1. Introduction
Over the past two centuries, society has undergone profound changes driven by the rise of urbanization and industrialization. Advances in society have introduced various hazards directly impacting human health [1]. Among these hazards are biological and chemical pollutants, extreme climate conditions, gas emissions, and heavy metal accumulation, all of which have been linked to an increased risk of various health conditions, not only respiratory complications, but also endocrine disruptions, cancer, cardiovascular, and neurological disorders [2,3,4,5]. Globally, stroke is a highly prevalent neurological disease and a main contributor to long-term disabilities, remaining the second leading cause of death [6]. Importantly, stroke is no longer a disease of just the elderly; over the past two decades, the prevalence and incidence rates of stroke in people under the age of seventy have increased [7]. This phenomenon has been attributed in part to increased risk factors, including poor diet, smoking habits, and chronic exposure to stressors. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests that environmental toxins, including household air pollution, ambient particulate matter, and exposure to heavy metals, contribute to the global stroke burden [8,9]. In fact, the most recent systematic analysis shows that among stroke risk factors, ambient particulate matter exposure is second only to high blood pressure in terms of prevalence [6].
Human exposure to environmental toxins can occur through three primary routes: dietary intake, inhalation, and dermal absorption [1]. Short and long-term exposure to toxins has shown bioaccumulation in different tissues, including the gut, lungs, and central nervous system [10]. In consequence, these toxins can interfere with cellular processes, inducing neurotoxicity and altering the host immune response [11]. Indeed, experimental studies have demonstrated that exposure to a range of environmental toxins can disrupt host homeostasis by impairing the cellular response of the immune system, particularly at barrier sites such as the gut and lungs [12,13,14]. This disruption is further reinforced by recent findings that environmental contaminants also significantly alter the gut microbiome’s composition and function [12,15], suggesting exposure to such toxins has an impact on biological interfaces. Because recent studies highlighted the critical role of the gut–brain axis, in neurological disorders [16] and given that the primary route of exposure to environmental toxins is through food consumption and inhalation, the lung and intestinal microbiota could be significant intermediaries in the influence of these chemical pollutants on neurological disorders.
Despite growing evidence linking environmental toxins to stroke risk factors, the field lacks a thorough mechanistic understanding of the precise pathways through which these toxins influence stroke pathobiology. Research on this topic is limited, leaving a gap in our knowledge of the long-term effects of toxin exposure and the synergistic impact of multiple pollutants on brain diseases. Additionally, socioeconomic status, geographical region, sex difference, and pre-existing conditions that may affect individual susceptibility to these toxins are not well characterized, further complicating risk assessment and mitigation strategies. Bridging these gaps is crucial for developing targeted interventions and refining policy regulations to reduce stroke incidence linked to environmental neurotoxins. Therefore, this review aims to examine the biological mechanisms associated with environmental toxins and deleterious consequences on the host. To do so, it explores the impact of these toxins on the lungs and gut, especially delving into the cellular pathways and microbiome-related changes, and further emphasizing their potential contribution to an increased risk of stroke onset and its outcomes. This narrative review aims to raise awareness of the importance of the gut- and lung-brain axis linked to exposure to environmental toxins and stroke risks, which we believe is relevant for other neurological and neuroinflammatory diseases.
2. Environmental Toxins and Stroke Risk
Environmental toxicants are either airborne pollutants or chemical toxins that have been shown to cause systemic inflammation and ultimately becoming neurotoxic [17]. These environmental toxins, grouped under the name of xenobiotics, are nearly impossible to evade in today’s industrialized world and include particulate matter, dioxins, persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [18]. Chronic interactions with these substances can incrementally impact human health, leading to the emergence of disease through different exposure pathways. Importantly, exposure to environmental toxins has been shown to increase the occurrence, risk, and development of neurological disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, and be a possible risk factor for Parkinson’s disease, and it impacts neuronal development [19,20]. The neuroinflammatory response is a key common component of the pathobiology of these neurological diseases [21,22]. Neuroinflammation is not only observed from repeated or chronic exposure periods but can be induced even after a single insult [23], demonstrating the need to monitor toxin exposure and prolongation to minimize potential threats to human health. Although observational and prospective studies have offered valuable insights into the correlation between exposure to environmental toxins and the onset of various neurological and neuroinflammatory disorders and neurodegenerative diseases [19,24], there is a lack of research elucidating the mechanisms and pathways underlying the role of environmental toxins in neurological conditions such as stroke.
In this section, we discuss pertinent environmental toxins and their metabolic pathways that lead to host toxicity, particularly in the context of stroke. The categories of toxins reviewed include (1) persistent organic pollutants (POPs), (2) per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFASs), (3) air pollutants, and (4) micro- and nanoplastics. Table 1 summarizes experimental studies that demonstrated the biological consequences of environmental toxins on the host cellular response and, when available, the implications for stroke.
2.1. Persistent Organic Pollutants
Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) represent a broad class of toxins abundant in the environment and formed as byproducts from industrial or chemical processes, such as waste incineration, vehicle exhaust, and cigarette smoke [50,51,52,53]. Due to their physical properties, these pollutants resist natural degradation processes and persist in the environment. Common POPs include organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), dioxins, and dibenzofurans [50]. These persistent pollutants are ubiquitous in atmospheric, terrestrial, and aquatic environments [52]. Due to their lipophilic properties, POPs accumulate in lipid-rich tissues and organs, including the liver, blood, brain, adipose tissue, and kidney, and bioaccumulate in mammals, humans, fish, and invertebrates [54,55].
2.1.1. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Organic pollutants characterized by two or more fused benzene rings are classified as PAHs. Biodegradation or detoxification of PAHs by the host involves several enzymatic pathways, including the binding of xenobiotics to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and subsequent expression of P450 (CYP) genes [56,57]. Most of the metabolic products of xenobiotics are excreted from the body, while a significant amount fails to be detoxified and is retained in the body. Indeed, CYP-mediated biotransformation of various POPs can result in toxic compounds that either elicit a mutagenic or genotoxic effect [58,59,60]. For instance, the highly toxic environmental chemical TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) has been shown to alter several cellular and tissue responses, leading to neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and the formation of tumors [60]. Mechanistically, inhibition of AhR activity, using AhR-deficient mice, prevented the carcinogenic effect of the PAHs: TCDD and benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) [61,62], highlighting the functional role of AhR in mediating deleterious effects of environmental toxins.
Epidemiological studies have shown that PAHs, including BaP, have been associated with hypertension [63] and cardiovascular diseases [64], both known to increase ischemic stroke risks [65]. Regarding the association between stroke and exposure to PAHs, Rahman et al. found that higher levels of specific urinary PAHs were positively correlated with increased odds of stroke onset in men and women [66]. In experimental studies, BaP exposure has been associated with high blood pressure and vasoconstriction (Table 1). Indeed, following both acute and chronic BaP exposure in animal models, BaP increased blood pressure, exceeding 20% of baseline values [65,66]. Moreover, chronic treatment with BaP administered by oral gavage in mice susceptible to atherosclerosis (ApoE-deficient mice) increased the size of atherosclerotic plaques and a local inflammatory response characterized by the infiltration of T lymphocytes and macrophages [67]. Exposure to BaP has a direct effect on brain function since BaP and its metabolites can accumulate in lipid-rich tissues such as the brain [68] and have been shown to impair the blood–brain barrier function [69]. Tanaka et al. demonstrated that exposure to PAHs altered stroke outcomes in mice after intranasal exposure, which induced edema in the brain and impaired locomotor functions in rats [70]. These findings suggest that despite the liver’s primary role in detoxifying xenobiotics [71], there exists a tissue-specific vascular response, potentially highlighting the link between certain PAHs and stroke pathophysiology. The complex interplay between the increased risk of cardiovascular complications linked to PAH exposure and stroke occurrence and outcomes underscores the necessity for deeper insights into how environmental toxin exposure heightens the risk of stroke onset, mortality, and morbidity.
2.1.2. Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Despite the implementation of new regulations to ban the production of some PCBs in 1978 [72], the lasting repercussions of industrial manufacturing continue to persist and have lasting effects on human health. Even decades after the ban of PCBs, Raffetti et al. identified correlations between the fasting blood serum levels of several PCB compounds and the health status of middle-aged individuals residing in a heavily polluted area with a history of PCB production. Significantly, specific PCB congeners, such as 138, 153, and 180, which are considered to be mid- and highly chlorinated and are more resistant to being metabolized, were found to be associated with the onset of hypertension based on fasting blood serum levels [73]. Elevated serum levels of PCBs have also been positively associated with increased blood pressure [74] and an increased risk for ischemic stroke in both men and women [75]. Moreover, as shown in Table 1, passive dietary consumption of PCBs has also been demonstrated to increase the risk of stroke onset, specifically in women [31]. Mechanistically, PCBs, which are ligands of AhR, activate the nuclear transcription factor nuclear factor- κB (NF-κB) pathway, inducing oxidative stress, production of inflammatory cytokines, and upregulation of the expression of inflammatory genes [76,77]. This indicates the role of PCBs in inducing a pro-inflammatory response.
2.2. Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances
The production of PFASs began just less than a century ago [78]. Due to their structural and chemical properties, these chemicals are highly resistant to degradation and persist in the environment for extended periods of time. PFAS have been extensively utilized in household and industrial products, including non-stick cookware, medical devices, insulating packaging material, cosmetics, and textiles [79]. The broad utilization of PFAS across various sectors has resulted in widespread accumulation in both the environment and animals, raising concerns regarding their potential impact and health hazards for individuals [78,80]. Ingestion and inhalation are the two primary routes of human exposure to PFAS through dietary consumption, mainly from drinking water [81,82]. It has been reported that the average half-life in human blood serum for some of these substances is up to 8.5 years [83]. Several studies have shown exposure to PFAS is positively associated with an increased risk for hypertension [84]. Despite elevated levels of cholesterol and hypertension observed in the previous studies, which are known risk factors for cardiovascular disease and stroke [85], there have been conflicting results regarding whether exposure to PFAS increases the risk of stroke onset. Simpson et al. found a modest association with stroke incidence in individuals living near a PFAS chemical plant [86], while Feng et al. demonstrated that higher PFAS levels increased the risk for cardiovascular disease and stroke, particularly in males [87]. Another study showed that individuals with higher serum levels of PFAS exhibited dyslipidemia, yet no significant association between stroke and myocardial infarction [88].
Experimental research indicates that exposure to members of the PFAS family induces immunotoxicity by activating signaling pathways, including the NF-kB pathway. This activation triggers the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and facilitates the upregulation of cytokine production [89]. Moreover, tissue inflammation after exposure to PFAS is mediated by several signaling pathways such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) and Janus kinase 2/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 [90,91]. Although these signaling pathways are activated following experimental stroke [90,91], the exact mechanistic pathways linking PFAS exposure to influencing the risk for stroke remain elusive. Additionally, a new hypothesis has emerged that exposure to PFAS may target the cardiovascular system by activating platelet aggregation and adhesion, promoting thrombosis [92]. A deeper understanding of the health hazards associated with PFAS exposure and the underlying mechanistic pathways could provide insights into how these compounds contribute to stroke risk.
2.3. Air Pollutants
The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that a significant portion of premature deaths linked to outdoor air pollution is due to cardiovascular diseases and ischemic stroke (37%), and respiratory infections (23%) (
According to the National Institute of Health (NIH), air pollution is a mixture of hazardous compounds, which include PAHs, ozone, particulate matter, noxious gases, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur oxides (
In animal models, passive exposure to air pollution induced significant alterations in the lung epithelium, characterized by increased mucus secretion and morphological changes in the pulmonary cell lining. These changes manifested as an augmented presence of microvilli and a reduction in the population of ciliated cells within the lung tissue [102]. In a controlled laboratory setting, individuals without pre-existing health conditions who were exposed to a mixture of common air pollutants, including sulfur dioxide, sulfate aerosols, and ozone, demonstrated an increased risk of developing pulmonary dysfunction, including a decrease in forced expiratory volume and vital capacity [103]. In an epidemiological study investigating the association between PM2.5 exposure and respiratory and cardiovascular complications, findings revealed that women were more likely to be hospitalized for such complications compared to men when exposed to PM2.5 [104].
Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 is associated with a higher ischemic stroke incidence rate and mortality compared to studies investigating ultrafine ambient pollutants [93,105,106,107]. Szyszkowicz et al. observed a correlation between low-level exposure to ambient air pollution and an increased number of visits to the hospital for hypertension [108], which may be an indicator of higher stroke risk for those individuals exposed to ambient air pollution. These findings highlight that air contaminants may compromise an already vulnerable region of the lungs, potentially increasing the risk of lung infections, hospitalizations associated with lung complications, and post-stroke pneumonia, and stroke outcomes should be further explored.
2.4. Nano- and Microplastics
The use of plastic globally has continued to increase at a staggering rate, reaching nearly 500 million tons annually. Despite policy efforts and heightened awareness of methods to recycle and dispose of plastics, less than 10% is recycled, and a quarter of the plastic is inadequately disposed of (
3. Exposure to Environmental Toxins at Barrier Sites
Barrier sites, including the lungs, gut, and skin, act as physical barriers and immune barriers to maintain host homeostasis and protect from external threats [119,120,121]. If compromised by environmental toxins, these barrier sites have been shown to contribute to brain diseases, specifically regarding the lung–brain axis and gut–brain axis. Cellular mechanisms linking environmental toxins, barrier sites, and stroke pathobiology are discussed in the next sections.
The respiratory tract is lined with an epithelial layer consisting primarily of pseudostratified ciliated columnar cells, which function as a barrier against foreign particles. The cells lined with cilia and mucosal cells initiate a defense mechanism by generating mucus and trapping foreign particles and pathogens [122]. Exposure to environmental toxins such as particulate matter increases ROS production, compromising the epithelial barrier integrity and creating an environment where bacteria are more likely to invade [123], demonstrating the vulnerability of the barrier site. Short-term exposure to PM10 reduced the tight junction protein occludin in human and rat alveolar epithelial cells [124]. In contrast, exposure to PCB126, a dioxin-like compound, increased the expression of the tight junction proteins occludin and claudin [32]. Jang et al. found that ozone exposure also significantly impacts the structural integrity of the lung’s epithelial layer and immune response in the lungs. After exposure to ozone, the researchers observed initial epithelial cell death followed by an increased proliferation of epithelial cells coupled with an increase in neutrophils [125]. In wild-type mice, it was shown that acute exposure to ozone compromised the epithelial lining, increased epithelial damage in the lungs, and increased permeability in ST2-deficient mice [39]. Overall, these findings highlight the complex interaction between environmental toxins and the integrity of the epithelial barrier and immune regulation. While different environmental pollutants can have contrasting effects on epithelial barrier function and immune regulation, exposure may have implications for respiratory health and disease susceptibility.
In the gut, the digestive tract serves as an interface between the environment and the host, acting as a direct entry sight for pathogenic invaders, including bacteria, pathogens, and contaminated food components [126]. As a defense mechanism to prevent bacteria and pathogens from invading the tissue, specialized intestinal epithelial cells known as goblet cells produce mucus, forming a mucosal layer [127,128]. It has been shown that even within the first 24 h post-stroke, intestinal permeability is compromised, contributing to inflammation and bacterial translocation to secondary sites. The impaired permeability of the gut has been directly correlated with an increased severity of stroke outcomes [129]. Environmental toxins can also lead to altered permeability of the gut lining. A 3D model of human intestinal samples revealed that exposure to particulate matter at a concentration of 500 μg/cm2 for up to two weeks reduced the levels of zonula occludens protein 1 (ZO−1) and claudin-1 [36]. Mice acutely and chronically exposed to high concentrations of ambient PM2.5 increased the permeability of the gut barrier by reducing the expression of the tight junction protein, ZO-1, at acute and chronic time points [130]. Histological analysis of the gastric epithelium in mice deficient in the tight junction protein occludin did not compromise the structure of the epithelium but rather promoted chronic inflammation [131]. The subsequent inflammatory response in the gut activated by the upregulation of IL-17-producing T cells can increase gut permeability by disrupting the tight junction barrier [132]. One explanation for the impaired architecture of the tight junctions is that cells, as a stress mechanism in response to exposure to particulate matter, will generate ROS, which disrupt tight junction formation and increase epithelial cell permeability [35].
3.1. Lung–Brain Axis and Environmental Toxins
Recent findings suggest there is a bidirectional communication pathway involving pulmonary microbiota, their metabolites in the lungs, the central and autonomic nervous system, and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, which are collectively known as the lung–brain axis [133]. While still an emerging concept in understanding the functional role of the lung–brain axis in health and disease, the lung–brain axis has been demonstrated to play an integral role in the pathology of neurological diseases. In a recent study, Hosang et al. manipulated the pulmonary microbiome using a cocktail of antibiotics, which in turn influenced the pathogenesis of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a rat model of multiple sclerosis [134]. Further evidence supports the idea that environmental toxins can alter the lung–brain axis and may influence the likelihood of stroke onset and post-stroke outcomes. Tanaka et al. demonstrated that intranasal exposure to urban aerosols in mice can affect post-stroke recovery by augmenting neuroinflammation, activating brain resident microglial cells, and impairing motor function post-stroke [70].
Among the various complications experienced by patients following a stroke, urinary infections, and post-stroke pneumonia are the most prevalent [135]. Post-ischemic stroke not only causes site-specific damage but has been shown to impact secondary organs such as the lungs in experimental stroke models [136]. Stroke onset activates an immune cascade and consequently leads to immunosuppression in the periphery, increasing the risk of developing infections, including stroke-associated pneumonia and the patients’ 30-day mortality rate [137,138]. Exposure to air pollution has also been linked to an increased risk of bacterial lung infections, in particular bacterial pneumonia [139]. The association between stroke and lung infection highlights the need for more research unveiling the lung–brain axis (Figure 1).
3.1.1. Environmental Toxins and Immune Response in the Lungs
The lungs are one of the first organs to interact with inhaled particulate matter. Exposure to particulate matter has been shown to impair immune cell functions, modify the immune response, and disturb lung architecture. PM10 can penetrate deeper into the lungs, targeting the lung bronchioles and resulting in remodeling of lung tissue and the upregulation of immune cells [140]. Damage to lung architecture and altered immune response elevate the likelihood of lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic bronchitis, and respiratory tract infections due to resulting lung impairment and dysfunction post-exposure to environmental toxins [43,141,142].
Importantly, studies have shown that particulate matter can translocate to secondary organs and elicit a systemic effect. Upon inhalation, particulate matter first enters the nasal cavity and can then translocate into the brain through multiple routes, including the olfactory nerve, compromised blood–brain barrier, or damaged nasal epithelium [143]. Chronic insults from inhaled particulate matter have revealed that aging is associated with a decline in the phagocytic capacity of macrophages and accumulation of particulate matter within the lung-associated lymph nodes, ultimately altering the lung-associated lymph nodes’ follicular architecture [144]. Similarly, Samary et al. demonstrated in rats that ischemic stroke resulted in changes in the respiratory environment, impairing the phagocytic capacity of macrophages, upregulating inflammatory markers including TNF-α and IL-6 levels in the lungs, and inducing lung edema [145]. While it has been shown that exposure to particulate matter can alter the tissue and immune architecture, even in the absence of lung damage, exposure to particulate matter can influence coagulation factors and fibrinogen, bridging the connection between inhaled particulate matter and cardiovascular diseases [146]. Impaired lung function has been demonstrated to result in a higher incidence of ischemic stroke [147]. Together, this highlights the intricate connection between exposure to particulate matter and the crosstalk between the lungs and the cardiovascular system, which may influence the onset of disease.
3.1.2. Effect of Environmental Toxins on the Lung Microbiome
The pulmonary microbiome should be considered when determining the effects of environmental toxins. While it was once thought that the lungs were sterile [148], emerging evidence suggests that manipulating the pulmonary microbiota can activate immune cells in the brain and influence neurological disease outcomes [134]. Variation in bacterial taxa has been mapped along the respiratory tract from the oral cavity through the trachea and to the lungs [149]. Despite the limited number of studies investigating pulmonary microbiota, a recent study demonstrated that inhalation exposure to PM2.5 led to acute inflammation in the bronchioles, increased the number of goblet cells, and reduced the abundance of proteobacteria in the lungs [42]. Potential consequences of exposure to environmental toxins disturb mediators within the lung–brain axis. We suggest that future investigations should invest in understanding the role of the pulmonary microbiota influenced by environmental factors in stroke pathogenesis.
3.2. Gut–Brain Axis and Environmental Toxins
The gut–brain axis is a bidirectional communication pathway that signals information between the gut and the brain via the autonomic and enteric nervous system, the hypothalamic–pituitary axis, the vagal nerve, and systemic circulation [150,151]. Humans are exposed to millions of foreign substances referred to as xenobiotics directly and passively. Upon exposure, the body metabolizes and eliminates these substances, with toxic xenobiotics being transformed into less harmful derivatives before being excreted through stool, urine, perspiration, and bile [152]. Xenobiotics are also metabolized by the resident gut microbiota, which can influence bioaccumulation and toxicity [153]. However, accumulation of metabolites in the body from xenobiotics, when not excreted or eliminated, can pose significant health risks by disrupting cellular homeostasis and causing tissue damage [57]. Moreover, oral exposure to environmental toxins will not only accumulate in the digestive tract but can also enter the bloodstream through enterohepatic circulation. Consequently, this can lead to the bioaccumulation of toxic derivatives in secondary organs such as the brain [154].
Trillions of microorganisms reside within the intestinal tract, comprised of bacteria, fungi, protozoans, archaea, and viruses [155]. Metagenomic analysis of the human microbiota without underlying conditions revealed that the phyla change along the digestion tract; however, it is dominated primarily by commensal bacteria: Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria phyla [156]. Several factors shape the composition and function of the microbiota, including diet, aging, and the environment [157,158,159]. In particular, the gut microbiota plays an integral role in training and educating the immune system and facilitating tolerance mechanisms [160]. Signaling from the brain can modulate the immune response in the gut, intestinal permeability, and bacterial–host interactions [161]. Recent studies have revealed exposure to environmental toxins shifts the relative abundance of bacteria and alters microbial profiles in animal models. Dietary exposure to heavy metals and PCBs has been shown to reduce the abundance of Proteobacteria while simultaneously increasing the presence of Bacteroidetes [25,26,30]. Chronic exposure to PAHs (BaP and TCDD) also shifts the bacterial ratios, increasing the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes while reducing the abundance of Firmicutes [12,162]. Interestingly, long-term inhalation exposure to PM2.5 altered the ratio of bacteria in mice, marked by a significant reduction in Akkermensia and Firmicutes, and significantly increased the Bacteroidetes [130], demonstrating the impact of inhaled air pollutants on the gut microbiota. Collectively, these experimental findings highlight the impact of environmental toxins on the gut microbiota, yet the impact of alterations of the composition in the context of neurological diseases such as stroke risk and outcomes remain unknown.
Exposure to Environmental Toxins and Stroke Risk
Stroke onset triggers an immune response in both the brain and the periphery. It has been established that the occlusion of a cerebral artery causes shear stress in the brain, altering the blood–brain barrier permeability and limiting the amount of glucose and oxygen to the brain tissue, leading to neuronal cell death [163]. This acute response triggers an immune cascade signaling to resident immune cells to activate the innate and adaptive immune response [164]. Inflammation after stroke extends beyond the site of injury and propagates a systemic effect, greatly impacting secondary organs in the periphery [165]. Immune cells have been shown to traffic from peripheral organs, such as the gut and brain, post-stroke to mediate inflammation [166,167]. Because neuroinflammation plays an essential role in the pathobiology of stroke, the effect of environmental toxins on the immune system warrants further investigation.
Several preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated stroke induces dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, which can influence the severity of stroke outcomes [168,169,170,171]. Singh et al. found that in an experimental stroke model, the expansion of Bacteroidetes is associated with a proinflammatory response marked by the increased expression of IFN-γ+ and IL-17 cytokines produced by T helper cells [168]. Moreover, prior to stroke onset, mice treated with Ampicillin shifted the microbial profile, leading to the expansion of Proteobacteria and Lactobacilliales and a reduction in Bacteroidetes, which were deemed to be neuroprotective by reducing the lesion size after stroke [172]. These changes in the microbiota composition induced an expansion of regulatory T cells in the gut and down-regulation of IL-17 γδT cells, which prevented their trafficking into the brain and thereby prevented the formation of the primary ischemic damage [166]. Together, these studies reveal the intricate relationship between the host microbiota, the gut immune system, and stroke pathobiology. Because environmental toxin exposure induces alterations in the microbiome’s relative abundance, inducing a proinflammatory environment, this complex interplay may influence the immune response and, subsequently, impact stroke outcomes. However, further research is needed to understand the detailed mechanisms and implications of these interactions and how exposure to xenobiotics can influence stroke outcomes.
Inhalation of particulate matter can directly impact the lungs, but it can also indirectly induce inflammation in the gut [34]. Experimental models have shown that inhalation of particulate matter alters the bacterial ratio, as previously mentioned [130], but it also has an impact on the immune cell reservoir in the gut. The authors demonstrated that exposure to air pollution in dense urban regions for two weeks upregulated the expression of inflammatory cytokine production in the colon [34]. These findings highlight that environmental toxins exert a systemic effect at barrier sites, which can disrupt immune cell reservoirs in the periphery. Understanding how environmental toxins shape the immune compartments in peripheral organs and potentially influence the outcomes of stroke could further reveal the complexity of these interactions and improve our understanding of the impact of environmental factors on health outcomes.
4. Conclusions and Outlook
Reducing the incidence of strokes requires a comprehensive approach, including addressing exposure to environmental toxins. Prevention requires the implementation of new laws and regulations targeting exposure limits and the production of hazardous material to minimize exposure. Concurrently, detection strategies, on the other hand, provide a measure of an individual’s risk. Measuring metabolite concentrations in urine samples can be used to monitor toxin exposure [173]. Whereas prevention and detection strategies have long-term implications, immediate measures are required to counter-effect the deleterious consequences of environmental toxin exposure for stroke.
To date, there are limited studies understanding how environmental toxins act to mediate their potent effects contributing to stroke development. In this review, we examined numerous clinical, experimental, and epidemiological studies that have demonstrated that exposure to toxins via ingestion and inhalation disrupts cellular homeostasis, in particular the immune system and microbiome, and exerts a systemic effect on the gut, lungs, and brain. In addition, we highlighted how environmental toxins could increase the risk of stroke or exacerbate stroke outcomes.
By understanding the mechanisms of action related to environmental toxin exposure on the gut and lung–brain axis, we could limit the impact of environmental toxins-induced toxicity and associated brain diseases. To develop new therapeutic or preventive strategies, we need future research to address the systemic impact (gut and lungs) of environmental toxins and their contribution to stroke onset. For instance, dietary interventions rich in fiber and polyphenols have been demonstrated to play a role in reducing the bioavailability of xenobiotics by absorbing and minimizing their uptake [174,175]. Characterization of the gut and lung microbiomes associated with immune changes may be another approach to mitigate the effects of environmental toxin exposure. This would lead to new therapeutic strategies targeting microbiome–host interactions to counteract the deleterious effects of environmental pollutant exposure for brain diseases.
In conclusion, this review addresses how environmental toxins induce a systemic effect that may play a critical role in stroke pathogenesis. To our knowledge, there are limited studies that address the impact of environmental toxins in the context of stroke pathogenesis. While this review article provides insights into the role of environmental factors as risk factors for stroke, several gaps in the literature remain. Firstly, the precise mechanisms through which environmental toxins contribute to stroke pathogenesis remain unclear. Secondly, the exploration of sex differences in susceptibility to environmental toxins and their subsequent impact on stroke risk remains largely unexplored. Furthermore, there is a need for research to elucidate the systemic effects of environmental toxin exposure on stroke outcomes. Addressing these gaps will be crucial for advancing a more comprehensive understanding of environmental influences on stroke pathogenesis.
Conceptualization, A.R. and C.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R.; writing—review and editing, A.R. and C.B; visualization, A.R.; supervision, C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Mechanisms of environmental toxins inhaled or ingested potentially leading to increased susceptibility to stroke and severity. Environmental toxins originate from several sources, including industrial processes and as byproducts from incomplete combustion. These toxins can enter the environment and contaminate sources such as food, water, and soil and can also be abundant in the air, increasing human exposure via inhalation and ingestion as two primary routes. Once exposed, these toxins can target the primary organs, gut and lungs, and induce perturbation of the microbiota composition (dysbiosis), a pro-inflammatory response leading to disruption of tissue architecture, immune cell activation, and increased permeability at epithelial barrier sites, which may increase the exposure risk to harmful bacteria and pathogens. Inhaled or ingested xenobiotics are metabolized and bind to their respective receptors, upregulating ligand-activated transcription factors and inflammatory signaling pathways (AhR, PPAR, and NF-κB). Alterations at the gut and lung barriers can indirectly affect brain function. Metabolites generated from the metabolism of xenobiotics can traffic to the brain and may directly increase the risk for stroke by compromising the blood–brain barrier, activating brain resident immune cells and immune cells trafficking from the periphery, and causing cell death. AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; BBB, blood–brain barrier; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; PAHs, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; PCBs, polychlorinated biphenyls; PET, polyethylene terephthalate; PFASs, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances; POPs, persistent organic pollutants; PPAR-α and -δ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha and -delta; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; Tregs, regulatory T cells, created with Biorender.com.
Studies linking the effect of environmental toxins on the gut, lungs, and circulatory system and their consequences for stroke risk.
| Environmental Toxins | Compound/ | Model | Dosage | Exposure Method and Duration | Effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gut | ||||||
| Heavy Metal | Cadmium | Sprague–Dawley rats | 5 mg/kg | Gastric infusion daily for 30 days | ↓ Expression of the tight junction protein ZO-1 | [ |
| Heavy Metals | Cadmium/Arsenic | C57BL/6 mice | 50 ppm | Dietary exposure through drinking water for 2 weeks | ↓ Alpha diversity of the microbiota | [ |
| Heavy Metal | Arsenic | Participants in cohort study | <50 μg/L | 20-year exposure | Higher incidence of stroke | [ |
| Microplastics and nanoplastics | Micro/nanoplastics | C57/B6 mice | 0.2 and 2 mg/kg | 28 days | High dose led to morphological changes along the GI including the followings: | [ |
| Microplastics | Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) | In vitro simulation | 0.166 g/intake | 72 h | Shift in the relative abundance of bacteria in the upper region of the colon. Specifically, ↑ Desulfobacterota and ↓ Proteobacteria over time. | [ |
| Microplastics | PS-MPs | Male mice | 0.1mg/day of 5 or 20 μm PS-MPs | 28 days via oral gavage | Accumulation of PS-MPs in the gut, liver, and kidney. | [ |
| PAH | BaP | C57BL/6 mice | 10 mL/kg of BW | 28 days oral exposure | ↑ Inflammation in ileal segments | [ |
| PCBs | PCB153, PCB138, and PCB180 | C57BL/6 mice | 150 µmol/kg | 2 days | ↓ Proteobacteria | [ |
| PCBs | Prospective population based Follow up | Middle-aged and elderly women | Passive dietary exposure | 12 years of follow-up | Positive association observed between stroke risk and PCB exposure. | [ |
| PCB | PCB 126 | Ldlr−/− mice | 1 μmol/kg of PCB 126 | 14-week atherogenic diet and exposed to PCB 126 (1 μmol/kg) at weeks 2 and 4 | ↑ Expression of TNF-α, IL-6, and interleukin IL-18 in the jejunum | [ |
| PCB | PCB153 | C57BL/6 mice | 300 μmol/kg | 1× per day for 2-days | ↑ Expression of TNF-α and IL-6 in the intestinal epithelial cells of the small intestines | [ |
| Particulate matter | Urban particulate matter | C57BL/6 mice | 40 μg course particulate matter/mL | Mice were placed 4 h/day or 5 days/week for 2 weeks in inhalation chamber | ↑ Expression of TNF-α, IFN-γ, CXCL10, and IL-10 | [ |
| Particulate matter | Urban particulate matter | C57BL/6 mice | 200 μg | Gastric gavage | ↑ ROS production | [ |
| Particulate matter | Atmosphericparticulate matter | Intestinal tissue | 50–500 µg/cm2 | 1 week and 2 weeks | ↓ ZO−1 and claudin−1 expression level | [ |
| Lungs | ||||||
| Nanoparticles | Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles | Rats | 50 and 150 cm2 for 10 min | Intratracheally instilled 1 day and 4 weeks | -Narrowed alveolar ducts and alveoli | [ |
| Nano and microplastics | Polyethylene particles | BALB/c mice | 10 mg/kg 1× daily for 1 week | Oral administration | ↑ Percentage of Th17, Tregs, and Th2 cells | [ |
| Microplastics | PS-MPs | C57BL/6 mice | 6.25 mg/kg PS-MPs | Intratracheally instilled 3× per week for 3 weeks | ↑ Expression of collagen | [ |
| Ozone | Ozone exposure | C57BL/6 mice | 1 ppm ozone for 1 h | Inhalation chamber 1× | ↑ Barrier disruption and epithelial cell permeability | [ |
| Ozone | Ozone exposure | C57BL/6 mice | 1 ppm for the acute model and 1.5 ppm for the chronic model. | Acute phase: 1 h | Acute exposure induced the following: | [ |
| PAH | BaP | Sprague Dawley | 0.01 mg/kg | Intratracheally instilled for 7 days | ↑ Neutrophil recruitment | [ |
| PAH | Atmospheric PAHs | Human lung epithelial cell lines | Low dose | 30 days | Chronic exposure: | [ |
| Particulate matter | PM2.5 | C57BL/6N mice | 1.8, 5.4, and 16.2 mg/kg | Intratracheally instilled for 1 week | PM2.5 exposure led to the following: | [ |
| Particulate matter | Various | 18–64 years | Passive exposure | Average daily concentration | Exposure to air pollutants | [ |
| Circulatory system | ||||||
| Heavy Metal | Cadmium | Cohort study | Passive exposure | Measured urinary cadmium concentration | May increase the incidence of ischemic stroke | [ |
| Heavy Metal | Mixed metals | Ischemic stroke patients | Passive exposure | Fasting blood concentration within 48 h post-diagnosis | Higher plasma concentrations of aluminum, arsenic, and cadmium | [ |
| Dioxin | TCDD | Primary human aortic endothelial cell | 0.1% TCDD | 24 h | ↑ Hypertension and endothelial dysfunction. | [ |
| PAH | BaP | Sprague Dawley | 0.01 mg/kg | Intratracheally instilled for 7 days | ↑ Systolic and diastolic pressure and heart rate | [ |
| PAH | BaP | Wistar rats | 20 mg/kg for 4 and 8 weeks | Intra-peritoneal. injection | ↑ Blood pressure after 8 weeks in vivo | [ |
| POPs | Passive exposure | Aged 70 yrs. in Sweden. 5-year follow-up | Passive exposure | Baseline plasma samples | PCB congeners, organochlorine pesticides, and octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin showed increased risk of developing stroke in elderly population. | [ |
| PCBs | Various PCBs | Endothelial cells from porcine pulmonary arteries | PCB 77, PCB 153, and PCB114 | 24 h | Exposure led to the development of atherosclerosis and endothelial barrier dysfunction. | [ |
BaP, benzo-a-pyrene; CXCL10, interferon gamma-induced protein 10; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; Foxp3, forkhead box P3; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma; IL-4, interleukin-4; IL-5, interleukin-5; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-10, interleukin-10; IL-17, interleukin-17; Ldlr−/−, LDL receptor deficient mouse; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; PCB, polychlorinated biphenyls; PET, polyethylene terephthalate; PM2.5, particulate matter ≤ 2.5 μm; PS-MP, polystyrene microplastics; POP, persistent organic pollutant; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; Th2, T helper 2 cells; Th17, T helper 17 cells; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; Tregs, regulatory T cells; ZO-1, zona occludens 1. Upward and downward arrows indicate an increase or a decrease of the observed effect, respectively.
References
1. Manisalidis, I.; Stavropoulou, E.; Stavropoulos, A.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review. Front. Public Health; 2020; 8, 14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014]
2. Iwasaki, M.; Itoh, H.; Sawada, N.; Tsugane, S. Exposure to Environmental Chemicals and Cancer Risk: Epidemiological Evidence from Japanese Studies. Genes Environ.; 2023; 45, 10. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41021-023-00268-3]
3. Béjot, Y.; Reis, J.; Giroud, M.; Feigin, V. A Review of Epidemiological Research on Stroke and Dementia and Exposure to Air Pollution. Int. J. Stroke; 2018; 13, pp. 687-695. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747493018772800]
4. Kurt, O.K.; Zhang, J.; Pinkerton, K.E. Pulmonary Health Effects of Air Pollution. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med.; 2016; 22, pp. 138-143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mcp.0000000000000248]
5. Yang, A.-M.; Lo, K.; Zheng, T.-Z.; Yang, J.-L.; Bai, Y.-N.; Feng, Y.-Q.; Cheng, N.; Liu, S.-M. Environmental Heavy Metals and Cardiovascular Diseases: Status and Future Direction. Chronic Dis. Transl. Med.; 2020; 6, pp. 251-259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cdtm.2020.02.005]
6. Steinmetz, J.D.; Seeher, K.M.; Schiess, N.; Nichols, E.; Cao, B.; Servili, C.; Cavallera, V.; Cousin, E.; Hagins, H.; Moberg, M.E. et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Disorders Affecting the Nervous System, 1990–2021: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Neurol.; 2024; 4, pp. 344-381. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00038-3]
7. Krishnamurthi, R.V.; Moran, A.E.; Feigin, V.L.; Barker-Collo, S.; Norrving, B.; Mensah, G.A.; Taylor, S.; Naghavi, M.; Forouzanfar, M.H.; Nguyen, G. et al. Stroke Prevalence, Mortality and Disability-Adjusted Life Years in Adults Aged 20–64 Years in 1990-2013: Data from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 Study. Neuroepidemiology; 2015; 45, pp. 190-202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000441098]
8. Feigin, V.L.; Brainin, M.; Norrving, B.; Martins, S.; Sacco, R.L.; Hacke, W.; Fisher, M.; Pandian, J.; Lindsay, P. World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. Int. J. Stroke; 2021; 17, pp. 18-29. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17474930211065917]
9. Feigin, V.L.; Roth, G.A.; Naghavi, M.; Parmar, P.; Krishnamurthi, R.; Chugh, S.; Mensah, G.A.; Norrving, B.; Shiue, I.; Ng, M. et al. Global Burden of Stroke and Risk Factors in 188 Countries, during 1990–2013: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet Neurol.; 2016; 15, pp. 913-924. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30073-4]
10. Genuis, S.J.; Kelln, K.L. Toxicant Exposure and Bioaccumulation: A Common and Potentially Reversible Cause of Cognitive Dysfunction and Dementia. Behav. Neurol.; 2015; 2015, 620143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/620143]
11. Cresto, N.; Forner-Piquer, I.; Baig, A.; Chatterjee, M.; Perroy, J.; Goracci, J.; Marchi, N. Pesticides at Brain Borders: Impact on the Blood-Brain Barrier, Neuroinflammation, and Neurological Risk Trajectories. Chemosphere; 2023; 324, 138251. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138251]
12. Ribière, C.; Peyret, P.; Parisot, N.; Darcha, C.; Déchelotte, P.J.; Barnich, N.; Peyretaillade, E.; Boucher, D. Oral Exposure to Environmental Pollutant Benzo[a]Pyrene Impacts the Intestinal Epithelium and Induces Gut Microbial Shifts in Murine Model. Sci. Rep-UK; 2016; 6, 31027. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep31027]
13. Yang, Q.; Dai, H.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, B.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xu, F.; Ma, Q.; Lin, F. et al. Oral Feeding of Nanoplastics Affects Brain Function of Mice by Inducing Macrophage IL-1 Signal in the Intestine. Cell Rep.; 2023; 42, 112346. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112346]
14. Michaudel, C.; Fauconnier, L.; Julé, Y.; Ryffel, B. Functional and Morphological Differences of the Lung upon Acute and Chronic Ozone Exposure in Mice. Sci. Rep.; 2018; 8, 10611. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28261-9]
15. Qiao, J.; Chen, R.; Wang, M.; Bai, R.; Cui, X.; Liu, Y.; Wu, C.; Chen, C. Perturbation of Gut Microbiota Plays an Important Role in Micro/Nanoplastics-Induced Gut Barrier Dysfunction. Nanoscale; 2021; 13, pp. 8806-8816. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1nr00038a]
16. Cryan, J.F.; O’Riordan, K.J.; Cowan, C.S.M.; Sandhu, K.V.; Bastiaanssen, T.F.S.; Boehme, M.; Codagnone, M.G.; Cussotto, S.; Fulling, C.; Golubeva, A.V. et al. The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Physiol. Rev.; 2019; 99, pp. 1877-2013. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00018.2018]
17. Fuller, R.; Landrigan, P.J.; Balakrishnan, K.; Bathan, G.; Bose-O’Reilly, S.; Brauer, M.; Caravanos, J.; Chiles, T.; Cohen, A.; Corra, L. et al. Pollution and Health: A Progress Update. Lancet Planet. Health; 2022; 6, pp. e535-e547. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(22)00090-0]
18. Thompson, L.A.; Darwish, W.S. Environmental Chemical Contaminants in Food: Review of a Global Problem. J. Toxicol.; 2019; 2019, 2345283. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2345283]
19. Nabi, M.; Tabassum, N. Role of Environmental Toxicants on Neurodegenerative Disorders. Front. Toxicol.; 2022; 4, 837579. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2022.837579]
20. Lanphear, B.P. The Impact of Toxins on the Developing Brain. Annu. Rev. Public Health; 2015; 36, pp. 1-20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114413]
21. Iadecola, C.; Anrather, J. The Immunology of Stroke: From Mechanisms to Translation. Nat. Med.; 2011; 17, pp. 796-808. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.2399] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21738161]
22. Kwon, H.S.; Koh, S.-H. Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Disorders: The Roles of Microglia and Astrocytes. Transl. Neurodegener.; 2020; 9, 42. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40035-020-00221-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239064]
23. Block, M.L.; Calderón-Garcidueñas, L. Air Pollution: Mechanisms of Neuroinflammation and CNS Disease. Trends Neurosci.; 2009; 32, pp. 506-516. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19716187]
24. Cannon, J.R.; Greenamyre, J.T. The Role of Environmental Exposures in Neurodegeneration and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Toxicol. Sci.; 2011; 124, pp. 225-250. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfr239] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21914720]
25. Liu, S.; Deng, X.; Li, Z.; Zhou, W.; Wang, G.; Zhan, J.; Hu, B. Environmental Cadmium Exposure Alters the Internal Microbiota and Metabolome of Sprague–Dawley Rats. Front. Vet. Sci.; 2023; 10, 1219729. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1219729] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565077]
26. Li, X.; Brejnrod, A.D.; Ernst, M.; Rykær, M.; Herschend, J.; Olsen, N.M.C.; Dorrestein, P.C.; Rensing, C.; Sørensen, S.J. Heavy Metal Exposure Causes Changes in the Metabolic Health-Associated Gut Microbiome and Metabolites. Environ. Int.; 2019; 126, pp. 454-467. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.048]
27. Ersbøll, A.K.; Monrad, M.; Sørensen, M.; Baastrup, R.; Hansen, B.; Bach, F.W.; Tjønneland, A.; Overvad, K.; Raaschou-Nielsen, O. Low-level exposure to arsenic in drinking water and incidence rate of stroke: A cohort study in Denmark. Environ. Int.; 2018; 120, pp. 72-80. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.040] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30071456]
28. Tamargo, A.; Molinero, N.; Reinosa, J.J.; Alcolea-Rodriguez, V.; Portela, R.; Bañares, M.A.; Fernández, J.F.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V. PET microplastics affect human gut microbiota communities during simulated gastrointestinal digestion, first evidence of plausible polymer biodegradation during human digestion. Sci. Rep.; 2022; 12, 528. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04489-w] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35017590]
29. Deng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lemos, B.; Ren, H. Tissue accumulation of microplastics in mice and biomarker responses suggest widespread health risks of exposure. Sci. Rep.; 2017; 7, 46687. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46687]
30. Choi, J.J.; Eum, S.Y.; Rampersaud, E.; Daunert, S.; Abreu, M.T.; Toborek, M. Exercise Attenuates PCB-Induced Changes in the Mouse Gut Microbiome. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2013; 121, pp. 725-730. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306534]
31. Bergkvist, C.; Kippler, M.; Larsson, S.C.; Berglund, M.; Glynn, A.; Wolk, A.; Åkesson, A. Dietary Exposure to Polychlorinated Biphenyls Is Associated with Increased Risk of Stroke in Women. J. Intern. Med.; 2014; 276, pp. 248-259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joim.12194] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24428778]
32. Petriello, M.C.; Hoffman, J.B.; Vsevolozhskaya, O.; Morris, A.J.; Hennig, B. Dioxin-like PCB 126 Increases Intestinal Inflammation and Disrupts Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Homeostasis. Environ. Pollut.; 2018; 242, pp. 1022-1032. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.039] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30373033]
33. Phillips, M.C.; Dheer, R.; Santaolalla, R.; Davies, J.M.; Burgueño, J.; Lang, J.K.; Toborek, M.; Abreu, M.T. Intestinal exposure to PCB 153 induces inflammation via the ATM/NEMO pathway. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.; 2018; 339, pp. 24-33. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2017.11.027] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29197519]
34. Vignal, C.; Pichavant, M.; Alleman, L.Y.; Djouina, M.; Dingreville, F.; Perdrix, E.; Waxin, C.; Alami, A.O.; Gower-Rousseau, C.; Desreumaux, P. et al. Effects of Urban Coarse Particles Inhalation on Oxidative and Inflammatory Parameters in the Mouse Lung and Colon. Part. Fibre Toxicol.; 2017; 14, 46. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-017-0227-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29166940]
35. Mutlu, E.A.; Engen, P.A.; Soberanes, S.; Urich, D.; Forsyth, C.B.; Nigdelioglu, R.; Chiarella, S.E.; Radigan, K.A.; Gonzalez, A.; Jakate, S. et al. Particulate Matter Air Pollution Causes Oxidant-Mediated Increase in Gut Permeability in Mice. Part. Fibre Toxicol.; 2011; 8, 19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-8-19]
36. Woodby, B.; Schiavone, M.L.; Pambianchi, E.; Mastaloudis, A.; Hester, S.N.; Wood, S.M.; Pecorelli, A.; Valacchi, G. Particulate Matter Decreases Intestinal Barrier-Associated Proteins Levels in 3D Human Intestinal Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2020; 17, 3234. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093234] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32384765]
37. Jeong, M.-J.; Jeon, S.; Yu, H.-S.; Cho, W.-S.; Lee, S.; Kang, D.; Kim, Y.; Kim, Y.-J.; Kim, S.-Y. Exposure to Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles Induces Acute and Chronic Inflammatory Responses in Rat Lungs and Perturbs the Lung Microbiome. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2022; 19, 522. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010522]
38. Li, X.; Zhang, T.; Lv, W.; Wang, H.; Chen, H.; Xu, Q.; Cai, H.; Dai, J. Intratracheal administration of polystyrene microplastics induces pulmonary fibrosis by activating oxidative stress and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in mice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.; 2022; 232, 113238. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113238]
39. Michaudel, C.; Mackowiak, C.; Maillet, I.; Fauconnier, L.; Akdis, C.A.; Sokolowska, M.; Dreher, A.; Tan, H.-T.T.; Quesniaux, V.F.; Ryffel, B. et al. Ozone Exposure Induces Respiratory Barrier Biphasic Injury and Inflammation Controlled by IL-33. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.; 2018; 142, pp. 942-958. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.11.044]
40. Gentner, N.J.; Weber, L.P. Intranasal benzo[a]pyrene alters circadian blood pressure patterns and causes lung inflammation in rats. Arch. Toxicol.; 2011; 85, pp. 337-346. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-010-0589-6]
41. Bai, H.; Wu, M.; Zhang, H.; Tang, G. Chronic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure causes DNA damage and genomic instability in lung epithelial cells. Oncotarget; 2017; 8, pp. 79034-79045. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20891] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29108285]
42. Li, J.; Hu, Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, Q.; Zeng, J.; Chen, C. PM2.5 Exposure Perturbs Lung Microbiome and Its Metabolic Profile in Mice. Sci. Total Environ.; 2020; 721, 137432. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137432] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32169651]
43. Kaspersen, K.A.; Antonsen, S.; Horsdal, H.T.; Kjerulff, B.; Brandt, J.; Geels, C.; Christensen, J.H.; Frohn, L.M.; Sabel, C.E.; Dinh, K.M. et al. Exposure to Air Pollution and Risk of Respiratory Tract Infections in the Adult Danish Population—A Nationwide Study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.; 2024; 30, pp. 122-129. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2023.10.013] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37858866]
44. Chen, C.; Xun, P.; Tsinovoi, C.; McClure, L.A.; Brockman, J.; MacDonald, L.; Cushman, M.; Cai, J.; Kamendulis, L.; Mackey, J. et al. Urinary cadmium concentration and the risk of ischemic stroke. Neurology.; 2018; 91, pp. e382-e391. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005856]
45. Wen, Y.; Huang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, L.; Li, D.; Xie, C.; Lv, Z.; Guo, Y.; Ke, Y. et al. Associations of multiple plasma metals with the risk of ischemic stroke: A case-control study. Environ. Int.; 2019; 125, pp. 125-134. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.12.037]
46. Kopf, P.G.; Walker, M.K. 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin increases reactive oxygen species production in human endothelial cells via induction of cytochrome P4501A1. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.; 2010; 245, pp. 91-99. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2010.02.007]
47. Tzeng, H.P.; Yang, T.H.; Wu, C.T.; Chiu, H.C.; Liu, S.H.; Lan, K.C. Benzo[a]pyrene alters vascular function in rat aortas ex vivo and in vivo. Vasc. Pharmacol.; 2019; 121, 106578. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2019.106578]
48. Lee, D.-H.; Lind, P.M.; Jacobs, D.R., Jr.; Salihovic, S.; van Bavel, B.; Lind, L. Background exposure to persistent organic pollutants predicts stroke in the elderly. Environ. Int.; 2012; 47, pp. 115-1120. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22809777]
49. Toborek, M.; Barger, S.W.; Mattson, M.P.; Espandiari, P.; Robertson, L.W.; Hennig, B. Exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls causes endothelial cell dysfunction. J. Biochem. Toxicol.; 1995; 10, pp. 219-226. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbt.2570100406]
50. Gaur, N.; Dutta, D.; Singh, A.; Dubey, R.; Kamboj, D.V. Recent Advances in the Elimination of Persistent Organic Pollutants by Photocatalysis. Front. Environ. Sci.; 2022; 10, 872514. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.872514]
51. Samanta, S.K.; Singh, O.V.; Jain, R.K. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Environmental Pollution and Bioremediation. Trends Biotechnol.; 2002; 20, pp. 243-248. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7799(02)01943-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12007492]
52. Adeniji, A.O.; Okoh, O.O.; Okoh, A.I. Levels of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Water and Sediment of Buffalo River Estuary, South Africa and Their Health Risk Assessment. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.; 2019; 76, pp. 657-669. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00244-019-00617-w] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30879120]
53. Rodgman, A.; Smith, C.J.; Perfetti, T.A. The Composition of Cigarette Smoke: A Retrospective, with Emphasis on Polycyclic Components. Hum. Exp. Toxicol.; 2000; 19, pp. 573-595. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1191/096032700701546514] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11211997]
54. Sharma, B.M.; Bharat, G.K.; Tayal, S.; Nizzetto, L.; Čupr, P.; Larssen, T. Environment and Human Exposure to Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in India: A Systematic Review of Recent and Historical Data. Environ. Int.; 2014; 66, pp. 48-64. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.01.022] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24525153]
55. Daley, J.M.; Paterson, G.; Drouillard, K.G. Bioamplification as a Bioaccumulation Mechanism for Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in Wildlife. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.; 2013; 227, pp. 107-155. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01327-5_4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24158581]
56. Larigot, L.; Juricek, L.; Dairou, J.; Coumoul, X. AhR Signaling Pathways and Regulatory Functions. Biochim. Open; 2018; 7, pp. 1-9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopen.2018.05.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30003042]
57. Esteves, F.; Rueff, J.; Kranendonk, M. The Central Role of Cytochrome P450 in Xenobiotic Metabolism—A Brief Review on a Fascinating Enzyme Family. J. Xenobiotics; 2021; 11, pp. 94-114. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jox11030007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206277]
58. Bukowska, B.; Mokra, K.; Michałowicz, J. Benzo[a]Pyrene—Environmental Occurrence, Human Exposure, and Mechanisms of Toxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2022; 23, 6348. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116348] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683027]
59. Knecht, A.L.; Goodale, B.C.; Truong, L.; Simonich, M.T.; Swanson, A.J.; Matzke, M.M.; Anderson, K.A.; Waters, K.M.; Tanguay, R.L. Comparative Developmental Toxicity of Environmentally Relevant Oxygenated PAHs. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.; 2013; 271, pp. 266-275. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2013.05.006]
60. Mandal, P.K. Dioxin: A Review of Its Environmental Effects and Its Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Biology. J. Comp. Physiol. B; 2005; 175, pp. 221-230. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00360-005-0483-3]
61. Shimizu, Y.; Nakatsuru, Y.; Ichinose, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Kume, H.; Mimura, J.; Fujii-Kuriyama, Y.; Ishikawa, T. Benzo[a]Pyrene Carcinogenicity Is Lost in Mice Lacking the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2000; 97, pp. 779-782. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.2.779]
62. Gonzalez, F.J.; Fernandez-Salguero, P. The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor: Studies Using the AHR-Null Mice. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem.; 1998; 26, pp. 1194-1198.
63. Ranjbar, M.; Rotondi, M.A.; Ardern, C.I.; Kuk, J.L. Urinary Biomarkers of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Are Associated with Cardiometabolic Health Risk. PLoS ONE; 2015; 10, e0137536. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137536]
64. Xu, X.; Cook, R.L.; Ilacqua, V.A.; Kan, H.; Talbott, E.O.; Kearney, G. Studying Associations between Urinary Metabolites of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Cardiovascular Diseases in the United States. Sci. Total Environ.; 2010; 408, pp. 4943-4948. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.034]
65. Mallah, M.A.; Mallah, M.A.; Liu, Y.; Xi, H.; Wang, W.; Feng, F.; Zhang, Q. Relationship Between Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review. Front. Public Health; 2021; 9, 763706. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.763706]
66. Rahman, H.H.; Sheikh, S.P.; Munson-McGee, S.H. Arsenic, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, and Metal Exposure and Risk Assessment of Stroke. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.; 2023; 30, pp. 86973-86986. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28593-8]
67. Curfs, D.M.J.; Lutgens, E.; Gijbels, M.J.J.; Kockx, M.M.; Daemen, M.J.A.P.; van Schooten, F.J. Chronic Exposure to the Carcinogenic Compound Benzo[a]Pyrene Induces Larger and Phenotypically Different Atherosclerotic Plaques in ApoE-Knockout Mice. Am. J. Pathol.; 2003; 164, pp. 101-108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63101-x]
68. Grova, N.; Schroeder, H.; Farinelle, S.; Prodhomme, E.; Valley, A.; Muller, C.P. Sub-Acute Administration of Benzo[a]Pyrene (B[a]P) Reduces Anxiety-Related Behaviour in Adult Mice and Modulates Regional Expression of N-Methyl-d-Aspartate (NMDA) Receptors Genes in Relevant Brain Regions. Chemosphere; 2008; 73, pp. S295-S302. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.037]
69. Ho, D.H.; Burggren, W.W. Blood-Brain Barrier Function, Cell Viability, and Gene Expression of Tight Junction-Associated Proteins in the Mouse Are Disrupted by Crude Oil, Benzo[a]Pyrene, and the Dispersant COREXIT. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol.; 2019; 223, pp. 96-105. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2019.05.011]
70. Tanaka, M.; Okuda, T.; Itoh, K.; Ishihara, N.; Oguro, A.; Fujii-Kuriyama, Y.; Nabetani, Y.; Yamamoto, M.; Vogel, C.F.A.; Ishihara, Y. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Urban Particle Matter Exacerbate Movement Disorder after Ischemic Stroke via Potentiation of Neuroinflammation. Part. Fibre Toxicol.; 2023; 20, 6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-023-00517-x]
71. Gu, X.; Manautou, J.E. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Chemical Liver Injury. Expert Rev. Mol. Med.; 2012; 14, e4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1462399411002110]
72. Erickson, M.D. Analytical Chemistry of PCBs; Routledge: London, UK, 1997; pp. 125-151. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315137452]
73. Raffetti, E.; Donato, F.; Palma, G.D.; Leonardi, L.; Sileo, C.; Magoni, M. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and Risk of Hypertension: A Population-Based Cohort Study in a North Italian Highly Polluted Area. Sci. Total Environ.; 2020; 714, 136660. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136660]
74. Goncharov, A.; Pavuk, M.; Foushee, H.R.; Carpenter, D.O.; Consortium, A.E.H.R. Blood Pressure in Relation to Concentrations of PCB Congeners and Chlorinated Pesticides. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2011; 119, pp. 319-325. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002830]
75. Lim, J.; Lee, S.; Lee, S.; Jee, S.H. Serum Persistent Organic Pollutants Levels and Stroke Risk. Environ. Pollut.; 2018; 233, pp. 855-861. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.031]
76. Schlezinger, J.J.; Struntz, W.D.J.; Goldstone, J.V.; Stegeman, J.J. Uncoupling of Cytochrome P450 1A and Stimulation of Reactive Oxygen Species Production by Co-Planar Polychlorinated Biphenyl Congeners. Aquat. Toxicol.; 2006; 77, pp. 422-432. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.01.012]
77. Hennig, B.; Meerarani, P.; Slim, R.; Toborek, M.; Daugherty, A.; Silverstone, A.E.; Robertson, L.W. Proinflammatory Properties of Coplanar PCBs: In Vitro and in Vivo Evidence. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.; 2002; 181, pp. 174-183. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/taap.2002.9408]
78. Evich, M.G.; Davis, M.J.B.; McCord, J.P.; Acrey, B.; Awkerman, J.A.; Knappe, D.R.U.; Lindstrom, A.B.; Speth, T.F.; Tebes-Stevens, C.; Strynar, M.J. et al. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Environment. Science; 2022; 375, eabg9065. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abg9065]
79. Glüge, J.; Scheringer, M.; Cousins, I.T.; DeWitt, J.C.; Goldenman, G.; Herzke, D.; Lohmann, R.; Ng, C.A.; Trier, X.; Wang, Z. An Overview of the Uses of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS). Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts; 2020; 22, pp. 2345-2373. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0em00291g]
80. Cousins, I.T.; DeWitt, J.C.; Glüge, J.; Goldenman, G.; Herzke, D.; Lohmann, R.; Ng, C.A.; Scheringer, M.; Wang, Z. The High Persistence of PFAS Is Sufficient for Their Management as a Chemical Class. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts; 2020; 22, pp. 2307-2312. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0em00355g]
81. Domingo, J.L.; Nadal, M. Human Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) through Drinking Water: A Review of the Recent Scientific Literature. Environ. Res.; 2019; 177, 108648. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108648]
82. Roth, K.; Imran, Z.; Liu, W.; Petriello, M.C. Diet as an Exposure Source and Mediator of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance (PFAS) Toxicity. Front. Toxicol.; 2020; 2, 601149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2020.601149]
83. Olsen, G.W.; Burris, J.M.; Ehresman, D.J.; Froehlich, J.W.; Seacat, A.M.; Butenhoff, J.L.; Zobel, L.R. Half-Life of Serum Elimination of Perfluorooctanesulfonate, Perfluorohexanesulfonate, and Perfluorooctanoate in Retired Fluorochemical Production Workers. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2007; 115, pp. 1298-1305. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10009]
84. Xiao, F.; An, Z.; Lv, J.; Sun, X.; Sun, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Guo, H. Association between Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Public Health; 2023; 11, 1173101. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1173101]
85. Boehme, A.K.; Esenwa, C.; Elkind, M.S.V. Stroke Risk Factors, Genetics, and Prevention. Circ. Res.; 2017; 120, pp. 472-495. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.116.308398]
86. Simpson, C.; Winquist, A.; Lally, C.; Steenland, K. Relation between Perfluorooctanoic Acid Exposure and Strokes in a Large Cohort Living near a Chemical Plant. Environ. Res.; 2013; 127, pp. 22-28. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2013.10.002]
87. Feng, X.; Long, G.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, Q.; Song, B.; Wu, K.-H. Association of Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases with Higher Levels of Perfluoroalkylated Substances in the Serum of Adults. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.; 2022; 29, pp. 89081-89092. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22021-z]
88. Schillemans, T.; Donat-Vargas, C.; Lindh, C.H.; de Faire, U.; Wolk, A.; Leander, K.; Åkesson, A. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Stroke: A Nested Case–Control Study in Sweden. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2022; 130, 037007. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp9791]
89. Zhang, H.; Shen, L.; Fang, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhong, Y. Perfluorooctanoic Acid-Induced Immunotoxicity via NF-Kappa B Pathway in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) Kidney. Fish Shellfish Immunol.; 2021; 113, pp. 9-19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2021.03.004]
90. Vemuganti, R. Therapeutic Potential of PPAR γ Activation in Stroke. PPAR Res.; 2008; 2008, 461981. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/461981]
91. Satriotomo, I.; Bowen, K.K.; Vemuganti, R. JAK2 and STAT3 Activation Contributes to Neuronal Damage Following Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia. J. Neurochem.; 2006; 98, pp. 1353-1368. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04051.x]
92. Meneguzzi, A.; Fava, C.; Castelli, M.; Minuz, P. Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Chemicals and Cardiovascular Disease: Experimental and Epidemiological Evidence. Front. Endocrinol.; 2021; 12, 706352. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.706352]
93. Verhoeven, J.I.; Allach, Y.; Vaartjes, I.C.H.; Klijn, C.J.M.; de Leeuw, F.-E. Ambient Air Pollution and the Risk of Ischaemic and Haemorrhagic Stroke. Lancet Planet. Health; 2021; 5, pp. e542-e552. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00145-5]
94. Strosnider, H.; Kennedy, C.; Monti, M.; Yip, F. Rural and Urban Differences in Air Quality, 2008–2012, and Community Drinking Water Quality, 2010–2015—United States. MMWR Surveill. Summ.; 2017; 66, pp. 1-10. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6613a1]
95. Mannucci, P.M.; Franchini, M. Health Effects of Ambient Air Pollution in Developing Countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2017; 14, 1048. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091048]
96. Schwarze, P.E.; Øvrevik, J.; Låg, M.; Refsnes, M.; Nafstad, P.; Hetland, R.B.; Dybing, E. Particulate Matter Properties and Health Effects: Consistency of Epidemiological and Toxicological Studies. Hum. Exp. Toxicol.; 2006; 25, pp. 559-579. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096032706072520]
97. Poh, T.Y.; Ali, N.A.B.M.; Aogáin, M.M.; Kathawala, M.H.; Setyawati, M.I.; Ng, K.W.; Chotirmall, S.H. Inhaled Nanomaterials and the Respiratory Microbiome: Clinical, Immunological and Toxicological Perspectives. Part. Fibre Toxicol.; 2018; 15, 46. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-018-0282-0]
98. Mühlfeld, C.; Rothen-Rutishauser, B.; Blank, F.; Vanhecke, D.; Ochs, M.; Gehr, P. Interactions of Nanoparticles with Pulmonary Structures and Cellular Responses. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.; 2008; 294, pp. L817-L829. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00442.2007]
99. Hameed, S.; Zhao, J.; Zare, R.N. Ambient PM Particles Reach Mouse Brain, Generate Ultrastructural Hallmarks of Neuroinflammation, and Stimulate Amyloid Deposition, Tangles, and Plaque Formation. Talanta. Open; 2020; 2, 100013. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talo.2020.100013]
100. Hartz, A.M.S.; Bauer, B.; Block, M.L.; Hong, J.-S.; Miller, D.S. Diesel Exhaust Particles Induce Oxidative Stress, Proinflammatory Signaling, and P-glycoprotein Up-regulation at the Blood-brain Barrier. FASEB J.; 2008; 22, pp. 2723-2733. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-106997]
101. Block, M.L.; Wu, X.; Pei, Z.; Li, G.; Wang, T.; Qin, L.; Wilson, B.; Yang, J.; Hong, J.S.; Veronesi, B. Nanometer Size Diesel Exhaust Particles Are Selectively Toxic to Dopaminergic Neurons: The Role of Microglia, Phagocytosis, and NADPH Oxidase. FASEB J.; 2004; 18, pp. 1618-1620. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-1945fje]
102. Gulisano, M.; Pacini, P.; Marceddu, S.; Orlandini, G.E. Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Alterations Induced by Polluted Air in the Rabbit Bronchial Epithelium. Ann. Anat. Anat. Anz.; 1995; 177, pp. 125-131. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0940-9602(11)80058-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7741271]
103. Kleinman, M.T.; Iley, R.M.; Chang, Y.-T.C.; Clark, K.W.; Jones, M.P.; Linn, W.S.; Hackney, J.D. Exposures of Human Volunteers to a Controlled Atmospheric Mixture of Ozone, Sulfur Dioxide and Sulfuric Acid. AIHA J.; 1981; 42, pp. 61-69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15298668191419361] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7223637]
104. Bell, M.L.; Son, J.-Y.; Peng, R.D.; Wang, Y.; Dominici, F. Ambient PM2.5 and Risk of Hospital Admissions: Do Risks Differ for Men and Women?. Epidemiology; 2015; 26, pp. 575-579. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000000310]
105. Andersen, Z.J.; Olsen, T.S.; Andersen, K.K.; Loft, S.; Ketzel, M.; Raaschou-Nielsen, O. Association between Short-Term Exposure to Ultrafine Particles and Hospital Admissions for Stroke in Copenhagen, Denmark. Eur. Heart, J.; 2010; 31, pp. 2034-2040. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq188]
106. Li, B.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Chai, E. Research Progress of Different Components of PM2.5 and Ischemic Stroke. Sci. Rep.; 2023; 13, 15965. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43119-5]
107. Zhang, R.; Liu, G.; Jiang, Y.; Li, G.; Pan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wei, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y. Acute Effects of Particulate Air Pollution on Ischemic Stroke and Hemorrhagic Stroke Mortality. Front. Neurol.; 2018; 9, 827. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00827]
108. Szyszkowicz, M.; Rowe, B.H.; Brook, R.D. Even Low Levels of Ambient Air Pollutants Are Associated With Increased Emergency Department Visits for Hypertension. Can. J. Cardiol.; 2012; 28, pp. 360-366. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2011.06.011] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21944840]
109. Lai, H.; Liu, X.; Qu, M. Nanoplastics and Human Health: Hazard Identification and Biointerface. Nanomaterials; 2022; 12, 1298. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12081298]
110. Ghosh, S.; Sinha, J.K.; Ghosh, S.; Vashisth, K.; Han, S.; Bhaskar, R. Microplastics as an Emerging Threat to the Global Environment and Human Health. Sustainability; 2023; 15, 10821. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su151410821]
111. Mason, S.A.; Welch, V.G.; Neratko, J. Synthetic Polymer Contamination in Bottled Water. Front. Chem.; 2018; 6, 407. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00407]
112. Gasperi, J.; Wright, S.L.; Dris, R.; Collard, F.; Mandin, C.; Guerrouache, M.; Langlois, V.; Kelly, F.J.; Tassin, B. Microplastics in Air: Are We Breathing It In?. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health; 2018; 1, pp. 1-5. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.002]
113. Leslie, H.A.; van Velzen, M.J.M.; Brandsma, S.H.; Vethaak, A.D.; Garcia-Vallejo, J.J.; Lamoree, M.H. Discovery and Quantification of Plastic Particle Pollution in Human Blood. Environ. Int.; 2022; 163, 107199. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35367073]
114. Ragusa, A.; Notarstefano, V.; Svelato, A.; Belloni, A.; Gioacchini, G.; Blondeel, C.; Zucchelli, E.; Luca, C.D.; D’Avino, S.; Gulotta, A. et al. Raman Microspectroscopy Detection and Characterisation of Microplastics in Human Breastmilk. Polymers; 2022; 14, 2700. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14132700] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808745]
115. Schwabl, P.; Köppel, S.; Königshofer, P.; Bucsics, T.; Trauner, M.; Reiberger, T.; Liebmann, B. Detection of Various Microplastics in Human Stool: A Prospective Case Series. Ann. Intern. Med.; 2019; 171, pp. 453-457. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7326/m19-0618] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476765]
116. Meaza, I.; Toyoda, J.H.; Wise, J.P. Microplastics in Sea Turtles, Marine Mammals and Humans: A One Environmental Health Perspective. Front. Environ. Sci.; 2020; 8, 575614. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.575614] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765609]
117. Nelms, S.E.; Barnett, J.; Brownlow, A.; Davison, N.J.; Deaville, R.; Galloway, T.S.; Lindeque, P.K.; Santillo, D.; Godley, B.J. Microplastics in Marine Mammals Stranded around the British Coast: Ubiquitous but Transitory?. Sci. Rep.; 2019; 9, 1075. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37428-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30705316]
118. Marfella, R.; Prattichizzo, F.; Sardu, C.; Fulgenzi, G.; Graciotti, L.; Spadoni, T.; D’Onofrio, N.; Scisciola, L.; Grotta, R.L.; Frigé, C. et al. Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Atheromas and Cardiovascular Events. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2024; 390, pp. 900-910. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2309822] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38446676]
119. Harris-Tryon, T.A.; Grice, E.A. Microbiota and Maintenance of Skin Barrier Function. Science; 2022; 376, pp. 940-945. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abo0693] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35617415]
120. Brune, K.; Frank, J.; Schwingshackl, A.; Finigan, J.; Sidhaye, V.K. Pulmonary Epithelial Barrier Function: Some New Players and Mechanisms. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.; 2015; 308, pp. L731-L745. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00309.2014]
121. Turner, J.R. Intestinal Mucosal Barrier Function in Health and Disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol.; 2009; 9, pp. 799-809. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri2653]
122. Ganesan, S.; Comstock, A.T.; Sajjan, U.S. Barrier Function of Airway Tract Epithelium. Tissue Barriers; 2013; 1, e24997. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/tisb.24997] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24665407]
123. Liu, J.; Chen, X.; Dou, M.; He, H.; Ju, M.; Ji, S.; Zhou, J.; Chen, C.; Zhang, D.; Miao, C. et al. Particulate Matter Disrupts Airway Epithelial Barrier via Oxidative Stress to Promote Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection. J. Thorac. Dis.; 2019; 11, pp. 2617-2627. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.05.77] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31372298]
124. Caraballo, J.C.; Yshii, C.; Westphal, W.; Moninger, T.; Comellas, A.P. Ambient Particulate Matter Affects Occludin Distribution and Increases Alveolar Transepithelial Electrical Conductance. Respirology; 2011; 16, pp. 340-349. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01910.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21122029]
125. Jang, A.-S.; Choi, I.-S.; Koh, Y.-I.; Park, C.-S.; Lee, J.-S. The Relationship between Alveolar Epithelial Proliferation and Airway Obstruction after Ozone Exposure. Allergy; 2002; 57, pp. 737-740. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.23569.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12121195]
126. Awad, W.A.; Hess, C.; Hess, M. Enteric Pathogens and Their Toxin-Induced Disruption of the Intestinal Barrier through Alteration of Tight Junctions in Chickens. Toxins; 2017; 9, 60. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9020060] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28208612]
127. Zhang, M.; Wu, C. The Relationship between Intestinal Goblet Cells and the Immune Response. Biosci. Rep.; 2020; 40, BSR20201471. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bsr20201471] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33017020]
128. Iacob, S.; Iacob, D.G.; Luminos, L.M. Intestinal Microbiota as a Host Defense Mechanism to Infectious Threats. Front. Microbiol.; 2019; 9, 3328. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03328] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761120]
129. Crapser, J.; Ritzel, R.; Verma, R.; Venna, V.R.; Liu, F.; Chauhan, A.; Koellhoffer, E.; Patel, A.; Ricker, A.; Maas, K. et al. Ischemic Stroke Induces Gut Permeability and Enhances Bacterial Translocation Leading to Sepsis in Aged Mice. Aging Albany Ny; 2016; 8, pp. 1049-1060. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.100952]
130. Xie, S.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, J.; Li, D.; Chen, J. Exposure to Concentrated Ambient PM2.5 (CAPM) Induces Intestinal Disturbance via Inflammation and Alternation of Gut Microbiome. Environ. Int.; 2022; 161, 107138. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107138]
131. Saitou, M.; Furuse, M.; Sasaki, H.; Schulzke, J.-D.; Fromm, M.; Takano, H.; Noda, T.; Tsukita, S. Complex Phenotype of Mice Lacking Occludin, a Component of Tight Junction Strands. Mol. Biol. Cell; 2000; 11, pp. 4131-4142. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.11.12.4131]
132. Nouri, M.; Bredberg, A.; Weström, B.; Lavasani, S. Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction Develops at the Onset of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis, and Can Be Induced by Adoptive Transfer of Auto-Reactive T Cells. PLoS ONE; 2014; 9, e106335. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106335]
133. Li, C.; Chen, W.; Lin, F.; Li, W.; Wang, P.; Liao, G.; Zhang, L. Functional Two-Way Crosstalk Between Brain and Lung: The Brain–Lung Axis. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol.; 2023; 43, pp. 991-1003. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10571-022-01238-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35678887]
134. Hosang, L.; Canals, R.C.; van der Flier, F.J.; Hollensteiner, J.; Daniel, R.; Flügel, A.; Odoardi, F. The Lung Microbiome Regulates Brain Autoimmunity. Nature; 2022; 603, pp. 138-144. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04427-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35197636]
135. Aslanyan, S.; Weir, C.J.; Diener, H.-C.; Kaste, M.; Lees, K.R. GAIN International Steering Committee and Investigators. Pneumonia and Urinary Tract Infection after Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Tertiary Analysis of the GAIN International Trial. Eur. J. Neurol.; 2004; 11, pp. 49-53. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00749.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14692888]
136. Faura, J.; Ramiro, L.; Simats, A.; Ma, F.; Penalba, A.; Gasull, T.; Rosell, A.; Montaner, J.; Bustamante, A. Evaluation and Characterization of Post-Stroke Lung Damage in a Murine Model of Cerebral Ischemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2022; 23, 8093. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158093] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35897671]
137. Faura, J.; Bustamante, A.; Miró-Mur, F.; Montaner, J. Stroke-Induced Immunosuppression: Implications for the Prevention and Prediction of Post-Stroke Infections. J. Neuroinflamm.; 2021; 18, 127. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-021-02177-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092245]
138. Katzan, I.L.; Cebul, R.D.; Husak, S.H.; Dawson, N.V.; Baker, D.W. The Effect of Pneumonia on Mortality among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Stroke. Neurology; 2003; 60, pp. 620-625. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000046586.38284.60] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12601102]
139. Sigaud, S.; Goldsmith, C.-A.W.; Zhou, H.; Yang, Z.; Fedulov, A.; Imrich, A.; Kobzik, L. Air Pollution Particles Diminish Bacterial Clearance in the Primed Lungs of Mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.; 2007; 223, pp. 1-9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2007.04.014] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17561223]
140. Pinkerton, K.E.; Green, F.H.; Saiki, C.; Vallyathan, V.; Plopper, C.G.; Gopal, V.; Hung, D.; Bahne, E.B.; Lin, S.S.; Ménache, M.G. et al. Distribution of Particulate Matter and Tissue Remodeling in the Human Lung. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2000; 108, pp. 1063-1069. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.001081063]
141. Kurmi, O.P.; Semple, S.; Simkhada, P.; Smith, W.C.S.; Ayres, J.G. COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Risk of Indoor Air Pollution from Solid Fuel: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Thorax; 2010; 65, 221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2009.124644]
142. Elonheimo, H.M.; Mattila, T.; Andersen, H.R.; Bocca, B.; Ruggieri, F.; Haverinen, E.; Tolonen, H. Environmental Substances Associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease—A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2022; 19, 3945. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073945] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35409627]
143. O’Piela, D.R.; Durisek, G.R.; Escobar, Y.-N.H.; Mackos, A.R.; Wold, L.E. Particulate Matter and Alzheimer’s Disease: An Intimate Connection. Trends Mol. Med.; 2022; 28, pp. 770-780. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2022.06.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35840480]
144. Ural, B.B.; Caron, D.P.; Dogra, P.; Wells, S.B.; Szabo, P.A.; Granot, T.; Senda, T.; Poon, M.M.L.; Lam, N.; Thapa, P. et al. Inhaled Particulate Accumulation with Age Impairs Immune Function and Architecture in Human Lung Lymph Nodes. Nat. Med.; 2022; 28, pp. 2622-2632. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02073-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36411343]
145. Samary, C.S.; Ramos, A.B.; Maia, L.A.; Rocha, N.N.; Santos, C.L.; Magalhães, R.F.; Clevelario, A.L.; Pimentel-Coelho, P.M.; Mendez-Otero, R.; Cruz, F.F. et al. Focal Ischemic Stroke Leads to Lung Injury and Reduces Alveolar Macrophage Phagocytic Capability in Rats. Crit. Care; 2018; 22, 249. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2164-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30290827]
146. Brook, R.D.; Franklin, B.; Cascio, W.; Hong, Y.; Howard, G.; Lipsett, M.; Luepker, R.; Mittleman, M.; Samet, J.; Smith, S.C. et al. Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation; 2004; 109, pp. 2655-2671. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000128587.30041.c8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15173049]
147. Hozawa, A.; Billings, J.L.; Shahar, E.; Ohira, T.; Rosamond, W.D.; Folsom, A.R. Lung Function and Ischemic Stroke Incidence The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Chest; 2006; 130, pp. 1642-1649. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.130.6.1642] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17166977]
148. Dickson, R.P.; Erb-Downward, J.R.; Martinez, F.J.; Huffnagle, G.B. The Microbiome and the Respiratory Tract. Annu. Rev. Physiol.; 2015; 78, pp. 481-504. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021115-105238] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26527186]
149. Dickson, R.P.; Erb-Downward, J.R.; Freeman, C.M.; McCloskey, L.; Falkowski, N.R.; Huffnagle, G.B.; Curtis, J.L. Bacterial Topography of the Healthy Human Lower Respiratory Tract. mBio; 2017; 8, e02287-16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02287-16]
150. Appleton, J. The Gut-Brain Axis: Influence of Microbiota on Mood and Mental Health. Integr. Med.; 2018; 17, pp. 28-32.
151. Carloni, S.; Rescigno, M. The Gut-Brain Vascular Axis in Neuroinflammation. Semin. Immunol.; 2023; 69, 101802. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2023.101802]
152. Johnson, C.H.; Patterson, A.D.; Idle, J.R.; Gonzalez, F.J. Xenobiotic Metabolomics: Major Impact on the Metabolome. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.; 2012; 52, pp. 37-56. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134748]
153. Koppel, N.; Rekdal, V.M.; Balskus, E.P. Chemical Transformation of Xenobiotics by the Human Gut Microbiota. Science; 2018; 356, eaag2770. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2770]
154. Zhang, Y.; Hu, Q.; Fu, J.; Li, X.; Mao, H.; Wang, T. Influence of Exposure Pathways on Tissue Distribution and Health Impact of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Derivatives. Environ. Health; 2023; 1, pp. 150-167. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/envhealth.3c00060]
155. Turnbaugh, P.J.; Ley, R.E.; Hamady, M.; Fraser-Liggett, C.M.; Knight, R.; Gordon, J.I. The Human Microbiome Project. Nature; 2007; 449, pp. 804-810. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06244] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17943116]
156. Huttenhower, C.; Gevers, D.; Knight, R.; Abubucker, S.; Badger, J.H.; Chinwalla, A.T.; Creasy, H.H.; Earl, A.M.; FitzGerald, M.G.; Fulton, R.S. et al. Structure, Function and Diversity of the Healthy Human Microbiome. Nature; 2012; 486, pp. 207-214. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11234] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22699609]
157. Badal, V.D.; Vaccariello, E.D.; Murray, E.R.; Yu, K.E.; Knight, R.; Jeste, D.V.; Nguyen, T.T. The Gut Microbiome, Aging, and Longevity: A Systematic Review. Nutrients; 2020; 12, 3759. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12123759]
158. Gacesa, R.; Kurilshikov, A.; Vila, A.V.; Sinha, T.; Klaassen, M.A.Y.; Bolte, L.A.; Andreu-Sánchez, S.; Chen, L.; Collij, V.; Hu, S. et al. Environmental Factors Shaping the Gut Microbiome in a Dutch Population. Nature; 2022; 604, pp. 732-739. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04567-7]
159. Goodrich, J.K.; Waters, J.L.; Poole, A.C.; Sutter, J.L.; Koren, O.; Blekhman, R.; Beaumont, M.; Van Treuren, W.; Knight, R.; Bell, J.T. et al. Human Genetics Shape the Gut Microbiome. Cell; 2014; 159, pp. 789-799. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.053] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25417156]
160. Belkaid, Y.; Hand, T.W. Role of the Microbiota in Immunity and Inflammation. Cell; 2014; 157, pp. 121-141. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011]
161. Rhee, S.H.; Pothoulakis, C.; Mayer, E.A. Principles and Clinical Implications of the Brain–Gut–Enteric Microbiota Axis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.; 2009; 6, pp. 306-314. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2009.35]
162. Lefever, D.E.; Xu, J.; Chen, Y.; Huang, G.; Tamas, N.; Guo, T.L. TCDD Modulation of Gut Microbiome Correlated with Liver and Immune Toxicity in Streptozotocin (STZ)-Induced Hyperglycemic Mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.; 2016; 304, pp. 48-58. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2016.05.016] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27221631]
163. Dirnagl, U.; Iadecola, C.; Moskowitz, M.A.; Dirnagl, U.; Iadecola, C.; Moskowitz, M.A. Pathobiology of Ischaemic Stroke: An Integrated View. Trends Neurosci; 1999; 22, pp. 391-397. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01401-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10441299]
164. Iadecola, C.; Buckwalter, M.S.; Anrather, J. Immune Responses to Stroke: Mechanisms, Modulation, and Therapeutic Potential. J. Clin. Investig.; 2020; 130, pp. 2777-2788. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1172/jci135530] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391806]
165. Simats, A.; Liesz, A. Systemic Inflammation after Stroke: Implications for Post-stroke Comorbidities. Embo Mol. Med.; 2022; 14, e16219. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15252/emmm.202216269] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35971650]
166. Benakis, C.; Brea, D.; Caballero, S.; Faraco, G.; Moore, J.; Murphy, M.; Sita, G.; Racchumi, G.; Ling, L.; Pamer, E.G. et al. Commensal Microbiota Affects Ischemic Stroke Outcome by Regulating Intestinal Γδ T Cells. Nat. Med.; 2016; 22, pp. 516-523. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.4068] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27019327]
167. Brea, D.; Poon, C.; Benakis, C.; Lubitz, G.; Murphy, M.; Iadecola, C.; Anrather, J. Stroke Affects Intestinal Immune Cell Trafficking to the Central Nervous System. Brain Behav. Immun.; 2021; 96, pp. 295-302. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2021.05.008] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33989742]
168. Singh, V.; Roth, S.; Llovera, G.; Sadler, R.; Garzetti, D.; Stecher, B.; Dichgans, M.; Liesz, A. Microbiota Dysbiosis Controls the Neuroinflammatory Response after Stroke. J. Neurosci.; 2016; 36, pp. 7428-7440. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1114-16.2016] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27413153]
169. Houlden, A.; Goldrick, M.; Brough, D.; Vizi, E.S.; Lénárt, N.; Martinecz, B.; Roberts, I.S.; Denes, A. Brain Injury Induces Specific Changes in the Caecal Microbiota of Mice via Altered Autonomic Activity and Mucoprotein Production. Brain Behav. Immun.; 2016; 57, pp. 10-20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2016.04.003] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27060191]
170. Xu, K.; Gao, X.; Xia, G.; Chen, M.; Zeng, N.; Wang, S.; You, C.; Tian, X.; Di, H.; Tang, W. et al. Rapid Gut Dysbiosis Induced by Stroke Exacerbates Brain Infarction in Turn. Gut; 2021; 70, pp. 1486-1494. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323263]
171. Haak, B.W.; Westendorp, W.F.; van Engelen, T.S.R.; Brands, X.; Brouwer, M.C.; Vermeij, J.-D.; Hugenholtz, F.; Verhoeven, A.; Derks, R.J.; Giera, M. et al. Disruptions of Anaerobic Gut Bacteria Are Associated with Stroke and Post-Stroke Infection: A Prospective Case–Control Study. Transl. Stroke Res.; 2021; 12, pp. 581-592. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12975-020-00863-4]
172. Benakis, C.; Poon, C.; Lane, D.; Brea, D.; Sita, G.; Moore, J.; Murphy, M.; Racchumi, G.; Iadecola, C.; Anrather, J. Distinct Commensal Bacterial Signature in the Gut Is Associated With Acute and Long-Term Protection From Ischemic Stroke. Stroke; 2020; 51, pp. 1844-1854. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.120.029262] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32404038]
173. Strickland, P.; Kang, D.; Sithisarankul, P. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Metabolites in Urine as Biomarkers of Exposure and Effect. Environ. Health Perspect.; 1996; 104, pp. 927-932. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.96104s5927] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8933036]
174. Wu, J.-C.; Lai, C.-S.; Tsai, M.-L.; Ho, C.-T.; Wang, Y.-J.; Pan, M.-H. Chemopreventive Effect of Natural Dietary Compounds on Xenobiotic-Induced Toxicity. J. Food Drug Anal.; 2017; 25, pp. 176-186. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2016.10.019]
175. Stavric, B.; Klassen, R. Dietary Effects on the Uptake of Benzo[a]Pyrene. Food Chem. Toxicol.; 1994; 32, pp. 727-734. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0278-6915(09)80005-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8070737]
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
