days; p = 0.310) and shorter median ICU LOS (MAP65/70: 6 days, MAPCVP: 6.5 days; p = 0.783).
Table 2 RVF admission outcomes.
MAP65/70 | MAPCVP | p-Value | |
Peak ProBNP [median (IQR)] | 5915.0 (1690.8–11,480.8) | 6081.0 (3145.2–17,001.0) | 0.375B |
Peak lactate [median (IQR)] | 2.6 (2.0–4.2) | 2.4 (1.6–2.8) | 0.189B |
Admission Cr (mean ± SD) | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 0.130A |
RAP | 18.9 ± 3.8 | 18.4 ± 3.3 | 0.615A |
CVP | 13.9 ± 5.2 | 12.3 ± 4.0 | 0.639A |
CI (F) (mean ± SD) | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 0.459A |
SvO2 | 53.0 ± 6.4 | 52.9 ± 6.4 | 0.958A |
ScvO2 | 57.4 ± 6.8 | 53.7 ± 9.1 | 0.465A |
LOS overall | 14.0 (7.0–20.2) | 15.0 (9.8–22.0) | 0.310B |
LOS ICU | 6.0 (4.0–10.0) | 6.5 (4.8–9.2) | 0.783B |
Need for ventilator | 5 (16.7%) | 4 (13.3%) | 1.000C |
Development of AKI | 22 (73.3%) | 1 (3.3%) | <0.001C |
Need for RRT | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.3%) | 1.000C |
In-hospital mortality | 13 (43.3%) | 5 (16.7%) | 0.047C |
Vasopressor and inotrope management of RVF
The most frequently utilized initial vasopressor in the entire cohort was norepinephrine (40/60, 66.7%), followed by vasopressin (10/60; 16.7%), and a total of 22 patients required more than 1 vasopressor to achieve the designated MAP goal (Table ). 36 patients also required support with an inotrope, where dobutamine was more frequently administered compared to milrinone (21 [35%] versus 15 [25%], respectively; p = 0.319]. A total of 16 patients were initiated on advanced prostacyclin therapy (intravenous treprostinil or epoprostenol) during the index hospitalization as well.
Table 3 Vasopressor, inotrope, and prostacyclin management of RVF admission.
MAP65/70 | MAPCVP | p-Value | |
Initial vasopressor administered | 21 (70%) | 30 (100%) | 0.002A |
Specific vasopressor administered | 0.303B | ||
Norepinephrine | 15 (71.4%) | 25 (83.3%) | |
Vasopressin | 6 (28.6%) | 4 (13.3%) | |
Epinephrine | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.3%) | |
Phenylephrine | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
>1 vasopressors administered | 10 (33.3%) | 12 (40%) | 0.789A |
>2 vasopressors administered | 4 (13.3%) | 6 (20%) | 0.731A |
Initial inotrope administered | 19 (63.3%) | 17 (56.7%) | 0.792A |
Specific inotrope administered | 0.008A | ||
Dobutamine | 7 (36.8%) | 14 (82.4%) | |
Milrinone | 12 (63.2%) | 3 (17.6%) | |
Both | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
“Rescue” prostacyclin administered | 6 (20%) | 10 (33.3%) | 0.382A |
DISCUSSION
Clinical implications
The universally accepted MAP goal of 65 mmHg for critically ill patients originates primarily from the literature surrounding sepsis and subsequent shock. However in specific clinical conditions, the MAP goal may need to be adjusted to optimize perfusion pressure, such as in hepatorenal syndrome. When it comes to RVF as a result of decompensated pre-capillary PH, an optimal MAP target has not been well studied. Patients with RVF exhibit systemic congestion with an elevated CVP or RAP. This condition is frequently overlooked as patients do not typically display obvious hypotension, and symptoms only become pronounced when it reaches a severe stage. Reduced SPP results in inadequate organ perfusion. Therefore, investigation of a dynamic MAP goal by taking CVP or RAP into consideration is paramount for promoting perfusion to the RV myocardium, maintaining SPP primarily to the kidneys, and increasing LV afterload, which in turn counteracts interventricular septal flattening and encourages normal cardiac geometry. In this retrospective study, our data suggests the importance of having a dynamic MAP target instead of a fixed goal when it comes to RVF where optimization of RV preload, afterload, and contractility is key.
Campo et al. previously showed that the presence of renal dysfunction is a significant indicator of poor outcomes in RVF patients. Patients with PH are at risk of developing AKI due to multiple factors, including low cardiac output, venous congestion, activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, and hypoxia. An additional cause of worsening renal function in these cases may be related to diuresis, even though it is a mainstay of volume optimization therapy. Pre-capillary PH patients with an elevated CVP or RAP often require high-dose diuretics though clinicians may be inclined to abandon such therapy if there is a worsening trend in kidney function. However, the developing renal dysfunction may not be a result of over-diuresis but, instead, poor SPP in the setting of RVF. The findings from our study support this theory by showing that the dynamic MAP cohort, which focused on optimizing SPP based on the patient's changing CVP or RAP, had significantly less development of AKI.
Strengths and limitations
The present study has several limitations. The data are retrospectively collected from a single center with a relatively small sample size, which may introduce bias and limit the generalizability of results. MAP was measured both invasively and noninvasively, potentially affecting the precision of these measurements. Most importantly, the dynamic MAP group had a higher use of invasive hemodynamic measurements via PAC compared to static MAP group (MAPCVP n = 27; MAP65/70 n = 19) potentially leading to better utilization of diuretics and vasoactive drugs, including inotropes and intravenous prostacyclin agents. As such, there was a statistically significant difference between the type of inotrope used between the dynamic and static MAP groups without a significant difference in the overall number of inotropic support between groups. While Dobutamine and Milrinone have well-established and similar outcomes in cardiogenic shock, they have not been studied head-to-head in pre-capillary PH. Similarly, there was a trend toward higher usage of intravenous prostacyclin in the dynamic MAP group compared to static MAP as well.
Despite these limitations, this study includes patients with a diverse demographic background with multiple etiologies of pre-capillary PH that were investigated over a multi-year period. Moreover, the findings from the study serve to introduce the novel concept of adjusting the MAP target in RVF patients based on dynamic changes in invasive hemodynamics, which is quite plausible from a physiologic perspective.
CONCLUSION
There is a high prevalence of RVF in pre-capillary PH, resulting in prolonged admissions to the ICU that are accompanied by significant morbidity and mortality. We found that targeting a dynamic MAP goal, instead of the traditional MAP target of 65 mmHg, resulted in a significantly lower incidence of AKI and significantly lower in-hospital mortality compared to a static MAP target in pre-capillary PH patients admitted with RVF. Refinement of this clinical approach and subsequent investigation through a multi-center study and perhaps a randomized controlled trial is needed to further evaluate these findings.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Niala Moallem: Conceptualization; data curation; investigation; methodology; validation; writing—original draft; writing—review & editing. Garrett Fiscus: Conceptualization; data curation; investigation; methodology; validation; writing—original draft, review, editing. David M. O'Sullivan: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; methodology; writing—original draft, review, editing. Michael Perkins: Conceptualization; data curation; investigation; methodology; validation; writing—original draft, review, editing. Andrew Scatola: Conceptualization; data curation; investigation; methodology; validation; writing—original draft, review, editing. Raj Parikh: Conceptualization; investigation; methodology; validation; writing—original draft, review, editing.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
No funding was received for this study.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ETHICS STATEMENT
This material is the authors' own original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere or currently being considered for publication elsewhere. The article reflects the authors' own research and analysis in a truthful and complete manner. The authors give consent for publication.
Ryan JJ, Huston J, Kutty S, Hatton ND, Bowman L, Tian L, Herr JE, Johri AM, Archer SL. Right ventricular adaptation and failure in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31(4):391–406. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2015.01.023]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Right ventricular failure (RVF) in pre‐capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. While mean arterial pressure (MAP) goals have been well established in critical care literature, the optimal MAP target for patients with RVF secondary to pre‐capillary PH remains unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the difference in outcomes between patients who were managed with different MAP targets. We retrospectively analyzed records of 60 patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit for decompensated RVF secondary to pre‐capillary PH. The records were stratified into two groups: 30 patients who were treated with a static MAP goal of either 65 or 70 mmHg (MAP65/70) and 30 patients who received a dynamic MAP goal (MAPCVP) determined by invasively obtained central venous pressure or right atrial pressure. The dynamic MAP group had a statistically significant decrease in in‐hospital mortality and incidence of acute kidney injury compared to the static MAP cohort.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
2 Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellowship, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
3 Department of Research Administration, Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
4 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
5 Division of Cardiology, Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA