It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The thermal conductivity of bentonite plays a crucial role in analyzing the heat transfer process and determining the temperature field distribution within deep geological repositories. Despite considerable efforts in modeling the thermal conductivity of compacted bentonite and its mixtures, a comprehensive synthesis of these studies has not been previously undertaken. This research aimed to thoroughly review predictive models for the thermal conductivity of compacted bentonite and its mixtures, assessing their performance against a substantial dataset comprising 495 measurements of GMZ and MX80 bentonite. Through a systematic compilation and evaluation of seven models for compacted bentonite and three models for bentonite mixtures, the study identified TC2008 and LC2016 as the most accurate models for GMZ and MX80 compacted bentonite, respectively, whereas PT2021 emerged as the superior predictor for GMZ and MX80 bentonite mixtures. This exploration revealed the absence of a single, universally accurate model capable of predicting the thermal conductivities across all bentonite variants, highlighting the necessity for researchers to judiciously select the most fitting model for predicting the thermal conductivity of bentonite. Furthermore, we expressed the inherent limitations in current thermal conductivity models for compacted bentonite and its mixtures, and proposed directions for future inquiry in this domain.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University , Shanghai , China; Key Laboratory of Geotechnical & Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education and Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University , Shanghai , China
2 Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University , Shanghai , China
3 Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology , Beijing , China