It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Gene drive systems could be a viable strategy to prevent pathogen transmission or suppress vector populations by propagating drive alleles with super-Mendelian inheritance. CRISPR-based homing gene drives convert wild type alleles into drive alleles in heterozygotes with Cas9 and gRNA. It is thus desirable to identify Cas9 promoters that yield high drive conversion rates, minimize the formation rate of resistance alleles in both the germline and the early embryo, and limit somatic Cas9 expression. In Drosophila, the nanos promoter avoids leaky somatic expression, but at the cost of high embryo resistance from maternally deposited Cas9. To improve drive efficiency, we test eleven Drosophila melanogaster germline promoters. Some achieve higher drive conversion efficiency with minimal embryo resistance, but none completely avoid somatic expression. However, such somatic expression often does not carry detectable fitness costs for a rescue homing drive targeting a haplolethal gene, suggesting somatic drive conversion. Supporting a 4-gRNA suppression drive, one promoter leads to a low drive equilibrium frequency due to fitness costs from somatic expression, but the other outperforms nanos, resulting in successful suppression of the cage population. Overall, these Cas9 promoters hold advantages for homing drives in Drosophila species and may possess valuable homologs in other organisms.
High-performance promoters are needed for gene drives; these are currently lacking in Drosophila melanogaster. Here the authors tested eleven Drosophila melanogaster germline promoters in several configurations and show higher drive conversion efficiency with minimal embryo resistance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Peking University, Center for Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.11135.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2256 9319)
2 Peking University, Center for Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.11135.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2256 9319); Tsinghua University, School of Life Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.12527.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 0662 3178)
3 Cornell University, Department of Computational Biology, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 877X)