It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
To study the reproducibility of 23Na magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements from breast tissue in healthy volunteers.
Methods
Using a dual-tuned bilateral 23Na/1H breast coil at 3-T MRI, high-resolution 23Na MRI three-dimensional cones sequences were used to quantify total sodium concentration (TSC) and fluid-attenuated sodium concentration (FASC). B1-corrected TSC and FASC maps were created. Two readers manually measured mean, minimum and maximum TSC and mean FASC values using two sampling methods: large regions of interest (LROIs) and small regions of interest (SROIs) encompassing fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and the highest signal area at the level of the nipple, respectively. The reproducibility of the measurements and correlations between density, age and FGT apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were evaluatedss.
Results
Nine healthy volunteers were included. The inter-reader reproducibility of TSC and FASC using SROIs and LROIs was excellent (intraclass coefficient range 0.945−0.979, p < 0.001), except for the minimum TSC LROI measurements (p = 0.369). The mean/minimum LROI TSC and mean LROI FASC values were lower than the respective SROI values (p < 0.001); the maximum LROI TSC values were higher than the SROI TSC values (p = 0.009). TSC correlated inversely with age but not with FGT ADCs. The mean and maximum FGT TSC and FASC values were higher in dense breasts in comparison to non-dense breasts (p < 0.020).
Conclusions
The chosen sampling method and the selected descriptive value affect the measured TSC and FASC values, although the inter-reader reproducibility of the measurements is in general excellent.
Relevance statement
23Na MRI at 3 T allows the quantification of TSC and FASC sodium concentrations. The sodium measurements should be obtained consistently in a uniform manner.
Key points
• 23Na MRI allows the quantification of total and fluid-attenuated sodium concentrations (TSC/FASC).
• Sampling method (large/small region of interest) affects the TSC and FASC values.
• Dense breasts have higher TSC and FASC values than non-dense breasts.
• The inter-reader reproducibility of TSC and FASC measurements was, in general, excellent.
• The results suggest the importance of stratifying the sodium measurements protocol.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University of Cambridge, Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 5934)
2 Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre (MMIV), Bergen, Norway (GRID:grid.412008.f) (ISNI:0000 0000 9753 1393)
3 York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, York, UK (GRID:grid.5685.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9668); Institute of Sport, Manchester Metropolitan University, Department of Sports and Exercise Science, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.25627.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 5329)
4 University of Cambridge, Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 5934); Danube Private University, Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and AI (MIAAI), Krems, Austria (GRID:grid.465811.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 4904 7440)
5 York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, York, UK (GRID:grid.5685.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9668); University of York, Department of Biology, York, UK (GRID:grid.5685.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9668)